Ask Blogging Baby: taking a not-very-sick child to the museum?
Filed under: Health & Safety: Babies
My three-year-old, Everett, has had a fever on and off for the past 10 days. I
think it's a virus - my pediatrician's office doesn't ask to see the kids until the fever has gone on for two whole
weeks. And, most of the time, he's fine. Last night wasn't great: he woke up several times complaining of being
"hot." Now, he's telling me his tummy "doesn't feel bery good."
I don't think he's terribly ill; he was in great spirits and terrifically energetic yesterday. But, today, his dad had planned to take him to OMSI (the local science museum) with one of his Army buddies. Where he'd be in quasi-contact with any number of susceptible three- and four- and five-year-olds escaping the wet, gray Portland January.
My usual gut check: I ask him. If he feels badly enough, my thought process goes, he'll choose staying at home and watching videos over going to OMSI. He chose, go. Now I have a new dilemma. Should I send him off to the trip that he was promised and to which he is so eagerly looking forward, even though he may infect other children with his unidentified virus? Or should I just figure that, if he's been exposed to something, so have 90% of the other kids who'll be there? I don't know if he's even contagious - for all I know, it was a bad hot dog. What would you do?
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- The owner of the property or debit creditor can relieve the person(s) of the debt,(a employment position or (court) is not ownership
- 3 SHOWS A HOUR 7 HOURS = 21 (10 DAYS = 210) 10 STUDIOS = 2100 20 STUDIOS = 4200 (IN 10 DAYS) 3 (20 MINUTE SHOWS).
- Derian d hickman v. Internal revenue service superior court dc 2012











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
1-10-2006 @ 5:19PM
suburban misfit said...Food poisoning doesn't tend to produce a fever.
I don't, as a rule, take my kids to other kid places when they have fevers. I'd rather not expose the others to something my kid has, and when the kid has a fever, he or she is contagious. Plus, feverish kids can go from feeling ok to pretty darned lousy in the span of moments.
I have been known to take a kid with a cough or a clear runny nose to a museum or zoo, though.
Reply
1-10-2006 @ 5:30PM
Kim said...Has your child had rash or other symptoms of Kawasaki's disease? Persistent fever is one of the symptoms, and it could be serious, so-- I'm supportive of whatever you think as the mother regarding whether he should be out and about, but we just had a Kawasaki's scare so I'm on a campaign to ask moms to be sure to check into it! Best wishes!
Reply
1-10-2006 @ 5:33PM
Ethel said...As far as I know a cold by day ten is no longer contagious (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/print/ency/article/000678.htm)
so except for being concerned with the possibility of a bacterial infection, what harm is there? Okay, yeah snot on shared surfaces that is just gross for others, but that is there anyway.
Reply
1-10-2006 @ 6:25PM
Heather said...I don't think you should take him if he's still running a fever, regardless of how "well" he feels.
Reply
1-10-2006 @ 6:53PM
margalit said...I would absolutely not allow any child with a fever over 100 and a virus of any kind to go out to a public place. You don't know if someone that works there, or a visitor there is immunodeficient. Someone on Chemo, for example, might get terribly sick from your child. What you consider mild could be life threatening to someone else. I wouldn't risk it and the guilt would kill me anyhow.
Reply
1-10-2006 @ 9:35PM
Sharon said...Please, please don't take your sick child to the museum! Even if he is not 'very sick', think about how you would feel if another mom did the same and as a result, you were left dealing with an unexplained fever for 10 days (which may not have affected your childs energy level, but may really affect another child!). Pediatricians generally agree that your child is contagious until they have been fever-free for 24 hours (w/out the aide of medicines). What you also should consider is not just the children at the museum, but the people in their lives - newborn babies, elderly family members, etc. to whom whatever your son has may be much more serious. I personally am very careful with who I expose my kids to when I know they are even a little sick, especially if they've been running a fever. I feel that it is selfish to be otherwise.
Reply
1-10-2006 @ 10:04PM
MelissaS said...Will your child be making out with the other visitors?
Honestly I think of colds and fevers and yes, even the flu, as necessary evils of life. And every person I know who is militant about keeping fevers and other 'sick' children away from their 'healthy' children has sick children way more than the rest of us.
Kids are contagious before they ever show any symptoms, even fever. You can not stop children from getting sick some of the time so don't fight it.
Reply
1-11-2006 @ 9:11AM
Tricia said...As a mom of a child with chronic health issues, I beg you NOT to take him.
For your child a simple fever is just that - a simple fever. But for someone with heart defects, a "simple" fever becomes quite complex. If they can't pinpoint the source, we're sent for a chest xray and bloodwork to rule out heart infection. Sometimes they'll even admit us until the bloodwork comes back (depends on the pediatrician on call).
We either have to keep our child indoors and away from everyone or have to depend on all the other families to not take their sick kids out.
Just our experience ...
Reply
1-11-2006 @ 11:10AM
jj said...if he were in daycare or school, most require that kids be fever-free for 24 hours before taking them back. i think the same rule probably should apply for taking them to museums/birthday parties/playgroups and the like. sorry.
Reply