Kim Possible's creators speak: An interview with Mark McCorkle and Bob Schooley
Categories: Money & Work, Development, Media

It's no secret around these parts that most of the TV I watch these days is kids' TV. And it's even less of a secret that I'm a fan of Disney Channel's Kim Possible, a smart series about a girl secret agent who manages to squeeze in saving the world between algebra class and cheer squad. In what may be an animation fan's idea of heaven, I had a chance to gab this week with the show's creators, Mark McCorkle and Robert Schooley, whom I caught up with after they had just attended a recording session for Season 4. Naturally, since I write for Blogging Baby, I hit them from the parenting angle - asking about their show's appeal to parents, how kids' TV has changed in the past two decades, and how they manage their own childrens' TV viewing time. But, hey, I'm also a fan, so I managed to sneak in a question or two about the upcoming Season 4. It helped that my nine-year-old daughter Neve - a rabid KP fan in her own right - was in the room and kept egging me on.
Mark, can you tell us a little bit about how Kim Possible started?
Mark: Bob and I had been working here [at Disney] for a while doing spinoff shows, like the Aladdin and Hercules series. Those were great, but we wanted to create something original. This was the first time this division was going to do something like this, create new characters from scratch. So we came up with the idea of Kim Possible, of this girl who can do anything - and, of course, Ron Stoppable, who, well, can't. And it just snowballed from there. We got very lucky.
You're both executive producers. So tell us, what does a cartoon executive producer do?
Bob: It varies, depending on whether you're on the artistic, animation side or the story/writing side of the team. We're more on the writing side, although we do have input into some aspects of the visual designs of the characters. We weigh in on art, but we focus on the plotting and dialogue. We work with the other writers and story editors. We attend the recording sessions and work with the voice actors.
What stage are you in with Season 4?
Mark: The early phase - we're just starting production on the 22 episodes Disney requested for Season 4. We're recording this week. Next week, we'll go to story boarding which is more Steve Loter's job.
So what can you tell both kids and adult fans about Season 4? The big question everybody in the fan community seems to want to know is: Does it pick up from the last movie, So the Drama, where we saw best friends Kim Possible and Ron Stoppable become a couple?
Bob: Well, we don't want to give the whole thing away! But...well, here's the thing. We thought So the Drama was the series finale. That was it. Ending it with Kim and Ron getting together seemed right. Problem is, now we've kind of painted ourselves into a corner. But yes, it definitely picks up from So the Drama. We're finding a way to tip-toe out of that corner.
Mark: Obviously, we can't ignore So the Drama. At the same time, we want to do something different with the series - we don't want to do the same old thing. So having this new direction is actually good. It forces us to do something original.
Bob: But it's not going to turn into a soap opera. This is a kids' show. We're trying to keep it light and fun. We realize there are a lot of 10-year-old boys out there, and we don't want them to get totally grossed out!
From what I've seen, some members of the fan community would lynch you in effigy if you attempted to backpedal on So the Drama.
Bob: We'll have been working on this show for six years by the time we finish Season 4. And it's amazing how dramatic, how excited people get about the show. That's been the fun part of doing this. The fan community is so engaged with the characters. That's a great testament to Will and Christy [Will Friedle and Christy Carlson Romano, the voice actors behind Ron Stoppable and Kim Possible] - they add something to this that makes it more than a typical gag-oriented cartoon. I mean, Christy was 16 when we started this show, and now she's 21, 22, and getting married next year! So she and Will have had a good opportunity to grow the characters.
Will you consider doing a Season 5?
Bob: That seems kind of unlikely, I mean, Season 4 was a bolt out of the blue. But never say never, I guess. The break actually worked out nicely for us, as we've been doing other things in the interim [the two co-wrote the film Sky High with Paul Hernandez]. But it's nice to get back to the world of Kim after a year. So I dunno - if they give us another year's break, perhaps.
Mark: So long as we can come up with new, fresh stories. That's my position.
What's been the most rewarding part about producing Kim Possible?
Bob: It's easily the most recognizable thing we've done. This is the one project where we're constantly butting into people whose kids are fans, and who are fans themselves. People we haven't heard from in 20 years who see our name in the credits will call us up out of the blue. It's a property that people plugged into.
Mark: We've had a great response from kids, and from parents as well.
I can see that. It's one of my daughter's favorite shows as well.
Neve (loud enough so Mark and Bob can hear through the phone): Are you kidding?! It's my absolute FAVORITE show!
Mark and Bob: (laugh)
Bob: Beyond the praise, it's our baby. We developed it. We had a great time with the others, but with spin-offs, you're always mindful of the original movie, and what the characters were when you took them over. Being able to create the characters from scratch has been rewarding.
Now, about us grown-ups for a minute. The humor on Kim Possible is oddly appealing to adults, even though it's not chock-full of inside jokes or references that only adults might get. Do you keep adult fans and parents in mind when writing scripts?
Mark: Yes. We don't put in a lot of adult references. Instead, we try to do a sitcom-style dialogue rhythm - the fast-paced, witty speaking that adults respond to. As a result, our scripts are about five pages longer than most scripts coming out of the studio.
When I was a kid, we didn't have no fancy "Nickelodeon" or Disney Channel. Nick started up when I was in 6th grade as a bunch of reruns from other networks and local TV stations. Back then, the only time to watch cartoons was on Saturday morning. Does the plethora of options that exist for kids makes it more challenging to create good kids' entertainment?
Bob: Truly. The bar's been raised for everybody.
Yahoo or some other site had clips recently from the "Super Mario Bros. Super Show", which I
had worked on back in the late 1980's. And it was just amazing to me how unwatchable it was. The dialogue, the bad
puns. The worst cartoon today is light years ahead of what we used to have!Mark: The quality shift started when Disney did Ducktales. They poured a ton of money into making that good. And then Warner Bros. upped the ante even further when it did the Batman series. That caused everybody to take it to the next level. I wish I was a kid now. When I think of the action shows we used to watch, many of which were badly animated, I think the industry today is definitely in great shape.
Bob: Animation fans have this nostalgia for the old days, but the caliber of all the new stuff is impressive. One of the things we set out to do with Kim Possible was to do something that could be animated on a TV budget and schedule, but still looked and sounded attractive. And I think that's where everybody is now. And there's such a variety of styles now. All TV animation used to look the same.
True. You have such a difference between, say, Kim Possible, Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends, and Jimmy Neutron.
Neve: And don't forget Fairly Oddparents!
Bob: (laughs) That's funny, because we've seen Butch Hartman (Fairly Oddparents series creator) at lunch every day this week. In Burbank, Disney, Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon are all in a two mile radius from each other, so at lunchtime in the nearby restaurants, it's all people from different animation studios. A lot of us started out together at studios like DiC. Most of the people we knew who used to be runners and production assistants are now running studios.
Do you have any sort of message you're trying to communicate to kids with the series - particularly to young girls?
Bob: Yeah - give the geeks a chance! It's wishful thinking on our parts.
Mark: We both have daughters, and we were conscious of creating a girl character with dimension. We wanted a character that girls could watch and appreciate. And we hear a lot from people who appreciate that - though it might color some people's perception of us. We had a meeting with someone who's a fan, but who'd never met us. He'd heard us described just as "Schooley and McCorkle." When he saw us, he was taken aback. He said, "Oh, I thought you guys would be two young women!"
We've had a lot of debate on Blogging Baby about how much TV is too much TV for kids of certain ages. Do you limit your own kids' TV viewing?
Bob: Eh. My kids all watch Disney, Cartoon Network, Nick, etc. - they never even go to the network stations.
Mark: We try to make sure they read and do other things too.
Bob: We have worked with people in this business who won't let their kids watch TV at all. Which we find more than a touch hypocritical. What we do is not damaging their psyches. It's all in good fun.
Recent Posts
- Just Chute Me! (Or: Do We REALLY Have to Play with Our Kids?) (2/09/2010)
- Atlanta Billboards Proclaim 'Black Children Are An Endangered Species' (2/09/2010)
- Canadian Hospital Offers Surgery for Obese Children (2/09/2010)
- Celeb Clan Close-Up: Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie and Maddox Hit the Super Bowl (2/08/2010)
- Bob Dylan's 'All the Animals' Inspires Children's Book (2/08/2010)






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Saint Raven 2-07-2006 @ 12:57PM
Aw, why are they including So The Drama? I still say that Kim/Shego is much more realistic than Kim/Rob for one reason: eventually, Kim will definitely get bored with Ron. Shego's the only one whose able to really give Kim the excitment she craves (and that's not a dirty joke).
Reply
Otaru 2-07-2006 @ 10:20PM
My parents don't care 'bout the show,but let them be as long as I love Kim...I mean the show.....
Reply
chelle 1-13-2006 @ 10:38AM
That was awesome! I too love Kim Possible errr I mean my daughter!!! Love the interview, thanks for sharing!
chelle
Reply
Andie D. 1-13-2006 @ 11:24AM
Fantastic interview! I love the show. My son and husband do too.
Reply
Richard 1-14-2006 @ 2:40PM
I'm here following a link from http://www.tvsquad.com and want to congratulate you on an interview I've hoped to see for a very long time. It's worth mentioning that Kim Possible has a considerable fan following even among those who are single and childless. If you think about it, an intelligent show about young people can have an audience composed of all sorts of adults; even if we don't have kids ourselves, we were all that age once and everyone can relate to that experience!
Obviously Kim herself presents a great role model for girls, but I also think her parents are an ideal role model for parenting. In one episode, Kim's dad reassures an insecure Kim, worried about not being a normal teen, by saying "You're not 'normal' -- you're a Possible! You can do anything!" Every parent in the world should take a cue from that. But for me, the crux of the show is Ron Stoppable: a gentle and nurturing guy who, in spite of his timidity and phobias, is always there to back Kim; a partner who doesn't feel threatened by her superior abilities and accomplishments. Talk about a good role model!
Reply
Ted Rall 1-14-2006 @ 10:40PM
In an effort to add some zest to this discussion, I'll cut and paste the following review from the IMDb site:
"Kim Possible is an unusual show because most story problems are solved by resorting to physical
violence, yet it's meant to appeal mainly to girls.
That's not to say that as a superhero action adventure it doesn't attract lots of boys as well.
Which is a shame, because the only male role models in this program are either comedic nerds or
villains in some form.
The central theme of this show is represented by Kim Possible, who can do anything and her side
kick, Ron Stoppable, who can't. Cute, except the juxtaposition of these strongly opposite characters makes a powerful statement on the roles of men and women in a show aimed solidly at formative age kids.
The main male character is Ron, the clich?ood hearted slacker dingbat who accompanies the
ultra accomplished (superheroine/head cheerleader/great student) Kim on her adventures as
the "diversion" or target. While he's getting shot at and blown up, she's solving the riddles and beating up the bad guys. The signature running gag for this series is Ron losing his pants, sometimes 2 or 3 times an episode and often being humiliated in front of girls. The other male characters are unattractive nerds and the occasional romantic lead who's always a jerk. If the genders were switched on this program, it would be slammed as a misogynist fest.
In one utterly detestable episode, Ron and Kim switch bodies. Ron learns the lesson that he can't possibly be the achiever Kim is and she finds out that her pathetic side kick is often beat up for his lunch money.The solution to this is that Kim beats up the bullies he isn't brave enough to face up to on his own. Way to foster character development in boys, Disney.
In summary, this program is like the Witch's apple in "Snow White". Beautiful production design and great animation hides a poisoned center. Parents with young boys should steer clear of this Disney offering."
Reply
Richard 1-14-2006 @ 11:43PM
I cannot offer a well-reasoned rebuttal to the above diatribe at the moment because I'm laughing so hard. Curse you, Disney Channel, for sucking me into your sinister anti-male pants-removing agenda of teen violence!
Reply
Ted Rall 1-15-2006 @ 12:20AM
Curse you Richard! May your son be still living in your house when he's 40, due to early exposure to the Disney channel.
Ted
Reply
Jay Allen 1-15-2006 @ 2:13AM
Well, the only reasonable response is to point out that this is only one TV show. There are so many other shows with strong male protagonists - some of them on Disney Channel - that one inept, well-meaning geek is hardly going to emasculate your sons. Heck, my six-year-old boy doesn't even like Kim Possible.
But it was quite the passionate rant nonetheless. :)
Reply
Nate 1-15-2006 @ 7:54PM
Interesting (if personal-agenda-pushing) rant. The only male characters are comedic nerds? Does that include Wade the super genius who graduated school at 12 and is more computer-capable than Bill Gates? Or Kim's one-time boyfriend, Josh Mankey, who is not only kind, talented, and the school heart-throb, but also is clear that he likes Kim for the person she is? Her twin brothers that are constantly inventing new technology? Her rocket-scientist father? Or is the writer of this diatribe associating intelligence with nerdiness? 'Cause I think that might say a lot about him/her... :)
Reply
Jayce Landers 1-16-2006 @ 2:07AM
Kudos to the producers of "Kim Possible". It's an excellent show for all ages. And it's sooooooo refreshing to see parents in a cartoon who aren't portrayed as idiots (as they are in most Nick shows). Not to mention a strong female who isn't put down for her smarts (as is poor Wanda in the detestable "Fairly Odd Parents", a show that bashes both females AND parents - not to mention teachers, politicians and just about every adult in any capacity). Kim is a great girl character who isn't a token or a bow to political correctness. She's the Nancy Drew of our time (hey, I'm 25, but my grandmother has the complete Drew collection from the 1950's, which I've read!) Thanks again to the producers of "Kim Possible" for a great, original, uplifting and entertaining show. And Ron Stoppable is adorable!
Reply
Allie 1-19-2006 @ 2:43AM
I stumbled across this interview while looking for information about the upcoming Season 4; it's brilliant! I feel very encouraged to know that the creators of one of my favorite shows are so all-around sensible about it.
(It's certainly a show with appeal to folk of all ages, not just kids and parents. I'm a twenty-one-year-old college senior. I am so excited for what the new season will bring.)
I have to say, though: I'm actually concerned that the new season is going to take So The Drama into account. While I enjoyed the movie very much, I was kind of disappointed in the writers for the (as far as I was concerned) very sudden romantic development between Kim and Ron. I'm all for the geeks getting the girls, to be sure, but I thought that Kim and Ron were a stellar example of something that popular culture ignores far too often: girls and boys can be friends. Best friends, platonic partners . . . there need not always be a romantic subtext. That's a lesson that I think children ought to be exposed to.
(Well, and in my personal fannish opinion, Kim and Ron feel more like siblings; I just don't see the romantic chemistry. But the reason above is my stronger one.)
Reply
gianluca de duonni 1-19-2006 @ 2:56PM
I hope that everyone realises that the ending of So the Drama sent a clear message that boys and girls cannot just be FRIENDS. This is because the world and the human race would die out if they did. It may only be a TV show but the people who talk about the exceptions on the show to the comedic nerds need to realise that in TV terms the exceptions confirm the rule.
Reply
Allie 1-20-2006 @ 1:20AM
Hang on, are you serious? That makes no sense. Girls are not attracted to all boys or visa versa. Of course girls and boys can be just friends. There's more to human interaction than procreation . . . and thank goodness for that. What a messed up society that would be.
The human race would hardly die out because girls and boys (or men and women) can be friends. (And they can, and it hasn't, so there you go.) We are attracted to individuals, not an entire gender. We don't ALL have to procreate, and we certainly don't have to procreate with every single member of the opposite sex that we meet.
Someone really ought to reassure the little girls who have a number of male as well as female friends that she should not just view the former as potential mates.
And of course you didn't take, you know, gay people into account. Though I have no desire to get into THAT argument.
Reply