Gwyneth Paltrow's nanny gives terrible, horrible advice in her new book

With words like "kingpin" and "servants" this writer really shows her true colors.

Can you imagine the shitstorm if somebody on the flipside wrote that mothers who schedule are trying to be the "kingpin" or "boss" of the baby, or theorized that mothers who schedule feedings for NBs are raising kids who will be unable to handle transitions/changes/emergencies at school age.

I frankly don't care what others choose, but this writer sure does and man is she judgmental. I agree it doesn't really click with Chris and Gwynnie's more earthy vibe. who knows

Reply

I thought if you wanted to be successful at breastfeeding, feeding on demand played a pretty big part in keeping your supply up.

The only "schedule" we were told to follow once we got home was to make sure we offered a feed every 2-3 hours if Paul didn't act hungry in between. My pediatrician told me not to worry about schedules, but try to start routines to help Paul transition between sleeping and waking, and back again. I think that helped more than a schedule would have.

I think by necessity, the baby does need to be the center of attention during the first year. They can't verbalize what they want, and their dietary/sleep needs change a lot over the first year. I don't think the majority of babies are supposed to be sleeping through the night so young, since they're still doing a lot of growing and need to refuel more often than a toddler would.

Reply

Here here, Stefania, I couldn't agree more.

When I first had Kieran and was desperately trying to come to terms with my new life as a mother (and a breastfeeding mother to a round the clock, nearly constant nurser) I commented to my stepmum that I was intrigued by a book called The Baby Whisperer. I was intrigued not by what I had heard of it but by the name, which implied to me that the author had some magic skill at interpreting the needs of newborns (and toddlers, as she wrote a follow up for older babys and toddlers).

My stepmum bought the books as a shower gift for me. What I read flew in the face of everything I instinctually felt was in baby's best interest, including nursing on demand. I found the unnatural, imposed scheduling advised in this book (and presumably in the book by Gwyneth's Nanny) to be so off-base that I don't even want to give them away to the Value Village lest a mother who has less confidence in common sense than I had should buy them and take them for gospel.

Routines and schedules are all well and good, but unless the child themselves are given the lead in establishing those routines and schedules, the parent is merely preparing for an entire life where the needs of the child are denied in favour of the wants of the parents.

Babies are only babies for such a painfully short time. Why the need to regiment them like little soldiers? Babies know exactly when they are hungry, when they are lonely, when they are tired and when they are awake: why do parents presume to know better?

Reply

Based on your range of excerpts, I couldn't agree w/ you more. If you don't have your newborn baby at the center of your universe, what's there?

Reply

Our pediatrician advised us to use a "flexible schedule" from the beginning. It was amazing how quickly our newborn adjusted to it. She would've been sleeping through most nights at 5 days old had we not been waking her to eat in the middle of the night (which we learned not to do after two weeks!). I realize that her adjustment has to do just as much with her personality as our scheduling, but everyone has to make decisions as to how they can best raise their children. Just because parents believe in a schedule doesn't mean they are putting their child's interests behind their own.

We have friends that chose to go the attachment parenting route, with feeding on demand and letting their child make decisions. That's fine for them, but that's not how we intend to raise our child. We don't say a word to them about how their two-year-old acts, because we feel it's their own personal decision how they wish to raise their child. We, however, feel that a certain amount of scheduling is best for our child.

Reply

OH goodgod! What newborn DOESN'T deserve to be the center of the universe for a while? I'm hating her with ya. And honestly the Gwynnie endorsement doesn't help matters, in my opinion.

Reply

I agree with Emily - for many children, a certain amount of scheduling is very beneficial.

When I was pregnant, I read A TON of books about this. How to schedule a baby and make the baby a PART of the family, not the RULER of the family. That being said, I think that flexibilty is key for every child. The schedule should serve you, not the other way around. I have heard TONS of negative comments about books like "The Baby Whisperer" and "BabyWise", but just as many about "The Happiest Baby on the Block" which is the very anthesis of the scheduling books. I have read all three and found something beneficial in each one. I adopted none of them in their entirety because that wasn't right for my child.

I think the real problem isn't that these books give harmful advice - though I will say that some of it isn't very good - but that some parents don't have the confidence to take what works for their child and leave the rest behind. That comes with personal well-being and experience - two things that people tend to get as they age. So, as with many things, time will cure many people of issues surrounding child-rearing. Chances are that the kids will survive their babyhood, scheduled or not.

Reply

Stefania, I think I love you.


(I'm not going to rehash, because I was pretty vocal about how much I hate this book in the other thread.)

Reply

Emily, allow me to clarify that I never meant to imply that schedules and routines are bad on principle. What I'm saying is that if the routine and the schedule do not serve the child, they serve the parent.

Newborns and babies have needs that are in constant flux. A good parent listens to those needs and uses that information to sketch out a schedule of what is typical and needful for their child. Some newborns require long sleep periods, some require nursing for 10 minutes out of every 45 - those are child led schedules and routines.

Arbitratily imposing a schedule on a small baby is not helping serve the baby's needs, and if the imposed schedule is radically different than the baby's individual natural needs, the imposed scheduling can be dangerous (which is the problem Ezzo created with his scheduling teachings).

Reply

I completely disagree with you! I am an excellent, lovong , stay at home mom. My family benefitted greatly from techniques very similar to those mentioned. My son is a very happy, healthy, well attached little person. We loved him without question, that does not mean we assumed a person who has been on the planet for six weeks knew what was best. And, "Hippy/Dippy"?!? Was that really necessary?

Reply

Mama Christy: I absolutely agree.


"I think the real problem isn't that these books give harmful advice - though I will say that some of it isn't very good - but that some parents don't have the confidence to take what works for their child and leave the rest behind."

This book makes sense to me, but not in it's entirety because I'm my kids mom and I know what works for us and them but this sounds quite a bit like what I did with my kids and it made all of our lives much more livable.

But what was right for me may not be right for you. So I can't say this is 'a horrible' book. Following anyone's parenting manifesto to the letter is horrible.

Picking and choosing, like a salad bar? Perfection.

Reply

I am so glad to hear other people found this as disturbing as I did. My daughter is, and always will be the center of our universe. I can't imagine it being any other way. I don't think it's possible to give a baby too much nurturing/affection.

Once again, blogging baby has made me feel normal!

Reply

This woman's attitude is too extreme for me but I completely agree that a child is joining a family, not becoming the leader of it. In sum I more or less agree with Amanda and MelissaS. Different things work for different people.

Reply

Milk supply concerns aside (since every woman`s body is different), I personally think breastfeeding on demand is asking to be a human pacifier. I did it with my first two, but my third baby went straight into daycare when he was 14 weeks old, so yes, I put a newborn on a SCHEDULE, as much as possible.

After the third, I wish I had done some things very differently with the first two, but I was in southern California when they were born, and I felt pressured into a modified AP style that wasn`t right for us and in retrospect may have even been harmful.

I haven`t read the book, but think some of the comments trashing it, and the author, and the rest of us whose parenting styles don`t agree with yours, are intolerant and scary.

Reply

Ok back again on this-I figured out something about the "kingpin" crap that really bugs me. Whether the family is be on-demand or scheduling really has nothing to do with the the baby being the center of attention.

Many of the AP families I know are lacakadasical about the baby; the baby is seemingly along for the ride. The family goes where it wants when it wants with baby just toted. Certainly not as kingpin.

On the other hand there was woman in a Wiggleworms class we took who made a complete spectacle of herself racing out after class to get the baby home for a feeding and nap on time. I've known other moms who have to keep to the schedule in order to keep the baby managable, keeping the baby on track runs thier whole life.

I totally agree that different families and babies will do well in different ways. However Waddilove is wrong to suggest that on demand babies are kingpins and by extension that scheduled babes cannot become kingpins, or the person around whom things will take place.

Reply

...re-reading and I just want to state more clearly- I don't think scheduled babies WILL be kingpins. They may or many not, as on demand babies may or may not, there's just soooo much more too it that Waddlilove is sound biting on.

Reply

Is she even a mother? And WHY does she leave after the first six weeks?

Reply

Count me in as someone who can't imagine how a baby can be anything but the center of your universe. Isn't that the way it's supposed to be?

I've found in my family, general routines work better than strict scheduling according to a clock, but even if schedules worked better, I wouldn't impose one on a brand new baby.

Reply

I still don't even understand HOW these people put a newborn on a schedule? How is that even remotely possible? Do you just deny certain feedings? Or force-feed them when it's scheduled??

The whole thing just boggles my mind. I've got two beautiful children. Both of them slept through the night by the time they were 10 weeks old. I never scheduled anything, but they both ate routinely every 2-3 hours during the day. I am well aware I was very lucky to have two children without colic or any sleeping problems, but I have to believe that my husband's and my attitude toward parenting played a role. We were relaxed and enjoyed the newborn stage. When they woke up crying to held them and fed them and just snuggled. They only fit on your lap for so long, can a few hours of missed sleep really be so important?

Reply