Sean Preston Federline tops worst dressed list
Filed under: Celeb Kids, Life & Style, Media, That's Entertainment
From the I - can't - believe - I'm - contributing - to - coverage - of - this files: According to US Magazine, Sean Preston Federline, infant son of Britney Spears and Kevin Federline, has topped Esquire Magazine's annual Worst Dressed Men list. The Esquire article, in referring to the "honour," says "being the offspring of a hyper fertile backup dancer and prematurely wilted flower is no excuse, but being 12 months almost is...As soon as you gain some dexterity, straighten out your hat."Sean Preston is a good company -- singers Marc Anthony and Axl Rose also apparently made the list.
And yet...
... is it just me, or are you also seized by an irresistible urge to grab the publishers of Esquire and scream, "DUDES! HE'S A BABY!"











ReaderComments (Page 5 of 15)
8-15-2006 @ 5:01PM
Betty Harvey said...They should just leave that darling baby alone............that is downright cruel and nasty to say those things about any innocent baby. Shame on GQ.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:02PM
S said...First off, I am not a fan of Spears. But come on! He's a BABY!! How can you put a baby on a 'worst dressed' list? Especially a MEN's worst dressed list? Yes, I expected something different clothing-wise seeing how Britney is his mother, but she can dress he child however she wants to.
Shame on attacking a baby just to get at his mother. I don't like Britney, but I still say you should let her be already.
SEAN LOOKS CUTE!! He's a cute baby boy and Britney should be proud.
P.S.: How can someone actually have a website devoted to Sean's clothing, the prices, whether or not they match, ect?? If she wants to go cheap or go with one shirt instead of the other then let her. She may like something cheap better than something expensive that she can afford, it happens. If you care so much about how your baby looks rather than if you are being a good, decent mother...than you should reconsider somethings.
I ain't a mother, but I love children and I'm sure many agree with me.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:07PM
NETTIE said...Give me a break! This is a baby you are talking about.I can't believe you people get pay checks,unbelievable! If that's all GQ has left to deal with then maybe you ought to think about closing shop.Because whom ever seems to be picking some of your so called hot guys.Look again some of them aren't as hot as you guys think. A baby give me a break!!!!!
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:07PM
tdavillier said...SHAME ON YOU FOR ATTACKING AN INNOCENT BABY. CHILDREN/BABIES ARE OFF LIMITS, EVEN TO THE MAFIA. IF I WAS B.S., I'D HIRE SOMEBODY TO WHIP YOUR ASS!
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:07PM
retrosoul2 said...I agree with GQ. Children are a reflection of their parents. Enuff said! Way to go GQ! Let 'em know.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:09PM
Robert Cooper said...I can not believe any one actually gives a rat's behind about any of the so called "Stars". They are only entertainers, and most of are not that good at it. Why should any sane person fawn over some self absorbed millionaire to begin with? Geez, this society needs to get a life and quit wringing their hands over these idiots.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:09PM
Kim said...I have 3 kids and when they were little I dressed them to be comfortable and he looks comfy, It's just another attack on Brittany, & it's really low to pick on an innocent baby. I hope people will boycott the magazine!!!!!!!!
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:15PM
Nicole said...OMG!! I think that baby is absolutely adorable... and every time I see a picture of him I smile... yes, that's right - that baby is so adorable I can't even look at him without smiling.
What's next, GQ? You people are seriously disturbed!
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:16PM
Stacey said...Is this really what are world is comming to?There are so many MORE IMPORTANT THING"S to worry about.The war,the men & women who are dieing for us,abused kid's,thing's that really matter.Not what some child has on or does not have on.I am not condemning anybody,everybody has a right to say what they want,just think about the really important thing's.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:16PM
Ian Scheinberg said...why can't people just let her be.
wow this world is funny here we are paying $3.25 per gallon and we are worried what a new mom is doing.
Maybe if people started to worry about them selves instead of rich over weight sex honey's we wouldn't have such troubles.
I can still remember when she was on tour and her body was so fine I watched her while my porn was recording.
(I miss the day's I once blew my juice because of her)
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:24PM
Sarah said...Wow! I don't think anyone who is older than twenty can actually look back at photos, when we were younger, and not think that our parents were crazy for dressing us the way that they did! After many photos and bad haircuts, I have often asked my mother what she was thinking!
It is hard enough raising children, let alone raising them in the spotlight. For goodness sakes I am sure that many children have asked for different parents from time to time. And it is inevitable that all parents make mistakes, that is how everyone learns. I would just hate for all of my mistakes to show up on the news, magazines, newspapers, and the internet!
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:36PM
JESSA said...I THINK THAT BRITT HAS PROVED HER POINT
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:36PM
Ruth said...I am in total shock at GQ magazine for mocking an infant. This child or any child for that matter cannot be blamed for his parents choices in clothing.
It disgusts me to see what lengths a media outlet will go to, to sell magazines. I for one will be canceling my Husbands subscription to GQ and I intend to ask for a refund of my balance. If I wanted to read this type of crap I would subscribe to the Star.
I urge others to boycott this magazine as well, poking fun at a 10 month old goes to far, no wonder Tom Cruise has his baby in seclusion.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:40PM
JESSA said...SHE IS AN ADULT LET HER BE ONE LIKE I SAID BEFORE LET HER PROVE HER POINT. LET HER BE HER AND LEAVE HER FAMILY ALONE
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:41PM
Melody said...It really doesn't matter how Britt or anybody else dresses their baby! They're not trying to impress anyone but themselves and the GOOD LORD UP STAIRS! That's the only thing that matters, not what other people think or say. I (myself), could care less what other people say about me, it's what I think that matters!!!!
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:43PM
Jose said...Wow...what a stupid thing to publish. But in reality, they did it to stir people up. They knew it'd cause controversy. That helps them to sell magazines. It get's their company out there on the news, where a bunch of stupid celebrity obsessive people start getting all offended. Our generation is truly sad and pathetic. Who gives a shit about celebrities lives and what they were? Or even how they live?! I do not care how many cars they have, or what bad things they've done. Everyone does bad a couple times in their lives. Now a barrier has been crossed and the infants of these people are targetted. It was sad when they started focusing on the celebrities personal lives many years, now there's not even a word to describe everyone's obsession with their children. This is so ridiculous.
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:44PM
Ray said...Okay, enough is enough! For the love of God, can we go a week or so without another attack on Britney? Hey, I am no fan of her music--and even less of a fan of her philandering husband--but it appears the media will go to any length to embarrass her.
Let the young lady be a mother. Let her care for her child. Let her live without a pack of frenzied cameramen harassing her every waking hour.
Oh, and by the way, Sean is a baby. Have we stooped so low that we have to attack a baby for being a baby?
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:47PM
Pam said...OMG!*! If this is the best that a supposed top rated magazine like "GQ" can come up with for a story line,then the world of publishing is going down the drain as we know it!*! Come on people,do we really not have anything better to do then pick on a baby and his clothes? Ok,I get the point that it is Brittney's son but please he is only 12 months old and does not deserve to be dragged into the spot light over what he is wearing!*! "GQ" needs to get some new writers that maybe can come up with better stories than this pathetic excuse that they call news worthy!*!
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:47PM
JESSA said...SO MANY PEOPLE ARE QUICK TO JUDGE SOME ONE ELSES LIFE.......REALIZE YOU ARE NOT PERFECT YOURSELF. MOST OF YOU PEOPLE WERE PROBABLY UGLY AS CHILDREN AND PROBABLY WORE 2ND HAND CLOTHING AND A GOOD 65% OF YOUR PARENTS WERE PROBABLY ON WELFARE COLLECTING FOODSTAMPS SOSIT BACK AND THINK "IS IT OK FOR ME TO JUDGE SOMEONE, WHO DOES NOT NEED TO BE JUDGED"
DONT BE SO QUICK TO JUDGE
Reply
8-15-2006 @ 5:52PM
karen said...Well,look who his mother is!
Reply