Skip to Content

Looking for the best info on potty training your toddler? Click here.

UK health watchdog calls for WiFi radation inquiry

Categories: Health & safety, Gadgets & tech, That's entertainment

Concern about 'electronic smog' and the possible dangers it poses to children's' health has prompted the UK Health Protection Agency to demand an investigation into the use of wireless communications networks (Wi-Fi) in classrooms.

Wi-Fi is known to give off radiation, just as cell phones do. While research has shown that the radiation emitted from mobile phones and phone masts can be linked to cancer and brain damage, the dangers of Wi-Fi radiation have not been clearly determined.

Some some scientists are concerned that this radiation could cause cancer and premature senility. Since it is estimated that more than half of primary schools and almost all secondary schools in the UK are using it, there is growing pressure on the government to examine Wi-Fi's potential health hazards.

Sir William Stewart, the chairman of the Health Protection Agency, has been involved in the inquiries into the hazards of mobile phones and is advising that students should be monitored for any ill effects from exposure to Wi-Fi radiation.

There are some who are already convinced that Wi-Fi radiation is dangerous. Professor Olle Johansson, of Sweden's Karolinska Institute, is adamant that science has already proved the adverse health effects and wonders "Do we not know enough already to say, 'Stop!'?"

What's going to happen if they do find that Wi-Fi radiation is harmful? When cell phone radiation was determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals, we didn't get rid of them and return to standard land-line phones. Like cell phones, we are far too dependent upon our wireless networks to ever plug back in.

Recent Posts

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

ParentDish Polls

    Hollywood's Hottest Dad
    51% of you voted Hugh Jackman the Hottest Dad in Hollywood by a landslide. Wolverine edged out Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp -- and we can see why.

    Jewel Samad/Getty Images

    Best Stepdad
    How cool would it be to have Ashton Kutcher as your stepdad? Pretty cool, according to 52% of you. After all, you wouldn't have to teach him how to send a text message or use Twitter! Kutcher is pictured here in 2007 with stepdaughters Rumer and Tallulah Willis.

    Evan Agostini/Getty Images

    Who cares about IQ?
    Not ParentDish readers! 80% of you said that this 24-year-old UK mom should be allowed to keep her baby--even after social workers said she was "too stupid" to take care of her.

    Jenny Goodall, Daily Mail / ZUMA Press

    Enough With the Gosselins!
    Will you buy Kate Gosselin's cookbook? 64% of you say no -- and you're also tired of hearing about her.

    David Livingston, Getty Images

    Best Babysitters
    31% of you said that you would leave your kids with Ellen and Portia, while only 9% would trust Oprah to babysit. Interesting, since none of the celebs are parents.

    Kevin Winter, Getty Images

    Fav Celeb Mom
    Jennifer Garner is your favorite celebrity mom, beating out Angelina Jolie and First Lady Michelle Obama with 37% of the vote.

    Kris Connor, Getty Images

    Bad Mommy
    Dina Lohan and Courtney Love tied for worst celebrity mom, each with 32% of your votes. Only 3% of you said that Kate Moss was a bad mom, though, which says a lot -- mostly what a mess Dina Lohan is.

    Michael Buckner, Getty Images

    Unimpressed
    Only 8% of you think Bristol Palin a better parent than baby daddy Levi. [Get the full story]

    Getty

    Octo Overload?
    60% of you are worried about her kids. Maybe because she reportedly once stripped under the name "Angelina?" [Get the full story]

    Getty

    Tough to Swallow
    45% of you said this Burger King ad was "totally inappropriate." What would the King say? [Get the full story]

    YouTube

Features

Recent Comments