Hot on HuffPost Parents:

 

Parent vs Parent: No tattoos, temporary or otherwise

Filed under: Relatives

A couple of years ago, at a family vacation, one of my sisters-in-law was passing out temporary tattoos to her kids as well as to the rest of the kids. Despite my protests, Jared ended up with one and I kind of had a meltdown. I bolted for the hotel room in disgust, trying to keep from getting physically sick.

My response was likely more dramatic that was necessary due to the extreme exhaustion that comes from trying to watch a three-year-old in the swimming pool while at the same time dealing with a one-year-old and the lack of sleep that comes with having an infant. Part of the reason that I got upset at all is my utter dislike for make-up -- a long time ago, in another life, I used to have to wear it and I find it utterly disgusting. Tattoos, especially the temporary ones are, to me, extremely gross.

The bigger part of the problem, however, is the deeper significance of tattoos to me and in my family. It is quite possible that my paternal grandparents and my aunts each had one. The concentration camp at Auschwitz, where it is believed my father's family was taken and eventually killed, tattooed prisoners for ease of identification, especially after death.

To me, tattoos are a symbol of oppression, of enslavement, of mass murder. I can't see them as anything else. To voluntarily brand oneself is unthinkable to me, especially for such a trifling and empty reason as fashion. That's why I have no tattoos, why I don't let my kids have temporary tattoos, and why they won't be getting any real tattoos.

ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)

FollowUs

Flickr RSS

TheTalkies

AskAdviceMama

AdviceMama Says:
Start by teaching him that it is safe to do so.