Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Michael Roth: Why Colleges Should Offer a Three-Year Option
Barbara Gordon: The Envy That Took Me By Surprise
Indian children found working in sweatshop for Gap Kids
Filed under: Tweens, In The News
I've long heard rumblings about Gap being involved in some hot, dirty water in relation to sweatshops in third-world countries, but honestly, I didn't know the details behind the scandal.
Now that new allegations of sweatshop abuse have surfaced in relation to Gap kids clothes and young Indian children, i understand the history a little bit more. And I'm saddened.
Apparently, child workers as young as 10 have been discovered working in textile factories in India in conditions that border on slavery. They were making children's clothes destined for Gap Kids.
The small children told the Guardian newspaper about hours of unpaid work as well as physical abuse. The Gap issued a statement noting that they had been unaware of the conditions, and that their clothes had been "Improperly subcontracted to a sweatshop using child labour.".
Gap's penchant for outsourcing big contracts to developing-world countries is likely the reason it's been involved in so many child and forced labour scandals. The company has admitted that it's terminated contracts with 136 suppliers due to unethical business conduct. Well. I guess that's a step, but since this keeps happening -- why not just contract in countries where slave labor doesn't exist?
Now that new allegations of sweatshop abuse have surfaced in relation to Gap kids clothes and young Indian children, i understand the history a little bit more. And I'm saddened.
Apparently, child workers as young as 10 have been discovered working in textile factories in India in conditions that border on slavery. They were making children's clothes destined for Gap Kids.
The small children told the Guardian newspaper about hours of unpaid work as well as physical abuse. The Gap issued a statement noting that they had been unaware of the conditions, and that their clothes had been "Improperly subcontracted to a sweatshop using child labour.".
Gap's penchant for outsourcing big contracts to developing-world countries is likely the reason it's been involved in so many child and forced labour scandals. The company has admitted that it's terminated contracts with 136 suppliers due to unethical business conduct. Well. I guess that's a step, but since this keeps happening -- why not just contract in countries where slave labor doesn't exist?












ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
10-29-2007 @ 9:54AM
sweetsalty kate said...This is the whole inevitable issue the western world is going to face - if we're not okay with child labour or toxic materials in our products or unethical manufacturing, we need to simply pay more for everything we buy - and buy less overall.
The super-hyped consumer culture - the Wal-Mart culture of plentiful, disposable crap for ultra-low prices - has to end in favour of more sound human rights, third world and environmental practices.
We don't need even a half or a third of as many toys, clothes, and treats that we buy. I'm guilty of it too - and often feel like I need to go on a consumer holiday.. and learn to be happier with less. (or, better put - learn to be happier by buying less crap, more higher-quality stuff and then throwing away less junk over time).
So yeah, child labour will end - as soon as Americans and Canadians in particular decide they're willing to pay more, and not be the world's materialistic gluttons.
Wouldn't it be amazing if we could turn that tide?
Reply
10-29-2007 @ 10:42AM
Jenna said...Guh. I hope this doesn't extend into their other companies, such as Old Navy. :(
Reply
10-29-2007 @ 10:44AM
Nicola said...Amen to that, Kate. We have done just that. Taken a break. Stopped buying. Stopped caring about sales or cheap mass produced crap. We're those lame parents who bring an all wood educational game to your child's birthday party when everybody else bought him Transformers. We're the meanies who have asked all of our relatives to please donate to the local Toys for Tots instead of dropping more gift wrapped plastic junk in front of our son this Christmas. He is receiving a wood kitchen set this Christmas and a few goodies to go along with it (free trade plantation wood crafted). He will love it. The planet will not suffer for it. And we have taken the first steps away from the American consumer lifestyle.
If we want cheap crap, the big companies will provide us with cheap crap. Made with the cheapest available labour and of the cheapest available materials. Is that the legacy that we want to leave our children? We did it for you. Sorry about the suffering and the environmental destruction and your lead tainted development. You had some good toys though, eh?
Reply
10-29-2007 @ 2:34PM
kate said...Kate, Nicola, you're right on!! As long as "we" support these companies, they'll keep at it.
This year, like last year, I'm doing all my holiday shopping at etsy.com and local arts/crafts fairs. Not only does this support independent crafters, I know exactly where the gifts come from. Better all around.
That said, this article depreses the hell out of me. I just shopped there yesterday. uugghh. I'll be returning those size 7 pants...
Reply
10-29-2007 @ 2:53PM
SKL said...While I agree companies need to do all they can to ensure their suppliers are not, directly or indirectly, using abusive child labor, I don't agree that it's wrong to source labor from countries where "slave labor" exists.
The reason "slave labor" exists in those countries is that there is so much poverty there. Not poverty in the North American sense - most of us have no idea. Poverty in the sense that in many cases, it is stupid for a child to go to school because she will starve there, and if she has a job, at least maybe she will eat.
If we really want to do away with abusive child labor, we need to keep providing jobs for their parents and older siblings, so the children can both eat AND go to school. If you really have a heart, DON'T insist on North-American-made products. Insist on ethically-produced products that may be made anywhere.
Reply
10-29-2007 @ 6:34PM
Victor Chu Fashion Technology said...There is no way any garment retailing for under $20 is not made by either slaves, children or enslaved children.
$20 retail = $7 wholesale = $2.80 cost
$2.80 cost = $2.10 for fabrics + $0.50 for parts which leaves $0.20 for labor.
Old Navy, GAP, H&M, Walmart etc. all demand the lowest bottom prices from Asian factories, it's corporate practice for many decades.
Reply