Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Melina Bellows: Why Being a Mom is the Coolest Job Ever
Bruce Reyes-Chow: The Importance of Making Memories With Our Children
Ricki Lake's The Business of Being Born
Filed under: Your Pregnancy, Celeb Parents, That's Entertainment
Last April, I wrote about actress Ricki Lake's documentary, The Business of Being Born. At the time, the film had not yet been released and was getting buzz mostly because Lake appears in the movie in all her naked, pregnant glory, giving birth to her son Owen. But now that it has been released, albeit in a limited number of theaters, the movie is getting attention for the reasons Lake intended: its unflinching look at the reality of giving birth in America today.
Produced by Lake and directed by Abby Epstein, the documentary asks a fundamental question: Should most births be viewed as a natural life process, or should every delivery be treated as a potentially catastrophic medical emergency?
In the United States, the answer seems to be the latter. The film examines our maternity care system from historical, political and scientific points of view and declares it to be in crisis. With hospitals focused on the fast turnover of beds and the monetary bottom line, the documentary makes a case for natural childbirth.
I've not seen the entire documentary yet, but the trailer is enough to make me want to. It is currently showing only in a few theaters in California and will be in Tulsa, Oklahoma and Seattle, Washington next month. It might eventually make it to your town, but even it it doesn't, you can get it through Netflix or buy the DVD online.












ReaderComments (Page 5 of 6)
1-25-2008 @ 1:07AM
Tiffini said...Ren, this is a very touchy subject, so I am going to try and be gentle here. the baby NEVER survived. In todays world it is fought against as part of Roe vs Wade. I am just attempting to show how much everything changes. We CAN'T compare the home births of yesterday anymore then we can the physician directed births of yesterday. We can't just look at the U/S as a defining factor in our decisions either...look outside the U.S. They are performing home births and have much better outcomes all over the world then we do here in the U.S.A. even with physician directed births. I hardly doubt that we Americans just can't do birth as well as they can in other countries. I know alot of people want to "believe" in their Physician and nursing staff...but the bottom line is this, WE as mothers to be have to be informed and not just believing in what they tell us as the way it is. Fear is a horrible thing and often used against women in General. I love watching the nurses on here getting irritated about Nurse Midwife directed homebirths ...can we say job security LOL. I am not telling women that one is better then another, in my education it isn't. It's choice..and unless your in the sticks way far away from medical care and haven't recieved good medical care during the pregnancy and there are no known complications there is no more problems in general with home birth then with physician directed births in hospital. They both carry risk...they both carry a miracle.
1-25-2008 @ 12:10AM
Cat said...George: How dare you tell people where they should give birth! It is THEIR choice, no one else's! I had both my children inthe hospital, and I could've done without those experiences. No one has the right to judge other people on where they decide to have their kids. Don't you think that if something happened to their baby that they would be blaming themselves enough? There are so many good and bad stories for both home births AND hospital births. Having a baby isn't a garaunteed thing. Things happen. It's like choosing the take the bus or drive in your car, something could happen no matter which you choose.
No one is selfish or ignorant for the choices they make about THEIR LIVES!!!!!! For everyone that thinks they have the right to judge anyone else, mind your own business!!!!!
Reply
1-26-2008 @ 8:36AM
memphismom said...I think having a baby "naturally" is the best way. I had both of my girls natually and everything went smoothly however I had them in a hospital just in case something went wrong medically we would all be covered. I could have never forgiven myself had I had my girls at home and something went wrong and I lost them.
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 12:45AM
memphismom said...I think having a baby "naturally" is the best way. I had both of my girls natually and everything went smoothly however I had them in a hospital just in case something went wrong medically we would all be covered. I could have never forgiven myself had I had my girls at home and something went wrong and I lost them.
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 12:59AM
SKL said...I have never given birth, but based on what I've read and observed over the years, I would most likely try to do a "natural" birth but in or very near a hospital in case anything went crazy wrong.
My mom had six kids, and two were "natural." It worked like this. The first three were with whatever painkiller / duller was standard in the 1960's. The fourth was born in the hospital hallway with no intervention because labor went too fast - hence basically a natural birth. My mom felt this was a lot less uncomfortable overall than the first three, so for #5 (1975) she planned on a "natural" birth in the hospital. But, once in the delivery room, they started hanging her legs in stirrups with her butt up above the table, which is obviously not natural. She asked why, and they said because this makes it easier for the doctor. She decided hanging upside down couldn't be a good position to birth a baby, and took her only other option, which was the standard painkiller / duller. She was sick for quite a while after this birth. With #6 she went with new providers and planned a "natural" birth that would be basically like #4 except for the hallway part. Once again, she felt so much better having the birth with no drugs, etc., etc. And the baby was way more alert, too. Unfortunately the option a "natural" birth was not even discussed by her doctors unless and until she brought it up. I am not sure how often this is still true, but judging from comments I see on threads like this one, I suspect it is still quite common.
So the long and short of it is, I agree with a poster who said fear is often the biggest problem and most limiting factor in childbirth. And often (or usually?) the source of that fear is doctors who want us to make choices based on what's convenient for them. While I would probably not be adventurous enough to have a home birth (maybe when I was younger I would), I like the way midwives provide education and choices. I see no reason why doctors and hospitals can't do the same, unless they are motivated by greed.
Reply
1-26-2008 @ 6:05AM
Sandyone said...I don't think most docs are motivated by greed as much as they are victims of institutionalization. Whenever you institutionalize something, individuals are going to "suffer". Sometimes, this suffering isn't such a big deal. Other times, it approaches criminal levels.
Docs are also motivated by fear. Litigation in the US is outrageous (all those damn lawyers, you know!!! *chuckle*) and these days, everyone expects a perfect outcome. It is safer for the doctor to do everything in his power to get the birth over and done. Not all unnecessary c-sections are based on fear of litigation, though...sometimes doctors would just prefer to get the baby born so they can go home. I can't imagine being an OB and being on-call so much. Yeah, as a parent, I'm on-call all the time (hence, I'm on the computer at 5 on a Saturday morning with a hungry kiddo), but I love my demanding clients. It's different when it's a job, no matter how wonderful a doctor/person you are.
There's an awful lot that contributes to "what's wrong with birth in the USA". There's an awful lot that needs to be fixed and 'alternative birth options' are one way of helping the fixing along.
1-25-2008 @ 1:00AM
sunnydays said...I am a young female physician, who just gave birth 2 weeks ago...and I absolutely have to respond to the home VBAC comments that I've read. Risk and odds are two totally separate things. What many refer to as 'risk' really speak of the odds that something will or will not happen.... RISK is WHAT may happen...thus the risk you take. That being said, the risks of having a VBAC, whether in hospital or at home are great. The greatest risk being the chance of uterine rupture and potentially baby and mom dying. Now, complications may arise more from RLTCS (repeat long transverse c section), but those complications are usually relatively minor...minor meaning not life threatening. i.e. infection, scarring, adhesions, etc. And being someone who actually performs csxns, I'm sorry, but I've yet to see a repeat go bad.
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 1:02AM
MARY said...Having babies at home is the norm in Europe and they along with some (almost) third world countries have a better. infant mortality rate than us with all our drugs and fancy procedures (and staff infections)...to each their own, information is always welcome....
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 1:21AM
Stupid Shrill Mommies said...Oh PLEASE!!! What an insult. I have a close family member who has been an OBGYN nurse for decades and she is a DAMN FINE nurse who has saved thousands of lives over the years. She has always worked with dedicated professionals and this film is so one sided-and biased. The film is "EMOTIONAL" and that is the most pathetic part about it - women deliver babies every day - it is a bodily function people. If your delivery goes wrong and your kid gorks out at home and you don't have a facility there to back you up... don't come a crying... Those OBGYN nurses are some of the hardest working professionals I know. Go ahead and cheat your kids out of delivering with fewer risks so that you can selfishly have your Hallmark moment.
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 1:24AM
Kim Lakes said...I had all 8 (in 15 years) of my children at home, with the same midwife in attendance. Beah Haber, my midwife made the experience wonderful. There was no fear, no drugs and no problems. I wouldn't do it any other way by choice. I also know if there was a problem, I had a "backup" DR on the ready at a nearby hospital. Thankfully, I had no complications. Home birth isn't for everyone, but I can tell you that I never had a fear of taking home the wrong baby(yes, it used to happen) or worring that my newborn perfect baby was going to go home with a staph infection from the hospital. I also had complete say in how I wanted my birth to go, I walked, ate, visited with friends and family and ALL my children were there for the births of their sibilings, consequently, they are very close and NONE of them have had SURPRISE babies, they have first hand knowledge of what childbirth is like as well as having a newborn in the house. My oldest is now 25 and my youngest 10. My son (25) called me a few months ago and wanted me to explain home birth to his fiance. He is ALL for it, It was a very proud moment to know I have passed this legacy on to my children. I am looking foreword to being a Grandma someday and hope I am priviledged to attend their births...at home
Reply
1-28-2008 @ 2:58PM
Go Figure! said...That is old news. She has been talking about releasing it for months now. People don't have to watch it uness they want to, Incidently Ricki Lake looks better with a massive weight loss.
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 1:54AM
gina said...as a registered nurse; for 21 years in a large urban hospital (adult icu and picu history), i can tell you to blame; INSURANCE COMPANIES before you begin to blame the hospital, doctor or nurse, for lack of "service". in my experience, i can very honestly tell you; that hospitals (including the doctors and nurses who work in them); are generally; quite good.
in my opinion, i think america needs to invest alot more of its time and money; on treatment and early diagnosis of mental illness instead.
if i was president,
i would end the war, triple the number of nurses~aides in hospitals and nursing homes, and invest heavily, monitarily-wise at minimum; in mental health.
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 2:22AM
Tiffini said...Gina, I totally with you that insurance companies attempting to reduce risk etc is a problem....remember however that alot of what the insurance companies are doing is due to law suites, first go the atty's then the insurance companies, however people themselves have to become more involved in the process and information before these changes can be made.
1-25-2008 @ 2:01AM
Sterling said...My wife gave birth to both of our children naturally and to this day, I hold her in such high regard for having done so. I remember telling the nurses how proud I was of her for having done so as she was being wheeled from the birthing room to her hospital room and they stopped pushing the gurney and said, "why would anybody do that in this day in age." It was as it should be.
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 2:30AM
Maggie said...Tiffini~ No worries about job security. Even if everyone in the US decided to use midwives and have a home birth, I could get a job in one of hundreds of other areas. That is one of the many advantages of being a nurse. Sure, I may not be able to work in the area I truly love, but I will enjoy it none the less.
As a side note, I work with BOTH physicians and midwives on staff. We all work together as a team. Most of the deliveries are done by midwives. We also have had many private midwives bring patients to us for the home births that needed some type of intervention.
Like I've said...Be educated and do what is best for YOU.
Peace.
Reply
1-26-2008 @ 6:04AM
Sandyone said...Three cheers for Maggie!!! All practices should run like yours. There's no reason for the animosity between the docs and midwifes. Well, no good reason! I do believe that we'll be heading toward that type of model....doctors, nurses, midwives and parents....all working together, all trusting that the baby's best interests are supreme.
*key inspirational music*
But seriously...thanks for reminding us that not "all doctors suck".
1-26-2008 @ 6:04AM
Sandyone said...Three cheers for Maggie!!! All practices should run like yours. There's no reason for the animosity between the docs and midwifes. Well, no good reason! I do believe that we'll be heading toward that type of model....doctors, nurses, midwives and parents....all working together, all trusting that the baby's best interests are supreme.
*key inspirational music*
But seriously...thanks for reminding us that not "all doctors suck".
1-25-2008 @ 2:31AM
april said...actually 10.5 is not bad lol. and really its not that the mom gained all the weight and ate alot. it just runs in some peoples families. i was 3 weeks early and almost 8 lbs. so was my sis. had we of stayed inside for the alloted time im sure we would have been bigger as it runs in the family. my uncle and great uncles and aunts were all over 9 lb babies. and my great grandma was a tiny lady lol. she was ALL baby. barely gained anything with all 6 kids that she had. its just genetics
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 2:34AM
Elizabeth Kennard said...I'm 33 & just gave birth to my 1st child. I ended up delivering at a military hospital which was also a teaching facility. W/in the 1st 6 hrs. of being in labor I saw a grand total of 6 different "doctors"(probably residents), not one of which I'd seen during my reg.appts. I was nearly given every intervention known to the obstetrical practice & when it was all said & done I felt like I should've pitched a tent & charged admssion. Short of having an epidural I could've done w/o half the procedures I was put through. Had I not had g. diabetes (which I managed perfectly) I would've gone to a midwife. I don't know that I'd be brave enough for a home birth, but after my experience I can see why someone would opt for one.
Reply
1-25-2008 @ 2:36AM
Tiffini said...Sterling, I don't understand the pride? I am the mom of three boys all delivered vaginally, all delivered without pain meds, and UNNATURALLY in the sense that when my body failed to work the way the books said it should the doctors of the last two children decided to make a square peg fit in a round hole. DA^^ that hurt...much more then the first one...took longer too. However that said, I don't think it is anything to be "proud" of...or NOT proud of in reverse. It has nothing to do with "as it should be"....Birthing Naturally has nothing to do with pain meds or not pain meds it has to do with a mind body connection that is the TRUE definition of birthing naturally...if you ask a midwife...she will tell you that...painmeds or not...birthinging naturally is about what goes on in the mind...going through more pain...longer pain...doesn't make that connection it can in the large scheme of things actually inhit that connection actually. Hold your wife in high regard for performing the miracle of life, no matter how that life comes into this world..she should have had that regardless.
Reply