Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Are Toxic Chemicals To Blame For Rising Rates Of Autism?
Melina Bellows: Why Being a Mom is the Coolest Job Ever
The #1 reason why people use TV as the babysitter
Filed under: Work Life, Health & Safety: Babies, Development/Milestones: Babies, Childcare, Gadgets, That's Entertainment
Over at babycenter.com they're asking "Do you ever have your child watch TV or a video so you can get a break?" and of the 16,607 people who voted, 97 % answered yes.
I know this should not come as a surprise to me, although it does. Not so much because that many people admit to using the TV as a babysitter--as an educator, I know this to be true, and I can see how it would be tempting--had my husband and I not agreed before our son was born that we would not allow him to watch any television or videos at all until he was at least kindergarten age--but because of HOW the "break" time was spent. 30% of respondents said that they use the TV downtime for cooking dinner, and an even greater percentage (33%) said they use this time to do housework.
Housework? Really? I'm sorry, but I can't quite seem to fathom how washing dishes, loading the dishwasher, running the vacuum, or folding laundry constitutes the need for a "break" while the kids sit passively in front of the TV. Bean loves to help with daily housework. He's had a forever obsession with the vacuum, and now at the age of three, he's actually starting to be pretty good at it. I'll do the floors once, and then let him keep going for a while, as I'm loading the dishwasher or wiping down counters. He's also great at sorting socks, putting things away, and carrying small items from where they've landed to the proper room where they belong.
Similarly, dinner prep is typically a fun family time at our house: all three of us in the kitchen, working together to prepare a meal. Bean loves to chop veggies with a butter knife. Mushrooms, green beans and red peppers are all a soft enough target for him to practice his chopping skills, and when they're ending up in a stir-fry or a salad, it doesn't matter if they look a tad irregular. He also helps toss salads, kneed pizza dough or quiche crust, and he's quite thrilled lately with the whole idea of setting the table, now that he is tall enough to finally see inside the silverware drawer.
But what shcoked me the most was that of all the various options for how people spend this TV "break" time away from their kids, only 2% of respondents said that they used this time to spend time with their partner. If, as I said, my husband and I hadn't already agreed to not allow our son to watch TV during his early childhood, I can definitely imagine that I'd see the TV as an appealing way to distract my son--specifically to have some alone time with my husband where we're not doing the married couple staccato of "What did he eat for dinner?" "Did you schedule his doctor's appointment or should I?" "When does this bill need to go out by?" etc, etc, etc.
It's the thing I miss the most, since having my son: that uniterrupted down time with my husband before the end of the day when we're both so tired we can hardly see straight, let alone carry on a conversation about astronomy or politics the way we often used to. I miss mornings leisurly in bed without a three year old jumping up and down yelling "time to get up Mommy, Daddy!" And it's the only way I can ever even imagine really wanting to us TV to garner a "break" from our small boy.
Amber Valetta, in this month's issue of Cookie magazine, talks about taking the TV out of her family's house, and out of her son's life. She said she noticed quickly how different he was--how imaginative and self directed. I see these qualities in my son daily, and I wonder often why more parents don't truly consider cutting back or entirely eleminating television/videos (and video games!) from their kid's lives--especially if all they're doing while their kids are watching is housework.
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- I cant be the only resposible parent that has a child age 3 who is creative enough to escape the house. I have put up multiple barriers and if even on...
- i have 4 kids single mom. maddy who is 10 katherine who i 9 suzy who is 4 and connor who is 3. i can not potty train connnor and i do not have any mal...
- Hi I'm going to be a mommy for the first time. Would it be okay to name my first child, if a boy, after my father's name?












ReaderComments (Page 2 of 2)
2-27-2008 @ 2:35PM
Michelle Detwiler said...As I also planned to not let my son watch TV until he was older, I was sucked in by the Baby Einstein DVDs my Aunt sent me when he was born. When I needed a shower, a meal, a trip to the bathroom, etc., BE was there to entertain and distract my darling son.
As he has evolved into a toddler, he has a keen appreciation for Veggie Tales and Sesame Street - and so do I. Because, although it's a nice idea to think that he would be a great housework helper and sous chef, he is only 20 months old, and would much rather hide in the cupboards, "kiss" the dog (with tongue, no less) and throw clean laundry on the floor than "help" me do my mommy chores.
I hardly think an hour or two - spread out over the day, mind you - will ruin his brain. Quite the contrary, he's a singing, dancing, mocking machine - courtesy of the exposure he gets to other children, monsters, etc. through those educational programs!
Reply
2-27-2008 @ 3:19PM
Jill said...This is a tough (and touchy) topic. It makes moms feel guilty. But no one has ever parented your child for you, and no one can know your tolerance for noise, activity, chaos, pulling on your pant legs, the yet-another-game-of-Candyland. Don't let someone else's decision about tv, breastfeeding, meals, bedtime or whatever make you feel badly about your decision. If you don't like what your family does, consider a change. But don't feel badly just because other moms on the web do it differently.
While I do not begrudge those who have quiet tv time (especially getting daytime sex?!) I chose to keep my kids away from tv while they were little. Now that the youngest is four, we're allowing a bit. However, they aren't very interested. There isn't anything in their day that they're willing to give up in order to fit in tv. We've watched things I'm tivo-ing for them when its too rainy to go out, or as a family on Friday nights occasionally, but they aren't hooked and I'm not sure they will get hooked at this point. I watch tv every night after they go to bed. TV is not evil. Too much screen time, however, happens easily. I think it's a slippery slope and the 30 minutes of a day becomes 30 minutes of tv, 30 minutes of computer/educational games, 30 minutes of wii....
Our decision came accidentally; I didn't decide to keep them away from tv before they were born. I'd never watched daytime tv (I'd been at work!) so I didn't turn it on for my baby. When he saw one he'd look briefly but not long enough for me to think it could be useful. I remember a week or two with each child when morning nap went away and suddenly I had a screaming child holding open the shower curtain while I tried to wash myself as quickly as possible. I could have set them in front of the tv; it would probably have been the simplest idea. However, I held out and they got over it. I didn't have a year of torture, only a few weeks. That said, listening to my child scream every day for more than a few weeks would probably have led me to seek another solution. I can't say that tv wouldn't have been among the tricks I would have tried.
Do not attack or scorn those who parent differently. Their way might work best for them.
Reply
2-27-2008 @ 3:31PM
Michele said...Christina, You really shouldn't judge other people's parenting choices. That's not what this site was designed for. Your only child is in daycare all day, your spouse helps around the house (as does mine, but that is often not the case). As I said, you really should judge.
Reply
2-27-2008 @ 3:38PM
Jenn said...It must be nice to have someone who helps with the chores, especially the ones that I don't feel comfortable letting little hands assist with. But when you are the only one at home in the evening, when the cooking/laundry/etc need to be done, letting the little one watch 20 minutes of Blue's Clues if she so desires is not something I choose to feel guilty about.
Must be nice also to have your spouse THERE to go and spend some "quality time" with!
Everybody's situation is unique. You may not have meant it to, but your post came across as quite judgmental, on a subject people already tend to be defensive about.
Reply
2-27-2008 @ 9:00PM
Sherry said...You know, this single condescending sanctimonious post may have turned me off of Parent Dish forever.
Like someone else said, does it hurt reaching around patting yourself on the back?
I let my children watch a lot of TV. Neither one of them is a drooling, lifeless idiot. They are both active, healthy, creative, and imaginative kids. Neither of them has trouble concentrating or completing age appropriate tasks.
My situation is a little different than most of your readers. I live in a foreign country where English is not the main language. Of course, I use English with my kids. However, I also allos them to watch English TV shows and DVDs for frivilous reasons like so they will be able to hear natural English from other sources too and thus communicate with half of their extended family!
I also let them watch tv so I can get housework, cooking, and so forth done. Unlike you with just the one, I have two kids who are far enough apart in age that they simply cannot do the same things. The younger one wants to do the stuff the older one does, but it isn't always safe for him so to keep screaming, crying, and fighting to a minimum and preserve my own sanity I don't really let either of them help me much right now.
As for time with my husband, he leaves for work at 6:30 a.m. and never gets home before 10. Never! Weekdays the kids don't even get to see him, and depending on how exhausted I am I might not either. Weekends are spent focused on the kids because they need his attention more than I do.
My family is half way around the world. Help from my in laws is no help at all. They just make things more difficult for me. Baby sitters or day cares where I live cost about $20 an hour per child. My friends are all in the same boat with me, so they can't be of much help. The TV is the only available and affordable baby sitter I have.
My point with this it that you have no idea what situations and problems other people are dealing with so you have no right to judge anyone about anything. Your way is not the only way! I think every mother makes the best decisions she can for her children given the circumstances in which she finds herself. Who are you to say they are wrong or question them?
Or are you looking for someone to praise you and make you feel better about your own choices?
Reply
2-27-2008 @ 9:18PM
mamaloo said...It just occurred to me that when we had trouble teaching my son his alphabet, when he absolutely refused to work with me on that and would get mad and push away so that he could go play, it was a DVD, recommended on ParentDish (then Blogging Baby) that actually taught him his alphabet, his upper and lower cases and the phonetic sounds of the letters. His teacher says he is by far the smartest kid in the class (and she told me because we are having a few in class discipline issues stemming from the fact that he is ahead of his classmates and isn't getting enough intellectual stimulation).
So, pfffffft to your attitude that parents who let their kids watch TV/DVDs regularly are doing something reprehensible.
Reply
2-27-2008 @ 10:38PM
Judy said...Hmmm, I didn't get the judgmental tone at all. Then again, I don't own a TV.
However, they do get to watch a DVD or (the older one) play on the computer just about every day, for 1-2 hours. (On a bad day, the might get more, but that doesn't happen often.)
The reason we got rid of the TV was largely because we're not going to pay for cable, and couldn't pick up anything with an antenna, so it was useless - why set it up at all? We can watch DVDs on the computer or the portable player.
I do think it's kind of surprising that it's used by so many people to "get stuff done." I use it for some "quiet time" usually - a break for me. When the almost 2yo naps, the almost 4 yo gets his "screen time" and I get to read, write in my journal, or even nap for 20 minutes myself!
Is it ideal? No, probably not. But Word World has gotten him interested in reading and writing (he's sounding out words all over the place now) and we haven't left the kids with any kind of a sitter in nearly a year now, so it's the only break I get.
As with all things, it's finding a balance.
I do admit I find it odd when parents seem proud of the fact that their kid will sit quietly and watch TV for long periods. (This happened to me this past weekend.) I'm never sure what to say to that.
Reply
2-27-2008 @ 11:26PM
SKL said...I was surprised when my kids' pediatrician asked me if they could sit for x minutes in front of a TV, as a test of how well they were developing. Well, I haven't sat them in front of a TV more than three times in the past four months, and those times were to watch a DVD, so I really wouldn't know. So I guess my kids are not meeting their milestones because Sesame Street doesn't excite me. Bad mommy!
2-27-2008 @ 10:40PM
isisaquaria said...While I do agree with most about the tone of the post, it shouldn't affect how you choose to raise your child(ren). If it did, mine would have a full-time nanny, my husband and I would be snippy and the kids would be in bed before we could have any family time. These post are meant to show different views and garner information from others that might be helpful. I do not truly get upset unless personally attacked which is rare--but you cannot let it stop you from sharing something about yourself or someone you know--that tidbit may help another person.
Reply
2-27-2008 @ 11:40PM
queenoqueens said...I've followed the comments to see where most people stand on the issue. I see I'm not the only one who interpreted the post as critical.
For each ParentDish post, I look for the "value add"---how is this going to help me in my parenting. Concrete tips are usually best, and I think Christina made an attempt, but failed. Mostly what came across was the critical tone. But I realize on reflecting on past posts, that she just has different priorities. She has said that she can't possibly see staying at home with her child. She says her house is a mess by the time the weekend arrives. She talks about having trouble managing stress. These are the very things that many people use TV for....to deal with these issues. But in her mind, TV is just a no-no, not matter what. That's where the difference lies. And I admire that stance, based on the scientific studies that have come out.
But.........
What nags me is that I see a somewhat "easy" solution to these problems....TV. And yet what the scientists discuss as problems, I have no anecdotal evidence for. So many kids I see were raised with plenty of TV and are intelligent, creative and motivated, even over-achievers within their peer group.
So who am I to believe?
Even though I am a believer in scientific results, I cannot deny what I see in my own personal experience. For that reason, in my heart of hearts, I think that TV in an of itself is alright, until you see behavior that says differently.
And as with everything else, there's usually a fine line into the "dark side". That my friends, is the tricky part.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 9:41AM
Heather said...Wow considering 97% said they use it for babysitting to do things like cook dinner seems like the entire 3% who don't are here. So someone is lying.
I do because we have a small kitchen barely big enough for 2. But now that he is older 4.5 he is starting to help a little. But that means my dd 15 can't help because there just isn't room in the kitchen.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 10:50AM
Molly said...I know that if I worked full time that the TV time in our house would be way down. But, I am the SAHM of a two year old that gets up at 6:30, doesn't nap, and doesn't go to bed until 7:00 or 8:00. I honestly would lose my mind without a little tube time. She does 'help' with chores and meal prep, but I need a little me time.. thirty minutes or an hour to read a magazine or a book, so hello Curious George.
Sure, I feel a little guilty about it and respect those that can manage without the TV, but it just wouldn't work for me.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 11:08AM
Mel said...Many of you people are irrevocably disturbed. So many of you drone incessantly about "doing what is right for your family." And then you get huffy when someone makes a declaration about what works for her particular family!
I think you all may be suffering from cognitive dissonance: You've always held yourselves out as anything-goes, whatever-feels-good people, but now that you've had kids you see that there is a right and a wrong way to parent. And that makes you sooo uncomfortable, because your beliefs do not match your actions.
I scorn those of you who "feel like a bad parent" because of something some anonymous person writes on the web. The thing is, you probably ARE a bad parent. Change your ways, or don't change them. But don't let writers/commentors make you "feel like a bad parent." That gives us way too much power.
What many of you want, the internet cannot offer. You want a cuddly, war-fuzzy board on which people praise you to the high heavens for deviant parenting, disguised as "doing what works for your family." This is the internet - hell, this is life! - and there will always be people who upset you, incite you, inflame you. Respond harshly to those people; do not whine about how bad they made you feel, and do not be effusive in your response. The worst characteristic on this board is the wrtiers'/commentors' constant effusiveness. Be firm and unapolegetic in your statements. If you cannot, the internet is really not an appropriate venue for you.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 11:57AM
queenoqueens said..."Be firm and unapologetic about your statements."
OK Mel, here goes....
Are you a cartoon character? Because you comment like one.
People who are constantly striving for what's best for their children are going to keep assessing situations as new information comes in. Even the most confident, expert parents will worry from time to time about what they're doing in raising their kids. There will always be questions in parenting. That is....if you are HUMAN.
So again, I ask, are you a cartoon character? Because if you are, my kid might like to watch you on the TV sometime.
2-28-2008 @ 12:45PM
maria said...Wow - you're harsh. It's tough for the rest of us when we're judged by the perfect, patient parents. Good grief. I'm glad to know your child helps with the housework and never ever watches TV. My first son never watched TV either - until he got a little brother with health issues. That hour of TV he got was a treat for him and some time for me to focus on one kid or fold some laundry. Now my 3 kids watch a few hours a week - almost never on a school day when they've gone to extended day - The limit is usually an hour of screen time - after their homework is done and their laundry put away. They'd like it if I sit with them and watch - but I'm usually being a bad mom and cleaning up the kitchen (dirty from making cranberry bread w/my son). You know - saying that we let our kids watch TV - doesn't necessarily mean our kids spend all day in front of the TV.
Wow - I just can't get past the tone. Usually I can ignore the you're a bad mom if you do this posts - but this really strikes a nerve.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 12:48PM
Mel said...Thank you queenoqueens! We need more of that on this board - direct, to the point, genuine. I don't really get the cartoon character comment; from the context of the rest of your comment I infer that it's an insult, but I don't see what's insulting about it. I guess you could be implying that I'm a caricature. Can you clarify what you mean? I think you might have a clever point that I'm overlooking, and I wanna be be'clevered! In answer to your question, I'd say that perception is reality and if you perceive me as a cartoon character, a cartoon character I am. Which one do you see me as? I don't really know of any cartoon characters except for Pluto, Daffy, and Mickey, so you might have to give an explanation along with a name.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 1:37PM
Lori said...Christina -- I just reread what I posted yesterday. Talk about a time when I should've deleted before sending! It's not a good excuse, but I was in a bad mood already and your post just hit an already frayed nerve. My apologies for the harsh words.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 2:07PM
queenoqueens said...Mel-
You asked, so here's the answer.
I asked if you were a cartoon character because your comments make you seem 2 dimensional. Not that of a 3 dimensional human that understands how another human can question if they're making a bad parenting choice.
As a 3D human myself, I can understand how this would happen. So I don't scorn others for being insecure, or call them bad parents. Reacting to a real or perceived crticism is human. At least that's what I read in "How to be a 3D Human: For Dummies".
In actuality, I think the odds are low that you are a cartoon. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you are someone who is pretty confident of themselves, and aren't sympathetic to human frailty. You think you can help by speaking harshly and that will "whip" people into shape and make them pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Sometimes "helpful words" are hard to recognize.
My gut reaction when I see someone comment that harshly, is that I'm dealing with a bully. So I say something back because a bully causes damage and needs to be stopped.
And on that armchair pscyhology note, I'm spent. That concludes the Q&A portion of today's session. Thank you and good night.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 6:16PM
Mel said...The underlying thrust of my original comment, and many of my past comments, is that most of this site's readership is insincere in its proclamation of "acceptance of what works for your family." Christina did not say that parents shouldn't allow television; she expressed surprised that some do allow it as much as they do, and she explained that so much tv wouldn't work for her family. That's all she said! I don't understand the firestorm of comments chiding her entry - it was merely a personal post expressing her particular stance on an issue. For that, everyone got their knickers in a twist. But - and this is major point - nobody would have been offended had she prefaced her words with a gushing disclaimer about how she's not judging because lo and behold all that matters is doing what works for your family and I don't want to offend but I'm just saying so please don't take offense etc. etc. ad infinitum. That's what I've noticed here: this readership *is* very accepting, but only if a thought is expressed after an effusive preface. This effusiveness is so off-putting to me; I've never encountered a group so uncomfortable with disagreement. I appreciate venues in which ideas are exchanged, even though sometimes discord results. That is apparently not the purpose of this venue, though. Most of the writers and readers here basically want to be told that what they're doing is right, and they throw a lavish pity party when anyone implies otherwise. Why in the world was everyone so angered by Christina's post? The only conceivable way this post could anger so many is that you're all suffering from cognitive dissonance, as I said before. If you let your kid watch a lot of tv (as I do) then fine, right? Because you're doing what works for your family, right? Unless...you do not believe that works for your family, but for some reason refuse to adapt it to better suit your family.
Your assessment of me as immune to "human frailty" was apt, considering my view of this site and its purpose. In many situations, I'm actutely aware of suffering. This site is not one of those situations. I truly don't see how "human frailty" plays any role in what we do here, which is basically trade stories with other parents. I truly don't see how Christina's explanation of her opinion on kids and tvs has any bearing on how someone "feels" as a parent. I happen to disagree with Christina; I watch a lot of tv as does my family. But Christina's post did not make me "feel bad" for that. I evaluted the statistics, mulled the basis for her objection, and concluded that I'm still cool with tv. I wasn't offended or put-upon; I approached the differing view rationally, and looked at it in light of what it was: a personal essay on a personal choice. This may mean, that, like you say, I don't comprehend "human frailty." Even so, I wish for the sake of all of the readers that they deburden yourselves of the giant chip that tugs at their souls.
2-28-2008 @ 8:13PM
queenoqueens said...I wasn't talking about Christina's post anymore. I was just saying you were unnecessarily rude and pointless based on the quote below.
You said: "I scorn those of you who "feel like a bad parent because of something some anonymous person writes on the web. The thing is, you probably ARE a bad parent."
Your comments have lots of conviction, but zero finesse when it comes to expressing it to other humans. Rock on with your bad self!
Are you an objectivist by any chance?
You are either an objectivist, or someone with a future in right wing radio. Good luck.
Reply