School district drops Mondays to save money
Categories: In The News, Education
What's the easiest way for public schools to save money? How about to not have school in the first place? That seems to be the growing trend, anyway. Our own local district will be shutting down on May 30th this year, a full two weeks earlier than usual. Last year, they took a three week winter break to save money on heating.But a Minnesota school district is taking it a step further and eliminating Mondays from their schedule. The move will cut 23 days from the school year and save the district $65,000, mostly in transportation costs. The district even says it won't be turning on the heat for those who use the buildings after hours. This is Minnesota, folks...bring a sweater. And a space heater.
I don't want to be a killjoy to all the kids and teens out there planning their future three-day weekends, but I'm not sure that these drastic sort of cuts are the best way, educationally at least, to cut costs. An hour tacked on to the end of each school day doesn't translate to 23 days of instruction. That said, cuts like these are what keeps school districts afloat and people employed. You know what they say about desperate measures, and for many school districts, these really are desperate times.
Recent Posts
- Reviews: What's New This Week (11/06/2009)
- Jim Carrey's "A Christmas Carol" Creepy in a Good Way (11/06/2009)
- Twitter Follow Friday on ParentDish! (11/06/2009)
- Babies Pick Up Mothers' Accents In The Womb (11/06/2009)
- Recall: Adventure Playsets (11/06/2009)

.jpg)
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
ame s 5-17-2008 @ 11:08PM
Our last day of school will be this Thursday. It is a half day. The busses run, but car riders can come in anytime during the day to pick up their report card.
Neither of my daughters has had homework for the past two weeks. My younger girl did have a weekly spelling test but on review words.
I think they should have closed school two weeks ago. They've done nothing except practice for the school musical, have field days, field trips, tie dye t-shirts, etc.
My older girl will be away from school most of the day tomorrow, going skating and to the park. She has awards day Tuesday at 9 a.m., then a picnic. Her grade is released after the picnic. Younger daughter has awards day Wednesday, then her grade is released from the day.
We're only going to school right now to fill the building, use some electricity, try to make kids eat what is left in the cafeteria freezers.
Reply
Jennifer 5-18-2008 @ 12:53AM
Wow! When does your school year start? We start the day after Labor Day and this year we run until the last week of June. I'm in NY. Our last few days here are fluff as well, pretty much once the report cards have been handed in to the office and formal teaching is done. We usually have what are called 'field days' or extra curricular days where all the teachers run activities, relays etc indoors and outdoors and the classes cycle through the activities, then there's a picnic for lunch. While it's not formal academics it does focus a lot on team building and school spirit.
When I was a kid though, I remembered how the last few days of school DRAAAAAAAAGGGGEEEED on forever...while it was fun in high school, it was horrible in elementary school. I can remember our teacher 'letting' us clean her room for her.
Jen
http://parents2parents.org
http://furoreandfrenzy.com
ame s 5-18-2008 @ 2:18PM
We are in TN. Our public schools open during the second week of August, when it is still 120 (I exaggerate slightly) degrees outside.
Ah, yes, I remember being in elementary and scrubbing down desks and chairs with Comet during the last week of school.
Jennifer 5-17-2008 @ 10:04PM
This actually isn't THAT new a trend. When I was in grad school 10 years ago now (God was it that long ago!) we were talking about schools in the midwest that were already moving to a 4 day a week schedule.
These days I personally think it makes a lot of sense. Where I live students may be bussed an hour or more to school with no other students to pick up in between. Not only do you save on the costs to bus students by switching to 4 days, there are no meals to prepare that day, the heat can be turned down, no lights to turn on, no computers or photocopiers running or any other type of equipment for that matter. There are no sports practices or sports bus runs. I don't think it equals a straight hour tacked on to the end of the day...closer to 1 1/2 but if the average school day is 6-7 hours long that time is easily made up in 4 days time. I think that other employers, not just schools should look at this model in an effort to save energy and gas for vehicles for both the company and it's employees. There's no reason that the office I work in couldn't accomplish it's work in 4 longer work days. I think as a country we really need to take a look at our work day model and see what works and what doesn't and what can be done to start actually making a difference toward conservation.
I imagine it's difficult to come up with a new schedule for many working parents, although if the entire community is making the shift then it certainly won't be a surprise to local employers. Many teachers in other districts that launched similar endeavors were happy to actually be able to attend the functions of their own children in other districts for the first time. For the first time they could volunteer in their child's classroom.
I really don't think this is the end of the world, or that education has become any more or less sound because of it.
Jen
http://parents2parents.org
http://furoreandfrenzy.com
Reply
LS 5-17-2008 @ 10:52PM
On one hand, I kind of agree with Jennifer - interesting, and perhaps very sound, way to save money, both for school and parents.
But on the other hand, I don't ever recall my taxes going down. Year after year, I pay higher and higher taxes to support the public school, even though my son attends private (so, in essence, I'm paying twice). I keep hearing how schools don't have money for supplies, building expenses, transportation or teacher's salaries. And yet, administration salaries continue to rise. Administrators make (and I'm making an educated guess here, based on several years in the public school system) on average, at least twice what teachers make. I'm sorry, but pushing a pencil and counting beans in no way deserves more pay than a person responsible for the education (and discipline, and everything else that goes with it) of 25+ students on a daily basis.
Bottom line - we wouldn't have to be messing with schedules if the finances were handled better. Need more proof? Look at the second post - two weeks of fluff? Honestly.
Reply
Jenni 5-18-2008 @ 12:27AM
If more of the money actually went to the schools and the children in the schools this wouldn't be an issue. The real trouble is that there are so many administrators that need their huge salaries and two secretaries (sorry administrative assistants) a piece. Things are done backwards. What are the actual needs to run a school versus wants.
Need: books, paper, pens, pencils, desks, blackboards (dry erase now a days), teacher
Strong need, but schools used to run without: principals, secretaries, health attendants (nurse)
Everything else is just fluff! Let's put the money back to what is needed, not wanted. When a school errects a million dollar statue in front of it, then claims they need more money; that's not smart spending.
Not going on Monday because the cost is too much? What about not taking a pay raise because the cost is too much Mr/Mrs Superintendent?
Reply
Jennifer 5-18-2008 @ 1:20AM
I agree with you Jenni and it would be nice to see an administrator in tough budgetary times say to the community "I really can't see myself taking a raise this year." But it doesn't usually happen that way ;)
To be fair though...really administrators don't have the power people think they do. Most of those people you listed, including the administrative assistants probably are required positions, and probably not required by the school administrator, but probably required at the state or federal levels. Perhaps they're guidance secretaries, or responsible for student data...I have no idea what their title would actually be, but it probably has a slash in the title because they do double duty as something else.
The administrators actually aren't that high on the totem pole. Students, then teachers, principals, superintendents (in some smalls schools this is the same person), Board of Education, State Education Department, and then US Education Department & No Child Left Behind. The US government actually gets to set a lot of the mandates, but doesn't actually put the funding in place to support them, they brush it off as not their problem. The State Education Department freaks out about the US mandates and adds their own interpretation of it and sets forth their own set of mandates. Administrators are looking at both sets of mandates, trying to figure out how on earth both are supposed to jive. Many of the mandates call for the creation of new programs and positions but the same amount of money is supplied as before, or the increase from last year to this year is just enough to make up for the cost of living increase. Keep in mind that every current employee will see a raise and increase in health insurance premiums each year, and that districts aren't given any extra money to compensate for gas that's more than $4 a gallon. And if food is expensive for the average person currently multiply that cost by what it would take feed a school full of children every day all year...even if it is sub-par cafeteria food.
Am I condoning the behavior of these administrators? A little bit. But I also agree with you as well. No one seems to remember that there' still pens and paper and supplies that need to be purchased. You're right, I think a lot of administrators right now could take a stand and refuse their raises to try to help the cause. I also know that in my local region right now a lot of teachers and staff workers are losing their jobs and budgets are pared down to the bare minimum because schools can't afford the current economy. Let's face it...many of us are having trouble in the current economy with more trouble projected.
I think things look bleak. But I think the problem is MUCH larger.
Jen
http://parents2parents.org
http//furoreandfrenzy.com
Jenni 5-18-2008 @ 12:49PM
Jennifer, I can understand why you think some of these positions are mandatory, but let me tell you my experience:
I work for a state funded agency for child care. We recieve the exact same money that school districts do. Of course, our contract is different, but any time we add a new position, it is not mandatory. We must have one site supervisor at each site (this is equal to a principal and it can be a teacher as well), only if we have more than one site, we must have a program director (someone to head up all the centers that are run).
Each teacher must be permited (similar to credentialled, just in child development rather than elementary or higher). We must run a lower ratio (1:8 adult to preschooler, 1:4 adult to toddler, I forget the infants as we don't have them but it's either 1:2 or 1:3)
Our enrollment coordinators (let's call them the secretaries) are extra and we know are a luxury; our assistant to the program director is also a luxury.
Our Executive Director (superintendant) is, I believe, mandated as is our board of directors.
Now, I can't imagine the mandate being much different for the schools. We get the same amount (around $30 a child) per day of enrollment as the schools. Because we have some fundraising sources and a food bank that helps support us, we are able to have these extra people. Most of our state funding goes into salaries; it doesn't matter how good your supplies are if you don't have a good teacher. As a matter of fact, the better the teacher the less supplies she will actually use/need in my experience.
Becky Scott 5-18-2008 @ 4:06AM
that would really suck for working parents, as they would then have to find daycare for that extra day. which, of course, saves the district money but costs the families more.
Reply