Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Susan Maushart: Digital Guilt: Mommy, Her iPad, and Me
Jim Medalia: Mentoring or Meddling - When Do You Stop Parenting?
Babies under 6 months should not drink water
Filed under: Newborns, Babies, Toddlers Preschoolers, Health & Safety: Babies, Nutrition: Health, Medical Conditions, Development/Milestones: Babies, Day Care & Education, Feeding & Sleeping, Baby-sitting, Research Reveals: Babies, Nutrition: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Babies, Health & Safety: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Development: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Behavior: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Activities: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Gear Guides: Babies, Gear Guides: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Research Reveals: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Toddlers & Preschoolers
While the list of foods that could harm or even kill a baby continues to grow and make one wonder how earlier generations ever survived, another no-no has been added to the list: water.
Thirsty babies under six months of age should not be given water. Due to the dangerous combination of a strong sucking reflex, and immature kidneys, it's easy for an infant to take in too much water and throw off the body's sodium level enough to affect brain activity.
To make matters even worse, the first signs of water intoxication in infants are the same as a baby just having a cranky day: irritability, drowsiness and other mental changes. Other symptoms include low body temperature (generally 97 degrees or less), puffiness or swelling in the face, and seizures. Because the early signs are easily overlooked, seizures are generally a parent's first real indication something is wrong. However with prompt medical attention, they should not cause lasting damage.
As a cost-cutting measure, it might be tempting dilute formula in order to make those expensive cans last longer, but that short changes the child of necessary calories and nutrients and increases water intake.
I wondered if swimming lessons could also cause water intoxication in babies. I took my sons to the beginner Red Cross classes, which were really more of a water playgroup than actual lessons. Parents held the baby in the pool and we sang songs and splashed their little hands and feet and tried not to die of embarrassment from showing our post partum bodies in swimsuits, but it does seem like a quick dunk underwater was involved. (However, the embarrassment over the bathing suit issue is clouding my memory.)
According to The American Academy of Pediatrics, if you're willing to squeeze into that suit, baby swim lessons are fine. The AAP policy on swimming and infants is:
Until more clear-cut scientific evidence exists on the effects of infant and toddler aquatic programs, the AAP recommends the following:
- Children are generally not developmentally ready for formal swimming lessons until after their fourth birthday.
- Aquatic programs for infants and toddlers should not be promoted as a way to decrease the risk of drowning.
- Parents should not feel secure that their child is safe in water or safe from drowning after participation in such programs.
- Whenever infants and toddlers are in or around water, an adult should be within an arm's length, providing "touch supervision."
- All aquatic programs should include information on the cognitive and motor limitations of infants and toddlers, the inherent risks of water, the strategies for prevention of drowning, and the role of adults in supervising and monitoring the safety of children in and around water.
- Hypothermia, water intoxication, and communicable diseases can be prevented by following existing medical guidelines and do not preclude infants and toddlers from participating in otherwise appropriate aquatic experience programs.
- Pediatricians should support data collection, drowning prevention research, and legislation aimed at reducing the risk of drowning in young children in and around water
YourVoice
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- When A father does not visit his children because the new girlfriend has said "it's me or the kids"...how can the children be protected
- Protect our children
- How can I help my 20 yr old son deal with being an unexpected father. He never wanted kids. I have known that for years. But accidents happen. Condoms...












ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
5-22-2008 @ 2:57PM
Jessica said...Well, what do they recommend when you have a terribly sick infant, running high fevers, major diarrhea off of antibiotics, who refuses everything BUT water. She refused pedialyte.....we even tried sugar-free jello. I guess there isn't a problem with water when they're already dehydrated. Until she was over a year, that was the only time she got water.
Oh, but I disagree with the rec on no swimming lessons or water survival classes. I live in FL and drowning is a HUGE risk here. We started ISR drowning prevention classes at 1.5 and she has done them every year since. She can swim. She isn't 4. They teach sensory-motor skills and just have refresher courses every season, so that the child can learn to accomodate for the change in their physique. I disagree strongly with not teaching drowning prevention in a state like fl where there are ponds, lakes, pools, and the ocean around every corner.
Reply
5-22-2008 @ 3:09PM
Monica said...I don't think they are saying that you shouldn't teach the skills, just that they shouldn't be promoted as "drowning prevention" to prevent parents from believing that their child is capable in water and therefore needs no supervision.
5-22-2008 @ 5:58PM
Trish C said...I think they recommend breastfeeding. I realize that doesn't help if you're feeding formula, or if your baby is so sick she won't even breastfeed.
5-23-2008 @ 2:22AM
Tamyu said...I think this is more directed to those parents who don`t think anything of giving their babies full bottles of water between feedings to keep the baby quiet. I think it`s particularly a problem with parents who want to stick to their (almost always bottle) feeding schedule no matter what.
Babies don`t really get thirsty - only hungry. So they will try very hard to fill their stomachs with whatever they are given. If it`s water, it`s absorbed right away and they stay hungry... So will drink more and more in an attempt to get full.
It isn`t so much that water itself is the culprit - it`s more a lack of knowledge. If you don`t know too much water can hurt your baby you are far more likely to give it to them... After all, it`s easy to think "It`s only water." and give them too much.
Reply
5-27-2008 @ 11:21PM
Back2Nature said...For me, I rely on the original design. How would primitive people feed their baby with water? I mean, without milk bottle, nice spoon, many of our very used to modern aka man-made stuffs, and most importantly clean water, I bet babies back then has only one food source: breast milk.
Although we don't know too clearly all details of the original design, I think we should know enough not to go against it in trying to improve our comfort.
Reply