Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Franne Golde and Syd Fox: Love More, Fear Less: A Mother and Her…
Dr. Peggy Drexler: The Breadwinner Complex: Are Women Apologizing For…
Kidman won't sell baby photos
Filed under: Newborns, Toddlers Preschoolers, Your Pregnancy, Work Life, Health & Safety: Babies, Development/Milestones: Babies, Celeb Kids, Life & Style, Celeb Parents, Rumors, In The News, Media, Day Care & Education, That's Entertainment, Feeding & Sleeping, Baby-sitting, Research Reveals: Babies, Nutrition: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Babies, Health & Safety: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Development: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Behavior: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Activities: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Gear Guides: Babies, Gear Guides: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Research Reveals: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Toddlers & Preschoolers

Nicole Kidman may be debuting pics of her new baby soon, but if she does so, it won't be for cash. The Oscar winner and her country music star husband, Keith Urban, recently welcomed Sunday Rose into the world. According to reports, they've been debating about whether to share their joy in picture format.
According to The Sydney Morning Herald, if they do release pics, it won't be for a lot of money. In fact, the Australian paper is reporting, if pictures are released it will be for free.
As we all know, the Jolie-Pitt twins pictures will be worth between $15 and $20 million. The money has reportedly been earmarked for charity. Hollywood stars have had a long tradition of selling pictures of their children to publications like People and OK Magazine for hefty sums. Nice to see the Kidman Urban tribe isn't willing to share their joy only if there's payment involved.
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO THE ANSWER BY DEFENDANTS ______________________________. Plaintiff, ________________________ h...
- Copyright royaly board understanding building a radio or tv (song sound good got your own radio)?
- Why would the defendant file an acknowledgment of service instead of a defence?










ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
7-15-2008 @ 5:57PM
Jan Bay said..."Nice to see the Kidman Urban tribe isn't willing to share their joy only if there's payment involved."
Is this statement to say that Nicole Kidman Urban and Keith Urban will not ACCEPT money for the pictures of the baby or that there has not been much money OFFERED from the newspapers or magazines? There is a difference.
What's wrong with celebrities taking money from the corporations and funneling into a worthy charity if they are going to make the pictures public anyway?
Jan from http://www.unique-baby-gear-ideas.com/
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 10:01AM
Lisa said...I don't see a problem with selling photos. They only have value because the idiot-masses care to see them. Those same people will be throwing money at mag publishers to purchase the issue with the photos whether the publisher pays for the photos or not.
Reply
7-27-2008 @ 12:40AM
Ku said...If celebrities want to sell their baby photos for charity I am all for it. Honestly, if I could avoid my baby have his photo in the paper I would but I understand why they do it. It's to keep the paparazzi at bay. Hey if they want to do it for free, good for them is all I have to say. It's a might refreshing... hoping it will last that is.
Reply