Disney underpants cause a stir

I wonder what they will be selling for on Ebay?

Reply

Are you serious?! they are on a LITTLE GIRL'S underwear! who the hell is going to look there except her caregivers. And I'm sure she's not going to think dive in means what you people are thinking. It's amazing how people make a fuss out of something so small ...

Reply

I can understand both sides of this, as a beliver I know that there or ADULTS that will get a tingle when seeing a little girl wearing this, and outher sexualy charged panties, what most people don't seem to realize is most pedophiles or daddys, mommies, uncles, aunts, and grandparents. This is sad but fact, sick as it may be. Also children are more awear now, both boys and girls are doing it at 9 and 10 years of age now, and talking sooner. These are the times we live in.
On the outher hand, some people make way to much out of nothing and that is in all arenas, sex, religion, race, politics.

I do wonder about Disney, it being a childs venue, take a look at Treck the thired? you know the green monster (in my day fairytales) now the hero?. Cursing, dragqueen(man in dress)where dose this come from, I do not remember a dragqueen in any fairytail that was told to me or I told any of my children. Some sick person or persons in a place of power had to come up with and allow it to to be.

That is why I thank God for those over sensitive people that cry out so we the people are awear one way or the other.

Reply

This is crap, what is this world coming too? That is a saying that is popular for high school musical, printed on the undies... only dirty minded people would think something more of what it really is. First of all, a 7 year old shouldn't know anything about "diving in". I would NEVER say to a partner "Dive In" so why is GRANDMA being so smutty minded. Now that she brought this to my attention, I am looking at in a distasteful way, prior to that; I wouldn't have paid it any mind. Seek help gramps!

Reply

Years ago, I saw a 4th grade girl wearing a t-shirt at school, and it had open hands designs on the lower part, with fingers pointing downward. Above it, in big letters was "Can't Touch This," apparently a reference to the MC Hammer hit in the 80s, but it had an obvious sexual innuendo. It was definitely inappropriate, and hopefully the girl had to change shirts at school later that day.

Reply

Oh, honestly.

Just because you people are desperate for money if not attention doesn't mean you have to sue someone because you tried to find something innapropriate about some little kid's undies.

Oh no! Barney's a dinosaur! He wears no clothes! That's not something good for my children to learn!

Is that what's coming next? Someone making a fuss because Barney doesn't wear any clothes? *rolls eyes* A seven-year-old isn't going to make the connection, morons.

Disney's already got a bad rep because of the original Little Mermaid cover (a male private part was shown on the cover), a word written in the stars and dust in the Lion King, a topless woman in The Rescuers, Jessica Rabbit showing HER Rabbit in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?", among other things. Give 'em a break, people! Geeze.

-R.E. Ravens

Reply

This reminds me of the lady who sued McDonalds because it did not say "caution: hot" on the coffee container. Like the person drinking it doesn't know it's hot coffee,duh??
So, is this woman looking to sue because she has a dirty mind?
I'm sure a child thought only of a swimming pool and nothing else. Besides, I don't think any adult should be reading her underwear.
I'm sure Disney didn't want that thought to come across and was only thinking in terms of a pool.

Reply

Do not see the big deal here. A child has no idea this has connotations. They just think they're cool looking or pretty. And who is going to see them anyway other than the kid and immediate family? Lighten up!

Reply

Walt is rolling over in his grave at what they're doing. . .really a shame

Reply

I really think it is really the "people" who have "dirty" minds that will think anything about it...otherwise it's a picture of a swimming pool implied to basically "dive in" to have fun........

Reply

I think people who are thinking about sexual things for a seven year old ought to have their Brains checked.Guaranteed that isn;t a Good saying on anyones Pants.why do we have to write on Pants now why not put little animal Pictures. Walr Disney was a wonderful Decent Man and he would be upset if he saw what your doing to his name.

Reply

I think some of you are missing the point. Yes, I think of a pool when I read that too, however you can't ignore the fact that the very stir these knickers are causing on this site prove they should be removed from shelves. Someone in Disney design needs to be reassigned to something harmless, like the unemployment line.

Reply

ya'll need to grow up the only one who is seeing this as a bad thing is ya'll i am pretty sure that little girl didn't look at it the way your implying
and who is going to be seeing her panties at that age to take it out of context. so seriously grow up people.

Reply

Ok, choice number 3 probably said something like, "It doesn't matter what is written on the undies, it was geared toward the movie". That was MY choice! I don't think Disney was implying that 7 year old girls should have anybody "diving" into their undies. Desperate people who are looking to make money off of a lawsuit will always go to the extreme to find something they can sue or or make an issue of. THIS is just stupid. Although I haven't SEEN the new Disney movie, I am certain it is a phrase that is key in the movie. Some people are so narrow minded. If you are looking for some type of sexual connotation you can find one. Does it make Disney liable? NO! If you don't like your daughter wearing undies that say that, take them back to the store, get a refund, and buy her undies that say nothing at all.

Reply

it gets so tiresome people always think the worst of the simplest words and actions when they need to look at the bigger picture. maybe disney corp. made a mistake. get over it thank u for being diligent now try reading info before judging. that is what is wrong now. all the crap people have in their minds dont like it dont seeit , dont buy it, dont listen to it . be a cave dweller . most kids that age unless exposed to a lot of stuff dont even notice everything their clothes say just the cool colors or someone else has them . did u tell your child what u thought it meant?. bet not. cause then u might give them real info on what and why u thought it meant whatever u thought .

Reply

hi im 10 years old and i know i shouldnt really be talking about this but i think parents can get sooooo confused on these things.now bigbry said that if a 10 year old boy was looking at them he wouldnt know what they meant.but a 10 year old boy would know what it meant because im a 10 year old and i know it seems impossible for a 10 year old to know what it means but we know.kids in my grade are really annoying some people make jokes about sex.and any 10 year old(other than children of over protective parents)would know what it meant.im not lying im just telling the truth.i cant believe the people who made those wouldnt think this would cause an uproar i think the person who came up with the idea to put thiese words on them was really trying to stir things up and get some attention for disney.well bye and thanks for reading my comment

Reply

It may be me-- and I am the parent of a girl... I see no harm in words written on a seven yo's underwear. I mean REALLY-- does a kid that little know what it means, and REALLY is a pedophile going to go after this girl with his see through clothes detector to identify which kid to attack. I think not- and this complaint is really just as silly

Reply