FDA finds BPA OK
Filed under: Newborns, Babies, Health & Safety: Babies, Nutrition: Health, Resources, In The News, Going Green, Mealtime, Expert Advice: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Nutrition: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Feeding & Sleeping, Research Reveals: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Gear Guides: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Gear Guides: Babies, Activities: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Behavior: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Development: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Health & Safety: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Babies, Research Reveals: Babies, Toddlers Preschoolers, Development/Milestones: Babies, Day Care & Education, Baby-sitting
In a draft report recently issued, the Federal Drug Administration has concluded that Bisphenol A is safe --at least when used in food containers. Commonly known as BPA to consumers, the chemical can be found in all sorts of children's products as well as cars, plastic food containers and lining aluminum cans.
This most recent study was one of two funded by the industry itself. Gee, of course any study funded by the industry that stands to make money off it is going to come out with data supporting a chemical's safety. There rationale is that people are exposed to so little of it that it won't do them harm. In other studies BPA has been found in 93% of testees' urine and has been known to cause cancer and behavioral disorders in lab animals. The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) supports the findings as well.
Opponents of the decision say the study agencies don't have enough data to support their findings that BPA is safe. The country of Canada has banned the use of BPA and products containing the chemical, and national retail chain giants Wal-Mart and Toys R Us are set to remove all children's merchandise containing the chemical from their shelves as of January 2009.
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
- At the internal revenue service it is not difficult to identify the inventor of a product or service that"s what create's the agency
- A motion to dismiss filed; is also using a motion to avoid perjury(having to testify under oath) correct?
- Pro-se not considered a attorney no bar# only self representation ,im i at a disadvantage based on non- affilation?