Banned Book Week starts September 26th
Categories: Kids 5-7, Kids 8-11, Teens & tweens, Education, Religion & spirituality
When I was a sophomore in high school, my 70-year-old literature teacher sat down on the edge of her desk, curled her fingers -- ruined by years of arthritis -- together and stared at us all. Then she swore -- one very bad word (to us), very loud and clear. We all nearly fell out of our seats. Then she said it again, and again, and again, while we looked around wildly at each other, wondering what in the world was going on."There," she said. "Now we've all heard it and had our giggle over it. In the book we're about to start, you'll see it several more times. It's just a word, now get over it." The book? The Catcher in the Rye.
She was right. By the time we came across that word in the book, it was fine. We were able to read, sometimes out loud, without squirming uncomfortably and get acquainted with this important book. (She also became one of the most respected teachers in our school's memory, purely for her refreshing honesty and refusal to coddle us.) But The Catcher in the Rye commonly appears on "most challenged" book lists. If book banners had gotten their way, we'd have never had a chance to read it in the first place.
September 26 starts Banned Books Week, the week when the American Library Association celebrates the freedom to read. There are some who are constantly challenging that freedom, fingering books like Maya Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, The Color Purple by Alice Walker, Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye, and Phillip Pullman's The Golden Compass, simply because they don't agree with the religious content. Even the Republican VP nominee Sarah Palin, has been accused of inquiring about challenging books in her own town's public library. Captain Underpants and Harry Potter, two wildly popular series that have kids returning for more, more, more have also been challenged, as well as Shel Silverstein's beloved collection of children's poetry A Light in the Attic.
As a teacher who is married to a librarian, I know there will never be a book in this house that a child is not allowed to read (allowing for age appropriateness, of course). There may be books that we, as parents, read first, or read alongside, where we pay close attention and discuss themes and answer questions. But it's hard for me to understand how we can raise educated children who are open-minded to the world at large if we don't give them access to books and materials that challenge them.
Want to learn more? Here are the most frequently challenged books of 2007, and the most challenged books of the 21st century, What about you? Do you think there are certain books that should be banned from your public library? And would you let your child read books off the banned book list?
Recent Posts
- Weekend Fun and Games (7/03/2009)
- Kids and Extracurriculars - When Do You Let Them Quit? (7/03/2009)
- Twitter Follow Friday on ParentDish! (7/03/2009)
- Lush Lashes (7/03/2009)
- Abigail Breslin Makes $13 a Week (7/03/2009)















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Glenda 9-10-2008 @ 4:17PM
Bethany Sanders, as far as should ANY book be banned? Absolutely not! Never, this should not even be up for discussion in any library, town or state. As for you throwing in VP nominee Palin's name into your "story"? Your ass should be banned from authoring articles not related to politics. Shame on you and shame on your editor for allowing it.
Reply
brokemom 9-13-2008 @ 12:18AM
Well said, Glenda!
Karen 9-10-2008 @ 5:08PM
Well of course, the key here is age appropriateness. I think most books are challenged because children have access to them. What you may find appropriate for your child, I may not find appropriate for mine.
I tend to limit books that challenge my religious beliefs, although now, as my daughter gets older, I'm more inclined to read along side her than keep her from readings something. I also do not want her reading things that have descriptions of extrememly violent actions. I restrict books that have sex described from an emotional point of view, but don't freak out on books that have characters that have had sex, have children out of wedlock etc.
So, in schools, I'd rather not have these types of books. My daughter was given a list of books to choose from over the summer and I kept her from reading books that dealt with a child that cut himself and another that had a parent physically attracted to her son which forced him to run away and then had graphic sexual descriptions later in the book. I bought 24 books, read them first, and set 4 aside for later. She is 11. I was disappointed that some of these books were suggested for her by the school. Granted, she is an an advanced/gifted classes so many of these books were generally assigned for high school students, but she still has the emotional development of an 11 year old child.
I have HUGE issues with banning books from adults, but would rather err on the side of caution when it comes to books for children. There are TONS of great books out there. And while I have no problem with Catcher in the Rye, if my child didn't read it, and read other worthy books, I wouldn't freak out. She could always read it as an adult.
Reply
Holly 9-14-2008 @ 4:53PM
As a 6th grade teacher and gifted/talented coordinator, I am saddened by this booklist your daughter was given. Teachers and schools have no business suggesting inappropriate books for 11 year olds and one of the biggest challenges in gifted education for this age group is finding challanging books students haven't read before that are also appropriate. I always tell my students' parents to read the books before giving them to their child even though I have previewed each one with a very critical eye. The bottom line is that a book does NOT have to be edgy or controversial to be challanging to a gifted 11 year old. I have my students read classics (the appropriate ones). They are reluctant at first, but the books are harder, and therefore more interesting and my students always end up loving them!