Does having it all make Sarah Palin more like us?
Filed under: In The News, Mommy Wars

Welcome to Red Mom Blue Mom, ParentDish's special coverage of the 2008 Presidential election. Each Tuesday through November 4, columnists Rachel Campos-Duffy (Red Mom) and Ada Calhoun (Blue Mom) will take on issues relevant to parents on both sides of the aisle. You can find past Red Mom/Blue Mom posts here.
Blue Mom: Sarah Palin -- She's not like us
By Ada Calhoun
The good news is we're popular. Women who are balancing career and family and worried about the tanking economy are this year's "security moms." Time magazine is calling us "Maxed-Out Moms" and saying we'll be deciding the election. Go, us!The bad news is John McCain thinks he can woo us with a "Type A, antiabortion, Christian Stepford wife in a 'sexy librarian' costume," in the words of Salon.com's Cintra Wilson. Sarah Palin is George Bush in pumps. She thinks creationism should be taught alongside evolution and that raped women should be denied abortions (and pay for their own rape kits).
The worse news: McCain's cynical bid for our attention has been working. And rather than focusing on Palin's political incompetence, we've been distracted by condescending questions you would never see if she were a man (and that are 100% projections of our own tough choices), like this one from Reuters:
"Should a 44-year-old mother of five, including a newborn with special needs and a pregnant teenager, take on a job that will keep her away from her home for much of the next two months to eight years?" The New York Times called these discussions "Mommy Wars: Special Campaign Edition."
It's a ridiculous conversation to even entertain. The truth is, we have far more in common with Barack and Michelle, who only recently paid off their student loan debt, than with Todd and Sarah, whose high-paying jobs allow them what appears to be infinite vacation time in which to gut moose and shoot wolves from planes
Let's stop worrying about her family. She can afford babysitting and sick days. Thanks to what Slate describes as "Alaska's large negative income tax (and outsize share of federal pork)," the Palins are living it up on two six-figure incomes.
Sarah Palin has it all, in the traditional sense: the hunky husband, the passel of kids, the high-power job, the financial security, the silk Valentino jackets. She's Diane Keaton in Baby Boom meets Melanie Griffith in Working Girl. Her family is living the dream.
But what about our families? Sarah Palin may be like us in certain ways. Most of us acquired our foreign policy expertise from sixth-grade global studies, for example. But judging by her right-of-Bush positions on the issues, she doesn't appear to have any intention of sharing the wealth. Every plank of the McCain-Palin platform shows that she's far from one of the girls.
Red Mom: Along comes Sarah
By Rachel Campos-Duffy
During one of the funnier moments in the Democrat primary, Barack Obama mocked Hillary's attempt to bond with Pennsylvania voters with childhood stories about hunting with her grandfather: "She's talking like she's Annie Oakley!" Obama laughed. Who could have predicted that five short months later an authentic Alaskan Annie Oakley, with pioneer-woman skills, down-home values, and sexy eyewear would shake up the race and our notions of successful motherhood. On the left and right, much of the fascination with Sarah Palin has to do with her having seemingly accomplished the elusive female trifecta: big career, great marriage, and a brood of five kids ranging from 18 years of age to 4 months. Did I mention that she was able to hide her latest pregnancy well into her sixth month, thanks to tight abs? Just as women were giving up on being super-mom, and well-educated Gen Xers began dropping out of the work force to explore a more balanced approach to work and family ("I can have it all, just not all at the same time"), along comes Sarah. She's the successful governor of America's largest and most macho state, yet she's the most unabashed and overtly maternal politician our nation has ever seen.
How does she do it? Does she really have it all? Yes, she does have it all, but this type of high-level multi-tasking is never simple and the results are always complicated and sometimes messy, as the tabloids and her critics ceaselessly remind us.
But while her over-achiever approach to career and fertility may not be for you (as a fellow mother of five, I get exhausted just thinking about it), there is still plenty to learn and admire from how well she has managed to put it all together. The first and most important part of her success is a supportive husband. She has also chosen to live close to her extended family and believes teenagers need to pull their weight in the family (amen to that one!). Following the birth of her son Trig, Todd, not a nanny, came with her to the office to help out. As the mayor and then governor, Sarah keeps a baby swing and crib at the office and she has been known to nurse discreetly during meetings.
Not every woman is blessed with these options, but when a woman who can DOES, it says something about her priorities. Besides, with an 80% approval rating, the highest of any U.S. governor, who can credibly say she is neglecting her professional duties?
What impresses me most about Sarah Palin is the fact that she stood by her pro-life values when she found out that only one year into first term as governor she was pregnant with a Downs Syndrome baby. It was an unplanned pregnancy and she knew that that following through with it would raise serious questions about her ability to perform as governor and expose her to harsh and hurtful criticisms about her mothering. While other women may have chosen an easier road, she did not. Instead of compromising her principles for the sake of convenience or political expediency, she found creative and cooperative ways to make it work. Not a bad credential for a future VP!
| Yes - she understands what's important to moms. | |
|---|---|
| No - her political views are nothing like mine. | |
| It's not relevant to her candidacy; only her qualifications are. |










ReaderComments (Page 1 of 2)
9-23-2008 @ 8:54AM
SKL said...OK, I don't even have the patience to read this whole thing - like we haven't already beaten Sarah Palin to death here. But I have to call the "blue mom" out on a new and ridiculous statement that I've never seen before.
Barack Obama is poor all of a sudden, and Sarah Palin is rich?
If you really think Barack Obama's finances are anything you can relate to, you obviously have no business writing this column, because his multi-million dollar annual earnings are basic public information.
Not that I'm surprised ParentDish would pay just anyone to slam Sarah Palin.
Interesting that there has not been a single word on this site about Joe Biden. Not a single word. Women are indeed their own worst enemies.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 9:09AM
heather said...Yes, I can see you are both addressing the "real issues" as deep as any news anchor. Give me a break abortion is a non-issue, it's not going anywhere so let's stop talking about it period. I can see how I'm supposed to relate to Barak and Michelle, with him educated at Harvard and all after all they do only make about $400,000 a year. Poor Michelle says she can't see to make ends meet sometimes...boo hoo! Let's not even go into Sarah Palin, there's no need to even discuss her it's already been said. Please stop with the Obama for the small man it's complete and total b.s. just as it is for the other side. I think that every person in this country should be scared because if these four are the best we have to offer you all better hold onto your birkenstocks or loafers depending which side you fall on.
Reply
9-29-2008 @ 2:16AM
slimgirlmichigan said...Thank you! I could not agree with you more!!
9-23-2008 @ 9:11AM
heather said...Oh, and one more thing if Michelle and Obama just paid off their college loans after earning as much as they do, maybe he wouldn't be the best person for the economy.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 11:50AM
Joy said...I really agree with Heather and SKL. This subject has been talked to death on this site. Every Tue till the election. YUCK!! Maybe we should all put together food baskets for the Obams's so they don't go hungry.
9-23-2008 @ 9:27AM
rebecca Biernesser said...Someone please tell me why i clicked on the link and attempted to read both articles????? It's the dame ole crap and it's going to bring the same opinions as the other acticles written about both...
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 9:37AM
CommaMomma said...It is disingenuous to characterize the Obamas as more economically similar to the average American than the Palins. Michelle Obama made a very nice salary working as an attorney and if Barack Obama wasn't able to pay off his student loans as quickly as he would have liked, it's because he chose to take a less lucrative job than he could have after graduating from law school at Harvard. While the Palin's jobs pay well, living expenses in Alaska are also significantly higher than the rest of the country, so they aren't as lucrative as they might sound.
All that being said, I don't really care which candidate is most like me. I care which candidate most closely aligns with my philosophy on the role of government and which candidate has demonstrated the ability to think independently and demonstrate leadership, even when their decisions are criticized.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 9:56AM
EK said...Rachel-do you read the newspaper? Please open your eyes. Sarah Palin's political decisions are questionable at best. Yesterday the news revealed her support of charging women for rape test kits in her hometown of Wasilla, while she was Mayor. I'll say it again...charging women $1000 for a rape test kit, and she supported it. Why and how do you even support this woman? Let's not even get into her bending the truth about the bridge to nowhere, and coming up with the brilliant idea of putting the federal budget online for everyone to see--which Obama supported earlier this year and is available ALREADY at usaspending.gov.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 2:31PM
Sandyone said...Wanna talk about crappy support of indefensible positions? How about how Obama voted that it would be ok for babies who survived abortions (they're babies once they're out of the woman's body, you know) to be denied medical care and even deliberately killed by suffocation or medical means. Now, there's a man with a conscience and a big heart.
I'm off to research the rape kit charge. Hadn't heard that one, yet.
10-04-2008 @ 7:37PM
S23 said...Sorry, but I think you have your facts mixed up. There has been NO CHARGE for rape kits....If you can prove otherwise, please provide information....Thank you.
9-23-2008 @ 9:59AM
JoAnn said...Someone above asked why we aren't talking about Joe Biden. Good question!!
I'll tell you why- because we're too busy falling all over ourselves and fawning over Sarah Palin's "sexy eyewear and silk valentino jackets". Honestly- I'm sick of it. Should the fact that her stylist has a great fashion sense be a reason I vote for McCain? Because I honestly don't know if that would qualify her to be the next president if that old Coot McCain kicks the bucket.
She's a working mom. Cool. She's great with guns and has a "down home" sensibiity. Awesome. Her husband is so HOT!! Fantastic! So does the woman who sits next to me here in my office. I'm certainly not going to write her in on the ticket.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 10:45AM
Shann said...I agree with some of you above... why are we comparing Palin to Obama...
The real debate should be between MCCAIN and Obama. They are the one's on the top of the ticket.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 11:32AM
julie said...People are comparing Palin to Obama because many realize that McCain is very old with health issues, and may not live through the entire term. Every time I see him talking, he seems like a feeble old man....I think his health issues over the years have aged him beyond his chronilogical age. So, as scary as it may seem, voting for McCain is also a vote for Palin as president. God help our country if that happens.
And Palin doesn't have it all. Let's get real, she is not the typical working mom and I'm sick of people making her out to be "just like us." I get to go home at 5:00. I get to take sick days to take care of my children. I get to leave work to pick my kids up from school if needed. As President, what if she's dealing with a major crisis? She's not going to be able to leave at the drop of a pin and leave work for later. And you know what, even with my flexibility at work, I don't have it all. I miss out on a lot of my children's lives because I'm not there for 8 hours a day. Let's stop kidding ourselves that Palin is super mom. I fully buy into the notion that you can have it all, but not at the same time. I honestly feel bad for Palin's children, especially the baby. When does he get real quality time to bond with mom? She's traveling the country nonstop right now campaigning.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 12:24PM
LS said...Frankly, if we're going to compare Palin with Obama, then we should be comparing Biden with McCain. Because, sad to say, there are enough nutcases out there who may be gunning for Obama if he's elected.
This should be a situation where we look at each candidate, and at the team as a whole, and decide based on issues and experience. I feel that while we've been scrutinizing Mrs. Palin's experience with a microscope, Obama's "experience" has been completely ignored. Further, I've heard *nothing* about Biden here, and pitifully little in the mass media.
9-23-2008 @ 12:07PM
Jennifer said...So I am supposed to vote for McCain/Palin because Palin is a good multi-tasker? What about the fact that she lies about what she has accomplished in office? And call me a bit old-fashioned but I have trouble getting behind a woman who put her child's life in jeopardy by boarding a plane AFTER she went into labor (I mean if she is willing to take that kind of risk with her unborn child's life just what kind of risk would she be willing to take with mine?)
What needs to happen is that voters need to take a good, hard look at the REAL issues surrounding this election. Do some research and see where the candidates stand and what their respective backgounds on each issue are. Then make an INFORMED choice about who to vote for (or who to not vote for, however you choose to look at it.)
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 2:31PM
Sandyone said...I suspect that it's the issues that have people running off on tangents. People who lean to the right and agree with some or many of Palin's political views tend to rah-rah the Super Mom thing. People who lean left and disagree with some or many of Palin's views are all over the "she's a crappy mom, how can we trust her?" or "she's hot...she can't lead" stories.
For this single issue voter, it was quite refreshing to see a pro-life politician tagged for the VP slot. It was inspiring to see that she not only talks the talk, but walks the walk...twice in one year. Kind of destroys the "white-haired old men shouldn't tell me what to do with my baby" argument.
9-23-2008 @ 12:26PM
Stefania said...Rachel, I've had your number ever since Real World SF when you'd hook-up with Puck then go to mass the next day to make it all better. Please save the hypocrisy for reality tv. Your attempts at punditry would much more tolerable coming from a more credible person. We are ALL pro-life, it's just that some of us are pro-letting women choose what is best for their lives or their bodies and others are anti-letting women choose what is best for their lives or their bodies. It must frustrate the hell out of fundamentalists and uber-Catholics like you that some women are happily able to leave religion and god completely out of the decision-making process. Secondly, to imply that a woman who chooses abortion makes the "easier" choice really is disrespectful to women who have had to face some very tough decisions.
I'd love to see you get off the Palin's Perfect Motherhood schtick (because her family values--parading a pregnant teen daughter and her fake boyfriend out in front of the world, so far not instilling the desire to go to college in her two oldest children among a host of other things--do not match with mine) and let's talk about the fact that she's an intellectual lightweight with zero foreign policy skills who is also apparently a habitual liar. She spreads untruths that have been debunked by independent sources. She hires her highschool BFF's to do jobs they aren't qualified for while her husband helps to strong-arm their enemies out of jobs. Let's talk about the fact that she displayed such a disregard for learning about the rest of the world that she didn't even bother to get a passport until last year. Who isn't curious about seeing the pyramids or the Eiffel Tower or the the Great Wall or a rainforest or just plain meeting with and interacting with people different than you. Say what you want about about her fabulous! pregnancy-hiding! abs! (yeah, cuz that's the right priority to focus on while pg), but that woman is a MAC-Spice-wearing dolt and everyone knows it. John McCain knows it, the GOP knows it--everyone knows why she was picked.
I'd like to see your next post compare McCain and Obama on the ISSUES and let's leave the "distractions" by the way side. Because that's all she is.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 1:10PM
Nicola said...Stefania, you took the words right out of my mouth. Thanks for saving this multitasking momma some time at work today. No need to type it all out again. What she said!
9-23-2008 @ 2:03PM
Michelle said...ummm. . . .I don't have a passport. Does that mean I'm uninterested in learning about the rest of the world? Just because I haven't had the opportunity to travel the world as yet, doesn't mean I haven't educated myself on the pyramids or the Eiffel Tower, granted, not through first-hand experience.
I'd love to see everyone lay off the personal shit and discuss the ACTUAL issues. Those are what shoud be determining our elections. Not whether a candidate has had a passport his/her entire life, or whether they paid off their student loans 10 years ago or 10 mos ago. Because, frankly, I don't give a flying fig. I want to know what the candidate is going to do for my family and this country.
9-27-2008 @ 7:48PM
justjojo said...Stefania,
You are freaking awesome!!!! I read this dribble that Rachel writes here and get physically ill and feel compelled to sit down and write long replies to her crap here and just don't have the time. So thank you for doing it and doing it with such skill and finesse. You are a great example of a thinking, discerning, multi-tasking woman. Awesome! You've impressed me so much I'm sending you cyber-hugs and kisses!
xoxo
justjojo