Boy suspended over anti-Obama tshirt
Filed under: Tweens, Teens, Day Care & Education
With only 40 days left until the 2008 Presidential election, there's no doubt that things are heating up. As the candidates battle it out on the main stage, conversations at home are bound to turn to politics. Parents, of course, have a huge influence over a child's developing political leanings. And parents who feel strongly about an issue are sure to pass those feelings on to their kids.
Whether or not it was his due to his parents' influence, a Colorado boy is pretty certain that, if he was of voting age, he wouldn't be casting his vote for Barack Obama. The boy wore a handmade t-shirt to school that declared, "Obama: A Terrorist's Best Friend." The school gave the boy three choices -- change his clothes, turn the shirt inside out, or get suspended. The boy chose suspension, and now his family plans to sue. Hooo, boy.
The family is citing First Amendment rights, of course, while the school district says it has a right to ban any clothing that interferes with learning. I think that the school district did the right thing. The shirt was inflammatory, and they gave the boy several options to avoid suspension. But I'm sure there are others who think this is a gross violation of this boy's rights. Where do you stand on the issue?













ReaderComments (Page 2 of 24)
10-01-2008 @ 1:42PM
Bea said...No school can nor should have to think of every possible inappropriate clothing issue. In today's hostile political environment I think the school's are wise to forbid any comments on any school gear.
9-30-2008 @ 1:28PM
pat said...wow a nasy kid!!! His parents need to be more involved....
9-30-2008 @ 2:39PM
robert said...If this country defends this immoral man anymore I will pull my hair out. Obama is horrible he wants our country to be socialist(communist) since when is it the governments responsibility to provide health care to the citizens or housing then the gun control issues theses are all steps to a communist society. He is for the murder of unborn children in the late stages of pregnancy. The school that has a problem with a childs t-shirt that isn't aligned with their beliefs are sick FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!! Another thing is a lot of people dont know why Wall Street in this bind is because the Liberal and Democrats who have been in power in Congress and the Senate FORCED private institutions to give mortgages to uncreditworthy people and minorities but you won't hear about this on the evening news they some how waant to blame Bush??? Bill Clinton started this mess with NAFTA why would we accept goods into our country without taxing them??? Please open your eyes and dont believe all that you hear remember there is usually two sides to the story but the media only pollutes us with their views. The polls are lies who would vote for Obama and WHY is beyond me. Take care fellow citizens. Signed a True American Patriot and Veteran God Bless America
9-30-2008 @ 2:56PM
Jhay said...I do think that both shirts were inappropriate. Obama is not a terrorist or has any affliations. Women shouldn't be broadcasted on in a bikini next to a truck. Just like I would also oppose "Older Than Dirt McCain T-Shirts", or Professional sport teams names and mascots like "Redskins, Braves, Fighting Irish, and Indians" I just don't think that it is right.
I also think that the Obama T-shirt sends an inconsitant message. If you want to promote a candidate... just wear a T-Shirt that says. McCain Palin 08. Country First. Just my opinion.
9-30-2008 @ 4:51PM
Laurie Garrison said...Well, a shirt like that shows vulgarity, no breeding and no refinement. That is just the type of thing people who are bigots are prone to wear.
10-01-2008 @ 5:08PM
NELLIE TERRY said...WE HAVE 5 GRANDSONS 2 ARE IN GUAM DADDY IN NAVY THE OTHER 3 ARE IN PUBLIC SCHOOL THEY ALL HAVE UNIFORMS AT SCHOOL I AM GLAD TERRY AND NELLIE
9-25-2008 @ 2:47PM
SKL said...It depends on what else kids are allowed to wear.
"Inflammatory" is a very subjective word. That is not a workable criterion for a dress code. If he's in a class full of white supremacists' kids, it's not inflammatory, while if he's in an inner-city Chicago school, it is. It's not a child's responsibility to decide what's politically correct and dress accordingly.
This site has run various articles about why it's OK to wear a t-shirt that says essentially gay is good, and not OK to wear one that says gay is bad. Either statement can be inflammatory and otherwise considered both politically and morally incorrect, depending on the audience. What's lacking in dress codes, and the principles behind them, is consistency.
Schools do need unique rules because it houses a "captive audience." A KKK shirt is 100% sure to offend black students, yet black students seeing it are not allowed to get up and leave. It's the second half of that sentence that is controlling for me. Something that is perfectly acceptable on the street is not OK in a school if forcing someone to sit next to it is extremely hurtful.
Still, unless the school has a clear policy against all political t-shirts, I think it's unfair to suspend this individual. There is too much scope for teachers to play political favorites. It would have been more appropriate to let the kid finish the day in the T-shirt and then make a rule against all political t-shirts effective the next day.
Reply
9-30-2008 @ 9:26AM
Jay Kedwards said...First off, I don not like Mr. B. Hussian Obama.
With that said, why can't the kid wear the shirt? Its inflammatory? Well so is the african america ball cap that says "X" on the front of it. SO is the word "*igger" that is heard all through the hallways of our schools, but because it is an young african american saying it to another african amierican, its justified.
Sue the school for infrigement of rights, no monetrey value, but have the administrator whom suspended him right, and deliver to the student body an essay on Freedom of Speech.
9-30-2008 @ 11:39AM
Sheryle said...I applaud the t-shirt! As a teacher, I know school policies should be adhered to. The mentioned student should have worn his t-shirt outside the school and then worn a school approved t-shirt for the candidate of his choice.
My comment is I cannot believe (as does this student , probably) that I cannot believe we would elect a President with the same middle name as the tyrant we over threw in Iraqu....somewhere this country has lost something!!!!!
9-30-2008 @ 2:40PM
Terri said...You missed the point. The kid was not suspended for wearing the shirt, he was suspended for refusing to accept an alternative to wearing the shirt. He could have worn the shirt inside out or changed shirts and he refused.
If he or his parents want to make a statement they should do so outside of the school system. I think they chose this venue to air the shirt because they KNEW that it would create a NEWS STORY.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and not everyone has to agree with that opinion, but we should be teaching our kids how to get along with the differnences not how to start a fight.
9-30-2008 @ 2:17PM
Marti said...Very well stated. I captured a statement in the previous posts, regarding what the other countries might feel about the USA. Well, I feel that they would feel very negative regarding the negative posts above, because it shadows bigotry. Teachers should not be the ones to independently inforce dress codes. This is biased. An over all dress code should be in place, instead of individualized codes.
9-25-2008 @ 3:09PM
Rob Austin said...It's been repeatedly shown that the First Amendment does not apply in schools with regards to clothing. Schools have the right - and have for quite a while - to limit clothing with messages on it when they deem those messages to be disruptive to the learning process. If the shirt was cusing controversy within his classes wherein other students were constantly challenging him on his political views then the school had every right to do what they did.
People like to take the First amendment in the wrong context. It is freedom of speech, yes. But it's not blanket freedom of speech. It is a right that bears responsibility with it. If we had blanket freedom of speech without fear of retailiation, then we could yell "Fire" in a crowded theater. We would not have laws of libel and slander if we had blanket freedom of speech.
In this case, wearing of his shirt is irresponsible if it disrupts the learning process, and so the school's actions can be upheld.
--*Rob
Reply
9-30-2008 @ 7:34AM
Maureen Strong said...I wonder if it were an anti McCain T shirt if the same big deal would have been made about it. Well , actually I don't wonder.......the school would have loved it. Bunch of card carrying aclu liberal morons.
9-25-2008 @ 4:00PM
Paul Cyopick said...Isn't a school a place to learn? Why not use the t-shirt as a cause for political discussion? Not necessarily about the candidates, but politics in general. Maybe the history of the two parties. It seems that this is an opportunity lost by the school to get their students aware and informed about the political process.
Reply
9-30-2008 @ 11:46AM
MsChocolate said...The student was given several options to avoid suspension, instead he chose suspension. He refused to turn it inside out or change. I am all for standing up for what you believe in but not in a derogatory way. There is a more tactful way of doing so. If there were a uniform procedure in place, then teachers can foucus more on students education, which is very IMPORTANT, and less on minor issues. As for the lawsuit, I don't think it will go anywhere. The schools procedures are sent home in the first couple of weeks of schools, so he knew what not to wear to school.
9-30-2008 @ 12:21PM
Kathleen said...Amen, Paul! It's disappointing to see that more parents haven't agreed with your very insightful lesson.
9-30-2008 @ 1:32PM
Paul said...I don't see this so much about opportunities to learn as much as it is a lesson about respect. The student in question was previously taught that there is a dress code for the school. The student in question was also taught that certain items of clothing or the messages attached to them are inappropriate in the school setting. Assuming both lessons were learned, the child (too young to vote, mind you) made a conscious choice to disrespect the limits in place. The child in question was also given choices as to how the situation could be rectified and the choice was made. Now said child, with the aid of the parents, is crying foul? What's wrong with this picture? You knew the rules, you were given choices, you made a choice, suck it up, live with it, move on, don't do it again. Sometimes you just do as you're told by those is the position of authority. It's called RESPECT!
9-25-2008 @ 4:16PM
Jan Bay said...Another excerllent argument for school uniforms unless you want to have a dress code that reads like Encyclopedia Brittanica.
Jan from http://www.unique-baby-gear-ideas.com/
Reply
9-25-2008 @ 4:22PM
c_rousseau05 said...I think that if he wore it almost anywhere but school it probably would have been a violation of rights to make him change his clothes or whatever but being that he wore it at school, no, it's not a violation. The school has rules, they gave him options and he chose his punishment. I don't think his parents should win that lawsuit and if they do I can just see that school going to uniforms next year lol. Anyway, yeah, we have a right to free speech but we also have the responsibility to obey rules, especially when you are on state or privately owned turf. In your own home, at he park....almost anywhere but school, stupid kid...maybe he forgot to show up for Government 101 when they were talking about situations like this and what "free speech" really means and how to use it.
Reply
9-25-2008 @ 5:56PM
Amber said...There is a girl who wears an "I vote Obama" shirt to school almost once a week. She is not of an age to vote but has an informed opinion. It is her right to wear this shirt. It doesn't hurt anybody. The shirt is not degrading anybody, either.
While I would say it was wrong for the school to suspend the student (he does have a right to his opinion) his shirt was defacing Obama. If the clothing had read "I am against Obama" and he was suspended, I would call that wrong. But just the fact that he was degrading Obama's image to other children in a derogatory way would make me side with the school.
(As for Joy's post regarding her son and his bikini wearing truck driver: I find that a bit sexist for school children and can see why the teacher had him remove his shirt. I've seen those shirts. The woman have less clothing on than if they where in their underwear.)
This all reminds me of the 'no church in school' rule while the pledge of allegiance (with the phrase "One nation under God" prominent) is required every morning. It's all hypocritical.
Reply