Hot on HuffPost Parents:

 

Do you let your baby be an adventurous eater?

Filed under: Babies, Nutrition: Health

A friend emailed me a study today, one that found that when babies under nine months are fed fish, they're less likely to develop eczema. Because she's never been a mom to an infant, she wondered, "Would you have fed one of your girls fish at such a young age?"

I laughed out loud. I was so afraid to feed my firstborn anything, she might still be eating baby food if my doctor hadn't given me a kick in the pants. Cheerios scared me in those days. But my second child was definitely sharing family meals with us at a much younger age. Not only had I relaxed just a "tiny" bit, so had the rules on feeding babies.


In 2000, the American Academy of Pediatrics urged parents to avoid feeding solids before six months, and then to introduce one food at a time after that -- a schedule that, if you've ever tried it you know takes forever. But they recently reversed their decision in the face of little evidence that this style prevented any harm. Now, they recommend feeding babies a variety of foods -- pureed or mashed, of course -- as early as four to six months.

Though babies depend on breast milk and/or formula for the bulk of their nutrition in those early months, I think that sharing favorite foods and flavors with babies is a great way to encourage a varied diet. Still, there are lingering questions about those high-allergy foods like nuts. And when it comes to fish, there's also the mercury issue. Would you or do you let your baby be an adventurous eater, or do you stick with the older, more strict guidelines?

ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)

FollowUs

Flickr RSS

TheTalkies

AskAdviceMama

AdviceMama Says:
Start by teaching him that it is safe to do so.