Hot on HuffPost Parents:
27 Fantastic Books For Kids Of All Ages
Mike Ryan: Ben Affleck Bids Bill Hader & Fred Armisen A Fond Farewell
Candidates, campaigns, and core values
Filed under: In The News, Day Care & Education

Welcome to Red Mom Blue Mom, ParentDish's special coverage of the 2008 Presidential election. Each Tuesday through November 4, columnists Rachel Campos-Duffy (Red Mom) and Ada Calhoun (Blue Mom) will take on issues relevant to parents on both sides of the aisle. You can find past Red Mom/Blue Mom posts here.
Red Mom: Making a choice about schools
By Rachel Campos-Duffy
Even some of Barack Obama's biggest fans concede that the press has gone pretty easy on him. Consider the famous US Magazine cover of an adorable would-be first couple under the caption, "Why Barack Loves Her" contrasted with the cover and caption the Palin's received, "Babies, Lies and Scandal."Of all the things Barack gets a free pass on, nothing gets my goat more than education, a topic of considerable importance to me as a parent and one he touts as his forte. Quite simply, when it comes to education policy, Barack and Michelle Obama are hypocrites!
While Barack and Michelle champion public schools (Michelle waxes endlessly in speeches about her own public education), they fail to mention that their own daughters attend the University of Chicago's Lab School, one of our nation's most exclusive prep schools that costs some $20,000 a year in tuition per child. In fact, according to the Wall Street Journal, Chicago's Lab School is among the top five feeder institutions for our nation's most elite universities. To be fair, the Obama girls began attending while Michelle was a University of Chicago employee and were therefore eligible for a tuition break.
Though Michelle no longer works there, the Obama's cite the proximity of this elite institution to their home as the reason they continue to attend. I get that, but I think there's more to it. Conspicuously absent from the Obamas's hard-knocks, they're-just-like-us video biographies during the Democratic convention were Michelle and Barack's impeccably Ivy League credentials. Presumably, they expect nothing less for Malia and Sasha.
Well, don't we all!
Michelle and Barack are opposed to school choice programs, also known as tuition vouchers, which would allow middle class and poor parents to also have choice when it comes to their children's educations. It is the height of hypocrisy for the Obama's to stand in the way of other families trying, as they do, to give their kids the very best education they can.
Interestingly, despite private school options in Wasilla, the Palins chose public school for their own children. And while it's not surprising that the very wealthy McCain family sent their kids to private schools, at least John McCain, who is a proponent of school choice, wants to help other parents have the same opportunities when it comes to their children's education.
So why do Michelle and Barack stand in the way of an innovative program that would give poor minority parents the power and choice that rich and privileged people like them enjoy? A big part of the reason is teachers unions, who are threatened by the potential exodus of students (and money) to private institutions. Too bad Obama doesn't have the audacity to stand up to that powerful lobby so that all families can hope to give their child the very best education they can. Now that would be change I could believe in.
Blue Mom: What happened to family values?
By Ada Calhoun
For years, the Republican party has promoted itself as two things: fiscally conservative and the sole defender of "family values."
Talk about irony. As Representative Steny Hoyer
John McCain vows to continue many of Bush's failed policies, including the continuance of huge tax breaks for the very rich at the expense of our children's and grandchildren's future. In a broad policy study
Sarah Palin's family bills itself as "Joe Sixpack," but it's been churning out one maverick-y scandal after another. In her attempts to punish her ex-brother-in-law, Palin engaged in what the recent report called a
How can the McCain-Palin ticket still be trying to claim the moral high ground?
Meanwhile, Joe Biden
Last week, Barack Obama suspended his campaign not to stage a failed last-ditch bid to portray himself as a non-partisan economic savior, but to pay a
Together, the Obamas have decided the best thing for their family and country is to put forward Barack's pro-family policies and also -- so refreshingly! -- their family's good example. How wonderful would it be to fill the White House with the laughter of the confident, lovely Obama girls rather than the tight couture grimace of Cindy McCain or, heaven forbid, the smug hypocrisy soap operatic-lifestyle of the Palins.
| Very important - I am a values voter. | |
|---|---|
| Somewhat important, but there are bigger things on the table. | |
| Not important at all - the economy is the real issue. |
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Here in dc since dec, 6 2006 retired FED BOARD GOV,inventor ,writter, FORMER GOVERNOR (founder of the republic of )DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN
- (department of defense)? hey can you build me a super duper all protector? yea what you want on it $$$$$
- There are more than 67,000 households on the list ...?????????????











ReaderComments (Page 2 of 2)
10-28-2008 @ 7:24PM
dmc said...the typical rantings of her race
are you kidding me? I love how you morally bankrupt right-wingers couch your racism in so-called "family values" and "small government" rhetoric. Just about every assertion that you made is either blatantly false and has been proven as such by reputable news sources (Fox News, by the way is not reputable by any stretch of the imagination) or is such a convulsion of the facts that it must hurt to stretch so far. You make me sick.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 9:05PM
SKL said...I'm sorry that you're sick, but I speak the truth. I will not apologize for either saying the truth or asking tough questions of Obama. Why don't you read the book Marva Collins' Way (by Marva Collins) if you want to know whether or not I'm talking out my ass.
Like I said, vote for who you want, but if you find yourself out of a job, don't come crying to people like me.
10-29-2008 @ 10:09AM
Mihir said...i love how you throw a blanket over SKL's comments, invoke the words "Fox News" and "reputable sources" and then say they are blatantly false. it's the intellectual equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ear and yelling, "LA LA LA LA LA, I CAN"T HEAR YOU!"
10-29-2008 @ 11:01AM
Amy said...Wait, wait, do y'all realize that in the last 8 years that taxes have gone down 5% for the 2 lowest tax brackets and only 2% for the 2 highest? And that is still 3% higher than it was 12 years ago? And if you feel the need for a source - call a CPA!!!
As for Obama's tax plan - SOCIALISM.
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 12:19PM
EH said..."So why do Michelle and Barack stand in the way of an innovative program that would give poor minority parents the power and choice that rich and privileged people like them enjoy? A big part of the reason is teachers unions, who are threatened by the potential exodus of students (and money) to private institutions. Too bad Obama doesn't have the audacity to stand up to that powerful lobby so that all families can hope to give their child the very best education they can. Now that would be change I could believe in."
Are you serious? (They will give anyone a soapbox...intelligent view point...or NOT.)
Those big bad unions...OUR TEACHERS...who are already suffering huge budget cuts are fighting to keep your kids educated and improve the public school system! It is not out of selfishness for money as you idiotically insinuate.
Our tax dollars need to go into our public schools that are already way underfunded...not to vouchers for private schools.
By the way, since when is being "rich & privileged" after years of hard work wrong? Isn't the point of working hard being able to afford things from better safer vehicles to better schools? Since when is private school something "everyone" should "enjoy"? It is hard earned $$ that puts kids in private schools. Should everyone get a voucher for a safer vehicle, as well? Why shouldn't the underprivileged be driving SUV's rather then used cars from past decades?
I personally don't want my tax dollars going away from public schools so Rachel can get vouchers for her 5 kids....if you can't afford private schools you get what you can afford...public schools! Use your voice to make your public schools better...not whine about "I wan't my kid's in private school, too".....
Obama can afford private schools for his girls AND works towards making our public schools better. He has my vote!
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 1:07PM
SKL said...I agree that hard-working people are entitled to their earnings. It's Mr. Obama who doesn't seem to agree.
What I'd like to know is, when is Obama gonna start spreading HIS wealth around?
10-29-2008 @ 1:21PM
EH said...SKL:
Obama hasn't been brought up on tax evasion charges that I've seen....so he is "spreading his wealth". As someone who will personally be effected "negatively" by his increase in taxes...I don't mind. It's pretty simple...track record and philosophy of the candidate will get my vote...not the tit-for-tat grasping at straws that have been displayed and the track record of McCain. McCain is a great man but not the one to lead our country at this time. His choice in VP and his campaign run-amuck confirms my opinion that he has passed his prime as far as judgement and leadership.
I refuse to vote for the possibility of President Palin.
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 10:53AM
md07302 said...It truly breaks my heart when someone says that they don't want to "spread the wealth around" as if the government will be taking away 90% of your income. Republicans are chanting this “I love America” speech when they can’t even agree to help their neighbor. It also really saddens me that when people think about helping the lower/middle class, all the think of is people who don't want to or could care less about working.
As an FYI, I'm a 23 yr old mother of a 1 year old little boy. I graduated from one of the best high schools in New Jersey and went on to graduate from F.I.T in the spring of ‘07. Throughout my college years, I went to school full time and worked two jobs. Not because I had to but because I wanted to in order to learn more in my future field and earn my own money as well. My parents make a pretty good living so I can't remember ever having to do without.
I got pregnant my last semester of my senior year. Both jobs did not offer health insurance and I was dropped from my parents insurance when I was 19. I had two choices: pay $511 a month for the two of us or get medical assistance from the state.
I chose to get insurance from the state thinking it was the best choice, I later regretted that decision.
I had never been through anything like that in my entire life, people looking down on me as if I was a beggar or a degenerate. Going to WIC and going to the Medicaid offices to sign him up. People, just like you, thinking (because I may have needed help temporarily) that all I was was just another girl knocked up, no education, and probably with a boyfriend in jail (or who knows what else) when I was FAR from it.
The insurance that my son and I received was because of the taxes that are paid for by people like you who make more than I do at the moment. I am grateful because who knows how much medical debt I would be swimming in right now. I was given a great opportunity but the scar from the judgment I received with stay with me forever.
I understand that no one told me to get pregnant and no one told me to not have health insurance but when you “spread your wealth around” keep in mind that it does help people like me. Those who need help in the moment. I’m not your charity case but I am your fellow American.
P.S. When coming to Republicans I can't help but think that they are just walking contradictions. I’m not terribly religious like most Republicans but what will you say when God says (loosely remembering the days of Catholic Middle School), “When I was hungry; did you gave me something to eat? When I was thirsty; did you give me something to drink? When I was a stranger, did you welcome me? When I was naked, did you clothe me? When I was sick and in prison, did you visit me?” Don’t spew your pro-life, anti gay, drill baby drill rhetoric on me.
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 1:07PM
SKL said...md,
1) You are the one looking down at others. Are you saying that because you were a senior in college when you made your choice that led to an uninsured pregnancy, you are better than people who make the same choice but have less education? Where exactly do YOU think we should draw the line between cases that do and don't deserve disdain?
2) You are projecting your feelings of guilt on other people. You disapponted yourself by making a choice. Nobody else can make you feel bad. Don't blame it on me. Oh, and by the way, Obama's tax plan isn't going to magically make everyone feel more accepting toward single uninsured mothers, as you seem to expect.
3) You should be thankful that you had that safety net that I pay for. You received better medical care than most people in this world will ever have access to. But instead of being grateful, you insult those of us who have paid for it. Do you think this is going to motivate us to want to send even more money in that direction?
4) I'm a single mom of two tots, but I also work to support my kids and many others. Nobody feels any special sympathy for me - why not?
5) I'd love to see a comparison of charitable giving by Republicans and Democrats. I would bet money that Republicans would come out ahead in terms of % of income. Personally I give more in charity than most Americans pay in taxes, and I have done so since long before I earned a salary most would consider "comfortable."
6) Nobody is saying we shouldn't have to pay any taxes. But enough is enough. Your own tune will change if you're ever lucky enough to pay several times more in taxes than you pay to support your family, as is my case.
10-31-2008 @ 1:33PM
LS said..."P.S. When coming to Republicans I can't help but think that they are just walking contradictions. I’m not terribly religious like most Republicans but what will you say when God says (loosely remembering the days of Catholic Middle School), “When I was hungry; did you gave me something to eat? When I was thirsty; did you give me something to drink? When I was a stranger, did you welcome me? When I was naked, did you clothe me? When I was sick and in prison, did you visit me?” Don’t spew your pro-life, anti gay, drill baby drill rhetoric on me."
Plenty of us "pro-life, anti-gay, drill baby drill" Republicans DO feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and visit the sick and imprisoned. We do it of our own volition. We do it through our churches, through our charities and through our communities. We make the CHOICE to give our own money, out of our own pockets, to the people we wish to help. We do NOT believe in FORCED "giving", or "spreading the wealth around", which seems to be Mr. Obama's mantra these days.
Does HE clothe the poor? No - his aunt lives in a Boston slum.
Does HE feed the hungry? No - his half-brother lives on $12 a YEAR in Africa.
And yet, he wants to stick his hand in my pocket to be "my brother's keeper"?????
md07302, you are living proof that there already IS help for the poor, uninsured, and those who have fallen on hard times. I, too, am one of those grateful recipients, since the beginning of the summer. But unlike you, my eyes are open wide, and I see through Obama's flowery speeches, and directly into his past - and present - policies, beliefs and associations. He is a Socialist. He does not believe in the Constitution. He is inexperienced and, frankly, dangerous.
And if you think that an Obama Presidency is suddenly going to make people sprinkle flower petals over the heads of chronic welfare recipients, you are sorely mistaken.
11-02-2008 @ 2:54PM
Paige said...md,
I thought your comment was very thoughtful and spot-on when it comes to the health care system in this country. It is simply too expensive for so many of us to afford health insurance. As Americans we are all entitled to the same health care, no matter how much or little we make. We need good heath in order to contribute and survive!
I cannot understand the negative, cruel comments of others on this blog when you basically admitted to making a mistake and being thankful that a safety net was there-momentarily-for you and your child, and that it isn't exactly a walk in the park taking the state insurance. Instead of asking for money from your parents, you are trying to handle the situation as best you can, so that you may have money to buy diapers, food and other necessities for you and your child, instead of going bankrupt from high insurance premiums and uncovered medical costs. I see nothing wrong with that, and I am happy to give a portion on my tax dollars to you. It's not like you're asking for money to go the mall, you are asking for good health!
Yes, mistakes are due mostly to poor choices we make, but NOBODY is perfect and all of us succomb to help, in one form or another, at some point.
I have always managed to do things on my own, but then again I was never in your situation. Even though I have lived a different life than you, I can still keep an open mind and realize there are people who struggle more than I.
Republicans are so quick to jump on the anti-abortion bandwagon, but then criticize someone when she decides to keep her baby and asks for assistance to keep she and her baby healthy. Unbelievable.
Sarah Palin's teenager is pregnant and luckily Bristol is probably still young enough to be on her mother's insurance plan. This is good because her boyfriend has dropped out of high school (so he can work to support the baby). I'm not sure how good of a job you can get with no high school diploma. Even if he has a steady job right now, he will almost surely need something to fall back on at some point. I can't believe he won't even finish his last year of high school for his child. Should Bristol and her baby be looked down upon because Sarah and Todd will be undoubtedly helping she and the baby with their hard-earned money? Should Bristol be punished because there is a real possibility she chose to have a child with a man who very well may be unemployed at some point? Perhaps she'll need to utilize her state funded insurance plan at some point too.
md, you are the perfect example of a person who is truly deserving of this temporary help you are receiving. So many of us place stereotypes on those needing assistance as uneducated and lazy, when many folks who need a little help are just the opposite. You have earned a college degree while working multiple jobs and are struggling to provide the best life for your child. I am sure you have learned some lessons along the way, and you are better for it. Someday when your son is a little older you will get your dream job and understand the struggle it took to get there. You will be grateful for the things that were given to you in times of need and will be a charitable person because of it. I believe you will be an intelligent, contributing member of this country.
That is what America stands for. It's not all black and white, like many Repulicans think.
Kudos to all of you who have managed to do everything on your own. But not everyone is the same. Some Americans have made poor choices. Others have been blindsided by unexpected events. That may be you some day, whether you believe that or not.
I would take admitting to my faults and surrendering to a little help, over being bitter, lonely and arrogant any day.
11-04-2008 @ 12:26AM
christine_p2 said...Getting back to the topic of education...I think that before public schools are disparaged by so many parents who choose to send their kids to private school, it's important to see what has happened in areas of the country where school vouchers and charter schools have been put into place. Many studies have been conducted in Milwaukee, WI, for example, because the city has had vouchers in place for 16 years. What you will find is that when all variables of race and poverty have been removed, these schools actually perform worse than public schools. (click on Executive Summary at the following website: http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/book_vouchers).
What longitudinal studies are finding is that school choice is not the answer to improving our schools. In some areas of the country, especially in urban areas, both public and private schools are struggling. What is needed is a fundamental change in how schools are structured--especially in offering more choices for career and education for what the kids, not their parents, need.
Reply
11-04-2008 @ 12:37AM
Christine said...LS:
Regarding your comment that Obama "does not believe in the Constitution": it may be worth your notice that Obama was a professor of Constitution law at the University of Chicago. I understand that McCain/Palin is not Bush/Cheney, but it has been made clear that Palin has no knowledge of the Constitution (i.e. she believes that the Vice-President is in control of the Senate and helps write bills; in fact, the Vice-Pres is only allowed to be the deciding vote in case of a tie. It's Cheney who has destroyed the Constitution). Stating something so ridiculous invalidates so much of the rest of your argument.
Reply