Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Barbara Greenberg: The Problem With Dressing Like Your Teen
Why Daughters Push Dads To Appreciate Equality
Should Schools Be Able To Hit Your Kids?
Filed under: Opinions
But it happens. According to CBS 2 Chicago, hundreds of Chicago public school children have been beaten by teachers, coaches and staff. The details are upsetting and horrifying. But just as disturbing is the fact that many of them have not been fired or even heavily disciplined. Why not?
Top Teacher Meltdowns
Two 16-year-olds were banned from school for being "too blond." The pair, who insist their hair are natural shades, were threatened with expulsion unless they dyed their hair brown.
Teacher Sued for Calling Teen "Ugly"
And on Valentine's Day to boot! READ MORE
SXC
Sleeping With Students
A Houston teacher was fired after she was caught one of her teenage students. READ MORE
pokoa on flickr
Teacher Claims to be Impaired by Baldness
Impaired from what exactly? READ MORE
Rubyyot on flickr
That's Just Gross
A Texas band teacher had a very unique (and nasty) punishment for one child who forgot his instrument. READ MORE
SXC
Caught on Camera
If you're going to freak out at the kids, make sure the security camera isn't taping your every word. READ MORE
SXC
Sleep, Or Go to Jail!
One 4-year-old was handcuffed at his preschool for refusing to nap. READ MORE
SXC
Suspended for a Cell Phone Call
...to his dad, who was stationed in Iraq. Not exactly supporting the troops. READ MORE
SXC
Bomb Threat!
A student teacher faked a bomb threat to get out of class. READ MORE
SXC
Teacher Accused of Being a Wizard
Sounds like a Harry Potter plot, but JK Rowling had nothing to do with this one. READ MORE
SXC
Simply put, they believe paddling a student will lead to better behavior. Where to begin?
An article from the New York Times illustrates this idea well. Most of the schools that still practice corporal punishment, it explains, are in the rural South and lower Midwest. In fact, one supporter of paddling and other methods of discipline, DuBose Ravenel, MD, a pediatrician and corporal punishment expert for James C. Dobson's evangelical Focus on the Family group, was quoted as saying: "I believe the whole country would be better off if corporal punishment was allowed in schools by parents who wish it."
First of all, how can you say that the world would be a better place if teachers were allowed to hit their students? Middle school principal Anthony Price of Texas says, "The rule is, never hit in anger." But that's nonsense. While I'm sure that there are cases where the punishment is meted out in a calm and measured fashion, the world is filled with kooks, and teachers can be just as kooky as anyone else (guns on a Facebook page, anyone?). If you tell them this type of punishment is acceptable, there are bound to be problems.
Secondly, what kind of message does this send to children? With domestic abuse -- Chris Brown and Rihanna being only one sad example if what we've heard is true -- people talk about "the cycle of violence." A father beats his children, and that child grows up to beat his own children, or his wife or gets into fights with peers. (This issue is addressed by the Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation.) Why should schools be included in that cycle?
Another argument is that the "parents want it" line. That's not how school works. I had a professor in college who once said that when you buy an airline ticket, you don't get to fly the plane. Schools can't cater to the whims of each parent, especially public schools. Does Dr. Ravenel think that each teacher should have a list indicating which student can be paddled? Perhaps they can wear stickers?
Finally, there's the idea that practicing corporal punishment is just another "community" issue. That is, if the community approves of it, it's okay. That doesn't wash. Why not? Because some things are just plain wrong. Hitting a child on the butt with a paddle until welts appear is wrong. If a teacher is the one doing the paddling, it's even more wrong. It's not a complicated issue.
What do you think? Should schools be allowed to use corporal punishment when students misbehave?
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Have time for a girlfriend? Say he has a newborn things didnt work out w/the childs mother but he is there for the child 100% does he have time for so...
- When my 9 yr old daughter came home from school real upset, because kids at school can be so mean verbal, I told her the old saying. "Sticks and stone...
- Grandparent dilemma












ReaderComments (Page 1 of 2)
2-12-2009 @ 6:14PM
CLM said...The community argument is bogus. The "community" at one time or another has approved of slavery, denying women the vote, and child labor. So much for the vaunted community.
I went to an elementary school that allowed corporal punishment and actually got paddled by the principal for something I didn't do. Needless to say, I never trusted any of the adults at that school every again. Can't say it encouraged me to behave either - rather the opposite in fact. If I could get punished for something I didn't do, then what was the point of being good?
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 9:01PM
hall monitor said...Leave the beating to mom and dad. I would hate to let a teacher/principal to decide how severe a student needs to be hit.
Hall Monitor
http://detentionslip.org
2-12-2009 @ 6:15PM
CLM said...Oops, that was supposed to read "ever again".
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 7:13PM
chitaroar said...If you hit or "paddle" your child at home until welts appear, the police are called and you get hauled away, to be lock up for child abuse or some other...
and CPS gets called on more case than we can imagine. Your children gets taken away from you.
Why should schools including principal or teachers be indifferent to the laws? Are they not abusing your child[ren]? Shouldn't someone call CPS to protect the children.
If somebody can tell me what the difference is, or enlighten me as to such a case I would much appreciate it. What's good for the goose should be good for the gander too.
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 7:10PM
Carla said...I hate the double-standard--that you can be arrested for hitting another adult (who, in some cases, might actually be able to run away or defend themselves), but it's totally legal in this country to hit children who have no way of defending themselves or any legal recourse. (Not to mention all of the negative psychological effects of spanking/physical punishment, the risks of major harm, etc.)
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 7:12PM
Marketing Student said...I find this article interesting for a few reasons:
1. "James C. Dobson" as written in the article has earned his doctorate degree in psychology and should not be referred to without Dr. in his name. This is a way of discrediting an individual and their views
2. Spanking is a controlled form of punishment, not simply the act of hitting someone. The article uses the terms hit, spank, and beating interchangeably, a way of emotionally charging the controlled act of spanking and turning it into the negatively revered act of hitting or even beating someone.
3. Public schools are government organizations that work for its constituents (property taxpayers), just like all organizations (corporate or governmental) the operations and views of the organization are to be based on those of the general population. Therefore, if the community believes that corporal punishment is acceptable then the school should follow the wishes of its constituents.
I understand that if this was simply written as an editorial, than it is fine for it to include such a strong one sided argument; however, I mistakenly read this initially as a significantly informative article.
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 8:18PM
Marketing Student said...I mistyped under number 3,
an organization is to base its views and goals on those of its owners or in a government on the taxpayers. In the case of a school district, the views should reflect those of the property taxpayers who financially support and technically 'own' the school.
I hope this makes more sense
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 8:44PM
CLM said...And if those "owners" believe that only white kids are smart enough for honors courses and insist the school follow that policy, is that ok too?
Oh yeah, and in the final paragraph of your first post, it should be "then", not "than".
2-13-2009 @ 6:44PM
Carolyn said...The idea of paddling a child is so "out" it makes me speechless...which is hard to do. If any teacher ever touched my child in any way, they would be very, very sorry because I would make sure they never taught again....
Reply
2-17-2009 @ 12:07PM
DORIS VAN said...It is parents like you that make the job of educating children the problem. Sad when a Parent lets their children grow up without any guidance,, more children have been jailed and imprisoned way before they are 18 years old, If A aParent loves their child they will discipline ...
12-02-2009 @ 3:55PM
jon said...I would not ruin somebody's carrer because they were teaching my child. to an EXTENT. if they had an injury i would notify them though. Children need to learn, the "community" is to over protective and we live in a "wimpy" society. If my child talked back to me, i would smack them accross the face. Not to hard where they have an injury, as in a brocken nose, or a bruise though. but just hard enough so they learn. I would never raise a "weapon" at a child as in a stick, belt, or paddle. I would warn them first then i would spank them. if they talked back to me right to my face, a good backhand should do the trick. I dont want my children growing up thinking that they can get away with stuff. what ever does not kill you will make you stronger. they will first grow up to respect elders, and toughen up a little bit, because if my child cries when they scrape their knee, im doing something wrong. When my child was four, he would not cry from falling, he would accept a spanking and a punishment and never talk back. I made sure my kid knows that he is still loved though, and i dont pick favorites. My son is cared for, nurtured, and punished. Spanked or slapped? yes. But not beaten. I dont hit my child to the extent where its dangerous.
2-12-2009 @ 9:03PM
Marketing Student said...grammar mistake noted.
Now, technically speaking your scenario is possible, but it should never happen. In no way would any sensible majority of Americans vote for an Amendment to the Constitution that bans a qualified black student from the same advanced placement classroom as a qualified while student. On the local level, which I feel your comment is focused, a single school district can attempt a crazy move like this but it should and will be deemed Unconstitutional by ANY court in America.
Reply
2-13-2009 @ 10:58AM
CLM said...Assault and battery are illegal too, but based on your argument, it's ok if the community approves. Call spanking controlled punishment all you want, it is still a physical assault on another person. My boss doesn't have the right to swat me if I make a mistake on a project, why should a principal have the right to hit a child?
2-13-2009 @ 2:52PM
Marketing Student said...You did not understand my comment correctly, a single community cannot change a law (they can make a radical move, but the courts in the land will deem the move legal or illegal based on a set of rules that we so revere as the Constitution and her Amendments). Now if the entire voting US believed that anything, be it assault and battery or something else, should or should not be illegal then the Government has the responsibility to follow the view of the MAJORITY of voting population.
I agree with your belief that spanking should not be used as punishment for mistakes, which is what we have created grades for in our schools. However, as a society I can see the value expressed in the views of the Dr.'s in the first part of the article. They say that there is some merit in having corporate punishment in place to deal with classroom behavioral problems that have not been responsive to other means of address. In the 'grown up world,' we have ways of dealing with behavioral problems at work which climax in the loss of the job; but the voters of the US value an education for all children and small part of this education is how to interact in the confines of a hierarchical business of the real world (boss/teacher and peers). In my opinion, expulsion is not a good alternative in the educational system because the student loses out on the learning opportunity available after they are removed.
2-12-2009 @ 10:00PM
Jim said...By all means, spank their little asses, something they don't get at home....so now it's coming back again. When I went to school in the 50's thru early 60's, we would get our butts, or hands blistered for not having homework turned in on time, speaking out of turn; then when you got home, you got your ass blistered again for bringing embarassment on the family. BRING IT BACK!!
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 10:58PM
dy said...We were spanked when we went to school (70s-80s) and we are none the worse for wear. Of those of us that were spanked ...not beaten we were punished again at home because we had done something wrong. Ask yourselves this ...why are our kids today so wild? They have no respect for authority noone can touch them not the parents, not the teachers, not the police. They are not held accountable for their actions the parents are. We are the ones fined for illegal behavior by the courts. And the courts then tell us we can not discipline them. Smacking my kids behind with an open hand is alot different than beating my chils black and blue with my fists. And believe me I tried all the new age punishments with my 18 yr old as he grew up....WHAT A JOKE... none worked.
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 11:48PM
dasha said...Absolutely not! Under no circumstances should any child be hit by a teacher or school administrator.
Reply
2-12-2009 @ 11:53PM
SKL said...I'm in favor of corporal punishment in schools. I would prefer for schools to have a policy that does not allow the child's immediate teacher to do the spanking. Preferably one central authority in each school should do it. That would greatly reduce the chances of abuse, as there would be no "heat of the moment" hitting or undocumented paddling.
It is really horrible to see how kids these days completely disrespect their teachers, classrooms, and classmates. I believe that if they knew they could be whacked for their behavior, they would do a lot less damage to the learning environment. Most kids have never actually been paddled, but the knowledge that they "could" was a fairly effective deterrent. Contrast the kids of the "could paddle" era to today's kids, who scornfully inform their teachers and other adults that nothing can be done to them no matter what they do.
I guess I really can't feel too sorry for the teachers as a group, since they are among the bleeding hearts who don't believe in corporal punishment. They don't seem to have come up with a more effective alternative.
Scratch that. I do feel sorry for everyone who is so inexperienced with real discipline that they actually don't understand how corporal punishment works. They are allowing themselves to be led and they, their students, their kids, and everyone around their kids suffer for it.
Reply
2-13-2009 @ 3:40AM
Mike Thorneburg said...I have researched the timeline on this issue and it is my belief that the major problems we are experiencing with children these days and for the past three decades or so is directly associated with several cultural changes that have occured in that time period. One of those changes, a significant one, is the gradual reduction and eventual abandonment of corporal punishment in public schools. While no rational person would advocate the "beating" of a child, there is a compelling argument to be made for the use of strong corrective measures, especially with younger, impressionable children that do not respond to normal discipline. I received moderate corporal punishment (it hurt like hell but did not scar me nor cause lasting pain) from both teachers and my parents when I was a child. At school, it was only given out in response to the most egregious of offenses, smoking in the bathroom, cheating on a test, starting a fight, vandalism. Me, I had a big mouth. Liked to start trouble. That only lasted through middle school. By the time I had reached my teens I had "learned my lesson". I went on to college, earned a couple of degrees and now own a successful business.
There are other contributing factors leading to the decline of childhood discipline and increase in antisocial behavior, as I see it, that are also important. The drastic increase in unplanned pregnancies and the resulting boom in single parent households brought about as a direct result of the "sexual revolution" of the sixties, the introduction of video gaming technolgy which has almost totally replaced after school outdoor physical activity, the dramatic increase in violence and sexually provocative programming on TV, to name a few.
The problem is that virtually everyone, save conservative traditionalists in this country, COMPLETELY IGNORS THE REAL CAUSES. "Modern progressives", as they absurdly refer to themselves, are quick to concoct myriad excuses, most of which describe some obscure, newly described psychological condition treatable only with drugs and long sessions on the therapist's couch for the ills that have befallen our youth. Conditions that blame the very methods relied upon for thousands of years of civilization as necessary, humane and successful for the proper discipline of young members of a society.
Look, it's tough raising a good kid in these times, even with decent genetics. Given the deplorable way in which many minorites have so depleted their genetic stores, it may be impossible. But you can't argue that kids that grew up in the fifties and early sixties, like me, had a much better shot at making it through their teens without getting shot, killed in a high speed auto crash or dying of a drug overdose than the current crop. Nor can you argure that kids today might very well benefit from the occasional "course correction" via a broad slap across the ass. It kept me out of a ton of trouble that I might otherwise have been very inclined to become involved in. My parents loved me enough to STOP ME from doing bad stuff and were brave enough to inflict a little pain when necessary to prove that they meant business and I thank God for that. They did real good.
Reply
2-13-2009 @ 3:46AM
CrimsonBberry said...this is for CLM.
i believe that Marketing Student has a far superior intellect than that of yourself.
and he makes valid points.
schools are run by the government, which is funded by us, the taxpayers.
and if an area of taxpayers were to vote on a certain school, and they believe that the childeren should be punished for their wrong doing, THEN so be it.
i know that detention sure as hell didnt have any effect on me. it had air conditioning.
and the temp outside could reach 110 easily from may to september. id rather sit in the comfort of a room then have to survive the heat.
Reply