Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Bonnie Fuller: Zach Sobiech: You Were a Huge Inspiration in Your…
When A Tornado Strikes, Should Schools Evacuate?
Late Start for Sleepy Students
Filed under: In The News
A proposed hour or more delay of school starting time may give kids a better night's sleep and help them remain more alert in the classroom, but it can also wreak havoc on after-school care and programs. The buzz of the alarm clock often comes before sunrise for students at Fairfax, VA, schools. Like most school districts across the country, high school here starts before 7:30 a.m. which leaves too many kids nodding off in class, unable to concentrate.
The solution, says one group of parents, is to fast-forward the starting bell. The problem, says their vocal opposition, is that it would be a scheduling nightmare, especially in families with two working parents.
Parents in The Start Later for Excellence in Education Proposal (S.L.E.E.P.) says adolescents need more sleep to do well in school. They've created a nifty Web site offering links to studies showing that kids do better with more sleep, and case histories of schools that have found success starting their days later than the norm.
On the other side is W.A.K.E., Worried About Keeping Extra-curriculars. Their site offers a sober description of the disruptions with any times changes. (W.A.K.E. seems slightly better researched of the two, but both sides get an A for acronyms.)
The proposed changes would have high school starting at 8:30 a.m., and middle school at 9:40 a.m. Elementary schools could open as late as 9:25 a.m.
Over at The Juggle, The Wall Street Journal's parenting blog, comments range from "NEVER!" to "good idea in theory, but difficult in practice." One interesting idea floated is the notion of moving extracurricular programs to the morning. "Is there a law that says a swim meet has to be after school? Ice Hockey players practice in the wee hours all the time, why can't the drama club practice the musical before school rather than after?"
That may work for older kids, why mess with kids from the younger graders? One elementary school teacher points out that "my students are at their best in the morning hours. By the time we reach the afternoon they are whining, tired, and sometimes even hungry." I agree with everything except for the "sometimes" hungry part. How about always?
As for the teens, they're going to stay up too late no matter what time they get out of bed. The benefits may be meaningless.
Do you think school should start later? Or is your kids' school schedule fine the way it is?










ReaderComments (Page 1 of 3)
3-03-2009 @ 9:26AM
Amy said...I have the cure? How about the parents of these kids actually try PARENTING??? Take the cell, turn off the tv, and put the kiddos in bed? When did parents become such wimps that they can't get their kids to school because they won't put them to sleep?
Putting
All
Students to
Sleep
PASS, maybe they'll pass if we start parenting.
Reply
3-03-2009 @ 1:20PM
Caitlin said...Amy, I don't think it's so much a parenting issue as it is a lack of time issue in the evenings. I work from home and pick up my friend's 14 year old after her school day is over. Originally, she was going to be my mother's helper after she finished her homework, but her teachers have been piling it on this year. She's at my house for 3 hours each day during the week and some days that's just not enough time to finish her homework.
I live in Fairfax - traffic here is horrid (it's faster for my husband to bike 10 miles each way than to drive). By the time you leave the office, swing by after/daycare, and get home, it's probably after 6pm. Throw in time for dinner, chores, homework, and it's going to be close to 9-10. Kids also need some time to unwind and relax so they don't burn out on school and it's not like they get much of a recess to do that anymore.
I think moving the start time back one hour for the jr/sr high kids would be a good move. They can't control their parents' work schedules, the amount of homework their teachers assign, or the amount of sleep they need during puberty. I'm kind of surprised they're considering 9:40am for elementary kids. It's not like they come home with hours of homework to do and couldn't reasonably be in bed by 9pm. It'd probably make kindergarten teachers miserable, since we have half day kindergartens.
3-04-2009 @ 4:36PM
Gr1m2eefer said...SHort- I work for sbux, I see how many people are truely awake from the hours of 4am - 12pm and I have yet to find anyone who looks remotely alert before 9am. So of the parents who oppose starting the kids off an hour later why not take a look at yourself and think (if i was able to sleep in an hour longer would I be more productive and awake at work) If you said no to that more power to you but the rest of the world isn't nearly as awake as me at 4am :D
I wanna be as nice as possible so I rewrote this :).
Being 23 I was in high school not so far back, I was into sports but never joined the school team or any big team for that matter. My days started at 6 A.M like most adults, I put in a full 8 hours of class taught by what some would call half ass teachers (I can count the number of teachers on both hands that have changed my life in huge ways.) Then I would walk my butt home and do my homework/chores.
By the time I was done with my homework, chores, dinner it was already time to hop in the shower and get ready for bed.
WHERE is the time to relax without staying up a little late?
For all the parents who have posted her against moving school later and said we need to fix the system and all that shit its bull. We are talking about one main subject and thats the damn time we start our kids going to school.
Let the kids have a break and wake up an hour later? I work for a coffee shop for crying out loud I don't know anyone other than myself who even has a smile on their face before 7am... NOW i'd really like to see the masses tell me im wrong, but if you can't put a smile on yourself that early and think straight why the hell would you think that your kids can?
3-05-2009 @ 8:54AM
Amy said...Here is what would happen, and I'm a high school teacher so I'm pretty knowledgeable about this. And I'm only 31, so its not like I don't remember being in school.
If you let the kids come into school at 10, they will sleep through their alarms, and with no parent in the house to wake them, they'll skip school. So, in skipping school, they'll get drunk, get high, get pregnant, or just generally mess around.
And it will be a never ending cycle. They will stay up later and later, adn the whining will continue.
People need to learn to get to places on time, and manage their time better. Get up, get your butt to school, and if you're tired, get of myspace or your cell phone, and go to sleep. This is a parenting issue. If you aren't willing to parent your children, then don't have them.
3-03-2009 @ 9:36AM
Mihir said...i'd just like to throw one more acronym into the mix:
L.A.M.E. - Less Acronyms Means Excellence
Reply
3-03-2009 @ 10:24AM
Inger said...Most teens really do need the extra sleep. And many extra curricular activities such as rehearsals for thing such as school plays or musicals, basketball or other sports games and various other school activities run late into the evenings.
In my area teens are out of school by around 2;30 in the afternoon, that is too early and just gives them more time to get into trouble. why not have school end at 3:30 like the elementary schools and start another hour later?
Elementary school should be the ones starting earlier, not high schools.
And to Amy - it is not a parenting issue, it is a natural biological fact that many adolescents experience a change in their sleep cycle come puberty. Not everything is the parent's fault.
Peace!
Inger
Reply
3-03-2009 @ 12:23PM
IndieMama said...This is a non-issue. Put the kids to bed earlier. Now can we deal with the myriad other REAL problems plaguing schools?
3-06-2009 @ 10:28AM
Mary Sullivan said...Even if your kids don't do a lot of extracurriculars, if you're in a homework-heavy district like ours, it can be tough getting to bed on time. My 6th grader does no extras except for Saturday, almost no screen time except for wkends, and still it's a constant struggle to shoehorn in some time for play, exercise....let alone getting 5 of us to the dinner table at roughly the same time...
This is a tricky one. Tons of kids & teens are chronically under-sleeping, which affects their learning. OTOH, parents who work full-time away from home usually need to be at work by 9 (or before) and need some time w/their kids in the p.m. Hard to come up with a schedule that will meet everyone's needs. My pie-in-the-sky fantasy would be a 9-9:30ish start for all ages, caps on homework volume, and flexible schedules for all parents so they can make this work!
Good topic; thanks.
Mary
http://www.squidoo.com/lovestamps
3-03-2009 @ 3:27PM
Brooke said...I agree with you Inger. Elementary school kids naturally get up early. Not too long ago when I was in middle school (I'm in college now) all of our extra curricular activities were before school. School started at 9:45 and ended at 4:05. then in High school it was a huge change starting at 7:05 and ending at 1:24. My freshman year of high school I remember standing in the dark at a bus stop at 6:20 AM. I propose starting high school at 8:30 and ending at 3. It should not be a burden on working parents because most high school students can drive or have friends that can drive. They are also old enough to walk, ride a bike, or take the bus to school on their own.
Reply
3-03-2009 @ 12:29PM
LS said...Wait. What? On one hand, we have school bigwigs saying that students need to go to school later because they're soooo sleepy. And on the other, we have school bigwigs saying that we have to have a four-day school week (with more hours in a day) because kids aren't learning enough.
WHAT???
I think we need to completely scrap the educational system in this country. Give everybody their money back (ok, just stop taxing for it), and start over from scratch.
Yeah, I know. Pipe dream, it'll never happen, etc.
But I'm sick to DEATH of these educators (and everyone else, for that matter) hanging the entire future of my kid on one cockamamie scheme after another.
We know what works... small classes, teaching the basics - math, english, writing, history (based on the Constitution), economics - and not fluffing it out with all kinds of touch-feely crap, gym class and recess to run off the 'stupids', even same-gender classes, and school uniforms, DISCIPLINE.
But what works isn't politically correct. So we end up with this. Late starts and four day weeks.
Reply
3-04-2009 @ 8:32AM
Christine said...As a high school student myself I'm kind of insulted by your comment. Teaching 'just the basics' is complete total bulls***. I am quite capable of doing the basics, but I like the extra stuff. There are classes in areas now for culinary, interior design, fashion design, computer tech. Not everyone wants a 9-5 desk job that is comepletely uncreative. Not to mention...gym class..now I'm personally not a fan of gym, but how do you think all of the personal trainers started learning they liked exercise? People get paid lots of money to do that. And no recess for younger grades ( elementary/middle)...? Are you out of your mind? Kids that age cannot sit still for 6 hours. They NEED to run around, in order to sit down in class and actually pay attention. Also, as far as your comment about "touchy-feely crap"... some people are not not visual or auditory learners. They need hands on experience in order to learn something, that does not make them stupid. I don't think you really thought about your response before writing it...and if you actually believe your idea will work, then you are deluding yourself.
3-04-2009 @ 12:12PM
LS said...Christine, if you had read my comment with an open mind instead of getting your hackles up at the first word, you would have understood that by "the basics", I meant (and let's go back and look at what I wrote)... "small classes, teaching the basics - math, English, writing, history (based on the Constitution), economics - gym class and recess to run off the 'stupids', even same-gender classes, and school uniforms, DISCIPLINE."
You see, I DID include gym class in there, and included recess as well, so kids can get the exercise and mental rest that they so desperately need. And not because one of them might want to be a personal trainer. That, frankly, doesn't matter when you're in grade school.
I think it's great that some schools can offer creative stuff like culinary arts, interior design, etc. I, myself, benefited from an excellent music program in high school, and went on to earn my degree in that field. However, there are more and more high school students who are learning how to cook, but can't spell, and don't know the difference between "too, to, and two". Those same students can tell you NOTHING about George Washington, Thomas Jefferson (except that he owned slaves, and therefore is a cretin), or Abraham Lincoln, but they CAN tell you Britney Spears' bra size.
My point was that, rather than noodling with the superficial crap like school hours, or taking a day away from the week, the entire system needs to be scrapped and rebuilt from scratch. And rebuilt on what works. Learn the basics, and the other stuff will come. If you can read and do math, you can learn to cook or sew on your own. You don't need Emeril or Martha Stewart to teach you. Where do you think they learned?
Also, by "touchy-feely" crap, I did NOT mean (and I understand how you would miss this, as I did not spell it out. Those who frequent this board know my position on this.) hands-on learning, but instead all of the "feelings" stuff (there was actually a class that my neighbor's kid HAD to take, called "making good friendships"... THIS, in place of History or Science??) that's included in the curriculum to the exclusion of hard knowledge stuff, like "the basics".
3-04-2009 @ 3:28PM
Amy Wood said...Amen!
3-03-2009 @ 1:52PM
Joy said...I have a great idea! Let's let the kids start school later and have swim meets and hockey practices in the morning! That way instead of getting up early for school, they'll be getting up early for "extra curriculars" and then they will be tired from playing and NOT learning. You have got to be kidding me!
Kids with nothing to do in the afternoons and are getting into trouble is not our concern. There were and always will be those kids who get into trouble no matter what time school starts. I do feel a big part of this is a parenting issue.
Come on people!!!
Reply
3-04-2009 @ 10:49AM
Kim said...Actually, getting the kids ACTIVE in the morning will help them to function. science proves that exercize helps the brain to function better and releases endorphins making people overall happier and with less stress. this might actually ENCOURAGE a healthy lifestyle for kids.
and on a side note... if the kids wish to participate in the extracurricular activities they will be encouraged to get up by the anticipation of it.
3-04-2009 @ 11:10AM
Joy said...So now we will have all the "extra" stuff for the high schoolers in the mornings. How will they get there and who will be there for them or watching them? Not all high schoolers have cars and the buses will have to get the younger kids to school so they can't depend on those. Maybe the parents can tell their bosses that they need to start later too so they can be with the kids in the AM.
This has PROBLEMS written all over it. You can't just "change" the way things are for a few kids who stay up to late and are tired. We all made it didn't we? School should come first kids and not the other way around. To many people would/could be involved. Teacher's, administrators, coaches, buss drivers, employers and what about the younger kids that have to be drug out of bed to go watch hockey at 6 AM? What about kids with after school jobs? If they can get up to play hockey, they should be able to get up and go to school. This started out by being the "poor little guys are tired and need more sleep" to now they can do this other stuff instead of sleeping!!
Has anybody ever heard that actions have consequences? Someone is tired in the mornings, they go to bed earlier at night. Isn't "teen-dom" for learning these "life" lessons?
This would change things for to many people and doesn't just involve the high school kids.
3-16-2009 @ 1:13PM
markycf said...If it is younger children that are having a problem staying up then the parents need to start putting their children to be earlier. My cousins used to be in bed by 7 PM or (the latest) 9 PM. There are were 4 (now 6) and not even all of them went to school. Still, they all went to bed at the same time and woke up at the same time. If they were tired it was most likely because they slept uncomfortably. They never fell asleep in school though.
As a high school student I know that if school starts and ends later that I'll still be getting the same amount of sleep. Almost every single time I go to sleep late is because I'm doing something, not because the teachers are giving a lot of work. Yes, sometimes I do have so much work that I can't finish it at home or have to stay up all night, but most work can be done at school or after school with the help of a teacher or friend.
I think that one or two schools should be set up in every state (or the state where this problem is great) and they could see how it goes.
Also for the times, my cousins get up around 6 AM (they're all in grades that are below 5th) and the two youngest aren't in school. They eat at home and they live 8 blocks away from their school and have a car. They're fine.
I get up at 5 30 and leave my house by 6 40. I get to school half a hour earlier so I'm prepared and have time to do work, hang out, get things done. I don't mind leaving when it is dark. I do, however, mind coming home in the dark.
Reply
3-04-2009 @ 6:40PM
raberyleti@msn.com said...I have 3 children ages 14, 13, and 6. I agree that we should probably leave the elementary school time alone. My 6 year old is definitely better in the morning. By 1:00 he is grumpy, hungry etc. and it's harder to get him focused to do his homework he receives from morning kindergarten.
As for the older 2, they both participate in sports - basketball, football and track. By the time they get home from practice (it ends at 6:00), do their homework (they get tons - especially my oldest - in honors biology, math and french) eat, shower, take out the trash etc. there is no time for them to relax and recoup from a very long day. They are both up at 6:00 a.m. in order to eat breakfast, wash, dress and walk to the bus. Trust me, anyone who says "get them in bed earlier" either doesn't have kids who actually do participate in after school activities, their kids don't get homework or they don't have kids period. A later start would be greatly appreciated.
3-03-2009 @ 6:25PM
John said...Wow, what a challenge for parents. We home school and work from home so that eliminates many of the issues parents face. But it sure can be difficult to fit everything in.
But I have to say that putting your kids to bed on time might sure help. But this issue might run deeper then a simple fix, it might be a cultural problem that has developed as our nation has gotten so our lives are so busy we can hardly get everything done.
Maybe figuring out how to have a simpler life would not be all bad.
http://qualitybabycarseats.com/britax-car-seats/britax-boulevard
Reply
3-03-2009 @ 7:25PM
penny said...I solved this awhile ago with the one activitie rule and the implementation of the Sunday night bed time. My kids are allowed one activity at a time, granted the reason we quit competitive cheer was because she was at the gym 3 days a week 3 hours or more at a time. But one at a time is the rule. Also on Sundays my kids go to bed a half an hour earlier than normal, my oldest is still awake at 11 some nights, but at least he has the computer, xbox and tv off at a decent hour so there is hope:-) All that changing the start time will do is move bed time back by at least an hour and I know some of my son's friends are up screwing around on the computer at 11 or 12 on a school night.
Reply