Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Zoe Armstrong: Five Ways to Fake a Break and Avoid Parenting Burnout
How To Help Victims Of The Tornado
Will a Daytime Curfew Keep Kids in School?
Filed under: Opinions
The deal is this: The new curfew would prohibit school-aged children from being off school grounds on their own between 9:00 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. Monday though Friday. One Dallas school district, Hurst-Euless-Bedford, has already enacted the daytime curfew, which specifically prohibits anyone under 17 from being in a public place during school hours.
10 Dumbest Laws in America
Virginia
Children are not to go trick-or-treating on Halloween.
This and more dumb laws can be found at DumbLaws.com.
Flickr
Nevada
It is illegal to drive a camel on the highway.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at DumbLaws.com.
Flickr
Colorado: It is illegal to ride a horse while under the influence.
Image couresty of Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at DumbLaws.com.
Florida: A special law prohibits unmarried women from parachuting on Sunday or she shall risk arrest, fine, and/or jailing.Image couresty of Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at DumbLaws.com.
Wisconsin: Margarine may not be substituted for butter in restaurants unless it is requested by the customer.
Image couresty of Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at DumbLaws.com.
Illinois: You may be arrested for vagrancy if you do not have at least one dollar bill on your person.
Image couresty of Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at DumbLaws.com.
Georgia: Donkeys may not be kept in bathtubs.
Image couresty of Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at DumbLaws.com.
Texas: A recently passed anticrime law requires criminals to give their victims 24 hours notice, either orally or in writing, and to explain the nature of the crime to be committed.
Image couresty of Flickr, licensed under Creative Commons.
This and more other dumb laws can be found at DumbLaws.com.
The daytime curfew would have exceptions: Kids would be permitted off school grounds during the day for approved work-study programs, for example. They would also be excused for any approved absence, or for lunch breaks at schools with open campuses, or if they are supervised by a parent. Homeschooled students would also be exempted.
Kids found wandering the streets would be returned to school, and someone -- the student? the parents? -- could be fined.
The American Civil Liberties Union thinks the new daytime curfew is a bad idea because, they argue, it criminalizes children. The City Council's goal in instituting a daytime curfew is specifically to reduce juvenile crime, but their approach seems to be to assume that every kid under the age of 17 is a potential criminal. The ACLU also argues that the curfew interferes with parental rights. I don't know about interfering with parent's rights, but the curfew does seem to imply that a lot of Dallas area parents aren't doing a very good job of keeping tabs on their kids. After all, they're sending them off to school and assuming that they will stay there! Oh no!
I'm all for kids getting into trouble if they're ditching school, but this extra curfew just sounds idiotic to me. Unless there are gangs of Dallas school kids roaming the malls during Algebra class, it's hard to imagine that there really needs to be a whole new law to take care of this. And the exemptions -- open campuses, approved absences, homeschooling -- seem pretty vague. Who's going to monitor that? Teachers? School officials? Police? Don't they already have full-time jobs?
And while I tend to find the ACLU a little over dramatic at times, I think they're dead on this time: The underlying assumption here is that any kid off school grounds during the day is looking to commit a crime, rather than just skipping Spanish because the weather is nice or it's Tuesday or all the other innocuous reasons kids have for missing school. I'm not saying it's okay for kids to play hooky, but it's not a crime, and the majority of parents don't need a law to help them manage their kids.
Would you feel safer if your community had a daytime curfew? Or do you feel like you're a responsible enough parent to take care of the problem if your child is ditching school?
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Why should anyone listen to a _____, what makes her an expert? Harpo is jus an actress, all she does is sit on her tush & claim she knows it all. ...
- Do people ever get a civil trial this is too many dismissals with out a response from defendants
- If a governor or former military general was not on tv you you believe he was if you were told











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
3-24-2009 @ 2:56PM
Amy said...I think this law is a no-brainer GOOD IDEA! Why should a kid be at the mall if he's supposed to be in school? This encourages parents to keep track of their kids, and to make them go to school. I think this law is dead on. Get your kids to school, and schools - make sure they stay there. The only reason you WOULDN'T like this law is if you think kids should play hooky and be irresponsible. If we didn't have a bunch of crappy parents, we wouldn't have to make laws like this. Way to go Dallas.
Reply
3-24-2009 @ 3:01PM
SKL said...Hmm, well, I would have been arrested weekly because:
1) I was sent home by the school nurse every time I faked illness on Thursdays (the only day the nurse was on duty);
2) My parents gave me bus fare to take myself to the optometrist or whatever because they worked during business hours;
3) I went to a parochial school that had different hours and different holidays than the public shools;
4) I graduated at 16 and my college schedule left me free during most "school hours";
5) I was often tardy because I would leave home late, detour to stop for a pop on the way to school, and take my good sweet time about getting there.
Sounds like they would have to build new jails on every street corner to hold all the new "criminals" this would create.
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 10:15PM
ame s said...OH, SKL, they would put your little behind in jail and your parents under nowadays, wouldn't they? ;) They wouldn't take into account that you were responsible enough to get yourself to and from school, to and from doctor's appointments. The nerve of you to be a responsible kid, the nerve of your parents to recognize it. Yes, other readers, this is sarcasm. SKL was obviously able to handle the responsiblilty, SKL's parents knew it, and if others have read SKL's other comments, it is obvious that SKL has grown into a responsible adult raising children who will also be responsible.
I'm thinking you didn't spend much time between the ages of 16 and18 hanging out at the mall, but the restrictions some are trying to impose now would mean you would have to, what, hide at home with the curtains closed?
There are people like SKL, and there are people who probably should be under lock and key. Why should kids like the kid SKL was have to pay the price for the little deviants running around?
I have a couple of SKL-type kids. They are responsible, do not cause trouble. How about punishing the kids who need punishment and leave the SKL's of the world in peace?
3-24-2009 @ 11:53PM
david said...This law is stupid. What about people like me who get out of school at 1.50 on days we don't have practice? Would we have to stay on campus for 40 minutes doing nothing before we were allowed home?
Reply
3-24-2009 @ 8:58PM
rawr said...i think this is a terrible idea, there's so much legitimate excuses children should be allowed out of the school that one should not be fine for.
1.) i've been sick many times without food in my house, and my parent arent gonna come back until 8 o clock pm. shouldn't i be allowed to get out to go to supermarket to get a can soup or such?
A sick person (other than stomach virus or similar condition) should be allowed to eat a healthy meal so they have the nutrient to aid immune system.
2.) same with the SKL, what happen if your under 17 and go to college. there are plenty people who are 17 who start on fall semester and they're birthday is in the fall or winter. shouldn't they be allowed to go out if they're classes ended.
3.) this law is also more nuance. Cop will have less time to focus on the crime that are in my opinion more important that patrolling kids. Such as drug dealing, robberies and other such. Parents and children should be responsible going to school. not lawmaker.
4.) How would Cop tell if one under 17. yes 13 and 14 years old can be easily spotted, but 16, and 17 is harder to tell. Therefore, someone in that age group might have more a chance to go undetected if they cut class. Or even someone who older can be easily mistaken being under 17, and all this law doing is wasting mistaken identify person and cops time.
5.) Also what happen if a high school student forget to bring his project or buy something for his class. Before that class start, he or she might be able go to his or her off period to bring the project or purchase the item, so he or she doesn't fail. Yes it is their fault for forget it, but if they have the chance to get shouldnt they get the project.
Reply
3-24-2009 @ 10:09PM
ckjh6 said...Accually, it is illegal for a student to play hooky.
Reply
3-24-2009 @ 11:21PM
Karen said...This is just plain dumb.
There are so many exceptions that you can't possible tell by looking at a kid whether or not they should be in school. Are you going to stop them all and question them? And what stops them from all saying they are homeschooled?
Just plain ol' dumb law.
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 12:37AM
andrewwang611 said...Why is the author of this article expressing her opinions? Shouldn't she stick to reporting on the facts?
"I'm not saying it's okay for kids to play hooky, but it's not a crime"
Yes it is, it's called truancy. The person that wrote this article is an idiot.
Reply
10-01-2010 @ 7:43PM
lala said...What about homeschooled kids
Reply