The Only Child Myth
Filed under: Opinions
Whether you have one child or eight, there is always somebody ready to pass judgment on your family-planning choices. Parents who choose to have a house full of kids are often blamed for contributing to overpopulation and accused of treating older siblings like unpaid nannies for the younger children. How could they possibly give all those children the love and attention they deserve?In families with just one child, however, the criticism is just the opposite and often aimed at the kids themselves. Back in the late 1800's, psychologist Stanley Hall referred to being an only child as "a disease in itself" and for many, that prejudice remains. "Onlies," who who are the beneficiaries of their parent's undivided time and attention, must surely be spoiled and will no doubt grow up believing the world revolves around them.
Thanks to Jon and Kate and the Duggars, we've all gotten a glimpse at what goes on in large families. But what about only-child families? The old stereotypes persist and there is no reality show out there to shed some light on the subject.
That's where Cafe Mom comes in. Readers are weighing in on the myth of only children and responding to a study that blows those old stereotypes out of the water. That study revealed that not only were single children not more spoiled and bossy than their peers with siblings, but they actually showed evidence of being more intelligent!
In essence, all that one-on-one time with parents often results in higher education levels, higher test scores and higher levels of achievement. That makes sense, but is there a trade-off? Even if they are not spoiled and bossy, do only children suffer for the lack of sibling companionship?
For the most part, Cafe Mom readers who are raising only children sing the praises of their decision. But many who grew up as only children themselves sing a very different tune -- one of loneliness and the feeling of being different. What about you? Were you an only child or are you raising one? Any regrets? Advice?












ReaderComments (Page 2 of 2)
8-19-2010 @ 10:35AM
Heidi said...I am 47 and am an only child. I've always wished I had at least one sibling. You have to do what works for you and your family. Not all onlies grow up spoiled and selfish. When I see my two daughters together, even when they fight, I know that they have a bond that only sisters can have and they will always (hopefully) have each others' back. I envy that.
Reply
6-07-2011 @ 7:49PM
gmwilliams said...Here we go again! I am an only child and quite proud of this. Yes, I was doted on by my parents and was given the finer things of life.. As a result of this, I appreciate the finer things of life and obtained an education and a career to obtain these things. I did not miss having siblings. Only children are mature beyond their years because we socialized with adults, not other inane, retarded children.
Children with siblings, especially those in large families, are more immature and feral. Children with siblings often lack class and manners and they misbehave more because they are in the company of children more. Children from large families have no sense of self which only children have. Because I received attention as a child, I do not seek it now. Some of the most attention seeking people I know come from large families. Madonna is very attention seeking and she comes from a large family. A coworker I knew always demanded attention and preferential treatment in addition to being very egottistical and she was the oldest of six children. A neighbor of mine continuously asked me to compliment her and she was the middle of nine children.
The only children I know could not care less about attention because we received so much of it as children. I can be described as very low keyed. Only children do share with their parents and friends. There are many people with sibilngs, especially those from large families, who were forced to share so much in their childhoods that they became extremely selfish as adults. I can name quite a few.
Only children are fine and are beneficial. Only children are beautiful and sincere people. Only children are not backstabbers and backbiting as children with siblings are. Only children are not bullies and are well behaved people who are joys to be around. Only children are smarter than other children because we had more intellectual and cultural tools at our disposal. Furthermore, us only children are not as manipulative in daily relationships and play games as people who have siblings do. Only children are superior in all aspects. Some of the kindest and most giving people are only children e.g. Betty White and Jerry Lewis.
At least only children do not have the pathologies that people from large families have. Children from large families tend to grow up poor and/or in poverty. They have less than anyone else. They score lower in intelligence tests and academically. Oldest children in large families do not have childhoods but are unpaid, live-in butlers and maids for their younger siblings. Children are more likely to be neglected in large families as the parents cannot give them individualized attention that parents from small families give their children.
Children from large families grow up in an impersonal and institutionalized setting which makes them suitiable to be either in the military or in jail. Studies show that children from large families usually end in gangs or indulge in delinquent activities. Girls from large families usually become pregnant while they are teens and have the highest incidence of teenage pregnancies.
Children from large families seldom attend college and/or other higher educational institutions of learning. They usually end up in menial, dead end jobs with no prospect of promotions Children from large families are born poor and end up poor. Pretty picture, isn't it ! Being an only child rocks but being in a large family sucks to heaven.
Reply
7-18-2011 @ 9:45PM
Kev said...Fully agree!!!!