PHOTO: Reese Witherspoon, Ryan Phillipe Reunite
25 Funniest Tweets From Parents This Week
New Study Finds Rich Moms Have Boys, Poor Moms Have Girls
Filed under: In The News, Research Reveals: Babies
Poverty may play a role in a baby's gender. Image: Richard Dunstan, sxc.hu
In January 2009, a researcher out of Newcastle University suggested that men have a gene that decides if they're going to father girls or boys. A 2007 study found that stressed out mamas are more likely to give birth to girls. And then there's the Shettles method, which claims that gender can be influenced by timing intercourse a certain way around ovulation.
The latest finding? Women who are poor are more likely to give birth to girls, but women with a higher social standing have more boys. I know, I know: Your well off sister-in-law has six girls, but you've got four boys bunking in a two-bedroom bungalow. We won't notice this influence here in America, because the gap between the rich and the poor may not be wide enough.But in places like Rwanda, where the study took place, the gap is significant. Strong mothers make strong babies, and -- according to this theory -- a strong healthy boy is a mother's best chance at her genes being passed for several more generations. On the other hand, if the mother is weak, sick or malnourished, a girl is a better gamble. Girl babies are tougher (say researchers), so they're more likely to survive and thrive.
This might partially explain why boys are revered in some cultures -- a sign of prosperity, perhaps? Or, it all might be bunk. After all, look at America's version of royalty: In 80 years, only one First Family, the Kennedys, has brought a boy to the White House.
What do you think? Is this theory a plausible one? Or does it just add fuel that old notion that boy children are preferred?
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Why should anyone listen to a _____, what makes her an expert? Harpo is jus an actress, all she does is sit on her tush & claim she knows it all. ...
- Federal reserve board of governors appointments ( understanding owning a tv image )
- Is it legal to claim relation to a person ? ( OR DOES IT HAVE TO BE FOR MONATERY GAIN) TO BE ILLEGAL ?
TheTalkies:RelatedVideos
-
Charlize Theron Adopts A Baby Boy
Charlize Thereon wasn't waiting for a man to get pregnant. She has adopted a baby of her own.
Charlize Theron's rep announced today that she has adopted a baby boy: "She is the proud mom of a healthy baby boy named Jackson."
The 36-year-old Oscar winner has had an amazing career, but she obviously wanted to start a family.
No details have been released as to where the South-African born actress has adopted Jackson from. Possibly her native country?
Though Theron is surely thrilled about exp
-
Charlize Theron Adopts Baby Boy Named Jackson
Charlize Theron is a mother: The actress has adopted a child. In a statement to The Associated Press on Wednesday, Theron's publicist said the actress is a "proud mom of a healthy baby boy named Jackson." (March 14)
-
Reese Witherspoon Gives Birth To Baby Boy
Reese Witherspoon has finally given birth, and her baby joy comes in the form of an adorable little boy with a very Southern name, Tennessee James Toth. Her rep says Both mom and baby are healthy and the entire family is thrilled. This first child with husband Jim Toth.
-
Hilary Duff Shares Photos of Baby Boy
Hilary Duff is proving she's as proud of a mom as ever by posting pictures of her 2-week old son, Luca, for the world to see.
SitesWeLove
- Site Map
- |
- Staff
- |
- Terms of Service
- |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Trademarks
- |
- Advertise With Us
- |
- About Our Ads
- |
- AOL Downloads
- |
- Contact Us
- |
© Copyright 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Aol Family
ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
7-13-2009 @ 1:28PM
SKL said...I could have told you this without a study. Boys are the weaker sex when they are in the womb, as well as when they are infants. More boys are conceived in every country, but girls have a higher chance of surviving most of the issues that are encountered in vitro and for years thereafter. If you are rich, you can do an ultrasound and see any issues early, which increases the chance of fixing them; you can take time off work and go on bedrest and change your diet and take drugs and pay for procedures to increase the child's chances of being born; you can have a c-section or induce labor at the safest time in the pregnancy, and provide state-of-the-art medical care to the preemie; etc. All this does is chip away at the natural advantage that baby girls have, whether their parents are rich or poor.
On top of that, there are a LOT of illegal gender-based abortions in countries where having a boy is preferred. The poor would not have access to ultrasound and so do not have this option.
Reply
7-13-2009 @ 1:47PM
Chrysee said...I was gonna say the exact same things. Males are less likely to survive at any age, so it makes sense that there would be a correlation between SES and male birth rate.
7-13-2009 @ 1:58PM
Uly said...EXACTLY what I was thinking, word for word.
7-17-2009 @ 12:05PM
kiki said...I guess what I don't understand is why, when women have two X chromosomes and men have an X and a Y, there is so much focus on women determining the sex of the child. A girl has 2 X's, one contributed from mom and one from dad. A boy has an X from mom, and a Y from dad. Only dad can contribute the Y, and therefore the gender is determined by which sperm happens to hit the egg. I guess if the study means that boy babies already in utero are more likely not to survive with a poor mom, that could make sense, increasing the overall number of girls for the poor population. But the environment the mother is in while pregnant can't possibly determine the sex of the child as I understand it.
7-13-2009 @ 4:41PM
JEAN said...I WAS TOLD THAT WHEN A WOMAN IS WANT FOR THE MAN, THEN SHE WILL HAVE A BOY. wHEN THE MALE HAS A DESIRE FOR THE FEMALE ARTNER, THEY WILL PRODUCE A GIRL. i BELIEVE THAT BY MY OWN CASE AND THAT OF OTHERS. JKLLDL@AOL.COM
Reply
7-13-2009 @ 5:28PM
Heidi said...Did I have girls because I was poor? Didn't think I was back then. Am I broke now because I have two teenage daughters who live at the mall? Absolutely! Paying them to do chores has not turned out to be a great idea. A maid would be cheaper.
Jokes aside, SKL has a good point. Add to that, if you can afford fertility treatments, selective "termination" used to prevent multiples could possibly factor in. And as for third world countries which value boys more than girls, hmmm, China comes to mind.
Reply
7-14-2009 @ 5:11AM
pamela said...thats a bunch of bull, im by far not rich , i had a son! thats just jinxing or what ever you call it,iit all depends on the fertility at the time, i tottally dont believe that crap!
Reply