Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Claire McCarthy, M.D.: Is Your Family Ready for a Disaster?
HooplaHa: WATCH: Shari Alyse: Showing What Kids Can Teach Us
Obama's Speech to Students: Education Message or Lopsided Propaganda?
Filed under: In The News, New In Pop Culture
Last week, a Utah elementary school principal apologized to parents after screening a video, "I Pledge," to students during a school assembly. You might recall the video; it went viral shortly after President Barack Obama's inauguration. Produced by actors Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore and featuring a wide range of hip celebrities, it was as popular with liberals as it was with conservatives, who saw it as more proof of the heights of Obama-mania.
Among innocuous celebrity pledges such as, "I pledge to smile more," are more controversial ones such as, "I pledge to support stem cell research," and a creepy pledge by Demi Moore who says: "I pledge to be a servant of the President." Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the democratic ethic that our president serve us. American civics aside, parents complained that the whole thing wreaked of lopsided propaganda and the school principal now claims to have not seen the video prior to the event (Teaching 101: Screen everything prior to showing to kids).
Now, the President has planned a speech for America's school children on Sept. 8th at noon, complete with pre- and post-speech worksheets and ideas developed by the Department of Education in conjunction with the White House. Questions include, "How does the President inspire you?" and "What is the President asking me to do?"
Frankly, I would have less of a problem with these leading questions if I thought that there was any sense of historical equality here. Could you imagine if the Bush Administration had planned a speech for kids in school at the peak of the Iraq war controversy and encouraged teachers to ask kids to write an essay about how they could help the President? Could you imagine teachers going along with it? It's inconceivable.
This summer we've witnessed a resurgence of a very healthy distrust of government among Americans. I believe that the outrage among many parents over the government-generated worksheets is an extension of this discontent.
Parents are now pressuring schools to cancel the event and are opting to keep their kids home if they don't.
Is it an overreaction to what could be a unique educational opportunity for kids to hear directly from their President? Perhaps. But sadly, the incident in Utah is hardly isolated. There are plenty of documented cases that point to teacher bias in the classroom and in textbooks. Fair-minded parents are wise to maintain a healthy suspicion about whether the President's address is more about the marketing of the president and less about education.
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Justin Bieber - Baby ft. Ludacris by JustinBieberVEVO 3 years ago 859,231,811 views
- The owner of the property or debit creditor can relieve the person(s) of the debt,(a employment position or (court) is not ownership
- Do people ever get a civil trial this is too many dismissals with out a response from defendants











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 3)
9-07-2009 @ 9:30AM
Mary said...America you must be kidding any time a president wants to tell kids to stay in school and why I'm all for it. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE. Thank you President Obama, my hat is off to you
Reply
9-08-2009 @ 6:54PM
EH said...Glorious-
Comments like yours are the exact reason children needed to stay in school today and soak up every ounce of education they can:)
9-09-2009 @ 12:59AM
rebecca decanio said...I agree, what is wrong with the President telling our youth to study hard and dream big. A education is a good thing. my daughers are only 3. I did watch the speech and I give the President a A.
God Bless you President Obama.
9-09-2009 @ 2:26AM
Kelly Holland said...RCD mentions "teacher bias" in the classroom. She must be talking about Kansas and the idiot creationists. I can't imagine Bush 2 would show up in any classroom as he spent most of his life avoiding them but Bush 1 and Reagan had no hesitation talking to school kids.
9-07-2009 @ 9:49AM
SKL said...I will withhold judgment until I see a transcript of the speech. I do not see anything wrong "per se" with children listening to or learning about the president / presidency. However, the complete transcript of the speech should have been disseminated to parents in advance, so they could decide whether it was political and whether to keep their kids out (or otherwise counsel them).
Of course, you are right about the bias - unfortunately, any positive educational message Bush might have wanted to disseminate to children would have been vehemently opposed, especially by the teachers' unions.
Keep in mind that there was plenty of time devoted to teaching / celebrating about Obama around the time of the election and inauguration. So no, I do not believe it is acceptable for any more school time to be spent on that - especially considering that the majority of Americans now openly oppose the man. But I will stop short of saying he has no right to present a substantive message to America's school kids, provided there is no political spin to it and it's reviewed by parents in advance.
Reply
9-14-2009 @ 1:29PM
Lou B. said...SKL believes that "the majority of Americans now oppose the man", ie President Obama. I know of no polls that have shown this to be true. I believe that a re-vote today would elect President Obama again. And I fervently hope that Mr. Obama will be re-elected in 2012. I'm already preparing to vote for Michelle Obama for president in 2016!
Also, comments of others claiming that Obama's administration includes numerous communists is patently absurd!
9-15-2009 @ 11:20PM
Kate Kerfoot said..."The majority of Americans openly oppose the man"? Where are you getting this little tidbit? Sure--his approval ratings are down, but that always happens after a President takes office. We, as Americans are used to demanding the best and we are impatient when our lives are "fixed" immediately. Everyone gets down on the government for being slow and ineffective. However, if you have ever worked for a large corporation you can appreciate the challenges of making things happen in the largest corporation that exists---the government. Regardless the majority of the country does not "openly oppose the man." In fact, when you want to look at a President who was opposed by a gross majority you have to look at Former President George Bush. The numbers don't lie.
The fact that both sides can't focus their energies on policy and stop babysitting/protecting their kids from a harmless and powerful message from the President is absurd.
Do people really think he was going to go into the schools and start selling the healthcare plan?
I didn't agree with President Bush's politics, however I never told my kids to talk negatively about him. This does not make any sense when they can't grasp political issues. Had my children had a chance to hear such a great speech from GW I would have welcomed it just as I welcomed the opportunity to commend John McCain to my kids on his behavior following the outburst during Obama's address to Congress.
9-07-2009 @ 9:52AM
LS said...I'm one of those "concerned parents". I screen everything that he 'consumes' - movies, tv shows, video games, books, even the school he goes to had to pass my test, or I would have "open enrolled" him elsewhere. I was not pleased when I heard about this speech, and read the curriculum that was to accompany it.
Perhaps, if the president hadn't tried to do an end-run around parents, completely shutting us out of the process, I would think differently. How hard would it have been for this administration, when they announced their plans, to have released the text of the speech? The man doesn't take a breath without a teleprompter, so you know that the speech will be written. Why not write it sooner and release it, so parents can screen it for themselves and see that there really isn't any big deal, and that all he is saying is "stay in school, work hard" ?
Further, the FIRST "suggested curriculum" (it's been amended multiple times) that was passed from the Obama Administration was pathetic, at best. One of the original questions was, "What can I do to serve my president?" I serve no man. I serve my God. You may not, but in our family, that's what we do. So to have this man go into the schools and ask the children to think about what they can do to serve HIM? No. way. Now, if the question had been, "what can I do to serve my *country*?" I would probably have been ok with it. But the entire curriculum was simply a bunch of questions to build up an already fiercely narcissistic personality which resides in the White House.
Finally, I know that there are going to be a LOT of people who say, 'what's the big deal, previous presidents did this all the time.' No, they didn't. By their own admission on the Department of Education Website, in a letter from the Sec'y of Education to principals (which has, once again, been revised and this statement has been scrubbed from the documents), this is a historic event because this is the first time that a sitting president has ever *directly* addressed school children.
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 10:07AM
SKL said...Wow, "how can I serve my president?"! What the hell? This is supposed to be a democracy. We don't serve the president, hello! We serve our country! This is a big part of what is wrong with America. Too many people at all levels don't understand what it means to be American. They haven't read the founding documents, they don't understand the separation of powers, their abysmal knowledge of history is almost worse than none at all. This includes teachers and politicians. This is why "concerned parents" need to get more involved their kids' education (and I don't mean helping with homework!).
9-09-2009 @ 9:22AM
OldScot said...Screen everything, censor your kids thinking allow them only "creation science" and the Limbaugh hurrah and they may grow up only to learn that the moon is not made of green cheese and disrespect is unwarranted at any time but especially for the President. When they find they were sheltered from the truth, that disrespect will be focused on you, and they will try things to "prove they can" to you when otherwise having learned the truth of diverse opinions early they would be prepared for "peer" pressure and "pusher" pressure. Teach your children to distrust the President with coercive teaching; they will, in the end, know they cannot trust you; you put no faith in them and misled them. Oops.
9-09-2009 @ 11:05AM
Karen said...Neither the president nor the department of Education said anything about "serving" the president. Please reread the article - that was said in a different video done by celebrities independent of any government endorsement. To be honest - aren't people tired of all these over-the-top predictions of horrible doom and gloom now being trotted out every time the president sneezes? For heaven's sake - bypassing parents?? The last time I checked nothing about this speech was mandatory for any child or school.
And there is nothing more "communist" that preventing people from hearing different points of view and deciding for themselves.
9-16-2009 @ 8:56PM
Mark said...Kudos to you for a well written and thought out comment. I agree with you wholeheartedly. I am wary of any man who tries to rush anything through. He tried the same thing with his healthcare reform, trying to push it through before the summer recess. My father taught me never to rush into signing or making a deal. When a salesman says "you must sign now or lose a great deal" BE CAUTIOUS! I feel like hes trying to pull one over on us. I work very hard to provide for my family. I put myself through graduate school, and will be paying back my loans for a long time. I believe if you earn it YOU should be the one to keep the bulk of it. NOT the government, NOT some lazy ass who refuses to get off ther duff, and expects everyone to pay for them. (and there are plenty of those around, see medicaid/welfare). Theres nothing wrong with learning a trade if your not the scholastic type. You have to be driven. Not all my friends are doctors or lawyers. Some work in mortgages, some are plumbers, electricians, craftsmen/builders. They have pride and went out and are doing well for themselves. Obama wants to create a country that relies solely on him (ie. govt'). The old addage rigs true: If you give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll eat for a lifetime.
9-07-2009 @ 10:09AM
ninainindia said...I really don't understand parents that want to control everything their child sees and hears. It is your President, do you really believe he would tell you child to start murdering others or something equally evil?
I'm sure he knows the speech should be age appropriate and about the subject at hand; stay in school, do you lessons. I can't find any problems in this.
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 10:44AM
Pat said...He has two children of his own, and him and his wife seem to have done a pretty good job raising them. I don't understand why everyone is so upset if he is telling children to study hard, and make something of themselves. They should be looking up to someone like the President instead of some of these sports people or singers that are going to rehab and doing lots of other things, that I wouldn't want my kids to look up to. Very sad when parents are saying we don't want the President of the United States talking to our kids. What kind of a message are you sending?
9-07-2009 @ 11:19AM
LS said...Nina: My child is 6. Are you suggesting I just sit back and let the world barrage him? "Go ahead, honey, watch whatever you want on TV. You'll see it eventually anyway!" No. Sorry. The job of a parent is to be aware of what that child is watching/reading/listening to, and act as a filter or help him interpret it. You call it control, I call it being a responsible parent.
Pat: You make some interesting points. First, we don't know what is going to be in the speech, because it has not yet been released. So, although the administration *says* that he's talking about staying in school, we don't really know that, do we? They *said* on Friday, that they were going to be releasing the text of the speech, but so far, it's not available.
Second, I agree that generally, the President of the United States *should* be a better role model for children than sports figures. However, *this* President? Not so much. By his own words, the president has asked us to "judge him by the company he keeps." Well, he surrounds himself with avowed Communists, Marxists and Racists. This is not an appropriate role model for my child. The message that I am sending is this: be critical of your leaders, be critical of those you choose to model for you. Do not simply accept that any person is appropriate to model yourself after, simply because he holds a fancy title.
Third, because Mr. Obama surrounds himself with people who are Communists, I am doubly skeptical of anything he does and says. Addressing children in schools, starting as early as possible, is one of many tools that Communist regimes, throughout history, have used to disseminate propaganda. This is disturbingly close to that. I would be saying differently if, 1) the text of the speech had been available ahead of time, 2) there was no "study guide" provided by the administration - teachers are educated, it is their job to know how to formulate a lesson around a speech, provided they're given the text ahead of time, and 3) this was not (as it originally was) *required viewing*. it is no longer required viewing, this is another point that has been backed away from.
Third,
9-07-2009 @ 11:56AM
SKL said...Aside from the objectionable things that his advisors and mentors have said; aside from the objectionable things that he thought was appropriate for his children to listen to in church every week; he has recently, very publicly, and in words young children can understand, declared that a cop "acted stupidly" (without even knowing the facts) and went on to say in the same breath that this is what happens to blacks day in and day out. Do I trust him to give a wholesome message to school children? Not really. The only thing I can hope for is that he will be restrained by his fear of backlash.
9-07-2009 @ 12:47PM
Bryan said...Bush senior addressed the schools during his administration. I was in school. I don't remember any of the speech otherthan the "stayin school" message. I'm a democrat now, so the republican propaganda didn't work...or wasn't the point. I believe the same of this administration. As freud said...Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Reply
9-08-2009 @ 9:11AM
LS said...When Bush spoke, there was uproar from the Dem. side. The then Democrat-majority congress even launched an investigation into the administration's use of taxpayer dollars to stage a political event, and complained that he was using the students as "props" for "paid political advertising".
The reason that you don't remember the furor over this is probably because, at that point, you (and I, because I don't remember it, either) weren't embroiled in the political mess - it hadn't spilled over into our lives at that point.
I found an article on it this morning. It can be found here: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/When-Bush-spoke-to-students-Democrats-investigated-held-hearings-57694347.html
Cheers!
9-08-2009 @ 2:46PM
EH said...LS- The fact that you don't even remember the uproar points out that (if you read your own link!) it was over the funds spent during a time where critical school funds were being cut. It was looked at as a taxpayer funded publicity advertisement for Bush.
The uproar over the current situation is due to the fact of too many fear inspired bloggers and critics fueling propoganda against our "socialist, non-citizen, racist, terrorist, President"....
Give me a break! Our President, Democrat, Republican or other should be able to address our children with a positive message about being accountable and responsible for their future.....isn't THAT what we want from our ELECTED officials?
I have to laugh at the ignorance of those who kept their children out of school today so that our schools can now suffer the loss of funds for the student not being in attendance.
9-07-2009 @ 12:47PM
Michelle said...Here is my big issue with this: If it really was just a pep talk about staying in school, great! Show it on the major networks at 7pm where I can choose to watch it with my children. Don't try to bypass me and make it seem like I have no say-so. When I asked my first grader's school if they were going to be screening the President's speech, I was told they were going to tape it and show it as it fits into the curriculum. I then asked if parents would be informed when that would happen. The principal seemed taken aback that I would expect to be notified.
I'm trying to keep an open mind, and will be viewing the speech for myself, before I decide if my young children should. Someone tell me, where does "Stay in School" fit into a First Grade curriculum, and why should I not have to give my permission for my child to deviate from that curriculm? I had to give permission for her to be tested for gifted, I had to give permission for her to participate in a "safe touch" lesson. Why is this any different?
Reply