Montana Upholds Same-Sex Partner's Parental Rights
Categories: Adoption, In The News
Same-sex couples in Montana now have the same rights as married couples to pursue child custody in court.
The Montana Supreme Court, in a 6-1 ruling, upheld that right Tuesday. Justices decided a woman who shared responsibility for two adopted children with her former partner was entitled to parental rights.
Montana law does not allow same-sex couples to adopt children, so only one partner can legally be regarded as the adoptive parent. According to court documents, Barbara Maniaci and Michelle Kulstad agreed that Maniaci would be the adoptive parent on all the legal paperwork, but the two of them would raise the children together. As a result, Kulstad was not listed as the legal parent.
Some people hailed Tuesday's ruling as a victory for people -- gay and straight -- who care for children outside the bounds of traditional marriage. Others said it opens the doors to outside parties who want to lay claim to children.
"This is a victory for families in all shapes, sizes and colors," Betsy Griffing, the legal director of the Montana branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, told the Billings Gazette.
Broadening the definition of family is not necessarily a good thing, wrote Justice Jim Rice in the sole dissenting opinion. Anyone who has spent a lot of time caring for children can make legal claims for custody, he wrote in his decision.
"Now even parents who are fit and capable are potentially subject to claims of third parties for the rights of their children," he wrote. "Consequences of geometric proportion will fall in the future upon many fit parents."
Maniaci and Kulstad lived for 10 years together near Missoula, Mt. They exchanged rings and raised two adopted children (now ages 9 and 6).
After the couple separated in 2006, Kulstad sought joint custody rights with the children. Maniaci has since remarried to a man.
Justice Brian Morris wrote the majority opinion and said state law allows nonparents to seek a "parenting interest" if a parent-child bond has been established. "Maniaci cannot rewrite history of the fact that she and Kulstad lived together for more than 10 years and jointly raised the minor children in the same household," he wrote.
It can only be discrimination to shut out homosexuals from the law, he added.
"Naming it for the evil it is, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is bigotry," he wrote. "Lesbian and gay Montanans must not be forced to fight to marry, to raise their children and to live with the same dignity that is afforded heterosexuals."
Related: Judge Says Mom Must Punish Kids for Skipping Visits With Dad, Hollywood Wife Asking for $1 Million Per Month in SupportRecent Posts
- Reviews: What's New This Week (11/20/2009)
- Twitter Follow Friday on ParentDish! (11/20/2009)
- Diabetic Student Wins Fight For Extra Gym Classes (11/20/2009)
- Suri Cruise Stumbles in Her High Heels (11/20/2009)
- Sports Traditions as Important During Holidays as Turkey, Gifts Under the Tree (11/20/2009)

.jpg)
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
racheline 10-08-2009 @ 2:41PM
Hurray! It's about time that lawmakers started ending the discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation found in many of these cases regarding adoption and child custody. A caregiver/parent who is fit and capable should never be excluded solely on the basis of their sexual orientation. Good for Montana. Hopefully other states will follow suit.
Reply
Karen 10-08-2009 @ 3:05PM
Seems to me the result of this case should be that adoption rights get extended to gay partners. If the two women had been allowed to file honestly and jointly for adoption in the first place, this would have been a much more straightforward case. I wish these children well, and I hope the adults work out their problems for the kids' sake.
Reply
Mom2-6 10-08-2009 @ 11:13PM
Kudos to the Montana justices who took the first step in recognizing that families are defined by their relationships, not their genders. Adoption equality belongs to all people, not just those with the state's vision of the correct combination of genatilia. On a side note, I wish those who write about adoption would use the correct terminology. Adopted is a verb, not an adjective. Children were or will be adopted - they are not "adopted children."
Reply
Nate 10-14-2009 @ 10:09AM
This comment on another site summed it up:
"It's very disturbing that someone who wants to get out of this lifestyle can still be trapped in it for years to come ... by someone who has no legal or adoptive relationship with the children."
Also, your title proves you people are super biased there Tom.....true journalism doesn't have a bias...
The very title you have is biased....I read the other titles around the country on this one and here they are:
Your Title: Montana Upholds Same-Sex Partner's Parental Rights
Others I found out there:
1) Montana Supremes Find for Lesbian Parent
2) Montana Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Lesbian Parent
3) Montana Supreme Court Finds for Lesbian Parent
4) Montana Supreme Court Rules Against Heterosexual Woman's Rights
See, these are non-biased.......
Reply