Diary of a Guest Co-Host of 'The View'
Filed under: Celeb Parents, In The News, New In Pop Culture
Last week I co-hosted The View and with Elisabeth Hasselbeck out on maternity leave, I was the lone resident conservative. I arrived a little frazzled because my hotel had failed to give me my wake-up call. As a result, I was 45 minutes late to the meeting that takes place behind-the-scenes during hair and makeup sessions, where the show's Hot Topics are debated and decided.
When I entered the makeup room, I was greeted warmly by Bill Geddie -- the executive producer, Barbara Walters, Joy Behar and a staff that appears to have had virtually no turnover since I first appeared on "The View" more than 10 years ago. It was here, during hair and makeup, that I met Whoopi Goldberg for the first time.
Chatty and utterly unassuming as she noshed on a 10 a.m. bag of Doritos, it was easy to see how she so effortlessly inhabits the friendly and down-to-earth characters she portrays in so many of my favorite movies.Topics decided, I returned to my dressing room to change clothes and then stopped in to see Fran, the show's longtime stylist, for a quick chat and some last-minute advice. She approved of my outfit, which was put together the night before by my friend Alison Deyette.
Secret service was hovering around my dressing room because across the hall was Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, a guest in our third segment. After requesting a little more background on the controversial secretary from producers, I was led downstairs to the studio where a mic was pinned to my blouse and I was given the earpiece that allows me to hear the director's directions.
No sooner was I mic'd than I heard the stage manager announce, "Thirty seconds to show time." The music cued, I didn't even have time to get nervous before she quickly led me to the doorway to the stage, instructed me that my chair was the second from the left, next to Barbara, and cheerfully told to have a "great show" as I walked out on stage to the lights and wildly cheering audience.
Hot topics consisted of a slightly awkward conversation about why I was passed over for the show twice and then I announced that I was pregnant! Later, a comment I made about President Obama's Nobel Peace prize made national news. Over the past week, I've received several hundred letters, e-mails, Facebook messages and Tweets – some hoping producers will never ask me back again -- mostly from viewers thanking me for representing their point of view.
Several viewers wondered if the ladies of The View or the producers were angry about my controversial comments. Nothing could be further from the truth. I was encouraged to speak my mind, and when I did, I was praised for giving an honest point of view, one that clearly resonated with a certain segment of "The View's" audience. After the show, I chatted briefly with Barbara and Bill, and Joy and I talked about being a guest on her new show, "The Joy Behar Show" on HLN.
What did I learn from my day of co-hosting? That "The View" has the best hair and makeup people in the business. That no other show has better lighting. That staff and producers must love working there because they never quit. That while liberals might outweigh conservatives at the table, "The View" remains one of the few mainstream network television shows that allows conservatives to speak their mind. You just have to be willing to take the heat.
But the most interesting thing about "The View" was just how comfortable I felt – even though more than five years had passed since my last performance. The hosts and producers put me at ease, but so did the familiarity of it all. It's amazing how easily I forgot about the studio audience and the millions watching at home. When I was at the table it was just me and the ladies in a free-flowing, spirited conversation – precisely the kind I love to have.
Related: Read more from ParentDish columnist Rachel Campos-Duffy here.












ReaderComments (Page 3 of 3)
11-02-2009 @ 11:28PM
Elizabeth said...Dac, I'm really not sure what you're asking here. You phrase your questions in these thinly veiled accusations and insults, and I'm really not sure what you want to know from me. I have tried to answer the questions you posed, and I'm sorry if you don't like them. What is it you want to know?
11-03-2009 @ 10:48AM
Dac said...Elizabeth, I am sorry if you feel insulted, that is not my intent. I am just expressing my frustration, maybe I should have been more patient with you. As I said, I have respect for people's opinions and views that differ than mine, but I am having trouble giving weight to your opinions because of the reasons you expressed that are contradictory to objective truths in life and in society. That is why I asked you how committed are you to the truth because I feel that unless we can establish this matter, we will just be going round and round. There is your opinion and mine, and there is reality. For an opinion to be valid, it has to be based on reality.
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 12:01PM
Elizabeth said...Dac, the truth is relative. While I am committed to that most bohemian ideal, what is true to you isn't necessarily going to be true to me. I am a firm believer in science over religion, the tangible rather than intangible. I admit there is a lot I don't know, but I'm trying to bridge the gap (albeit very slowly since college is ridiculously expensive). Can I say definitely that abortion is not murder? No, but until it is proven otherwise, I am going to stick to that convention, and will fight for women to have the right to choose it. With me, it isn't so much about having the abortion as the right to have it. As I've said, I don't believe that if I accidentally got pregnant I would have an abortion, but I don't know for sure, and I don't want someone else telling me that I HAVE to have this baby. That being said, I am a big believer in mistakes, because making them and learning from them is how we grow as people. If there are women out there who regret the decision they made to have an abortion, and wish they had done differently and are now opposed to it, that's good for them. They now know where their convictions lie, and they might help a few women change their minds about the procedure. But that doesn't change the fact that there are some women out there who wouldn't think twice about it, and the few should not be making the decisions for the many.
If I were to pose a perfect scenario, I would say that abortion is legalized, regulated and the statistics closely monitored. There would be mandated counseling (something that California doesn't have, which I don't like, because I believe all people should be well informed before making such as decision) from a person both pro and con, and they wouldn't be performed after twenty weeks. Just because this is the situation doesn't mean that everyone would go out and get an abortion. Cigarettes are legal, but not everyone smokes, because it comes down to everyone making the best choice for themselves at the time.
I hope I have answered your question, if not, let me know and I'll try again. :)
11-04-2009 @ 2:00PM
EH said...The truth is:
Pro-Choice encompasses so much more then if a woman should be allowed to obtain a legal abortion....more importantly it includes the following.
Females approaching child bearing age have the right to be educated on how their female body works reproductively. This is a scientific and educational right, not an ethical view to debated "religiously" on what information they should have.
A female approaching reproductive age should have education and access to birth control, should she choose to be sexually active. Abstinence should also be part of this education...but not the ONLY option, as religious conservatives would prefer.
If females were more educated we would have less abortions. It's really that simple.
I personally believe that 1st term abortions....especially before the heart beats, is not murder. At this stage the zygote is the POTENTIAL of life but not a life. If one believe otherwise then where is the outrage over all of the surplus frozen embryo's sitting in storage??
Once the 2nd term is reached I believe the situation is a much different case.. Induced births are birth so I disagree with those procedures. However it is a small percent that are performed in terms of overall abortions so until laws are passed against these that is a woman's personal issue to deal with.
11-04-2009 @ 9:28PM
Dac said...Elizabeth, now we have a point of reference! (whew!) So you believe that truth is relative, though I do not share it, you are entitled to your own belief. I admire your openness to learning more. Although you do not necessarily need a college education to have critical thinking skills, it can certainly help you develop your critical thinking skills and the more you know, the more you understand, and the more secure you are in life. There are a lot of good philosophical books that you can read too if you want to expand your understanding in general.
I believe that truth is absolute. Truth doesn't change, nor is it subject to opinion. It is what it is. I strive to live by the truth because it makes me feel secure. It does not necessarily make life hurt less, but it does make the load of day to day life easier to bear. To me it gives me anchor and a sense of peace. The more truth you know, the more humble you become.
You can choose to not engage in this comment I am going to make, I will respect that. Here goes: I am just curious, what do you make of contradictions? Based on our former discussions, there were so many contradictions from posts you made. This most important one I'm going to point out is the fact that you said that you believe that truth is relative. Then you are also a firm believer of science over religion - being that science can be proven. If you think about it, if truth is relative, then nothing can really be proven, nor dis-proven. You know, science in fact is a good tool to discover the truths about a lot of things. These truths that science does prove, do you think they are relative? There are so many things in life, in the world, that I can think of that are not relative - like gravity (which is intangible), death, life, and miracles. There are existing miracles today that can be seen and touched and have complete scientific documentation. What do you think of these things?
Reply
11-05-2009 @ 12:31AM
EH said...Everything is relative, this is the only absolute truth;)