Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Charlotte Robinson: LISTEN: How Gay And Lesbian Couples Become…
New Turnaround Teacher 'Trying To Get It Right' In Tough School
The December Dilemma
Filed under: Opinions
Hanukkah, Christmas, Kwanzaa. It's all good. Credit: Corbis / Getty Images
Some groups even use the holidays as an annual rallying cry against what they perceive as an out-and-out assault against Christianity, pointing to store clerks who might substitute "Happy Holidays" for "Merry Christmas" or school holiday assemblies that may lack religious content as part of a wider movement to secularize the country and undermine people of faith.
They almost uniformly point an accusatory finger at organizations that work toward ensuring the separation of church and state in schools and in government. They accuse these groups of being "the Grinch" and, worse, of trying to undermine the religious fabric of our society.
These charges make for good sound bites, but they are hurtful, damaging and fundamentally untrue. They show a profound misunderstanding of "the December Dilemma" -- the seasonal need to ensure that the December holidays are inclusive to all, regardless of religious identity, faith or affiliation.
All Americans have the absolute right to celebrate the holidays as their conscience dictates. As such, I have no quarrel whatsoever with Christians who want to "put Christ back in Christmas." Indeed, many who feel that way would likely agree with me that religious devotions belong in houses of worship, private institutions, in the home and in the heart.
The secularization of Christmas is more myth than reality. Isn't it silly to suggest that there is a de-emphasis on the holiday season when, if you just look around, one experiences the reality of the holidays on every street corner? There are Christmas trees galore, a smattering of Hanukkah menorahs and Kwanzaa kinaras, many festive lights and displays, numerous Santa sightings, reindeer prancing and good wishes all around for a season of happiness and peace.
Religious celebrations of the holidays and expressions of religious belief play a vital role in enriching the personal and spiritual lives of many Americans. They have always done so and always will. My intent is not to prevent Americans from wishing each other a "Merry Christmas," or from including a Christmas song in a holiday concert -- quite the contrary. It is my hope that expressions of faith are done with sensitivity to others in the true spirit of the season.
This means that there is always an imperative for public institutions, including schools, town halls, courthouses, parks and other public facilities that are open to all to be sensitive to all religious points of view without favoring one religion over another. This is the true promise of a religiously diverse society such as ours, one that is written into our nation's founding documents, and one that has become more important as our society as become more religiously and ethnically diverse.
The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion to all Americans by prohibiting the government from endorsing or promoting any particular religious point of view. This prohibition has led courts to ban religious activities in public schools, such as organized prayer, and the teaching of creationism. Indeed, a sturdy wall separating church and state is essential to preserving and promoting freedom of religion in our increasingly pluralistic nation.
When it comes to government, if it chooses to recognize our nation's rich religious and culture traditions, it must also ensure communal harmony. To that end, our public institutions should strive to respect Americans of all traditions, including Christmas, by acknowledging the December holidays in a spirit of inclusiveness that instills an appreciation for diversity.
Each year, my team works closely with school districts to ensure that a proper balance is met in negotiating the "December Dilemma." For example, we were once asked to work with an elementary school in which December holiday activities left a number of students feeling ostracized from their classmates.
In one public-school classroom, for example, when students worked on a Christmas angel arts-and-crafts project, Jewish students were instructed to leave the classroom and work on another project in the hallway.
To these young students such incidents are painful lessons that may have a harmful impact on their civic development and view of American society. It wrongly teaches them that to be a full member of the community they have to sacrifice their religious beliefs and freedom.
The December holidays should never be a lesson about religious division and exclusion, but a source of communal good will, respect and understanding.
Some argue that it's trivial whether a public school limits its holiday observances to Christmas. But our nation's schools are the incubators of American values and civic life. They must be sensitive, and seek to instill an understanding of respect for diversity, tolerance, acceptance and inclusion for every student.
These ideas are not anti-religion. In fact, they are strongly pro-religion. They are fundamentally American values. It is the right of religious liberty for all Americans and the right of everyone to celebrate the religious traditions of their own choosing – whether in the majority or the minority.
So let's stop with all of the recriminations and accusations surrounding this time of year. Let's put the emphasis back on the things that make the holiday season so special -- a time of reverence, of goodwill and of peace for all.
Deborah M. Lauter is the Anti-Defamation League's Director of Civil Rights. More information on the "December Dilemma" is available on the League's Web site.
Related: Christians to Blame For Secular Christmas
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- How many consumable plants are there? How many consumable animals? HOW MANY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE'S PER PLANT & ANIMAL
- How do (some) parents believe it's appropriate to change their child's dirty diaper on a table-top in the middle of a restaurant dining room? The rati...
- Can i turn my mom into CPS for being abusive with me in public












ReaderComments (Page 3 of 3)
12-15-2009 @ 8:03PM
Elizabeth said...LS, while a Merry Christmas banner does not establish a religion, it does show that institution's endorsement of that religion, and if that is the only banner present, then that is not acceptable, according to the non-fictional separation of church and state. If it is the only banner in the locale, it shows preference for that particular religion. If, however, there is a Happy Chanuka banner right next to that Merry Christmas banner, this is not preference or endorsement. Since most places have neither the space or the funds for multiple banners, they go with the more inclusive Happy Holidays instead.
If anyone is uptight, it is people like you who want to keep your religion's decorations and traditions the dominate ones in this this country.
12-16-2009 @ 10:54AM
LS said...I never said that the Christmas decorations should be the "dominant ones" in this country. Just the dominant ones during that particular season. I have no problem with a community hanging a "Happy Hanukkah" banner alongside that Christmas banner. Or even for them to exclusively hang a Happy Hanukkah banner during the week of Hanukkah, and then hang a Merry Christmas banner during the week of Christmas. Or even to hang that Hanukkah banner exclusively, if the majority of the citizens in that town are Jewish. I never said that I did. But if you'll read back to what I actually said, I noted that the community was predominantly, or exclusively, Christian - many communities are. I'm sure you have no problems with Hanukkah banners hung in the Jewish Communities in New York City or Chicago. Or Eid banners hung in a predominantly Middle Eastern community.
And you still haven't shown me this clause of the Constitution that says that there must be separation between Church and State. I see that it says that the state must not establish a religion, and nor may it prohibit the free exercise thereof. For example, there is the Church of England. THAT is establishing a religion. The Taliban requires that all citizens practice Islam. That, again, is establishing a religion. The United States does no such thing. Our Constitution prohibits that. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that "the state" cannot RECOGNIZE individual religions. Hanging a banner or placing a creche in the town square is not ESTABLISHING a religion, it is RECOGNIZING it. It is not forcing people to congregate in the churches. It is not punishing them for not going to church, or for worshiping in their own homes. It is simply acknowledging a special event in the lives of many of it's citizens.
This business of pretending that people are "offended" by seeing acknowledgment of a religion other than their own is absolutely ridiculous. I am constantly told that I should not be "offended" by things shoved at me that I do not agree with - violence on TV, for example. I'm constantly told to "turn the channel", or "sit down and shut up.... freedom of speech applies." Why is it now ok for you to be offended by something I do - to the point of using the courts to enforce your opinion? Does Freedom of Speech only apply to you?
And before you hit me again with the diversion that "individuals can say whatever they want"... this stuff trickles down. Your side has used the courts so effectively that cards that once said "Merry Christmas" are being crowded off the shelves by missives bearing the innocuous "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings". People are being told that they cannot say "Merry Christmas" as they check me out of a store, when it is glaringly obvious by my purchases that I celebrate Christmas. It is like a virus, silent and insidious, infecting until it takes over.
12-16-2009 @ 5:46PM
LS said...And just to continue my rant a little further, you state that the government must celebrate equally or not at all. If that is true, I hope that you are, right now, writing letters of dissatisfaction to President Obama, protesting the fact that
- there is no Solstice Celebration planned in the White House
- there is a Menorah and a Creche in the White House, but no physical representation of other religious celebrations. Mr. Obama did make a statement acknowledging Diwali and Ramadan.
- federal offices are closed on Christmas Day, but not on any day of Hanukkah, Ramadan, Kwanzaa (which, could be argued is not a "real" religious holiday), Diwali, Samhain, Scientology's "Freedom Day" which falls on Dec. 30, or any other religious holiday of any stripe.
What this boils down to is a few people who choose to be offended over words. This all started because a few uptight - to use your word - people wanted to erase the Christian influence of this particular part of the year, and they were not afraid to use the ACLU and the courts to further their agenda.
I will grant that *some* good has come from it - were it not for this controversy (in years past), I would not know what I know about those other religions and the fascinating ways they celebrate their faith. But the overarching sentiment is "don't offend me, even though I offend you". I also find it interesting that, on a board such as this one, I must curtail my urge to say "Merry Christmas," lest I offend someone, but others have no qualms about regularly telling me to go deal with myself in a sexually offensive manner. I wonder, which is more offensive?
**(and yes, this is a duplicate, and appears again below. Please forgive me, I hit the wrong button, and placed it in the wrong spot. Carry on.)**
12-15-2009 @ 9:30AM
SKL said...As I mentioned earlier in response to one of Elizabeth's posts, why don't we learn from a country that is truly one of many faiths, such as India? There it is accepted and expected for people of all faiths - minority and majority - to take their religions into the streets and give holiday-specific greetings to everyone. With the exception of certain places where there is a lot of politically-fueled tension, they do a better job of respecting each other's religions than we do here.
The idea that hiding (or keeping quiet about) one's own religion equals respecting religious freedom is nonsensical.
Reply
12-15-2009 @ 4:15PM
Mihir said...i'm just waiting for the PC crowd to go over the deep end. soon, we'll all just have to say, "have a nice winter."
Reply
12-15-2009 @ 6:02PM
LS said...We can't say that, Mihir... that might offend the Global Warming people!
12-16-2009 @ 10:02AM
jenn said...seriously people get over it and accept it when people say happy holidays...this country is very diverse with different cultures some do xmas some dont!!! when somebody tells you happy holidays...HELLO christmas is included in "holidays"...i myself am christian, and have respect for other peoples religions.... so stop crying about every little thing america!!
Reply
12-16-2009 @ 1:31PM
LS said...And just to continue my rant a little further, you state that the government must celebrate equally or not at all. If that is true, I hope that you are, right now, writing letters of dissatisfaction to President Obama, protesting the fact that
- there is no Solstice Celebration planned in the White House
- there is a Menorah and a Creche in the White House, but no physical representation of other religious celebrations. Mr. Obama did make a statement acknowledging Diwali and Ramadan.
- federal offices are closed on Christmas Day, but not on any day of Hanukkah, Ramadan, Kwanzaa (which, could be argued is not a "real" religious holiday), Diwali, Samhain, Scientology's "Freedom Day" which falls on Dec. 30, or any other religious holiday of any stripe.
What this boils down to is a few people who choose to be offended over words. This all started because a few uptight - to use your word - people wanted to erase the Christian influence of this particular part of the year, and they were not afraid to use the ACLU and the courts to further their agenda.
I will grant that *some* good has come from it - were it not for this controversy (in years past), I would not know what I know about those other religions and the fascinating ways they celebrate their faith. But the overarching sentiment is "don't offend me, even though I offend you". I also find it interesting that, on a board such as this one, I must curtail my urge to say "Merry Christmas," lest I offend someone, but others have no qualms about regularly telling me to go deal with myself in a sexually offensive manner. I wonder, which is more offensive?
Reply
12-25-2009 @ 2:40PM
SKL said...OK, it's Christmas day, 2:30pm, and I don't see Parent Dish posting a Merry Christmas post. Why the hell was there a Happy Hannukah post if they refuse to have a Merry Christmas post? I don't recall a Divali or Eid or other religious holiday post, either. Is this a Jews-only Website? Or should I be offended? This is further proof that it is only the Christian religion that is being suppressed in the name of PC. There's just no way to make this look like a supportable principle.
Reply