Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Charlotte Robinson: LISTEN: How Gay And Lesbian Couples Become…
New Turnaround Teacher 'Trying To Get It Right' In Tough School
New Phone App Lets Parents Screen Kids' Calls
Filed under: In The News
Is the Mobile Protector app too intrusive? Credit: Taser
The makers of the Taser stun gun have released a new application that lets parents control their child's cell phone from a remote location, and allows mom or dad to disable the phone for a specific period of time.
The application, called "Mobile Protector," allows parents to screen their child's calls -- both incoming and outgoing -- and their text messages, according to a story on physorg.com. They also can block specific phone numbers and listen in on their child's conversations. A dashboard on the parent's mobile phone or computer lets mom or dad monitor the child's phone from afar, and also alerts them to calls from unknown numbers.Taser chairman and cofounder Tom Smith tells physorg.com that the application is not "spyware," despite the fact that it gives parents unfettered access to their child's phone conversations. When listening in on a call, the application will "announce that to both parties," Smith says.
He adds that most smart phone media can be monitored, and tells phsyorg.com that text messages, emails, photos and videos can be screened.
Credit: Taser
"You can see the image and decide whether you want to let it go through or not," he tells the Web site. He specifically refers to inappropriate language or pornographic content, according to the site.
While "sexting" may be on the rise, is it really OK for parents to monitor their child's comings and goings so closely? What happened to what you don't know not hurting you? We understand that there are cases in which kids need a firm hand, but having the ability to listen in on their every conversation seems like a radical measure to take.
Lenore Skenazy, author of Free-Range Kids and ParentDish "Free-Range Lenore" columnist, says that while this kind of application may make sense for kids with special needs, for most kids it's like "one of those ankle bracelets they put on prisoners under house arrest."
"Is your child so evil, so inept or so endangered that he or she needs this kind of monitoring? If you think so, just remember, that's the message you're sending them: I don't trust you to take care of yourself," Skenazy says. "So much for raising a self-confident, self-reliant kid."
Does this application go too far?
Related: AOL Parental Controls, Tattoo Your Kids for Safety
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- i have 4 kids single mom. maddy who is 10 katherine who i 9 suzy who is 4 and connor who is 3. i can not potty train connnor and i do not have any mal...
- Hi I'm going to be a mommy for the first time. Would it be okay to name my first child, if a boy, after my father's name?
- Go the F to Sleep: For Kids or Just for Adults?












ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
1-11-2010 @ 1:47PM
Steve Johnston said...While I am not really interested in listening in to my children's conversations, I would be in support of the option to do so as I can definitely see that it is sometimes necessry. But I do want to be able to locate them in an emergency and I want them to be able to get a hold of me. While I am not against this type of application, I prefer for the cell phone companies to make an application that sets my childrens phones so that they can be located and so that the only phones they can call are the important ones such as mine, my wife's, the schools, the police, grandma and grandpa...just the very imortant ones.
Reply
1-12-2010 @ 7:49AM
sally said...Can't find it?
Reply
2-11-2010 @ 10:29AM
Clarissa said...I find this application wrong. Adults had their life when they were young without nosey parents. Even if they were nosey they were not watching over your every move. Children need to learn on their own what is right and what its wrong. Listening in or reading your child's texts can lead to a worse outcome. I find this application ridiculous.
Reply