Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Charlotte Robinson: LISTEN: How Gay And Lesbian Couples Become…
New Turnaround Teacher 'Trying To Get It Right' In Tough School
Opinion: ChatRoulette Is A Disaster In The Making
Filed under: Opinions
Watch CBS News Videos Online
There's nothing quite like clicking a button on your laptop screen at 6:30 in the morning and calling up a random, live image of a naked, middle-age man doing the dirty solo.
That's what happened to me when I signed on to ChatRoulette, a new Web site designed to randomly connect users one-on-one by Web cam. Created by Moscow 17-year-old Andrey Ternovskiy, the site is generating buzz -- some good and some bad -- all over the media.
The New York Times calls the site "reminiscent of those old anything-goes AOL chat rooms, only with video," and I agree. There's a distinct wild frontier feel to the experience. While some are calling ChatRoulette the new cyber-crack, others are condemning the complete lack of control over who -- and what -- can show up on your screen.
Playing ChatRoulette is a lot like trying to navigate the complex social hierarchies of high school. Not only are you at risk of finding something downright disturbing, you're also at the mercy of your fellow voyeurs who can choose to disconnect you at first sight.
A fertile breeding ground for Internet cruelty, even grown-ups are finding the rejection hard to take. I was a tad insulted when other players moved on from my face on first blink. And then I remembered who I was dealing with: Probably lots of wackos. And to be fair, I disconnected from my fair share as well. So long, naked, middle-age stroker.
Given that wackos are, well, wacko, I started to wonder how long would it be before the rejected figured out how to track down the rejectors? What happens then? And who is responsible?
The social Darwinism of the site is worrisome, indeed, but the deeper concern is the dangerous cocktail of sexuality and violence available there. Urban myths about the site include a fake image of a man who hanged himself. Reality was startling as well. Like another naked guy I saw fondling his own, very large breasts, or the freak whose backside -- and what he was doing with it -- left my heart racing not in a good way.
I am a fully grown woman with two kids. I may have seen a lot in my 38 years, but that doesn't diminish the impact of seeing it in my living room. It was, in a word, disgusting. The site offers no controls beyond a written admonishment that users must be at least 16 years old to play.
Any curious 5-year-old who stumbles on ChatRoulette could figure it out. And that would be a disaster. A ParentDish editor signed on this morning to verify my column. She began by talking to a 20-something, friendly-looking, dark-haired woman, who proceeded to ask her to take her top off. When our editor declined, saying she was doing research for this article, the stranger then stated that she had raped more than 9,000 people. Is it possible that the person the editor was looking at was not the same person who was typing? Bait and switch roulette? If my editor can get fooled, surely kids would easily be lured in by a child-friendly image of something or someone.
While there are options for blocking the site -- CNET suggests that most parental filtering programs can be used to prevent access to ChatRoulette -- that requires a certain level of awareness of the content to which kids could be exposed.
Even teenagers aren't equipped to handle this kind of conversation, despite today's hyper-sexualized media environment. Do we really want our children to become immune to the idea of rape and sexual brutality? Do we really want them exposed to so much virtual, verbal and visual violence that it becomes hard to tell reality from fiction?
My answer would be no. I only wish I was speaking for society at large. Sadly, from the instant popularity of ChatRoulette, I don't think I am.
I am a fully grown woman with two kids. I may have seen a lot in my 38 years, but that doesn't diminish the impact of seeing it in my living room. It was, in a word, disgusting. The site offers no controls beyond a written admonishment that users must be at least 16 years old to play.
Any curious 5-year-old who stumbles on ChatRoulette could figure it out. And that would be a disaster. A ParentDish editor signed on this morning to verify my column. She began by talking to a 20-something, friendly-looking, dark-haired woman, who proceeded to ask her to take her top off. When our editor declined, saying she was doing research for this article, the stranger then stated that she had raped more than 9,000 people. Is it possible that the person the editor was looking at was not the same person who was typing? Bait and switch roulette? If my editor can get fooled, surely kids would easily be lured in by a child-friendly image of something or someone.
While there are options for blocking the site -- CNET suggests that most parental filtering programs can be used to prevent access to ChatRoulette -- that requires a certain level of awareness of the content to which kids could be exposed.
Even teenagers aren't equipped to handle this kind of conversation, despite today's hyper-sexualized media environment. Do we really want our children to become immune to the idea of rape and sexual brutality? Do we really want them exposed to so much virtual, verbal and visual violence that it becomes hard to tell reality from fiction?
My answer would be no. I only wish I was speaking for society at large. Sadly, from the instant popularity of ChatRoulette, I don't think I am.
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- How many consumable plants are there? How many consumable animals? HOW MANY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE'S PER PLANT & ANIMAL
- When Did You Start Reading To Your Baby?
- i have 4 kids single mom. maddy who is 10 katherine who i 9 suzy who is 4 and connor who is 3. i can not potty train connnor and i do not have any mal...












ReaderComments (Page 1 of 3)
2-26-2010 @ 1:59PM
sandy said...Thank you so much for writing this! I worry for my kids, even though they are still so young. But I will say this -- I think all families MUST keep the computer(s) in an open family space. This is why kids should not have their own computers in their bedrooms.
Reply
2-26-2010 @ 11:21PM
Kimberly said...I'm reading the comments on here and the overwhelming consensus is that the parents must supervise their children... and to a certain extent I think that is a given... but to what extent does that supervision go. Do you honestly feel that a parent must hover over a child every waking minute? Honestly, it only takes a second for a child to accidentally pull up an inappropriate site, or for an inappropriate show to come on the TV. My grandparents provided very little supervision for their children (my parents) because it wasn't warranted... society did not condone the type of crud that is so prevalent today and because of the mostly "G" rated life that existed back then children went outside and were out there for the entire day with little to no supervision and grew up to be responsible adults with a sense of right and wrong that no longer exists in today's adults. As a child I lived the same sort of life, I had very little "supervision" because it wasn't necessary and I am an independent, self-supporting woman who has sucessfully raised a well adjusted, intelligent young man. How will children learn to be self reliant and independent if their parents are constently hovering near by, which is what is necessary in today's society if we want to protect them from material that is inappropriately sexual and violent for most ages... material that didn't exist years ago. It IS the responsibility of society to reject and prohibit material that is detrimental to our children including teens and the more we exercise our "freedom" in allowing overly explicit, sexualized and violent material in homes through the internet, cable and by way of violent video games the more violence our families are going to endure in real life, including the rape and murder of our children. We need to supervise our "freedom" and engage in self regulation as a society much more than we do at the moment. I am not a fan of government regulation, but if we do not implement common sense regulations as a society then the government has to step in and in doing that, we allow the government to make our decisions for us. Wouldn't it be better to make those decisions for ourself and provide a society full of clean and appropriate entertainment for all that allows our children to be able to develope independence and does not require parents to hover over their children every waking moment in order to protect them from what should not be there in the first place?
2-26-2010 @ 3:26PM
Kurt Schroeder said...I head the site mentioned on our local radio station and, having seen it, my first thought was the DJ would lose their job.
Reply
2-26-2010 @ 3:43PM
ewww said...saw friends on fb doing this and knew that nothing good could come from this and that was before i read this article
Reply
2-27-2010 @ 12:05AM
aNONOMOUSE said...saw a few friends talking about it on fb as well...and I have to agree with you. Good Luck.
2-26-2010 @ 9:57PM
Anti-Traditional Voice... said...I believe that the editor doing research for this article got pwned by anonymous... and that the person typing didn't say that "she raped more than 9,000 people" but "over 9000 people"...
The point being: just because someone says something on the internet doesn't make it true. That's especially relevant to completely randomized chat.
If you are afraid of words that other people might say or type, then avoid the internet. But as long as speech remains free, people are going to say things simply for shock value and to offend those with heightened sensitivities.
Just my two cents...
Reply
2-27-2010 @ 3:34AM
bazel said...What the hell is your point... except to be controversial. People like you should better label yourselves as "Contrary to any point", "suffering from Anti-Social Personality Disorder", " will avoid clarity at any cost", and prone to argue any opposing thought. Just go to bed.
Any good parent or person would have their antenae raised by the content of this article. They wouldn't want their loved ones being victimized or ruined by the likes of people at this site.
2-27-2010 @ 10:58PM
Ann said...If you have seen "Caprica", a series on TV, you would know we are not far from their virtual world on their version of the internet, in which anybody can do anything, without consequences. It is a virtual world of sex, drugs and violence. Parents lose their children to its fascination.
No one can protect children (or adults) from our own internet, either, except from banning it from your computers, and yes, policing your home computers and knowing what sites your children are visiting. If you have budding experts, all the more reason to have the computer in the family room. Some of them may break your protection codes, yes. So you need to actually talk to your children, teach them the values that will keep them safe.
You can't just abandon them to the net, the way kids used to be abandoned to the TV. And yes, you should protect your younger ones from today's televised sex and violence, too.
It isn't Howdy Doo Time out there anymore.
2-26-2010 @ 8:32PM
Anon said...Let's ban websites like this.
For the children.
And children could also accidentally swallow cleaning materials, so we should ban bleach.
For the children.
And children could be lured into a van an be horribly raped by a balding middle age white male, so we should ban white vans, and men buying candy.
For the children.
Reply
2-26-2010 @ 9:26PM
AM said...I wish there was a "like" button on this site. I'd click it for your comment. People today are waayyyy too sensitive and over protective. The world isn't this happy utopia they want it to be. They call this site ParentDish, but it is they who need to grow up.
2-26-2010 @ 9:48PM
susanjmaki357 said...Yeah
2-26-2010 @ 11:26PM
Beth said...Thank you. It also says clearly on the site that you MUST be 16 to use this service. Parents who let their children use this shouldn't bitch because they are breaking one of the sites rules.
2-27-2010 @ 5:26AM
Ruth said...To Anon & all all think like him, the big difference between bleach, the man in the white van etc, is that they are containable dangers! bleach can be put out of reach & the man in the white van is not inside your own home; THIS is the big difference between the internet & other dangers to children! I've brought up 2 boys & their friends tell them somethin g is "naughty" interesting or whatever & the minute your back is turned, to go to the bathroom, to answer the phone, they can log into look, there in their own home & it won't take a moment to switch sites! It's time this danger was acknowledged & controls imposed because obviously as long as people like you shout "loss of freedom" then no controls will be imposed to protect youngsters or other more vunerable people from such trash!
2-26-2010 @ 8:33PM
mlr12922 said...Any parent that does not supervise their 5 y/o on a computer should have nothing but the expectation that their child will be exposed to things beyond their age.
Reply
2-26-2010 @ 8:51PM
Anonymous said..."Even teenagers aren't equipped to handle this kind of conversation, despite today's hyper-sexualized media environment. Do we really want our children to become immune to the idea of rape and sexual brutality? Do we really want them exposed to so much virtual, verbal and visual violence that it becomes hard to tell reality from fiction?"
By the time you're a teenager, you should be well able to differentiate reality from fiction. If your kid isn't even into the double digits, why did you let them onto a computer with internet access in the first place? It all comes down to parental discretion.
Reply
2-27-2010 @ 2:31AM
susanjmaki357 said...The whole problem is that parents, increasingly, don't want to do what it takes to be parents to their children. Everyone wants their kids to like them. Trust me, my mom and I have as many problems/challenges/issues because she wanted to be buddies more than mom. Set ground rules early, or your child will be out of control before you know it. And you're legally responsible. If you can't keep your kid off a certain website or tv channel, what chance do you have of keeping them off drugs.
2-26-2010 @ 9:04PM
Cherenkov said...What a ridiculous article! What ever happened to objective reporting and media? Yay Amerikkka...
Reply
2-28-2010 @ 2:00AM
VenusAlexis said...YOU NEED SPELL CHECK!!!
2-28-2010 @ 1:34AM
mad267 said...It is an "Opinion" piece (kind of gives that away in the title don't ya think..."Opinion: ChatRoulette Is A Disaster In The Making"), just like what you would read in the Op/Ed section of a newspaper. It's intention is to present a person's opinion, not to be "objective reporting" genius.
2-26-2010 @ 9:09PM
matt715 said...What was the creator of ChatRoulette really thinking? I think this is sick & stupid.
Reply