Hot on HuffPost Parents:
New Turnaround Teacher 'Trying To Get It Right' In Tough School
Anne Woods: A Weekend for Superheroes
SmackDown: Did Air Traffic Dad Really Do Anything So Wrong?
Filed under: Opinions
Two dads duke it out over whether or not Airport Dad should be given a time out. Whose side are you on? Credit: Getty Images
Airport Dad Was Wrong.
by Brett Singer
Some people don't mind that an air traffic controller allowed his kids to chat with pilots who were flying planes in and out of one of the nation's busiest airports.
Airplane Kid's dad was just having a little fun, right? As one of our readers put it, "I wish everyone would lighten up!"
Here's what I wish: That people with important jobs would take them seriously.
It's no secret that America has gone crazy for security, especially at our airports. All it takes is one incident for a new screening procedure to be put in place. (If you're annoyed that we have to remove our shoes, blame would-be shoe bomber Richard Reid.)
Despite the legitimate questions on how effective these methods are -- remember the lovesick guy who inadvertently bypassed security at Newark Liberty International Airport in January? -- these screenings are important. It shows we're doing something.
Feeling secure while flying is what gets many of us on a plane in the first place. We might get irritated when asked to throw out our water bottles, take out our laptops and pack sunscreen into insect-sized bottles. But we do it.
So, if the first order of business is actual safety in the skies, what follows is that airport security must be treated seriously. Not seriously in a frenzied, grab-every-person-with-a-head-scarf-and-strip-search-them way. No, we simply want the people who work for the aviation industry to treat us, and the regulations, with respect.
When an air traffic controller let not one, but two of his children direct flights at New York's JFK airport, it's not cute. It's irresponsible.
"Lighten up?" How about, "Do your job." Did the air traffic controller's actions actually put anyone in danger? It would appear not, since, thankfully, no planes crashed. But what if the pilots had been startled upon hearing a child's voice on their headsets that they bumped into the steering column, causing a bit of turbulence? (I am not exactly Captain Chesley Sullenberger when it comes to piloting knowledge, in case you were wondering. Just go with me here for a minute.)
Picture this: One of the overhead bins opens and something heavy falls on your kid. OK, nobody dies. But it's pretty startling. If you say that scenario is unlikely, you are correct. But, you know what makes the possibility of pilots being startled at the sound of a child's voice coming over their headsets while they're flying a plane completely impossible? If a child isn't talking to a pilot.
I hate to be a pill, but as a dad, I know that not every situation is appropriate for children. Taking the kids to work is something all parents should do, if they can. Those last three words are the important ones. Do you want an 8-year-old manning the 911 phone lines? Or tagging along to fight a four-alarm blaze? How about preparing your food? Is that acceptable?
Besides, the official version of this practice is called "Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day." Not "Let Your Kids Do Your Job for You Day."
In response, the FAA has suspended the controller and his supervisor. Should they be fired? A commenter at ABCNews.com writes, "Leave him alone and get back to something important like health care or our failing budget." It's a good sound bite, except that the FAA is in charge of aviation, not health care.
Even though no harm was done, and no harm was likely to be done, letting kids direct flights is at best silly, and at worst potentially dangerous. Whether or not the workers' actions are worthy of a pink slip is up to their employer. But whatever they decide, hopefully other air traffic controllers will think twice before putting their kids on the mic.
At least while my family and I are in the air.
Tom and I want to know whose side you're on. As competitive dads (but perfectly collegial work buddies), we will be continuing this argument at the next staff meeting.
A Lot Of Yammering Over Nothing.
by Tom Henderson
Is anyone dead?
Seriously, did anyone die because an air traffic controller at JFK International in New York let his kids say a few words into a radio in the control tower?
The dad was standing right next to them. He told them what to say. Other highly trained professionals were in the room. It's not like all the adults went out for doughnuts and told the kids to take care of things until they got back.
It's not like the kids improvised what they told the pilots. "Hey, Jet Blue 57, this is New York. Can you do a loop-de-loop? That would be totally awesome!"
None of that happened. All that did happen was that 49-year-old air traffic controller Glenn Duffy brought his son to work on Feb. 17 and his daughter the following day. Now, Duffy and the supervisor on duty have been suspended, and the nation's hens are clucking about the horror of it all.
Those in the hen house, do us all a favor. Take a deep breath.
Think about this. Aren't there better targets for your righteous indignation? If you simply have to pop a blood vessel over something, pick an issue that isn't so astoundingly trivial.
Again -- and I cannot stress this enough -- no one died. No one was in danger of dying. No one risked so much as a hangnail.
That's not just my expert appraisal as a guy who knows absolutely nothing about directing millions of tons in metal through the air. The Washington Post talked with Ross Aimer, a United Airlines pilot with more than 40 years of experience as a pilot. He backs me up on all this.
"I have listened to the ATC tapes [Air Traffic Control] and in my opinion I can assure everyone that at no time was safety compromised," he tells the Post.
Aimer confirms Duffy was there with his finger on the radio, ready to take over. It was a slow time at JFK. But if anything had gone wrong, Duffy would have stepped in immediately. And let's get something else straight. Duffy did not let his kids direct flights.
"Simply repeating words your dad tells you is not directing," Aimer tells the Post. "If it were, we could hire anyone to do this job and just give them a handbook with no training."
In an online chat with Post readers, Aimer talked with a retired air traffic controller who saw a lot of this type of stuff in his 26 years on the job.
"This is far from being the first time that this type of thing was done using either children, female visitors with sexy voices or others," he told Aimer. "Nor is it unique to the folks on the ground. I've known pilots to use flight attendants to handle the radio transmissions."
OK, I grant you, what Duffy did was not terribly responsible. But you know what's really irresponsible? The way we in the media latch on to these trivial but sensational stories and blow them all out of reasonable proportion.
The retired air traffic controller is right. These things used to happen all the time. People just didn't notice because they had lives. They were too busy to huff and puff about every trivial news item. And the stories didn't get reported in the first place. Reporters were too busy covering things like wars and Watergate.
I used to take my son to work. I took him with me to cover fires when he was a preschooler. This would have been a problem if he had squealed, "Whee! Fire fun!" and ran into the burning building. It could have happened. But there is a yawning chasm between what could happen and what will likely happen. People need to learn the difference.
And for all the hens out there, please don't sit near me on the airplane. Your clucking interferes with my naps.












ReaderComments (Page 5 of 41)
3-04-2010 @ 8:38PM
jerry said...Someone should punch your lights out befor you have kids!
3-04-2010 @ 8:29PM
Maddie said...This is irresponsible and inexcusable. End of story.
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:29PM
DJ said...Whether or not this happened in this past is irrelevant right now. It doesn't make it right. Most of us out here never knew this. Now that it is, it should never be allowed again.
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:29PM
john said...Fine him and send him back to work. Enough of this "off with his head." fake outrage that has become so prevalent in this country.
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:36PM
Suzanne said...I don't think the guy should lose his job. The things his son said seemed extremely routine and it was obvious that the Dad was telling his son exactly what to say. It was a mistake that I don't think that control tower person or any other control tower employee will ever make again. Don't take his job away from him.
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 9:18PM
eric said...send them both to the front lines and the tell the son when to shoot
3-05-2010 @ 10:26AM
nino511029.954 said...Hi, I am asking what about the pilets?? Thy are in commened of the air craft , Why did thy not ask I need an air traffec conteler !! not a chiled. But, it seems to me the pilets knew about it before hand. Or, we have bigger problems the pilets are not doing there jobs very well.
Tony
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:36PM
Billions1 said...Bull S--T!!!! If this had been any other race who pulled such a dumb
A-- thing as this, they not only would have been terminated but
criminally charged. Kick him and his kid out!!!!!! And what about those pilots who responded? They "THOUGHT IT WAS CUTE".
America is going to the dogs with white people leading the way.
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:31PM
Master Jerry said...What a moron! he put the safty of hnudreds in the hands of his children, this guy should not only be fired but brough up on charges!
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 10:16PM
frac said...saemo saemo , bordom causes crashs, parroting is CYA, vfr slow time makes kids understand dads job ,allow HUMOR at proper times. kill PC
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:33PM
SHIRLEY said...HE SHOULD BE FIRED IMMEDIATELY ! ANYONE THAT USES SUCH POOR JUDGEMENT SHOULD NOT BE DIRECTING AIR TRAFFIC. THE CVS PHARMACY IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD BROUGHT IN THEIR CHILDREN TO PASS OUT MEDS AND GET INFO FROM PATIENTS -- ANOTHER STUPID MISTAKE. CHILDREN DO NOT BELONG IN PHARMACIES HANDLING PATIENTS MEDICATIONS !!! SHAME ON CVS PHARMACY !
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 10:17PM
Deb said...Get a grip. If you knew what you were talking about you might be interesting. Firing is not the answer. Letting the subject die and getting on with important things is life is the answer.
All of you who do not fly or do not control do not know what you are talking about so get over yourselves.
3-04-2010 @ 8:40PM
NatGreene said...Give it a rest. If you listen, you can hear this guy wasn't doing any AIR control, he was doing ground control. Giving clearance and passing off planes to departure controllers. People are acting as though the dad left the room or a cop gave his son the go ahead to storm a bank. How many of you have let a child drive late at night on a deserted road? Probably many of you who are bitcing and complaining right now. By the way, much to my wifes chagrim, that is something I'd never do but this controller thing is harmless.
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:40PM
Sam said...People need to lighten up a bit Dad was in control. If the FAA didn't want the kids there it should be in the manual as to no family visiting on work hours period. Start focusing on this dumb bunch we put in the political ring and start controlling them that is where a real focus needs to be. Nit Picking seems to be on the agendas of a lot of people these days plus trying to control others lives that is why the world is getting so crazy. Busy-bodies don't go to heaven and they sure as hell don't have many friends. Go ahead and call me whatever you wish then go look in the mirror and go back to church on Sunday.
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:41PM
shirley iveson said...This father should be fired he has no common sense at all in this day with all of the terrible things going on. Children should not even be allowed in the tower. Who wants a person like this directing planes
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:44PM
becky said...much ado about nothing. i am a 25 yr. veteran atc retiree (in at 23 yrs. old and out at 48) so much stuff happens that people arent aware of and probably wouldnt like, too much to list. bottom line is, none of it matters if it did not compromise anything. basically, when you train a new employee (and i did my share of training), it is exactly the same thing, only the "kid" might be 22. you tell them what to say, they repeat it. you are on an override radio where you can break in at any time and take over. if we think this is such a "resposible and important job" (which i definitely think it is), why is the govt. hiring new people for half the money. remember what capt. sully said. if you want the best, you have to pay them. i would be more concerned with the atc making less that some school teachers. of course, school teachers have responsible and important jobs too. it is just not life or death decision making.lets focus on important things, are world is screwed up enough.
Reply
3-05-2010 @ 9:50AM
Deb said...Wll said
3-04-2010 @ 8:38PM
Tex said..."Is anyone dead?" is your supporting argument? That would excuse letting your kid drive a car without training or license, as long as it didn't result in a fatality. Or how about letting little Johnny do the wiring in your home? As long as no one is electrocuted, where's the harm? Don't overlook letting your kid handle the control panels at the train station. Near-misses don't matter, as long as there are no train collisions resulting in fatalities. By golly, you're right!!!!
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:39PM
m said...Kids can be such a distraction.Why would he even think of bringing them to a job site that requires your full attention?Lives of others are in his hands.
Reply
3-04-2010 @ 8:39PM
barbara edwards said...I think the air traffic controller exercised bad judgment but shouldn't be fired. I think this is a "teachable moment" when he's admonished to never do that again. And if he does, he will be fired.
Reply