Girl Scouts Distribute Planned Parenthood Sex Guide at United Nations Meeting

Yep! Keep them thin , and germy .
Then wait to see if babies infected with HIV are given any choice about lack of nurturing . Regular "Typhoid Mary's' sharing . . syphilis ,, gonorrhea, herpes along with the other dozens of venereal diseases..,Sick babies had no choice; you love your choice of sex so much you share disease freely.
What a bunch of nonsense. Don't you dare pollute the air or environment !
Here is an agenda set out for girls right out of hell..
Somebody out there has a festering hateof the female body.; What jealousy to ruin for a lifetime the chance for experiencing the beauty of real love in marriage and keeping your eyes and yes cuteness for a one and only..
May the angels run interference here , and prevent hell on earth for young girls and women who would take a bite of that rotten apple offered by some idiot who doesn't know his or her backside from an outhouse..
There is nothing cool about some young girl having lost her innocence ,, looks you straight in the eye while she mimmicks f the likes of P.P nonsense ,which is far from being innocuous.
( P.P needs potty training and U N needs undoing)

Reply

Anybody that is well read knows the eugenics history behind Margaret Sanger and planned parenthood... not a thing you would want a girl scout involved in unless they are wearing a swastika

Reply

I can't post a link but if you google The Girls' Statement and follow the link provided by the WAGGGS, you'll find it.

Hardly scandalous stuff.

Reply

I am always amazed at the lack of logical thought behind many posts. The idea of worrying about unwed parents being "fixed" by planned parenthood is like having a bunch of shoplifter kids that went to some planned shoplifters organization so they could still shoplift but be able to get by with it and not land in jail. This is goofy. How about teaching kids to have integrity and character. How about they don't grow up to be slutty or loose or shoplifting thieves. How about they have enough character to not need the planned parenthood or planned thieves of America counsel. Hello... is there anybody in there?

Reply

hiv is a flatout fraud and a lie
hiv has never caused Aids !
read book deadly deception for more

Reply

AIDS: The Great Con Trick


It destroys the immune system, so CAUSING Aids. People are dying from the treatment, not the HIV. Aids is simply the breakdown of the immune system, for which there are endless causes, none of them passed on through sex. That's another con which has made a fortune for condom manufacturers and created enormous fear around the expression of our sexuality and the release and expansion of our creative force. What has happened since the Great Aids Con is that now anyone who dies from a diminished immune system is said to have died of the all encompassing term, Aids. It is even built into the diagnosis. If you are HIV positive and you die of tuberculosis, pneumonia, or 25 other unrelated diseases now connected by the con men to "Aids", you are diagnosed as dying of Aids. If you are not HIV positive and you die of one of those diseases you are diagnosed as dying of that disease, not Aids. This manipulates the figures every day to indicate that only HIV positives die of Aids. AZT is the killer. There is not a single case of AZT reversing the symptoms of Aids. How can it? It's causing them, for goodness sake. The Aids industry is now worth billions of pounds a year and makes an unimaginable fortune for the drug industry controlled by the Rockefellers and the rest of the Global Elite. - David Icke


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by David Icke
Dec 26, 2007

HIV does NOT cause Aids. HIV does not cause anything. A staggering statement given the hype and acceptance by the scientific establishment and, through them, the public that the HIV virus is the only cause of Aids. HIV is a weak virus and does not dismantle the immune system. Nor is Aids passed on sexually. There are two main types of virus. Using the airplane analogy, you could call one of these virus strains a "pilot" virus. It can change the nature of a cell and steer it into disease. This usually happens very quickly after the virus takes hold. Then there is the "passenger" virus which lives off the cell, goes along for the ride, but never affects the cell to the extent that it causes disease.

HIV is a passenger virus!

So how on earth did it become the big boogy man virus of the world? The person who announced that HIV caused Aids was an American, Doctor Robert Gallo. He has since been accused of professional misconduct, his test has been exposed as fraudulent, and two of his laboratory executives have been convicted of criminal offenses. Tens of millions of people are tested for HIV antibodies every year and Dr Gallo, who patented his "test", gets a royalty for every one. Luc Montagnier, Gallo's partner in the HIV-causes-Aids theory, has since admitted in 1989: "HIV is not capable of causing the destruction of the immune system which is seen in people with Aids". Nearly 500 scientists across the world agree with him. So does Dr Robert E Wilner, author of the book 'The Deadly Deception. The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause Aids'.

Dr Wilner even injected himself with the HIV virus on a television chat show in Spain to support his claims. Other doctors and authors come to the same conclusions, among them Peter Duesberg PhD and John Yiamouyiannis PhD, in their book, 'Aids: The Good News Is That HIV Doesn't Cause It. The Bad News Is "Recreational Drugs" And Medical Treatments Like AZT Do'. That's a long title, but it sums up the situation. People are dying of Aids because of the treatments used to "treat" Aids! It works like this. Now it is accepted by the establishment and the people that HIV causes Aids, the system has built this myth into its whole diagnosis and "treatment". You go to the doctor and you are told your HIV test was positive(positive only for the HIV antibodies, by the way, they don't actually test for the virus itself). Because of the propaganda, many people already begin to die emotionally and mentally when they are told they are HIV positive. They have been conditioned to believe that death is inevitable.

The fear of death leads them to accept, often demand, the hyped-up "treatments" which are supposed to stop Aids occurring. (They don't.) The most famous is AZT, produced by the Wellcome organisation, owned, wait for it, by the Rockefellers, one of the key manipulating families in the New World Order.

AZT was developed as an anti-cancer drug to be used in chemotherapy, but it was found to be too toxic even for that! AZT's effect in the "treatment" of cancer was to kill cells - simple as that - not just to kill cancer cells , but to kill cells, cancerous and healthy. The question, and this is accepted even by the medical establishment, was: would AZT kill the cancer cells before it had killed so many healthy cells that it killed the body? This is the drug used to "treat" HIV.
What is its effect?

It destroys the immune system, so CAUSING Aids. People are dying from the treatment, not the HIV. Aids is simply the breakdown of the immune system, for which there are endless causes, none of them passed on through sex. That's another con which has made a fortune for condom manufacturers and created enormous fear around the expression of our sexuality and the release and expansion of our creative force. What has happened since the Great Aids Con is that now anyone who dies from a diminished immune system is said to have died of the all encompassing term, Aids. It is even built into the diagnosis. If you are HIV positive and you die of tuberculosis, pneumonia, or 25 other unrelated diseases now connected by the con men to "Aids", you are diagnosed as dying of Aids. If you are not HIV positive and you die of one of those diseases you are diagnosed as dying of that disease, not Aids. This manipulates the figures every day to indicate that only HIV positives die of Aids.

This is a lie.

Many people who die from Aids are not HIV positive and the reason that the figures for Aids deaths have not soared as predicted is that the overwhelming majority of people diagnosed HIV positive have never developed Aids. Why?

Because HIV has nothing whatsoever to do with Aids.

Anything that breaks down the immune system causes Aids and that includes so-called recreational drugs. The vast majority of Aids deaths in the United States involve homosexuals and this perpetuates the myth that it has something to do with sex. But homosexuals in the US are among the biggest users of drugs which genuine doctors have linked to Aids. Prostitutes who take drugs often get Aids, prostitutes who do not take drugs invariably do not get Aids. The rise in the Aids figures in the United States corresponds perfectly with the increase in the use of drugs - most of which are made available to people on the streets by elements within the US Government, including Bill Clinton and George Bush. In Africa, the breakdown of the immune system, now known as Aids, is caused by ill health - lack of good food, clean water and the general effects of poverty. Haemophiliacs do not die from HIV-infected blood, they die, as they did before the Aids scam, from a quirk in their own immune system. Their immune system locks into foreign proteins in the infused blood and on rare occasions it can become confused during this process and attack itself. Their immune system, in effect, commits suicide. HIV is irrelevant to that. Yet how many people today who have been diagnosed HIV positive are having their lives blighted by the fear that the symptoms of Aids will
start any moment?

AZT is the killer. There is not a single case of AZT reversing the symptoms of Aids. How can it? It's causing them, for goodness sake. The Aids industry is now worth billions of pounds a year and makes an unimaginable fortune for the drug industry controlled by the Rockefellers and the rest of the Global Elite.

Reply

I am so glad I'm not a Girl Scout anymore. I'm not even proud to say I was one, especially now. This is completely ridiculous! There are so many things wrong with Planned Parenthood. It may have been created with good intentions and it may do some good, but it does a lot of bad too. Abortion is murder to an unborn HUMAN! It has potential for growth, success, and a full life, just like any other baby. The only difference is that the HUMAN is still inside the mother. And the mother can decide that she just doesn't want to raise a baby so she can kill it. What about adoption?? Just use common sense people! How would you like it if your mom chose to kill you?? Hmm..I'll let you think about that...

Reply

It is important that teen girls learn about their bodies and sexuality in a supportive atmosphere. The more a young woman learns about sexuality, the less likely she is to have an unwanted pregnancy.

Reply

If you feel that you can accurately educate your daughter about sex, then do it! Don't just assume she is going to remain sheltered and virginal until she gets married. Planned parenthood does amazing things for thousands of women, (and men!). We have spent too many decades watching teen women get pregnant and teens and young adults in general getting STD's left and right. If you aren't a complete idiot, or a bible thumper, you should realize that the only way that we have a chance at containing the spread of these diseases, and stopping unwanted pregnancy is to EDUCATE young men and women EARLY. Otherwise it is too late. Maybe if more people would allow their kids to be taught the TRUTH about sex early on in life, we wouldn't need to have the debate about the ethics behind abortion. You know why? PEOPLE WOULD KNOW HOW TO PREVENT UNWANTED PREGNANCY. What a concept. And for all of you parents who make your child feel like a bad person for thinking about sex, masturbating, or having sex, you can just stick it where the sun won't shine, (but remember make sure u don't enjoy it or you will go to hell).

Reply

I think this is great. Someone needs to tell girls the truth about whats going on out there. Girl scouts does NOT Just distribute cookies. They prepare kids for life and give them great science and math skills to they can become leaders in education. Sex education is science education too. My focus is human sexuality, and the younger the better that children learn the facts, the safer and more comfortable they will be as they grow older.

Reply

When I was a young girl I enjoyed girl scouts and went to many of their camps and stayed in scouting until I was a junior in high school. It was at that time I lost our scout leader and the closest leader was about a 40 minute drive away, and my parents said that was to far. I know Girl Scouts promote building a strong woman.

When I was older my daughter also joined Girl Scouts and I was her scout leader along with a friend. We enjoyed our times together. They do have a badge that talked about sex education in it. I know before we even thought about opening up that can of worms we had a meeting with all the parents. Then we planned the night we were going to discuss this very topic, and it was very opened WITH parent's permission. it was not closed door and it was not with a known organization like Planned Parenthood.

My daughter did attended the Girl Scout Conference back in 2000. (I think that was the year she went- she was a sophomore in high school.) I would not of appreciated her being cloistered behind a closed door like that with a sign that said NO ADULTS WELCOMED. I would of been the scout leader standing there and refusing to let any of the girls who were under my care attend such a meeting. I know the Girl Scouts want to build a well rounded girl, but this did take it to far even in today's modern world.

Reply

I am a very liberal woman. I don't think of abortion as "birth control" as one other person commented, but I do think there are women who are going to do it no matter what, and therefore it should be kept out of the back alleys and be legal. I was raised Catholic with all the guilt that comes with it. TV and movies were different then and when people were attracted to each other, they kissed and the scene faded to black... I didn't even know what sex was until I was 14. What I have a problem with is these girls are too young... well, sadly, I think they are even though I know that many are already having sex, I think they are still too young to be given that material although I support the distribution of that type of material to those who REQUEST it. Schools should teach about reproduction and families can teach their children about the emotional side of love.

Reply

I too benefited from generous practical knowledge on this subject as a youth, and do support both boys and girls having that (and it's easier to do it separately.) Knowledge itself does not lead to experimentation and risk-taking. This pamphlet, though, is not about knowledge. It contains many factual inaccuracies, some downright dangerous (such as the suggestion that you have a right not to tell a partner about HIV.) It is an activist pamphlet with the explicit goal of encouraging unhealthy, risk-taking behavior, and it shows clearly that Planned Parenthood has become a radical organization. The Girl Scouts should disassociate themselves. They don't need to tackle sex ed, but if they wish to continue to do so, they need a more mainstream approach, with materials available online, and of a kind that ordinary parents wouldn't be shocked to see there.

Reply

I wonder if any of the people on here singing the praises of Planned Parenthood know anything of the founder. Margaret Sanger was a regular humanitarian alright (yes I'm being sarcastic). She advocated for eugenics and was extremely bigoted, and I think that's the nicest, most polite thing I can say about her. There are plenty of other ways to teach young girls about safe sex without aligning the Girl Scouts of America with Planned Parenthood.

What shame this was allowed and that some people are proud of it. This isn't about teaching girls anything. This is about indoctrination of a younger, more vulnerable segment of the population with liberal views on sex, contraception, and "privacy rights". Who on earth would want a teenage girl (who so many people are convinced is sexually active anyway) to believe that an HIV-positive person shouldn't disclose his diagnosis with his sexual partners? This is teaching them about safe sex? Are you kidding me?

Reply

The brochure was discovered by a parent who was at the UN meetings because she was concerned about the WAGGGS meetings based on what she has heard in the past. You can see the original reports at
www.c-fam.org/publications/id.1589/pub_detail.asp

While this was not the GSUSA, and no one ever said it was, GSUSA has been denying any involvement, but they cleverly downplay their role and more notably, that of their parent organization, WAGGGS. WAGGGS had their delegates at the UN meeting of the Commission on the Status of Women. If you go to the WAGGGS website you can see that they were openly advocating for safe, accesible abortions for young people, as well as a number of other demands on sexual rights on behalf of young people, all being done in the name of girl scouting. See for yourself at www.wagggsworld.org/en/CSW54/Day6

GSUSA will not address the issue of whether or not they support these advocacy efforts. Keep in mind that GSUSA is a dues paying member of WAGGGS and pays millions in dues and other contributions to WAGGGS.

This has nothing to do with the mission of Girl Scouting, and they should not be advocating openly on these issues one way or the other. These are issues that should be left to families and the girls to decide for themselves. WAGGGS is misusing Girl Scouting to push the agenda of a few.

Reply

As a girl scout leader I know that no girl scout event is allowed without a registered and approved adult present! I too would not allow any of my girls in a meeting without adult supervision and yes this went a little far for girl scouts.

Reply

I'm glad Kiki finally mentioned the point that seems to be overlooked by the rush of emotional reactions against the responsible parents who want to control their own kids' "education."

It seems otherwise to be assumed that every kid needs the "education" (some may read "propaganda") of whatever the next nanny-group wants to promote. Believe it or not, many parents are perfectly capable of raising children with a rounded, healthy outlook that includes moral training (and, yes, even a respect for God, for those detractors who flinch at the idea of the Bible being an excellent educational tool).

The "education" provided by the baby-killing lobbyists seems to be welcomed by the dumbed-downed public who look forward to some (as in, any) training aimed at their kids, because they feel no control over what those kids will do when exposed to that big world-at-large.

Reply

I read the pamphlet and I think it is utterly disgusting! It makes
light of sex and blatantly promotes it. These girls are too young to
be having sex, and such brochures should not be read by their
impressionable minds. And to do it behind closed doors, without any
prior parent knowledge is just plain creepy. I think ignorance is
wrong as well, BUT it is MY JOB to teach my daughters about sex, not
the Girl Scouts!!! Hopefully the GS will end their relationship with
WAGGGS and Planned Parenthood or my girls are done, done, done!! To think that part of the sales of my daughters' cookies are going to
organizations such as this deeply disturbs me.

Reply