Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Louise Pennington: Teenage Pregnancy, Patriarchal Hypocrisy and…
'Rules Of Engagement' 100th Episode Series Finale
No More Pumping in the Bathroom: New Law Requires Private Nursing Space for Moms
Filed under: Toddlers Preschoolers, Work Life, Health & Safety: Babies, Development/Milestones: Babies, In The News, Day Care & Education, Feeding & Sleeping, Baby-sitting, Research Reveals: Babies, Nutrition: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Babies, Health & Safety: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Development: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Behavior: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Activities: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Gear Guides: Babies, Gear Guides: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Research Reveals: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Toddlers & Preschoolers
Who wouldn't love pumping their breast milk in here? Credit: Getty Images
Lactivists, rejoice -- buried deep inside the much-debated health care reform bill is a legislation that means working moms may never have to pump their breast milk in the bathroom again.
The Detroit Free Press reports that the Reasonable Break Time for Nursing Mothers legislation requires employers with 50 or more workers to give moms an on-site nursing space that is private -- plus, enough time to pump their milk.
While the "break" may be unpaid, it's a welcome relief for breast-feeding moms who sometimes pay a high price for keeping their newborns supplied with breast milk. Just ask LaNisa Allen, who was fired in August 2005, when she was "caught" pumping on the job at Totes/Isotoner.
The legislation is raising a lot of questions, too, because it leaves the law open to interpretation. Employers are uncertain as to their obligations: Are they required to build pumping time into daily working schedules? What exactly does a "private space" in which to nurse look like?Experts are looking to the U.S. Department if Labor to set guidelines and also are urging them to act fast. Dr. Rosemary Shy, co-chair of the Michigan Breastfeeding Network, tells the Free Press allowing moms to pump at work could have positive, long-term effects for mothers, children and businesses.
"The long-term health impact is huge," Shy tells the newspaper. "We know that most mothers who quit breast-feeding quit because they have to go back to work, and work makes no accommodations."
A study released earlier this month revealed that exclusive breast-feeding for at least the first six months of an infant's life significantly reduces the risk of serious health problems, including but not limited to diabetes and obesity. However, that study also shows that only 12 percent of moms follow that recommendation, and some experts claim that statistic could be the result of workplaces that aren't lactation-friendly.
The hope is that the new law will eliminate the need for moms to pump covertly and quickly in random bathroom stalls. Skeptics say the "one size fits all" law may cause compliance problems for employers who don't have a traditional office set-up, such as firms that employ truck drivers.
"It's going to be easy to comply if you're an office-based employer, and the employee's time at the job is 100 percent in the office," Wendy Block, director of health policy and human resources for the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, tells the Free Press. "It's going to be tougher to accommodate an employee whose work is not entirely spent in the office."
Related: Breast is Best for College











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
4-23-2010 @ 5:38PM
csi8299 said...One more reason to not hire women of childbearing age. Sorry ladies, I've got a business to run and a budget to meet and building you a pumping room ain't part of it.
Reply
4-23-2010 @ 9:18PM
Susan said...You neanderthal jerk - go back into your cave and play with rocks. You're obviously too stupid to be a professional. I hope someone sues you for every nickel your second-rate company ever makes!
4-24-2010 @ 5:10PM
steffsteff899 said...this is great! and to the person who doesnt want to build a room bc they "have a business to run" go 2 hell
4-25-2010 @ 2:56PM
baldinia said...Are you angry because you weren't breastfed?
4-25-2010 @ 11:24PM
Helena said...LOL csi8299... I get what you are saying, but it's not a very good stance to take. I pumped at work for an entire 12 months...and I wasn't docked any pay!! Yes, it took time out of my day, but you know what? I was a happier and more efficient employee because I knew that my employer respected my short term commitment.
4-28-2010 @ 5:48PM
Chase said...You can't not hire women because they can have kids... Men like you make me sad to be a man. They make up more than half of all people and you would be furious if they didn't hire you because your man parts needed special treatment. People in society have rights and they tend to become more powerful the more socially acceptable the group is. It's pretty acceptable to be a woman these days so they need to get rights and workspace that suits them. Hiring a man over a woman because of an expense is like hiring an illegal immigrant before a citizen because it's cheaper. Money isn't the all important thing in the world.
5-07-2010 @ 2:16PM
Paige said...people like this close-minded dunderhead make me wish his mother had been more careful with her birth control...
5-18-2010 @ 7:34PM
bbabe said...I agree with you csi8299. We to have a business to run and for years women have made their choice. And I don't hear of their children starving to death! And yes, my kids turned out just fine! No! it's Not just Men complaining! Maybe those who feel the need to express, be a stay at home mom for 6 months. Oh wait...you'll prob cry about wanting to get paid for that too! Just another government control issue~
8-23-2010 @ 7:07PM
lumnicence said...Well, I guess it'll have to be part of the budget from now on. That along with handicap accessable restrooms and entrances, paid over-time, OSHA, and all the other things miserly business owners hate to comply with.
As a lactating mother...
HA!! I win!
And as I am so often told (with social values, move to Europe), if you don't like it, why not move to China? Now that is cheap labor!
4-24-2010 @ 9:08AM
SKL said...csi8299 has a point, actually. There's a price to pay for accommodations that burden employers, and whether it's intended or not, women pay them. I have worked in international businesses where I've observed how much opportunity there is in those "progressive" countries where they have more accommodations for women. Those countries have far fewer women in key positions than the US has. And outside the government, I have never seen a mother of young children in a high-level corporate meeting except in the USA. Whether it's legal or not, they don't promote as many women because it would burden them too much. Who's going to put a women in a key position only to have her take off a year to have a baby? Hello? Yet it's very hard to prove that the reason you didn't get hired or promoted to a better job is due to your gender. So the reality is, if you are a career-oriented woman, the best place for you to live and work is in the USA. If pumping your breasts or taking a long maternity leave is more important to you than advancing in your career, then look for a 9-5 job with a big company or the government. But then, don't complain about the pay or the lack of challenge. If you are one of those unusual women who are highly productive at work despite being supermom, look for a job with a company that makes recruiting/developing/retaining women a priority, and you'll find plenty of accommodations as well as better pay than what you'd find in Canada, Europe, etc; coupled with lower taxes. If you are a woman who doesn't want kids, can't have kids, or is satisified with having kids but sharing some of the "earth mother" roles with delegees (and formula), then be happy that you live in a country where you have a decent shot at rising to the top and not paying for other womens' different choices.
Of course, the way things are going, my comments may be obsolete soon - the USA is moving toward more and more policies that punish both employers and employees for others' choices, while nationalizing industries. I'm not sure how much longer today's meaningful careers will continue to be as meaningful - for women or men.
Reply
4-25-2010 @ 5:55PM
abigail said...you guys who think childbearing women shouldn't be allowed to work need a reality check. what about positions like obstetricians and ob-gyns? those are two proffesions where its to your advantage to have kids. i mean, really guys. this stuff is coming from a 13 year old. i know more than you and you guys are probably 20 or 30 years older! TIME FOR A GUT CHECK.
Reply
4-25-2010 @ 10:32PM
Tiff said...Not all companies are heartless. And it isn't all that difficult to accomodate a nursing mother. When my first son was born I worked in an office setting and the company was very nice about finding a place for me to pump. It was a little 'sitting room' with a couch that was attached to a bathroom. The outside door locked and there was another door to seperate the sitting room from the bathroom. I had all the privacy I needed. The company never had to make any changes, they weren't inconvenienced and it didn't cost them any extra money. I used my breaks and lunchtime to pump even though I didn't have to. They never docked my paychecks if I needed a little extra time. My work was always done on time and they never had a reason to complain about my time away from my desk. They were a great company to work for. Pumping does not take long at all, 15-20 minutes once your on a schedule and most women would be willing to make that up at the end of their shift, I know I would stay a little later on the days it took me a little longer.
Reply
5-07-2010 @ 2:28PM
Paige said...slightly jealous, tiff!! :) I need a job wherever you were working!!
4-26-2010 @ 7:04PM
becca said...I am a business owner and a mother who breastfed. I am all for supporting women, but I do not need the government forcing my hand. In my job, if a woman requests time to breast feed or pump, I make personal accommodations for them.
Laws like these are put in place because a small minority have been unjustly fired. It is not indicative how most companies run their business and does not necessitate passing a law.
As a business owner I make it my mission to ensure the comfort and happiness of my employees and resent being put in a position of potentially being sued if I don't follow the exact federal protocol.
In my opinion, this law is just another step toward making the American workplace the most contentious and litigious in the world.
And in my opinion, it is going to negatively impact the numbers of women that are hired at companies.
The more laws that are put in place requiring businesses to give special treatment to women means that fewer young females will be hired due to the threat of potential lawsuits and the costs of forced compliance.
Why does the misfortune of a few require the passing of a law that will negatively affect so many?
Reply
4-28-2010 @ 2:44PM
Chase said...They need to require all places to have pumping areas regardless of women or men working there, it's the only way to prevent people from not hiring women. If you have to make one whether or not they work they it won't stop you from hiring them. Men are idiots sometimes. I've been one for awhile so it comes from a good source. Like I said earlier not hiring woman to not have to make a station is like hiring an immigrant to not have to pay full wages. Stop trampling on rights/common sense situations for the benefit of money or you aren't a righteous human being.
4-28-2010 @ 8:37AM
June said...When I had my first child the nurse in the plant insisted I give her a date when my child was due. I refused, turns out, it was none of their business. I worked in the office and it was not hazardous to me, my child or anyone else.
Reply
4-28-2010 @ 8:59AM
kerry said...Honestly a womens right to breast feed is her own decision. in the Navy it is specifically built into thier regulations to allow a place for privacy and running water for the duration of the time for her brestfeeding. Times to be allowed to do so are to be worked out between herself and her supervisor. If the military can make the concessions then why can the private force not? I am a mother of a 7 month old and had the choice to breastfeed or formula feed. i chose to formula feed. Yes there are many advantages to breastfeeding but over all formula is now very comparable to breast milk and every day more and more advancements are being made to make it even better. By the way just as a side note, breast milk is only as good as what you put in your system before your pregnancy and after. All those mothers who did drugs, heavy drinking smoking, poor eating habits, or worked with hazardous chemicals prior to the pregnancy and choose to breastfeed afterwords lets get real your not giving your child the best milk out there for it.
Let women who breast feed do so on thier own time and stop demanding so much. Once you give space, then it will be time then it will be more and more, it never stops aand we can look thorughout history at what appeasement does (world war II ringa bell to anyone)
Reply
5-07-2010 @ 2:25PM
Paige said...While I understand the small business owners who are justifiably concerned about the expense and possible litigation involved in this being passed, there are already laws like this in most states (my native FL being one), and they actually give quite a bit of wiggle room in favor of the employer in regards to accommodating the nursing mom/employee. The only reason there is a federal law being processed is for the few employers (like csi-asshat) who think that pushing a kid out of your crotch and serving your 6 weeks (UNPAID by asshat) maternity leave is where your rights as a mom end and that you have no rights as a mom afterward. (like all the ones who think that once you punch in, you are the company b*tch and you otherwise cease to exist...)
Reply
6-08-2010 @ 6:12PM
Cristi79 said...I am a business owner and honestly I'd be happy to have to comply to a law like this. When I had my first daughter I still worked for one of the Fortune 100 companies that had insanely strict rules about taking a break to use the restroom, let alone let you breasfteed. In my last trimester I needed a doctor's note to be able to take 5 minute breaks here and there to walk. I had an office job!!! I know a lot of companies who would find the first reason to fire you if you God forbid take a breastfeeding break! And I really hope this law is put in place for those moms who have to go back to work and still want to do what's best for their child!
I think we already are the world's most litigious country! You can sue anyone for anything here and usually win. We are here BECAUSE of the lack of regulations! If a company of 50+ workers is able to provide the space fore them to work, I am sure they could come up with what amounts to a chair somwhere for a nursing mother to pump and a 30 minute pumping break!
Reply
7-01-2010 @ 10:18AM
blinded said...I think if they take ime off the job to pump they eed to make it up during the day sometime. Maybe skip other breaks, part of lunch, or come in earlier the next day or stay later that night.
That wouls only be fair to everyone.
Reply