Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Christie Russell: What's Mine Is Mine and What's Yours Is Ours
'Scrubs' Alum Sarah Chalke Books New Pilot
Meet the New American Mom: Older, Educated and (Possibly) Unmarried
Filed under: Toddlers Preschoolers, Health & Safety: Babies, Development/Milestones: Babies, In The News, Weird But True, Day Care & Education, Feeding & Sleeping, Single Parenting, Sex, Baby-sitting, Research Reveals: Babies, Nutrition: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Babies, Health & Safety: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Development: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Behavior: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Activities: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Gear Guides: Babies, Gear Guides: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Research Reveals: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Toddlers & Preschoolers
More women aren't waiting for marriage before having kids. Credit: Getty Images
Researchers at the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press in Washington, D.C., looked at the changing demographics of American mothers by comparing women who gave birth in 1990 to those who gave birth in 2008.
They found some definite trends in a report released last week.
While June probably married Ward right out of high school, Junia put off marriage until she completed her bachelor's degree and started her career, waiting to say I do until she was in her mid- to late 20s. The marriage didn't last. Still wanting children, Junia had them on her own.
Oh, and by the way, while June was whiter than Wonder Bread, Junia is either Latina or boasts a variety of different ethnic heritages.
"The demography of motherhood in the United States has shifted strikingly in the past two decades," Gretchen Livingston and D'Vera Cohn write in the the Pew Center report. "Compared with mothers of newborns in 1990, today's mothers of newborns are older and better educated. They are less likely to be white and less likely to be married."
All this is because Pew researchers found:
- Women are having babies later rather than sooner. In 1990, more teens (13 percent) had babies than women 35 and older (9 percent). Now the reverse is true. In 2008, 10 percent of births were to teens and 14 percent were to women 35 and older.
- Mothers are better educated. Most mothers (54 percent) had at least some college education in 2008 -- an increase of 41 percent over 1990. Among mothers 35 and under in 2008, 71 percent went to college.
- Women are waiting to get married or not getting married at all. Possibly because of their education and careers, researchers found, women are delaying marriage until their mid- to late 20s or early 30s. "The more education a woman has, the later she tends to marry and have children," Livingston and Cohn write. However, a record 4-in-10 births (41 percent) in 2008, were to unmarried women. In 1990, 28 percent of births were to unmarried women.
- Mothers are increasingly non-white. While white women made up 53 percent of new mothers in 2008, that's down from 65 percent in 1990. A fourth of the babies born in 2008 were to Latina mothers.
That means 50 million of the new people added to the population in next 40 years will be the children or grandchildren of new immigrants.
Pew researchers also asked parents why they decided to have their first child. Most said, "the joy of having children." However, 50 years after the Food and Drug Administration approved the sale of birth-control pills, nearly half of parents said, "There wasn't a reason. It just happened."
Related: Census Portrait of At-Home Moms Hardly Revolutionary












ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
5-10-2010 @ 10:29PM
Eric said...Most of the Hispanic mothers don't count since they're all illegal aliens. And that's great that only half of new children being born in the U.S. are white. I'm guessing that half of the population will have to foot the bill for welfare for all of the new non white kids, right? The article seems to have failed to mention that.
Reply
5-11-2010 @ 12:37AM
Just Saying said...So, Eric and William,
Your main issue is not the birth rate among older, unmarried women ... but with the fact that these women are not white? And Eric, you might be surprised at the number of "white" kids on welfare. But your statement seems to imply that your issue (problem) is with non-white kids being on welfare...or upon deeper examination...non-whites, period.
One last note to William...
Euro White Christians were not the founders of the western civilization. Euro White Christians came to western lands already inhabited by non-white persons and eradicated or enslaved those non-white, true natives of the lands. Euro White Christians were nothing more than invaders and conquerers of that which didn't belong to them. Particularly true of the Americas and the middle and near East.
Although it's ridiculous to have to post this disclaimer ... here goes... I'm a white female. Mostly German and Irish. Because my great grandfather was half native American Indian...I am also native American Indian to a very small degree. My forefathers were both conquerers and the conquered.
If either of you believe that a particular skin color and religion should conquer and rule ... you are no better than the racist, religious extremists from other nations and, sadly enough, our own nation. You also lack knowledge, reason, and Truth.
5-11-2010 @ 2:51AM
lagerente said...Eric, take your racist mentality somewhere else. By making the extremely ridiculous statement that "most of the Hispanic mothers don't count since they are all illegal aliens" you just show how ignorant you are. Though most Latin-Americans are Hispanics (meaning their ancestors were from Spain but they were born outside of Spain), not all Hispanics are Latin-Americans, for example. Get over yourself. The world is a mixed place. People of all colours are related, whether it is to your liking or not. The concept of "Race" is not only outdated, it is completely false. Educate yourself by reading, a lot. You don't need a college education to read..All you need is an interest to know, that is all. Holding on to false beliefs is not only self-defeating, it is a waste of your true potential as a human being.
5-12-2010 @ 3:15AM
Eric said...lagerente:
I have no doubt that I am more well-read than you, so telling me to read in order to match your discredited politically correct views is silly. I'm not racist, I'm just not politically correct. "Racist" is a meaningless word anyway, which only applies to white males these days, when a white male says something that others would rather not hear, whether it's true or not. You mean you didn't know that? I guess you should start reading more. And race doesn't exist, really? I guess Obama ISN'T the first black President then. I guess his mother ISN'T white and his father ISN'T a black African, right? If race doesn't exist, why was the left wing media so happy to mention those facts? Face it, race DOES exist, and there is nothing more ignorant than to suggest that the concept of "race" is false. Try reading more.
And if you read more, maybe you'd be aware of the writings of REAL conservatives (not the fake ones you see on Fox News), such as Pat Buchanan, who clearly outline how the U.S. is under assault by uncontrolled third-world immigration. That's a very real phenomenon, one that even the leftists are very well aware of, further proving that race does, in fact, exist. So yes, the illegal immigrant Hispanic mothers do not count. Deal with it. Maybe if you read a little more, you'd be aware of all of this. Good thing you have me to explain these things to you, right?
10-25-2010 @ 10:13PM
TammaraPar said...You seem to like saying peoples' comments are meaningless. However, I say you are the meaningless one. Let's take this apart, piece by piece, hmm?
1) you say Hispanic mothers don't count since their all illegal aliens.
Wrong. To participate in a study like this, they have to have the proper documentation. Scientific studies are conducting in a professional manner, not willy nilly. Even so called 'random' surveys are not completely random, information is taken from the hospitals. If they were doing a world birth rate, sure, that comment would have some validity, but as this was limited to the US, it doesn't. Information was given whether the mothers were US citizens or not.
2) You claim whites will have to foot the bill for non whites? Wrong again. People are born with the same amount of potential. you always hear stories about how someone was born poor, but was able to become rich because of a certain skill or ability. While not everyone gets famous, nine tenths of children born into 'welfare' homes actually do well for themselves later on.
3) Half the kids being born are not going to be white. Wrong again. Take a look back into your own ancestry. 'white' actually refers to a Caucasian person of European or Germanic heritage. No one is entirely white. If you traced your ancestry back far enough, you would find that you, like all of us, are mixed race. Thus, making Race nearly a moot point, because you are only counting the 'majority' race. You don't get to pick and choose, really. You can say you're white all you want, if you have a single ancestor from, say, Ireland,guess what? you're not white.
3) You seem to have a very, and I mean very, split view. According to you, all whites are well educated, have jobs, and pay taxes. INCREDIBLY WRONG. Allow me to quote here.
"Social Security is the nation’s largest welfare program, although many Whites prefer to call it a retirement plan. What millions of Black Americans pay into the system ends up going to Whites who retire and Social Security is the biggest type of welfare. Some 61 percent of welfare recipients are White, while 33 percent are Black, according to 2000 Census Bureau statistics. ~~~The government writes retirement and disability benefit checks to 35.4 million recipients of whom 88.7 percent are White and 9.6 percent are Black. ~~~"
Startling? Let me continue.
Program Recipients Black White
Social Security (1)
Retirement insurance 26 Million 7.7% 90.4%
Disability insurance 3.7 Million 18.3% 79.3%
Survivor’s benefits 1.8 Million 24% 72%
Widow’s benefits 4.9 Million 9% 90.1%
Supplemental
Security Income 5.8 Million 26% 48.2%
Aid to Families with Dependent Children (2)
3.8 Million 39.2% 55.2%
Medicare 37 Million 8.1% 88% (3)
Medicaid 33.4 Million 25.1% 46.1% (4)
Food Stamps 27.5 Million 34.9% 42.3% (5)
Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Food Program (6)
5.8 Million 27.8% 44.3%
National Student Lunch Program (7)
44.5 Million 17% 75%
Veterans’ Benefits 26 Million 8.0% 86.4% 8
Housing Subsidies 4.7 Million 40% 46% (9)
What does all this mean?
While Black and latino's do tend to be on the books for things like afdc and other benefits more, you've gotta think about why. A lot of the time, its for only 1-2 years, or for an even shorter amount of time. A transitional phrase, so to speak. Whites on the other hand, tend to stay on it as long as they can. Also, blacks and latinos tend to go on with their lives after grief or accidents. A white person tends to get what they can out of the government for it.
an example here would be- a white person, if they break their leg at work, sues and gets rich off of the company and the government, taking it for all its worth. A black person in the same situation, or a latino in the same situation, would wait till the cast was off and be RIGHT BACK AT WORK.
Also, all those taxes the black and latino people pay, go straight to whites. Most whites retire as soon as the can, whereas a black or latino person rarely does.
So, if your racist beliefs can take the hint, lets follow the logic. Are whites paying for non whites........ no. It's the other way around.
Get over it, and stop the racist drivel.
5-10-2010 @ 10:55PM
Sarah said...It's way worse then she's saying. Like I've been saying for years in posts, when women give sex away for free, men don't marry until older, when they want more money, and then they EXPECT her to pay heavy bills, at least this is the CA trend where the men in general are very demanding in this respect, which is why I don't want one. There are some great exceptions, but overall the area breeds these personalities. So, when the white woman marries, if she marries, it's much later, when she can pay off that mortgage and improve his lifestyle. But the worst part is that they wait till they see what is to be had, and they never helped her get to that point they expect; so the older women who are smart and have alot to offer, are on to all of this and have nothing to do with them in this respect. Plenty of such older married couples have very high yearly taxes and we all know where that is going; to people who live as if we're still in the 50's only with A Little Help.
Reply
5-10-2010 @ 11:12PM
Sarah said...There is no such thing as free; if you got something for free, all that means is that someone else paid the price for it. I am paying the price for all of the free sex. They didn't want to support women, and they get abortions, and yet when it's too late and if they want to marry later, my god, what did they ever do to deserve all they expect? I can't believe women who make more then me even marry them or have a first kid at 40 only to work the rest of their life for a mortgage that will never be paid off. My god, smarten up people. All of this is just to get you to support other families who get a life you never had and never will. By removing myself from the situation I'm letting them go through what I did without them. They stole a major portion of life from me. All to get all this stuff for free, it's just sickening. And now what can I say; what is our future...you know what it is. It's a 3rd world country and that's what you'll see around you everywhere. You will be a freak in your own country. With that said, alot of them are good workers and friendly, but c'mon, how are these insane bills being paid with those large families. Cmon.
Reply
5-11-2010 @ 12:04AM
SKL said...Interesting point some have made - that maybe it's not just that women are deciding to wait. Maybe it's the behavior of men that leads to this. Why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free? Too many young women lack self-respect. They think they have to put out in order to deserve companionship. Then the men have no motivation to give a serious commitment.
Funny thing that my mom (married 49 years and counting) told me decades ago. Women don't need men. But men need women. Girls, know your power.
I am an unmarried older mom. I adopted. I'm quite happy with my choices, personally.
As for those who are getting pregnant younger, they are the groups who have aways had more babies at a younger age and probably always will. These are women who (along with their husbands) tend to be qualified only for those jobs that are increasingly moving offshore. If it weren't so politically incorrect, there would be a lot of talk of demographic, social, and economic trends. Frankly, there should be. We high-taxed older moms will be retiring as these low-income, subsidized families are multiplying. It's not rocket science.
Reply
5-11-2010 @ 4:10AM
TL said...FAIL b/c all your "facts" are inaccurate.
dumbass
Reply
5-11-2010 @ 4:57AM
Kookie said...Being better educated does not make a better Mom. In fact, older women have babies that are single are not real mothers. They have to get someone else to raise their kids (very selfish of them) because they have to work. They don't want children, they want possessions and then they ignore them. Children need a mother AND father. If they did, the juvenile crime rate would not be so high.
Reply
5-11-2010 @ 7:04AM
David S. said...Wow, Kookie, what twisted logic. So, in your world, a teen mom getting preganant is OK as long as she has another teen guy willing to marry her. As to the daycare issue, eh, plenty of married women also work and put their kids in daycare because they work. As to calling single mothers not real mothers, well -- I'll be a gentleman and not call you a name you deseve. I'll leave that to others. Have a nice day, Kookie.
5-11-2010 @ 9:05AM
Sara said...When you are such a freak in your own country, it's theirs. The stress of paying for that must be incomprehensible, and I've seen alot of mentally ill people out and about and much more is to come. Women having a job soared to a freak level too, where if you didn't make enough or have one my god instead of helping you to have a life, people will make your life worse; they will even have disdain for you. People are only out to enhance their own lives. We have empty vessels for too many men who have been disabled from having to be a man, and by so many around them, all the while claiming it was "realistic" that the women pay half a mortgage. Well now it's realistic that they lose it all. All of the psychological dynamics that come into play over this money and acquisition of materialism have resulted in men with a great job only marrying women with the same career. Other men have the job of a housewife. In either case, women are not protected for this. I know some of them are ingrate leeches for life, but you can tell the difference and prevent that. Unfortunately too many women realize too late that it isn't going to be fun for them to support themselves from 40 on whether married or not, and if they can even get a job. And the men, well, they are getting a taste of their own medicine permanently; they sure aren't getting help from me after suffering through this damage from sexual liberation; liberated; hah! Chained to a desk the rest of their life with no power is more like it.
5-12-2010 @ 3:04AM
Eric said...Just Saying:
Yes, I do have a problem with whites paying welfare to support non-whites, especially when non whites have kids at very young ages, and whites have to get an education, work, and pay taxes to support young non-white families. That's a ridiculous situation. Lots of whites agree with this, they just don't admit it.
And I'm racist, right? I could make the argument that non whites are the true racists. Name ONE country in the world where a non-white majority population works in order to pay taxes to support a white minority. Why aren't there any countries like that? I guess non-whites are racist.
And yes, Europeans "invaded" North America, but the majority of whites today are not descendants of any of the invaders, just like the majority of white Americans today are not descendants of Southern slave owners. In fact, most of there ancestors of white Americans today arrived in the U.S. AFTER slavery had ended. So your point is irrelevant. Try again. Also, those white "invaders" created a more advanced civilization than the natives, one that the natives and non whites are enjoying the fruits of today. Unless every single non white person living in North America starts living like the Amish, your point is meaningless.
Reply
10-05-2010 @ 3:07AM
Ann said...I guess I'm the only one who agrees with you. But you know what? I think it's not so much about who invaded who but rather when Europeans and anyone from another country came to America, they ASSIMILATED. Americans didn't have to learn their language to get a job, they learned the language and the ways of their new home. Yes, they kept their traditions and they were proud of where they came from but they didn't get pissed off when someone from America didn't speak their language. It's not racist, it's called telling it like it is. How about you guys look online at some job postings in states like California and Texas and Arizona and see how many of them say "Bilingual preferred". If you're white and you have kids, tell them good luck in finding a job when they get older. Oh yeah, and is it racist when I say I've heard several "non-whites" say they are on welfare because they believe it's "owed to them"? I didn't say it, they did. I quote what you said Eric, "just like the majority of white Americans today are not descendants of Southern slave owners", so why are we with the educations having to pay for something we didn't even do? Maybe they should be the one's reading books, and lots of them. But why try to better yourself when the government will support you all throughout your life? Racist? I think not. Just not oblivious and naive. Good job Eric! I wish I knew more people like you.