'Supersize' Families: The Joy of Having 8-Plus Kids
Filed under: Siblings, In The News, Weird But True, Amazing Parents, Twins, Triplets, Multiples
As a mother of eight, Michele Rusden says her calendar is key. Credit: Michele Rusden
When Melina Cummings, 37, of Montgomery County, Md., had her first child, she was overwhelmed. Three children later, she decided she was done having babies and gave all the baby stuff away. Today, she's the proud mother of eight -- three boys and five girls -- ages 5 months, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 13.
And when she and her husband take the family out (in their 12-passenger van) they get a lot of attention.
"Sometimes people can't even comment. They just stare," she says. "Others just count, with their finger, out loud, as we pass by."
How does she -- and other moms of eight or more children -- get it all done? It all comes down to organization. And Costco, iCal, date nights at home and laundry-folding parties.
A Team Approach
Elizabeth Foss, 44, who lives in the suburbs of Washington D.C., homeschools most of her nine children, ages 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 21, and works from home as a writer and blogger. Her husband travels for work, but staying connected is key to making it all work, she says.
"We text each other all day long and check in frequently by phone," she tells ParentDish. "The strength of this family depends very much upon the strength of our relationship and we both know it and work very hard to respect that."
Michele Rusden, 43, of Philadelphia, a full-time Avon representative and mother of eight, ages 7 to 21, agrees.
"Managing to keep my business thriving and their social lives in order can be a challenge," she says. "But we are able to keep things positive, due to our team efforts, and both my husband and I have a thriving business life, and the children have full lives, too.
Cummings says every year is a learning year.
"You meet the challenges and learn," she says. "It's not a talent, it's a blessing."
"The Calendar is Key"
"iCal is the only way I know where I am and where I'm supposed to be," Foss says.
And Rusden agrees that a calendar is a must-have.
"I have a big calendar where I write everything down -- appointments, dates, reminders, everything," she tells ParentDish.
Most of the moms we talked to simply don't use baby-sitters. (Do you know a teenager who could handle eight-plus children at once? And just imagine the hourly rate.). So couples make time for a lot of at-home dates, watching movies and eating together.
A Full -- and Clean Enough -- House
When you have so many children, keeping an immaculate house is nearly impossible.
"Keeping the house clean is like shoveling snow in a blizzard," Foss says.
And Gabriella San Severino, 49, of Myerstown, Penn., a mother of nine children ages 6 to 26, says, "I'll never get caught up. And I'm OK with that now."
Topping the list of consuming chores? Laundry.
"Laundry is utterly ridiculous," says Foss, who does four loads a day. Cummings does two a day, and if either woman gets behind, and the piles grow out of control, both call in the troops for some group folding. Cummings puts on a movie and everyone watches and folds, while Foss' sons only get to watch basketball on TV if they fold while doing so.
Foss does most of her food shopping at warehouse stores ("Other people are buying in bulk; I'm doing the weekly grocery run.") Her family goes through 15 dozen eggs a month, while the Cummings family tears through five gallons of milk and five dozen eggs a week and the Rusdens buy five to six loaves of bread a week.
Then all that food has to be cooked. Cummings enjoys cooking, and starts thinking about lunch and dinner as soon as breakfast is over. Foss says she cooks for her family every night, even when she's tempted to just dump cereal in paper bowls and be done with it.
Family Fun
Most of these moms tell ParentDish they always wanted to have lots of kids.
"When we were engaged, we thought it would be fun to have a big family," Foss says. "We also always thought a big family was four kids. But it very much surprises and delights us to be where we are today. The greatest gift we've given our kids is their siblings, and they know it."
Both Cummings and Rusden say as the children get older, they have even more fun with them.
"It used to bother us that we didn't go out," Cummings says. "But now when we go out with the older kids, we have a blast."
Looking back to those first overwhelming days of motherhood, when she would call her husband and ask when he was going to be home from work, Cummings says, "I laugh a little at myself, as I now find that with a few children in the house it seems quiet. I'm blessed to have had the chance to be a mother and share in the joy over the little things only a mother would notice -- eight times over."
Related: Josie Duggar Returns to Hospital











ReaderComments (Page 3 of 9)
5-18-2010 @ 1:02PM
Janet A. Keenan said...I think you missed the part about the ones that are home schooled.
Some also do what we did; pay taxes for the public schools, and pay again to send our kids to private school.
Get over it. The families in this story are an invaluable resource.
5-19-2010 @ 1:19AM
Sandyone said...David,
They can expect everyone else to pay for their education in the exact same way that the parents of just one or two children do (or, they could actually educate them by home or private school). In the USA, an education is a right and a duty and it doesn't depend on how many of your siblings have already taken advantage (or blown it off) of it.
So, what's your *real* problem with large families?
5-18-2010 @ 5:25PM
A.C. said...I think it's great that these large families seem to make it work. I don't know if I could do it, though!
And to all the environmentalist wackos freaking out of their CO2 emissions or whatever - don't forget that it's usually more conservative people who end up having large families. If you continue to limit yourselves to one, two, or even no children, all you are doing is ensuring that your extremist brand liberalism will die with you. : )
Reply
5-17-2010 @ 11:49PM
TraTill said...I'm surprised at all the ignorant comments here. If you want 2 or fewer children then fine, you make that choice. But to call people "breeders", "child abusers", "selfish", or say that they should "be shot", you should be thanking them that they are raising future workers who will pay taxes that will fund you into your old age. And the comment about older kids raising the younger ones? Since when does anyone have children and NOT expect them to help out around the house? Kids who do age-appropriate chores, learn to make their way around the kitchen, manage time and resources wisely are learning to be mature, productive adults. Aim your hateful comments at an issue that's worth all that angst.
Reply
5-19-2010 @ 11:57PM
Lee said...Future WORKERS???!! Ha! Are you aware of the current economic and employment statistics??? Greedy, selfish egoists......LOOKIT HONEY....we got another one....let's try for GREEN eyes this time....ooooooo I see myself and I LOVE IT! (What is in your pea-brains....)
5-18-2010 @ 2:34AM
Mei said...#2 Opihi
Someone tie a knot in you tail?? Where do you get your proof that any of them are on welfare? Did you not notice that both parents are working in these families? Since you know so much you must have grown up on it when you lived in your hale..
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 2:51AM
ellen said...All you nay sayers , shut up and leave them alone. it's none of your business if they have a lot children,,,
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 4:54AM
Laura said...Actually Ellen, it's very much our business. There are limited resources on this earth, and these selfish, arrogant people who over-reproduce themselves are adding to an already strained situation. To make thing worse, the glorification of these overly large families is happening via articles like this and various 'reality' TV shows.
Having 8+ children is NOT admirable - it's disgusting!
5-18-2010 @ 3:01AM
ellen said...I am number twelve of fourteen children, and a retired school teacher...
Reply
5-20-2010 @ 2:09AM
proudmama said...Laura-
I'm sensing some bitterness. Is it because you are UNABLE to reproduce? Or are you one of those child hating egotists? As far as I'm concerned, if the parents can afford to pay for the childrens' needs without relying on the welfare system, more power to them. I bet if you look far enough into your own family tree you will find a great grandparent, uncle, aunt, or someone who had a large amount of children. Such a hypocrite. Leave these families alone and go walllow in your self pity in a corner somewhere.
5-18-2010 @ 4:42AM
Samantha said...I think this is really a matter of choice on the part of families...
But, I also think that having upwards of 5 or more children naturally when there are so many children in this world who -need- homes is rather selfish. Have one, two, maybe three, but adopt the rest. We already have too many mouths that need to be fed and not enough good, responsible loving families to take care of them.
Just an example, my older brother is a product of "an unwed inner city mother" who had 4 kids before she turned 18 with two different fathers. He has a learning disability and asthma, and quite honestly, if my parents hadn't decided to adopt kids instead of having them naturally, he probably wouldn't have seen it past his 5th birthday, let alone to his high school graduation (with a normal diploma and all).
Great, they're not a drain on the state, but socially...if they wanted a large family, I would rather they have adopted. It's a win-win for everyone that way....
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 5:34AM
beck said...I'm all for adoption and I admire and applaud those that do, especially adopt special needs children. Not everyone that wants to adopt is allowed to because of the rules and laws governing adoptions.
Someone earlier said something about it being nature for hunter/gatherers to have children 4-5 years apart-it was nature's intention that we humans not live so long either. In my opinion, it is not so much the people coming into this life, it's the ones not leaving. The ones kept alive for years beyond "quality of life" thanks to modern medicine.
Do not misunderstand, I like very much modern medicine and all the inellect that we humans use for the betterment (yes, I agree there is alot to be desired) for our society.
But if one is so concerned about the global issues then think locally and kill yourself-those that are so hate-filled and finger-pointing, we could do without you.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 11:27AM
ellen said...Laura, it is not your business , you are not feeding those children, they are not asking YOU for anything...they have parents that are caring for them...your opinion is called control....you would control everything and everyone If you could...I am number twelve of fourteen, A retired seventy four year old school teacher..there are only two left from my family...an older brother and yours truly..my mother was Native American...
Reply
5-19-2010 @ 11:41PM
lee said...You are WRONG. Laura is feeding these children. I am feeding these children...and I resent it immeasurably. ANIMALS reproduce, in huge numbers, without thought, I might add....because they DON'T KNOW ANY BETTER. Period.
5-18-2010 @ 11:30AM
Cheryl said...I think it is great but most of all this article is very encouraging to me. We have 9 also the oldest 22 down to 4. We didn't plan this many God did! Thanks ladies for shareing it helped me.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 12:08PM
SKL said...I don't think anyone who hasn't adopted has a right to tell anyone else that they should adopt. And few of us who have adopted would never say such a thing. Adoption is as personal as any other aspect of building a family. It's none of your business.
So a few people have a bunch of kids. There are a lot more people who aren't having any kids. If we think anyone has a right to engineer family size in the US, the policy would have to include forcing those women who have fewer than 2 kids to get pregnant. Please report to the nearest breeding facility for duty.
Nobody has ever reported a study proving that kids from big, stable two-parent families grow up to have tons of kids and/or trample the environment. I'd guess they have done studies, but have not reported them because the studies would NOT prove their point. Or, the evidence would not be PC (as in, white traditional families would not be the culprit).
My parents had 6 biological kids but only have 3 biological grandkids (and aren't likely to have more). None of them has ever been on welfare or in prison. The bio grandkids are gifted, high-achieving HS students, hence likely to be mega-taxpayers rather than welfare recipients. The 6 are also bringing up a total of 9 non-bio grandkids (so far). And we siblings are there for each other (and for our parents) when times get tough. So yeah, I guess my parents should be ashamed. By the way, they are still married after nearly 50 years, so maybe that has something to do with it.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 12:16PM
Vee said...I am no longer going to post but appreciate reading the wide variety of comments from others. We are all just trying to get by in this world but some people do achieve some amazing things and I personally think raising children, whether one or ten, is a tough job and it is pretty amazing when they turn out well because so much is out of our control as parents. Some of the people commenting I would find very interesting to meet. Some others are quite unpleasant on line but I wonder if you would be the same way face to face. I will no longer post at this site.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 5:49PM
Kierston said...I am very disappointed that people are making such outstanding assumptions about large families. My name is Kierston, and I am Michele Rusden's 18 year old daughter.
Having a large family does not equal a polluted or stressed environment. In fact, I was just hired for a conservationist campaign to raise awareness about pollution, the lack of landfill space, the limited water supply, and the benefits of recycling. My family and I all recycle, are limited to shower use, know to turn the water off when brushing our teeth or washing the dishes, unplug our electronics, rarely watch TV, buy reusable items, donate to Good Will and other charities, and we do not water our lawn. I personally have volunteered for Habitat for Humanity, Haiti Relief Funds, the Red Cross, the Gift of Life Foundation, and several environmental campaigns in Philadelphia. If anything, my parents have produced 8 children who are becoming educated, going out into the world, and making a difference.
In this day and age, having more than 2 children does not equal a lack of social conscience. There are 6 billion in the world. 5% live in the United States. 14% of those have had absolutely no education in their lifetime and we use 21% of the world’s resources. We, on the other hand, are 8 people, all educated in private schools (not public, though public is paid by property taxes…), learning about the population, about the environment, and about sustainability. We are speaking for those without a voice and without an education.
Another few things. Not a single one of us (my parents included) have criminal records or jail time to be paid for by your tax dollars; my father is actually a police officer. None of us have ever been abused or neglected. I am the 3rd oldest and I do not “take care” of my siblings. They’re my siblings and I ENJOY spending time with them. I enjoy taking my youngest brother to baseball practice. Taking my 2 sisters to dance classes. I enjoy teaching them and spending time with them, and admire them for admiring me. Hey, 3 more people just there that know to recycle and know not to leave the water on and know that that extra box of Tasty Cakes isn’t necessary, because we are fortunate to have food at all, rather than the poor children of South Africa and India and other ailing countries. And unless those who posted degrading comments are doing something about the food and resource supply, they have no right to infringe on our family’s consumption. Not one of us is overweight and we conserve our resources to the best of our ability.
And yes, I would love to have 8 children of my own. Maybe even 14. But my decision to have many children does not reflect my neglect for our Earth. In fact, it reflects just the opposite. I want 14 little children rebuilding houses for disaster-stricken people. I want my children to know when and why and where to react to help someone else in need. I want more blood drives to be held, more organs to be donated, more lives to be saved. I want less ignorance and knowledge about our impact on the world. And until our living today recognize their own flaws, these things will not come. So rather, I’m going to have children to make the difference I want to make.
Reply
5-19-2010 @ 12:51AM
Sandyone said...Yeah, what Kierston said!!
5-19-2010 @ 8:29PM
E said...Hear hear!!!