Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Jennifer Pellegrini: After a Wild Week of News, Two Stories You Might…
Rev. Susan Baller-Shepard: Wild And Precious Lives: Godspeed…
Would You Let Your 8-Year-Old Play at the Park Without You?
Filed under: Opinions
Boo boos. Bathrooms. Predators.
Those are the three big objections that keep coming up -- though not necessarily in that order -- when I mention that this coming Saturday, May 22, is, "Take Our Children to the Park...And Leave Them There Day."
Yes, okay, it's a national holiday that I declared myself -- but it's gaining traction. So far I've heard from some parents who are psyched to drop their kids off, and others who wonder how much I'm getting paid by the Amalgamated Predators of America. (Not nearly enough.) (No! That's a joke!) All I'm really trying to do is get kids back outside again, without us, playing together safely.
Yes, safely. Please hear me out.
The idea behind "Take Our Children to the Park...And Leave Them There Day," is that kids, age 7 or 8 and up, can enjoy the kind of childhood we had, where we went out and played kickball, or tag, or even brought our Barbies to the playground. Our parents knew where we were and if we needed them, we'd run home for a Band-Aid, or Kool-Aid, or whatever darn aid we were missing. Or if the park didn't have a bathroom, we could go home for that, too.
Meantime, we were left to do the real work of childhood which is "free play" -- play without an adult running the show. All the psychologists these days are starting to realize that free play is crucial to growing up self-confident and happy. It's hardwired into us by evolution, it's that important.
But when we organize all our kids' time or, worse, lock them inside with a screen and a couch, they are missing out on free play. We've got to get them frolicking again. But how?
Usually when I tell my own kids to go out and play they say, "There's no one out there" -- and they're right. So in they stay. Of course, all the other kids in the neighborhood are looking out their windows, saying the same thing. "Take Our Children to the Park" Day -- or hour, or even half hour! -- is a chance to break that cycle. A chance for a whole bunch of kids to connect.
The biggest fear, of course, is that a child will be snatched. The good news is that the crime rate today is actually LOWER than when we were playing outside in the '70s and '80s. Our parents taught us to stick with our buddies and not go off with strangers, and then they made the big decision: Extremely small chance of danger outside, versus the extremely large benefit of mentally, physically, socially and psychologically fit kids.
Out we went.
With any luck, out a whole new bunch of kids will go, too, this coming Saturday. Will yours?
Related: Can a Mom Leave Her Kid Alone at the Library for Three Minutes?











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 3)
5-18-2010 @ 11:10AM
SKL said...I sure wish this catches on as my daughters grow. The biggest problem is that the number of kids being "allowed out" is so small, it makes it hard to develop a buddy system. Luckily my kids have each other, but it would be nice if they could count on a couple more kids so they could be an actual group.
My kids are 3 but if the weather allows, we'll stop at their favorite park on the way to shopping. Nowadays I take a walk around the outer paths while my kids play, so hopefully our being there will add to the fun atmosphere, even though I can't actually leave them there yet.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 11:33AM
Kari said...Two days ago in Chicago, an 8 year old playing at the park without adult supervision jumped a fence and fell into the river. It did not have a happy outcome. Maybe I'm a worrywort, but no. Too much can happen.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 1:36PM
LS said...A sad occurrence, to be sure. But how many other kids, in Chicago and around the country, went out to play that day and came home safely?
And if you're going to use that argument...
Two days ago, someone was killed in a car accident. You should never drive your car again. It's too dangerous.
5-18-2010 @ 2:59PM
Kari said...It's a little kid playing alone in a park, which is exactly what this article is about. I still think it's valid.
5-19-2010 @ 4:08AM
CharlesRyan said...A kid could also be struck by lightning while alone in a park. Or hit by a meteor! Are those also valid reasons not to give your kid the chance to grow and develop?
If you're worried that your child will jump a fence, here's a solution: Teach your kid not to jump any fences. Seriously, if you can't trust your kid to make halfway decent decisions, that's simply proof that you (and your child) NEED to take part in things like this. Start by briefing your kid thoroughly on all the basics--don't leave the park, don't run off with strangers, don't play with broken glass or whatever. Here's what to do if you have a boo-boo or get into an argument with another child. Then give the kid 15 minutes without supervision, if that's all you can handle. Maybe next time you can make it 30.
If a 9-year-old can't be responsible for keeping himself alive at a park for a short period of time, how on earth do you think he's ever going to be able to be a responsible, capable adult??
5-18-2010 @ 5:12PM
Pierce Nichols said...Two days ago, a child was killed in an auto accident. Are you planning to stop allowing your child to ride in motor vehicles?
5-21-2010 @ 4:16PM
Brit said...This is to the people who are talking about the car accidents:
Riding in a car is pretty much something you have to do, letting your kids play in a park by themselves is an option. There are alot of things in life that are dangerous, and as parents we should try to eliminate the ones that are obivious, and unnecessary. i.e. playing without adult supervision. I think a good alternative to letting your child play alone, is to let them play with a group of children with one of the parents there. Just one. That way, your child is playing without you present, but not without supervision. They would probably feel a little more "free". Parents could even take turns being the "supervisor" so every kid gets a chance to play without their parents.
5-25-2010 @ 12:41PM
Mady said...For the person that presented the example of a car accident, there are safety precautions that you take when driving, and although not everything can be prevented every time, you do take all the precautions necessary to be safe. Just the same, you take safety precautions with your children and supervise them when they play. They can enjoy themselves just the same with you there. Leaving them alone is just trying to prove an unnecessary point. If you can prevent something from happening by just being there, then why not do it. It's just like putting on a seat belt when you drive. Your point would be more valid if she had said to never let your children play in the park, but that's not what she's saying. She was stating that it's unsafe to let them play alone. So to translate that to your example you don't choose to never drive again you but you do make the choice to drive safely and put your seat belt on.
5-18-2010 @ 12:32PM
Mathew said...There is no way I will allow my child to play at the park by themselves. Feel free to take a chance with your own child's life. I refuse to be a part of the it won't happen to my child mentality. I do take my children to the park frequently. However, I do let them play independently with other children while staying nearby for an emergency.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 2:44PM
Donna Gresham said...I live in a small town in SW La. and there's no way I would ever leave my kids or grankids at the park alone. Even here we have homeless living on the outside area of the park and we don't know what type of people they are. My granson is 14 and he's not allowed down there by himself.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 5:11PM
Pierce Nichols said...You don't allow your 14 yr old to go to the park alone? That's crazy. I turned 14 in Aug 1991, the highest crime year in US history. We lived in the suburbs north of Boston, and I took the train in to a summer program at MIT nearly every weekday that summer (i.e. starting when I was 13), by myself. My mother wasn't about to spend 3-4 hrs in the car every day when there was a perfectly good train. I didn't have a cellphone -- few people did. North Station and the neighborhood around it were awfully scuzzy in those days. But I never had any problems, and I did have an amazingly good time.
5-18-2010 @ 12:46PM
cassi said...Yes, there is allot to worry about. No we can't just keep our children in the house all of the time, and then expect them to know what to do when they do get out on their own. Its like us never being out in the world and not knowing anything and just getting thrown into adulthood with full responsibilities. We wouldn't know what to do, we wouldn't know our boundaries. We need to give our children the tools that they need to be playing alone. Where they can and can't go, and what to do if approached by a stranger. By keeping them in the house all the time, they are becoming more succeptable to predators and other dangers when they do finally get out because they are not educated about them.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 2:50PM
Donna Gresham said...I don't keep my kids in all the time. They can go places if they are with people I approve of and I try to know as much as possible about the people they are with. We live on a busy street and they play outside all the time. They also play in the vacant lot next door too. Let them go in our city park by themselves? Not unless my oldest has a cell phone which I haven't gotten him one yet. I'm old fashioned I guess, he'll get his on his birthday this year when he turns 15.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 3:13PM
Heidi said...Whenever I read stories like this and the comments that follow I am so thankful that we moved from Boston to Vermont when the kids were babies. It never occurred to me NOT to let them walk to school, ride their bikes all over town, go to the park, pool or library once they were about 8 or 10. Never all alone though - the buddy system is a critical element of that kind of freedom. Now, however, I feel like a hypocrite. My daughter wants to go to college in NY City. Scares the living $h*t out of me! Suddenly I'm afraid to let her out of my sight!
Reply
5-19-2010 @ 5:55PM
Jill said...@Heidi -- haha! I moved to NYC from a family-friendly suburb. My mom felt the same way. But I have NEVER felt in danger here & I have lived/spent time in "not so safe"/un-gentrified areas of several Burroughs. It can be very dirty and gross, but that's the most I've encountered. Oh, okay I've been sexually harassed a lot but never to the point of feeling in danger. There's almost always a store to duck into with people around. I've had friends who've had their phones stolen, etc. But I don't know anyone who's ever been physically assaulted or threatened. I think NYC is a great place to grow as a person.
5-18-2010 @ 4:48PM
Laura said...We have a small neighborhood park about a block and a half away and my almost-8 year old is allowed to go play there without me, as long as he is with other kids. We also have a creek in our neighborhood and he can play there, likewise accompanied by other kids. There is safety in numbers. I worry far less about predators than about an accident, and feel okay if there's another kid who can run home and tell the grownups.
Reply
5-18-2010 @ 4:57PM
Sarah said...It's amazing that in the short time since I was a kid, the level of paranoia about letting kids go out to play by themselves has risen so high that even a 14-year-old isn't allowed to go to the park alone. What happens when he's 16, has a driver's license, and can't even navigate traffic alone?
I'm probably being silly, because that particular teenager probably won't be allowed to drive at 16.
But I was walking myself to and from school at 6 years old, and walking myself and my brother to and from school at 7. Equip your kids at a young age to be increasingly independent, and they will blossom into responsible young adults who can navigate the world successfully without constant handholding.
Reply
5-21-2010 @ 4:59PM
Brit said...I honestly believe they should raise the driving age to 18. 16 year olds are the leading cause of accidents and almost all of them text and drive. They don't know how to be responsible on the road!
5-21-2010 @ 7:20PM
Ed said...Yes, maybe murder rates are down...but it depends on what part of town you happen to live in Chicago. Maybe some of the crime against children (if it is truly down) is because many parents don't send the kids out alone and allow them to stay home more, drive or take them to school, ball games, friend's houses, etc. Maybe keeping better control of the environment for our kids is not the problem but is part of the solution. I do not feel it is safe for kids to be out by themselves when they are 8 to 12 in many neighbors. Unfortunately, many kids and adults are getting murdered almost every day on the Southside of Chicago...sometimes in their own yards, on their porches, or within in a block of their house (and definitely in parks and playgrounds). More needs to be done to make some neighborhoods safer before even thinking about having our young kids out alone in the parks, playgrounds, etc.
5-18-2010 @ 5:06PM
Paige said...I'm feeling the same as Sarah...and I'm only 22!
I walked to and from the bus stop from the moment I started school.
I was a mother's helper when I was 8, and was allowed to stay home alone.
When I was 10 I started babysitting kids alone.
By 12 I was a master babysitter and managed schedules and outings and all of it.
None of that was seen as crazy at all, and that was the '90s! Come on, guys!
Reply