Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Franne Golde and Syd Fox: Love More, Fear Less: A Mother and Her…
Dr. Peggy Drexler: The Breadwinner Complex: Are Women Apologizing For…
Schools Uncertain How to Handle Cyberbullying
Filed under: Your Kids, Big Kids, In The News, Bullying, Health & Safety: Big Kids, Development: Big Kids, Behavior: Big Kids, Nutrition: Big Kids, Education: Big Kids, Activities: Big Kids, Gear Guides: Big Kids, Research Reveals: Big Kids, Expert Advice: Big Kids
Cyberbullying is a growing concern in schools. Credit: Getty Images
Schools today are facing difficult and complex decisions on whether -- and how -- they should deal with cyberbullying.
High tech bullying, which ranges from barrages of teasing texts to sexually harassing group websites, is a growing issue, according to The New York Times.
A 2010 study by the Cyberbullying Research Center reports that one in five middle school students was found to be affected by cyberbullying, The Times reports, and studies show online harassment can begin as early as fourth grade.
With the problem escalating in frequency and severity -- cyberbullying has been linked to teen suicide -- parents are looking to schools to help protect their children. However, many educators feel unprepared, or are unwilling to handle these situations and unsure of the extent of their authority. School district discipline codes often say little about incidents that occur over student cell phones, home computers and off-campus speech, according to the newspaper.
Whether resolving these conflicts should be the responsibility of the family, police or schools remains an open question, The Times reports, and administrators who decide to get involved say they often face both practical and legal constraints.
"I have parents who thank me for getting involved, and parents who say, 'It didn't happen on school property, stay out of my life,' " Mike Rafferty, a middle school principal in Old Saybrook, Conn., tells The Times.
Forty-four states and the District of Columbia have enacted bullying statutes, according to the Anti-Defamation League. However, less than half offer guidance as to whether schools can intervene in bullying involving "electronic communication," which nearly always occurs outside of school and intensifies on weekends, when kids are more likely to be socializing online, The Times reports.
These issues have begun to crop up in state and federal courts, but rulings have been contradictory and much is still unclear and left to be determined, The Times says.
A few families have successfully sued schools for failing to protect their children from bullies, and one parent, Evan S. Cohen, took on an entire school district to defend his daughter when she was suspended from Beverly Vista School in Beverly Hills, Calif. for cyberbullying.
"What incensed me," Cohen, a music industry lawyer in Los Angeles, tells The Times, "was that these people were going to suspend my daughter for something that happened outside of school."
The judge in the case overturned the suspension based on a legal precedent, which maintained that the school could only impose discipline when a student's speech interferes substantially with the school's educational mission.
However, affirming the lack of clarity in these cases, Nancy Willard, author of "Cyber-Safe Kids, Cyber-Savvy Teens," tells The Times that the judge could have upheld the suspension using another standard from the same case, which looks at whether a student's hurtful speech collided with "the rights of other students to be secure."
The Times goes on to cite a number of additional court cases with contradictory rulings, adding that online student speech has not yet been addressed by the Supreme Court.
Cyberbullying is also taking its toll on schools, as educators report they are spending an inordinate amount of time dealing with the issue. In April, after the burden of resolving cyber conflicts had become too onerous, Tony Orsini, principal at Benjamin Franklin Middle School in Ridgewood, N.J., sent an e-mail to parents that made national news.
"There is absolutely NO reason for any middle school student to be part of a social networking site," Orsini wrote. If children were attacked through sites or texting, he added, "IMMEDIATELY GO TO THE POLICE!"
Earlier this year, Orsini was contacted by parents whose daughter received a dozen shocking, sexually explicit threats from the cell phone of a 12-year-old boy. The parents demanded action, yet Orsini initially declined because the incident occurred out of school and on a weekend, he tells The Times.
The girl's insistent parents refused to contact the boy's parents because it was too awkward, they told Orsini, and they refused to contact the police because they didn't want to be subjected to a protracted criminal investigation with an uncertain outcome. So they pleaded with Orsini to help them, and he finally relented, reports The Times.
Orsini tells the newspaper an investigation over the course of the next few days necessitated the involvement of an assistant principal, guidance counselor, social worker and an elementary school principal, in addition to himself.
Eventually, the school determined that the texts had most likely been sent by another student who had found the boy's phone. Having already devoted 10 hours to the incident, Orsini told the parents the school could do no more, aside from offering the girl counseling.
"All we are doing is reacting," Orsini tells The Times. "We can't seem to get ahead of the curve."
Related: New York Lawmakers Agree: Bullying is Bad, Bill Sent to Governor
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Parent's Unwind Page ???
- My daughter (14 yrs) was just kicked out of her Girl Scout Cadettes troop. Her offense? Having ADD (not hyperactive) and she wasn't picking up on a tr...
- PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO THE ANSWER BY DEFENDANTS ______________________________. Plaintiff, ________________________ h...











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
7-01-2010 @ 9:20AM
Mihir said...anyone want to tell me exactly why schools should be responsible for stopping cyberbullying? they've got enough problems just trying to educate our kids properly.
parents...learn the art of communication and use it to talk to other parents. the example in the article about the parents going to the principal because of harassing texts received outside of school and on a weekend is ludicrous.
Reply
7-01-2010 @ 1:20PM
Nancy Willard said...The NY Times story was great - but there is never enough space to actually explain things.
Based on very excellent court rulings - including Tinker, Layshock, and Saxe (as well as others) a very strong argument can be made that school officials have the legal authority to respond to off-campus student speech if that speech has - or there are good reasons to predict that it could - cause a substantial disruption at school or significant interference with the rights of students to be secure.
This would include those situations where the off-campus actions of student(s) have caused or threaten physical violence, significant interference in the ability of another student to effectively receive an education and participate in school activities, and substantial disruption of instruction or school operations.
The key is that when the impact of a student's speech has or will create the situation where the rights of other students to be secure and receive an education, school officials can and must intervene. We would expect nothing less.
--
Nancy Willard, M.S., J.D.
Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use
Resources for Cyber Savvy Schools:
Cyber-Secure Schools in a Web 2.0 World
Cyberbullying, Cyberthreats & Sexting
Cyber Savvy Teachers: Internet Safety Education
Reply
7-01-2010 @ 4:04PM
Evan Cohen said...Nancy --
Our case was about the limits of governmental power. Judge Wilson ruled that, as a matter of law, there could have been no substantial disruption at the school, based upon the facts presented. "Substantial disruption" does not include mere speculation that "something" could happen at school. One girl coming to school with hurt feelings is not substantial disruption.
Indeed, our case was unique, because in our case, unlike Layshock, Saxe, or Doninger, or J.S., or any other case, absolutely NOTHING happened at school. Nothing whatsoever. All that happened was a mother marched into school with her daughter, seeking revenge.
When studens are not at school, they have the same free speech rights as anyone else. Case after case has so held.
The court also ruled that the plaintiff's due process rights were violated, a point that I never see you writing about.
School districts will keep losing cases like this all over the country, unless they start understanding that the state's power does not reach into student's off-campus life.
Evan Cohen
Los Angeles
7-02-2010 @ 10:31AM
KenS said...I read the article too. The problem is that this problem of cyberbullying will never go away until every parent realizes they are part of the problem and part of the solution. Parents need to get involved in helping solve the cyberbullying problem. If parents cared enough about their child being the bully or passing along the material as much as they care when their child is a victim, it would be a huge step forward. But then, of course, how do you know if your child is involved in cyberbullying? You need to monitor their Internet activity. Monitoring software like our PC Pandora records everything that happens on the PC. If your child is a victim, you will know; if they are a bully, you will know. Whatever the case may be with your child (victim or bully), you need to intervene. Check us out and see how you can be a part of the solution instead of a passive part of the problem.
Reply
7-03-2010 @ 5:32PM
karen mccartin said...What all the comments above concerning Mr. Cohen's lawsuit against allegations of cyberbullying don't address is this: Mr. Cohen's lawsuit (and the attendant publicity) is important in that it will hopefully help to legally define the ever expanding parameters around which free speech can be used in a technological society. As a parent and free speech advocate however, I am appalled by Mr. Cohen's cavalier attitude toward his daughter's hurtful behavior and his refusal to take down the offensive YouTube video in order to satisfy his own needs. And as for receiving reimbursement for legal fees from a public school district (even Beverly Hills) in this economic environment? Don't get me started.
7-06-2010 @ 7:14PM
susan said...Mr. Cohen leaves me (almost) speechless. His refusal to take down the offensive video is astonishing, although perhaps not an abridgement of his daughter's rights because she is underage (?). Bad parenting is not illegal, but it is nevertheless shameful. Mr. Cohen does not seem to entertain the difference between what is legal and ethical.
Reply
7-06-2010 @ 10:36AM
Evan Cohen said...Sorry, both of you, Karen and Susan, are just plain wrong. I am not "refusing" to take down the video. The video was posted AFTER the case was filed to illustrate the issues and assist this important public debate. That debate continues. It is not, and never was, "cyberbullying."
And, as for the comments about the legal fees we were awarded, maybe Karen works for free, but I do not. All parties involved knew the risks, and that losing a civil rights case means that the defendants would have to pay legal fees. It's the law, and the fees were reasonable. I told the school administrators not two hours after the incident that legal fees were a possibility; they did not care. I wrote a nine-page letter to the head of the district before the case was filed, in which I told them that I would be seeking legal fees; it was ignored. Reasonable offers to settle (that did NOT involve ANY money) were rejected.Then they fought for six months, and we won on all three federal claims, including the due process issue. Our firm worked hard on this matter from start to finish, and the school district offered only token opposition on the propriety and amount of fees.
Karen, if you are really in favor of "free speech," as you say, you should be thanking me. Go ahead; I'll wait here.
Reply
7-06-2010 @ 7:51PM
susan said...Sorry, Mr. Cohen. I come from a family of lawyers and I know a lawyer/bully when I see one. I don't approve of it among my own kin and I don't approve of it in you. Is the video that is buttressing our nation's right to speak freely still up?
Reply
7-06-2010 @ 9:47PM
Evan Cohen said...If you come from a family of lawyers, you should put more value on legal work. What is it you don't approve of? A job well done? Intensive writing and research? Persuasive arguments? Ground-breaking issues? Defending civil rights? The federal law that awards legal fees in meritorious civil rights cases?
The district was given many opportunities to settle this matter, without money being paid, but wanted to keep fighting. We EARNED our fees. Get over it.
7-06-2010 @ 9:27PM
donnagoodwin21 said..."I told the school administrators not two hours after the incident that legal fees were a possibility..."
"I wrote a nine-page letter to the head of the district before the case was filed, in which I told them that I would be seeking legal fees..."
Anyone can see the not-so-veiled threat here.
P.S. I would work for free for my child. Hope this doesn't come back to hurt her.
Reply
7-07-2010 @ 11:26AM
Evan Cohen said...Donna, I see that you are not familiar with the process. Threats? No, I just told them what I was going to do. And I did it. It's really that simple. I told them not to let the suspension stand, but they insisted. And this is what the got -- a crushing, expensive defeat.
All of you: You want to apologize for those who violated the law. Why? It's a mystery to me. I stood up for the Constitution, and I am NOT going to apologize.
If you want to "work for free," that's up to you. I have a law firm to run.
And, finally, there's the usual nonsense, this sickly-sweet drivel of "gee, I hope it doesn't come back to hurt her." Donna, how do you go through life so scared? It sickens me.
9-26-2010 @ 2:52AM
20102609@03:30:00 said...Tất cả các bạn: Bạn muốn xin lỗi cho những người vi phạm pháp luật. Tại sao? Đó là một bí ẩn đối với tôi. Tôi đứng lên cho Hiến pháp, và tôi sẽ không xin lỗi.
Nếu bạn muốn "làm việc cho tự do," đó là tùy bạn. Tôi có một công ty luật để chạy.
Và, cuối cùng, có những điều vô nghĩa thông thường, chuyện vô vị này ốm yếu, ngọt ngào của "gee, tôi hy vọng nó không trở lại làm tổn thương cô ấy." Donna, làm thế nào để bạn đi qua cuộc sống quá sợ hãi? Nó sickens tôi.
Reply