Blind Couple Reunited With Baby Taken Away by State
Filed under: In The News, Amazing Parents
Erika Johnson and Blake Sinnett's daughter, Mikaela Sinnett, was returned to them after 57 days in foster care. Credit: David Eulitt, Kansas City Star / MCT
Erika Johnson and Blake Sinnett of Missouri had a baby. For two days. Then they had a nightmare. State authorities took their baby away because both Johnson and Sinnett are blind.
Following a public outcry, little Mikaela was returned to her parents this week, and authorities were reminded of an ancient truism: None are so blind than those who will not see.
But Johnson tells the Kansas City Star she's not bitter.
Blake Sinnett is guided to his mother's van with Erika Johnson as the two parents left for their Kansas City, Missouri apartment with their 2-month-old daughter. Credit: David Eulitt, Kansas City Star / MCT
"Disability does not equal inability," she tells the newspaper.
Mikaela was born May 21 at Centerpoint Medical Center in Independence, Mo. The Star reports doctors let Sinnett "see" his daughter's birth by feeling the crowning of her head.
According to the newspaper, Johnson's first attempts at breast-feeding were clumsy. A nurse noticed Mikaela's nostrils were covered by Johnson's breast, and Johnson felt that something was wrong. She switched the baby to her other side, but not before Mikaela turned blue.
A nurse wrote on a chart: "The child is without proper custody, support or care due to both of (the) parents being blind, and they do not have specialized training to assist them."
That notation kicked the system into auto-pilot and plunged the new parents, both 24, into a nightmare. It would be 57 days before they were reunited with their baby.
When Johnson held Mikaela again July 20, the Star reports, the new mother couldn't stop crying.
"We never got the chance to be parents," she tells the newspaper. "We had to prove that we could."
Although they were able to return to their home in Independence that day, they still faced an adjudication hearing to determine whether or not they would have to basically share custody of their baby with the state.
However, the Star reports, they got a call from their attorney, Amy Coopman, saying the state had dropped the case.
"Every minute that has passed that this family wasn't together is a tragedy -- a legal tragedy and a moral one, too," Coopman tells the Star. "How do you get 57 days back?"
Arleasha Mays, a spokeswoman for the Missouri Department of Social Services, tells the newspaper she can't comment on what happened because of privacy rules. Still, she insists, "the only time we recommend a child be removed is if it's in imminent danger."
Johnson tells the Star questions from a social worker started flying as soon as Mikaela was born.
How could they take the baby's temperature? With a talking thermometer. How would they get her to a doctor? In an emergency, they'd call an ambulance. For a regular appointment, they'd call a cab or ride a bus.
Johnson tells the paper those solutions weren't enough for the social worker. She and Sinnett were told they would need 24-hour care by a sighted person at their apartment. Johnson responded they couldn't afford such help and didn't need it.
"I needed help as a new parent, but not as a blind parent," Johnson tells the Star.
Soon, Mikaela was gone. The Star reports her parents weren't even allowed to hold her as she left the hospital. All they could do was touch her arm or leg.
Advocates for the blind were quickly on the case.
Gary Wunder, the president of the National Federation of the Blind of Missouri, tells the Star he found the story almost too incredible to believe.
"I needed to verify their whole story," he tells the newspaper. "We had to do due diligence. I found the couple to be intelligent and responsible. We knew this was an outrage that had taken place."
Wunder and other advocates rallied other associations for the blind nationwide. More than 100 people at a National Federation of the Blind national convention in Dallas volunteered to travel to Kansas City to protest and testify, both as blind parents and as the sighted children of blind parents.
They also hired Coopman, who tells the Star this is not the end of the story. Legal action will be taken.
"Whether a couple is visually impaired or deaf or in a wheelchair, the state should not keep them from their children," she adds.
Related: Woman Having Babies from 2 Separate Wombs











ReaderComments (Page 4 of 15)
7-26-2010 @ 3:42PM
Flora said...They should not take the baby away from them. They should help if they ask for help.
7-26-2010 @ 3:58PM
bitz said...Do you really think a person that is not blind has ever needed help with the care of their baby, to the point that they have put its life in jeopordy? Do you think that they had social services take their baby away? No, probably not. You know why? Because thats what the nurses are there for! That's why you stay in the hospital for a day or two, to learn how to care for your baby!!! You cannot deny that this was total discrimination all the way around! You must not be a mother, otherwise you would understand what losing 57 days with your newborn would feel like!
7-26-2010 @ 7:24PM
M. Fettig said...Actually, it only takes a VERY short while for a baby to turn blue (and I say that based on my training as an EMT as well as a mother of 3, including one breath-holder) & the mother knew that something was wrong (which means she must have realized it quite quickly since the baby IS ok!) The baby wasn't in any real danger with a nurse standing there who should have helped the mother...since that *is* what nurses are there for.
7-26-2010 @ 11:40PM
googysgoldy said...um the nurse saw the baby turn blue and did nothing but write a report she didnt lift up the baby. watching that and doing nothing could have killed the baby and she would have let it happen untill the mother realized something wasnt right. the mom did what she could do and the professional stood there and watched
7-24-2010 @ 10:40AM
mark young said...Child protection agencies, (here comes a WIDE brush I'm painting with,) Seem to be staffed with people who are completely lacking any sense of remorse, guilt, compassion, concern, or empathy.
The fact that they are empowered to walk into anyones home and remove a child that has not been harmed, simply because of an allegation made by some unnamed third party,during an "investigation", is an absolute violation of basic American principals.
The fact that they can do it repeatedly, and over the sobbing protests of children and their families, with no remorse, and with "legal" justification, signals some traits ascribed to persons usually described as sociopathic personalities. They perceive themselves as different from the general population,and not just a little bit, better. (sounds a bit like the entire legal profession to me.)
The lack of remorse while repeatedly "erring on the side of caution, it what has made the Florida Dept. of Children and Families, arguably the most powerful, and feared agency of its kind in the country. (To err on the side of caution, is still erring, and therefor should not be condoned repeatedly, by rationalization.)
Reply
7-24-2010 @ 12:20PM
Ashley said...Yes! The Florida DCF is TERRIBLE! Something similar happened to my family. My little sister's kindergarten teacher called the DCF and accused my parents of 'medical neglect' due to my sister's thin/gaunt appearance. My sister had mitchondrial disorder, and had seen countless doctors, was taking numerous medications, etc. But that didn't stop the police from coming into our home and going through our house and intimidating my stepmother, who doesn't speak English well, and asking her questions about how many kids she had and this and this. Unbelievable.
7-26-2010 @ 4:32PM
Cheryl said...Most of the people doing child protective investigations are uncaring idiots doing a GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVICE JOB. They can't be fired except for the most INCREDIBLY EXTREME negligence. I've yet to ever hear of that happening. In North NYS a young girl, was kept locked behind chicken wire in a home where there was animal feces all over from about 100 animals. Multiple social workers went there, made reports and did nothing, till the girl's step brother STRANGLED her to death. Then there was a court case. There are welfare mothers nearby who advertise on CRAIG'S LIST and do prostitution at home. Their young daughters escape to neighbors and sleep on their couches to get away from the prostitution, drinking and drug traffic. Another leaves her infant (1 month OLD) unsecured on the couch while she goes shopping and tells her three year old boy, "Watch her." The prostitution and drug mother is a convicted FELON. They do NOTHING about this. NOTHING. Awful
7-24-2010 @ 3:22PM
jh said...At the very least, the government could have used the money spent on foster care placement, social services, etc to offer this couple live-in assistance for those 57 days. It is ridiculous that their prerogative isn't success of the parents, but embarrassment and separation from their beautiful child. Big brother needs to leave families alone and, if they won't, then the only hand they should have in our lives should be a helping one.
I wish the best to this new little family.
Reply
7-24-2010 @ 11:18PM
Christine McMillan said...And that's 57 days of bonding that didn't happen!!! Why couldn't they see their daughter during the 57 days???!!!!!
Reply
7-25-2010 @ 11:31PM
kristian said...This is horrifying and tragic. As a first time mother, I had difficulty breast feeding. I don't know what the standards look like in the US, but as a Canadian citizen the expectation in the labour and delivery wards is that the nurses educate you not rob a child of their mother or vice versa.
It really appears to me that this family was victimized as a result of differing abilities. How very disturbing.
Reply
7-25-2010 @ 11:42PM
tr said...Those were 57 days they could have used to get someone in there and show those parents how to care for their newborn. Its called parenting classes and to me they don't seem to have any services to help out parents with special needs who just gave birth to a baby. In order for these parents to know about something new like taking care of their child, someone should have stepped up in the hospital while the mother was there and offered some type of assist with their child and when discharged, followed up to make sure the parents didn't need any more assist. Those parents aren't any different than any one else going out there being parents for the first time. We are all blind when it comes to doing something for the first time. If given the opportunity, we all see it to the end.
Reply
7-26-2010 @ 4:39AM
thepostnatal said...very sad story!!! amazing article!!!
thepostnatal com
Reply
7-26-2010 @ 1:43PM
Mandy said...All the nurse had to note in the chart was that she had some difficulty in breast feeding, stating what happened. THEN called someone in to help with it. Instead the nurse set off a chain reaction that was detrimental to the family. There is no reason two healthy blind people can't have children. They seem to have a great support system so I see no reason that with a little help that they shouldn't have their child. I believe that nurse was in the wrong and didn't give them a chance with their little girl. Unacceptable.
Reply
7-26-2010 @ 2:17PM
B said...What a beautiful child and she is blessed to have TWO LOVING PARENTS - so, the fact that they are blind is irrelevant. I am sure that if they felt that they needed help they would make sure to get help from family and/or friends to care for the baby.
Having a child is a God-given right and it is not limited to only people without disabilities!
GOD BLESS THIS BEAUTIFUL FAMILY!!! :)
Reply
7-26-2010 @ 9:08PM
Schristmas12 said...You are so right B!!! That baby is GOD GIVEN!!!! HOW DARE THEY TAKE AWAY A GIFT THAT GOD HAS GIVEN THEM!!!
Oh yes! Believe me the state and that nurse will repay!!! U dont mess with God's children!!!
7-26-2010 @ 2:22PM
Donna said...I have a physically challenged son. I know all about discrimination to the handicapped.
How small minded people are these days... I am a nurse and I know some physically challenged people who have children .......they are stellar parents. It's all about love and the will to be a good parent..
Go chase the druggies who are parents and the alcoholics..
Reply
7-26-2010 @ 2:43PM
debbie said...Amen to that comment
7-26-2010 @ 2:28PM
Renee said...There should be an organization in place to provide assistance.
This is more than your typical beginning breast feeding issue if the baby was turning blue and could suffocate and she cant see this happening that could be a problem. There has to be a solution without the separation.
Reply
7-26-2010 @ 2:37PM
League of Decency said...The nurse, hospital, social worker and associated agencies should be fired and held responsible for the damages incurred in those 57 days to this family! Social workers are wannabe psychiatrists, and nurses wannabe doctors with very narrow minded thought processes. This is a pure power trip to control and then no doubt grandstand about it. Govt is chock full of these fractured minds! Its all control to them.
Reply
7-26-2010 @ 2:32PM
Georgette said...Just one comment unrelated to the issue the car seat they are using for thier baby is expired and I believe also recalled.
Reply