Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Lisa Belkin: The Tornado In Oklahoma Is This Parent's Living Nightmare
Jenn Horton: Every Mom Deserves Your Nod

What's So Dirty About Kiddie Pictures?
Filed under: Weird But True, Media, Opinions, Sex
The new school picture? Credit: Anna Brooks / Samantha Harvey
Can't be too careful, right?
Wrong. We sure can be. We can be so careful that we warp what was a normal and wonderful part of life -- taking pictures of kids -- into something disgusting. Why has it become so dangerous, so dirty to take kiddie pics today?
We have come to equate child photos with child porn.
Credit: Anna Brooks / Samantha Harvey
That point could be fast approaching. One woman I know wanted to take pictures at her son's Christmas play, but this was verboten. "I wish I could have shared some images with his father, who had to work," she said. But no.
Another mom I just spoke to said no one is allowed to take pictures at her kid's swimming lessons. After all, the kids are half naked!
Then again, so were my friends and me on our summer vacations at Lake Michigan. Glad no one stopped my mom from taking the pictures we still love.
And then there are the stories like the one in a mall in West Virginia last December, when a freelance photographer snapped some shots of kids with Santa, and their fathers saw this and insisted he delete them.
The guy did. But the dads still pointed him out to a cop. When the photographer tried to take the cop's picture too, he ended up in a holding cell.
Those dads, I'm sure, felt protective and proud: No pervert is going to ... well, what, exactly? Sell those pictures to some porno site? Who wants pictures of fully-clothed kids?
So maybe the photographer was going to use those photos to track down their kids? That's a free-floating fear these days. But couldn't a halfway decent predator just follow them home?
OK, so maybe the photographer was going to use those Santa photos to get his rocks off? If so, who cares? If every photo of every kid is too hot to handle, maybe we should make a big bonfire and burn all the old Life magazines, every birthday album ever made and "Miracle on 34th Street" while we're at it. That girl was cute.
Pictures of kids used to be innocent. Now they're dirty. What has changed? Not the pictures. Not the kids.
Us.
Related: 'I See You Have a Family Decal on Your Car. Now I Will Kidnap Your Kids!'
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Here in dc since dec, 6 2006 retired FED BOARD GOV,inventor ,writter, FORMER GOVERNOR (founder of the republic of )DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN
- 3 SHOWS A HOUR 7 HOURS = 21 (10 DAYS = 210) 10 STUDIOS = 2100 20 STUDIOS = 4200 (IN 10 DAYS) 3 (20 MINUTE SHOWS).
- What's the penalty for falsley claiming relation to a person does it have to be for monetary gain or proven not just a social gesture











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
8-05-2010 @ 10:02AM
Silver Fang said...If I'm out in public, people have the right to photograph and record me, even without my consent. Parents have absolutely no business telling people that they can't photograph kids out in public.
As for the photog at the mall, he is technically on private property, so could be arrested for photographing if, and only if, a mall security guard told him to stop.
Reply
8-06-2010 @ 12:26AM
Lori said...I just got through signing a bunch of permission slips to allow my son's photo to be displayed at various places connected with his school (brochures, newspaper articles, even the classroom bulletin board). I don't really understand the photo fear, but I personally know several moms who have it. Of course, I'm probably not the best person to comment. Where we live, Chinese tourists often ask to snap pictures of themselves with my kids. It threw me for a loop the first time it happened, but now I just go with the flow and let them do it. And, my daughter is quite a ham, so she enjoys it.
Reply
8-10-2010 @ 4:59AM
heathercam said...I find it ironic that as fear increasingly prohibits the private photography of children, it will be accompanied by ever more intrusive and ubiquitous surveillance of children ''for their safety'.
Reply
8-10-2010 @ 7:59AM
Jenny said...As a teacher, I understand the restrictions on child photos to be not related to pornography, but to privacy. Think of the amount of child abductions that occur in the world today - and the number of custody battles, children being abused by people they know, internet predators, etc. The bottom line is - a photo of a face may one day somehow become attached to a name and a place...which makes that child a sitting duck. I know I work hard to use the safety tips I've been taught to protect photos of my students from becoming a risk to them, but not everyone is as informed of best practices, especially regarding the posting of children's photos on the internet (class blogs, school websites, etc.). As a mother, I have little tangible evidence to fear this will happen in my world. But, how many of the mothers of abducted/abused children sit around and think, "Yeah...that's probably gonna happen to me and my child one day..."
Reply
8-10-2010 @ 8:12AM
Jean said...As a parent, I am one of THOSE who does not allow photographs of her children in certain contexts. There's a person in their lives who, given the chance, WILL take them without permission. I fear that if they are on websites promoting their activities she will then know which they frequent - and she DOES look for them. Otherwise I wouldn't mind at all.
Reply
11-05-2010 @ 5:27AM
califundad said...I think this whole topic is borderline ridiculous! It's called basic common sense people, and if you ask me, anybody who's actually paranoid about taking innocent family pictures of their own children should seek some professional counseling. My wife and I have been clicking the memories of our 5 kids away since day one and yeah, they're wearing their birthday suits in some of them and those ones along with all the others are some of our most treasured belongings...Don't ever let a few half baked social dictators rob you and your family of beautiful memories!
Reply