Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Claire McCarthy, M.D.: Is Your Family Ready for a Disaster?
HooplaHa: WATCH: Shari Alyse: Showing What Kids Can Teach Us
SmackDown: Should Kids Wear Skinny Jeans?
Filed under: Opinions

Are skinny jeans for kids a denim do or don't? Illustration by Christopher Healy
Skinny Jeans for Kids Aren't Cool.
by Amy HatchLast time I checked, my daughter's back-to-school shopping list didn't include "items that can help put her self-esteem in the basement," and that's why we'll skip the skinny jeans this year.
When I saw the Wall Street Journal story on skinny jeans for toddlers, I had that "smack the forehead" moment. The story even shows with a graphic how the jeans are designed to "closely mimic the shape and style" of their adult counterpart, the denim trend that has so many women squeezing themselves into a dark-wash sausage casing.
In the interest of full disclosure, let me first say that I am one of those women -- I own not one, but two pairs of skinny jeans. But here's the thing: I am a fully- grown woman who has had 39 years to grapple with -- and come to terms with -- the notion of her own body image.
I'm not a 5-year-old girl like my own daughter, who is not a stick-thin baby waif, but instead has a muscular physique. She's beautiful, healthy and strong, and -- for the moment, anyways -- blissfully unaware that the rest of the Western world sees her as flawed. Not to mention that I'm disinclined to dress her like a miniature hootchie mama. It's bad enough that I can barely find a pair of jeans for her that doesn't ride so low that her underwear shows.
Now, she also has to contend with the fact she already doesn't fit the societal label of "skinny."
According to the Media Research Network, the research group Anorexia Nervosa & Related Eating Disorders Inc. found that one out of every four college-age women has engaged in unhealthy methods of weight control, including skipping meals, excessive exercise, self-induced vomiting, fasting and laxative abuse.
That number is staggeringly high. And now, we are starting even our toddlers off with the idea that they can -- and should -- sport the label of "skinny." The idea that they're just kids and that the message won't be absorbed is misguided at best and, at it's worst, dangerous. Any parent of a toddler can tell you that kids understand a lot more than we give them credit for.
And just why are we making clothing for little kids that mimics what adults wear? So often we bemoan the fact that our children, especially our girls, are growing up so much more quickly than ever before. We worry about teen sexuality, pregnancy and the objectification of our young women as nothing but sex objects, and then we set about creating a piece of clothing --for babies, no less -- that is designed for maximum sex appeal on adults.
We're hypocrites, too, pointing fingers at celebrity kids like Suri Cruise and her high heels, tsk-ing and judging her famous parents for decking her out like a miniature grown-up, and then we turn around and do the the exact same thing. The only difference is that we don't have to contend with the paparazzi.
Besides that, what ever happened to dressing kids like kids? I'm no puritan, and I love fashion-forward duds. I'm not advocating a return to Peter Pan collars and ankle-length skirts, but outfitting children in the exact image of adults and then expecting them not to adopt a precocious attitude makes no sense.
Recently, a major women's retailer was caught with their Photoshop showing, when an unedited image of a model showed up on their website next to the edited one. In the second, doctored photograph, the beautiful model's body was altered drastically to make her appear almost painfully thin. Women expressed their outrage over the image, taking the business to task for perpetuating the beauty myth in such a severe and obvious way.
Dressing babies and toddlers in skinny jeans does the exact same thing -- it sends a message, both to our children and to those who market to them -- that that you can never be too thin.
And that is just not cool.
Skinny Jeans Are Just Cute Jeans, People.
by Lesley KennedyI'm not gonna lie. I love shopping for my kids even more than I love shopping for myself. Cute headbands. Cute shoes. Cute dresses. Cute shorts. And, let's cut to the chase here: Cute skinny jeans.
Oh, I said it. Skinny jeans on kids are not too grown-up, they're not inappropriate and they don't send the wrong message. They're just cute. Like, really cute. And I'm not about to stop buying them because folks are balling their fists up and shaking them in air -- positively outraged that the popular denim trend has trickled its way down to the tot market.
"You're making 5-year-olds body-conscious!" they cry. "How dare you make my little girl worry about being skinny so soon!" they bemoan.
Please. My daughters, ages 5 and 3, are not concerned about their weight. They don't know what a diet is. They certainly aren't wondering if their butts look big when they pick out their clothes each morning. And let's talk about how "skinny" these jeans actually even are: I don't know about your kids, but slim-cut styles still hang off my girls and need to be belted to stay up most of the time.
My 5-year-old, a fashionista in training, goes from uber-girlie princess to copying iCarly to skateboard chic -- all in the course of one afternoon.
My 3-year-old? If it's not a dress, she won't wear it. But, occasionally, I'll convince her to wear pants underneath, and, seriously, if there's anything more adorable than a little girl wearing a dress over slim-cut jeans, I've yet to come across it.
You see, for kids, skinny jeans are simply jeans. They have absolutely nothing to do with sexiness or weight or body image, but everything to do with skateboard culture, comfort and -- yep -- looking cute.
And it's not just a girl thing. Skinny jeans are the must-have denim for boys today, too. But do you worry about boys becoming bulimic because of their jeans? No, you just send them off in their cool pants and Vans slip-ons and smile at their good fashion sense.
I think it's the name "skinny jeans" that gets people riled up. Thank goodness designers didn't decide to dub their latest versions of this style that's been around for decades "cigarette pants," as they were called when Audrey Hepburn and Sandra Dee wore them in the '50s and '60s -- can you imagine the outrage?
Because if it's not the name, shouldn't leggings stir up the same sort of anger? Did folks go crazy when girls started wearing them again in recent years with ... well, practically everything? They're certainly more form-fitting than skinny jeans, but they're totally accepted.
I bet if skinny jeans were called "skater jeans" people would see them for what they really are: slim-cut denim that's trendy and cool, super fun when done in bright colors and offered in a unisex silhouette.
When I see my kids in skinny jeans, I'm not thinking Lindsay Lohan -- I'm thinking Lindsey Vaughn. Skateboarders, BMX riders and other X-Games and Olympians have worn skinny jeans for years because, not only do they look good, they stretch and they are easy to move around in. Also, since they fit close to the body, there's no need to worry about baggy pants getting caught in spokes or wheels.
Fashion with function? Sounds like the perfect combo for kids' clothing to me.
Look, your daughter is not going to turn into Britney Spears just because she picks out a slim-cut pair of jeans. And, if you hate the trend, haven't you figured out that if you just sit back for five minutes, those five-sizes-too-big baggy jeans belted way down around the hips -- or, heaven forbid, the stonewashed pleated and tight-rolled styles I wore as a kid -- will soon be back in style?
Now, when that happens, you'll really have something to complain about.
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- 3 SHOWS A HOUR 7 HOURS = 21 (10 DAYS = 210) 10 STUDIOS = 2100 20 STUDIOS = 4200 (IN 10 DAYS) 3 (20 MINUTE SHOWS).
- Alot of .gov when submitting a program or proposal for government agency (be sure you personally can provide for the agency)
- If a governor or former military general was not on tv you you believe he was if you were told











ReaderComments (Page 3 of 14)
8-20-2010 @ 2:34PM
Lee said...At 39, the one mom is too OLD for skinny jeans. These are a kid thing. Skinny doesn't mean too tight or badly fitting, it means super straight legs. When I was in college...many years ago...I had jeans with zippers around the ankles so you could get 'em on. I don't see anything wrong with dressing a toddler or a preschooler in a pair of straight leg (skinny) jeans. If that particular style doesn't fit your child's body type, then pick one that does!!! I'm stuck looking for clothes for my 10 year old son that don't fall off. I'm not a fan of the baggy look, but for him they'd be the oops my pants fell off look, so I don't buy them. Other boys with sturdier physiques do. Big deal.
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:39PM
Tina said...Seriously.....Someone has way to much time on their hands to complain about skinny jeans. We have men and women dying everyday in an effort to save our country and our freedom. The last thing on my mind is skinny jeans. Be thankful that you can even afford to buy your kids any clothes at all with today's economy. It doesn't matter what generation we are in, there will always be someone to complain about styles and usually there old and don't know the styles or they need a job or hobby. Come on people...get real!
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:52PM
colleen said...Oh Tina, if you don't care, then don't comment. Just don't read it. Go to another page where you can read about people dying and starving. This page is where you go when you are taking a break from all that. You are just lost on the internet right now...scoot off...
8-20-2010 @ 3:26PM
Larry said...Right on Tina, you are a lady with a good head on her shoulders. I am in my 70's and have seen it all come and go. Next year or next generation will be different only a new product. I can remember my generation parents thinking we would all go to hell because we listened to rock and roll music.
8-20-2010 @ 2:35PM
jackie said...Skinny jeans have been in and out so often my head is spinning. Children - and infants often ARE body consious - think sensuous. It is a part of who they are. What a parent should be aware of is how people see that - possibly making a child a victim of thoughtlessness, cruelty, or even crime. That's the parents who need to be aware - not the child.
skinny jeans and leggings are less likely to be caught in a bike chain, or trip a child.(or adult) People - child and adult - should wear clothes that are comfortable and make them feel good - whatever their shape or age.
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:35PM
Cathie said...When I was young, these pants were called "pegged" or "pegs" when worn by males. The girls version were "capri pants". I never heard the term cigarette pants when I was wearing them. Yes, the original capri pants went all the way to the ankle. Out here in the West, we did not tuck our pants into our boots, cause that was like a "dude" from back east. Oh well, the more things change, the more they remain the same.
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:36PM
beth said...omg ppl......"skinny jeans" is just the cut of the pants. in the adult sizes you can find these "skinny jeans" in a size 22......lmao yeah that sounds skinny to me. find something else to argue about.
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 4:46PM
Nina said...Wow, talk about some hypocrisy there. "Not to mention that I'm disinclined to dress her like a miniature hootchie mama." Does that mean that you dress in front of your kids like a full-sized "hootchie mama" dressed for "maximum sex appeal"? That "do what I say, not what I do" has never worked, and isn't going to start working now.
I don't wear this style, because it's not my style, but when they asked, I got a pair each for my grade-schooler and high-schooler, because it was flattering on them.
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:38PM
Zoerhenne said...People are getting caught up in their own baggage. I read both sides of the issue and some of the comments. Amy-I disagree with you that girls should not wear "skinny" jeans. My dd is skinny so she wears them cause it's all that fits her. Thank goodness for adjustable waist pants! If your dd does not fit that model then she should not wear them. What you should be teaching your children (boys and girls) is that everyone is different. By having a different body type, we need to pick the style of clothing that best makes us look and feel good (adults and children alike). Everyone is different and so therefore everyone wears different styles. No big deal!
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 3:23PM
Mindy said...Yes!!! Excellent comment. Celebrate differences instead of trying so hard to be exactly like everyone else!
8-20-2010 @ 2:37PM
Carrie said...I have a 7 and 9 year old...both BOYS. They both wear skinny jeans! I even purchase them from the girls section...they are cheaper, and have stretch too...I think they look really cute on them...with a pair of Vans, or Chucks! It's just "the look" these days...no different than when I was little and wore neon leggings, leg warmers and jelly shoes! It's got nothing to do with squashing self-esteem...they're PANTS people. Let's not make a big ol' deal about it.
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:52PM
Shelley said...I completely agree with your post. My 9 year old son Loves them, and I think he looks adorable in them!
8-20-2010 @ 2:38PM
glitter2201 said...ok first off my kids ALL wear skinny jeans and yes i have 2 heavier girls its just a name , like straight leg pants we all use to wear???before the boot cut or bell bottom style??what does it matter what they wear skinny, straight leg, boot cut?? carpenter???i mean its a name people good grief??doesnt mean anything they even have adult skinny jeans for both skinny and heavier set people??
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:41PM
Beth said...I'm sorry but skinny jeans do not look good on anyone. They make skinny people look way to skinny because they sag, and they make normal/heavy people look fat. They are absolutely ugly, straight guys don't look straight while wearing them, and how can you sag in a pair of pants that are supposed to be like a second skin! They are hidious!
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:46PM
Shelley said...Oh my gosh, they are jeans, A fashion trend, by the time this debate gets anywhere the trend will be over and kids will be back to wearing jeans that sag to the floor, and then people will go back to having problems with that, this is not about skinny or fat, money or no money, its a freaking fashion trend. I don't think a mom putting her 5 year old in a pair of skinny's is going to ruin her self esteem...if it is, then that mom has bigger issues to deal with. I am a mom, and my kid at 5 was not dressing herself she wore what I put on her, so yes if a mom is forcing a child to wear something, that the child is not comfortable wearing then that parent has issues not the clothing. Personally I love skinny jeans!
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:48PM
maria said...skinny jeans are not very grown up.
I'm a young mom of 21 my 2 yr old daughter wears skinny jeans and she looks adorable and stylish.
not so long ago i was in high school in which pretty much every one wore them.
it a better look then having boys in super baggy pants with there boxers skinning out.
or better then girls in short denim skirts with no leggings.
skinny jeans are trendy at the moment.
just as are wild bright colors, for example a skirt i bought my daughter in bright green zebra print.
and toddlers don't care about there body images. parents should be telling them there beautiful no matter what not worry that my 2 yr old is gonna think shes fat because she cant fit into them. that's all the moms idea thinking her child is too over weight.
kids are kids and if the kids love there clothes then let them be kids and wear what they want.( as long as there is not any sexual-ness to the clothing as in how they had thongs for kids a couple years ago)
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:49PM
Tom Kelly said...Well, when I was about nine (in 1959...gasp!) we boys asked our moms to "peg" our pants, meaning to alter them from the knees down to be very tight. I'm not sure how we got them over our feet, but we surely had to put our shoes on last.
Personally, the first time I saw pants worn under a skirt, it reminded me of a homeless person, wearing as many items as possible, either from lack of "bag space" or just plain craziness.
But, ah! The generations! It all changes and comes back around again. I laugh at kids saying "Dude" all the time, until I remember that we used to say "Far Out for everything...and with a straight face, too!
Coming around again? As an old poop, I like pleated pants: roomy and comfortable and (my new criteria for comfort and style)... I can put them on after and over my shoes!
Ha!
PS...a note on the "morality" of skinny jeans on children: are the mothers who love them the same mothers who tart their girls up for those wretched toddler beauty pageants? Just wondering.....
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 3:02PM
Cathie said...Dude - far out. Somebody as old as me who still remembers what we wore. I was always bummed because my high arches wouldn't allow me to wear the low cut saddle oxfords like Annette wore. Now I just wish I could find a pair of shoes that I can walk in without pain.
8-20-2010 @ 2:49PM
Dayna Howell 336-575-0955 said...My granddaughter is 8, she is very thin and could wear skinny jeans. I buy her clothes and I would never buy skinny jeans for her. First, it is not healthy to wear a garment that rubs and is tight on the crotch. A child needs loose comfortable clothes. Second, we need to do all we can to protect our children from abuse, we can have a child predator around our child at any time and not know it. I may sound a lot different than you, I am 75. I listen to the news. Do all you can to protect your child.
Reply
8-20-2010 @ 2:56PM
c16lisa said...Skinny jeans are exceptionally horrible for boys! Gives them a very Gay appearance! As for girls, as long as they are worn as "leggings" with a shirt that covers their bottom, I do not see a problem with it.
Reply