Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Charlotte Robinson: LISTEN: How Gay And Lesbian Couples Become…
New Turnaround Teacher 'Trying To Get It Right' In Tough School
Proposed California Law Would Criminalize Truancy
Filed under: In The News, Day Care & Education, Education: Big Kids, Education: Tweens, Education: Teens
It's all fun and games until the the truancy officer comes around. Credit: Getty Images
The bill pending in the California Senate would make truancy a criminal misdemeanor, subjecting parents of "chronically truant" children to fines of up to $2,000 and jail time of as long as one year, reports the Oakland Tribune.
During the last school year, the Oakland, Calif., school district reported more than 5,000 children in kindergarten through eighth grade -- 18 percent of enrollment -- missed at least five full days of school without excused absences, the Tribune reports. And about 2,000 children missed 10 days or more, unexcused.
In Contra Costa County, Calif., 5,600 children in nine elementary school districts -- 22 percent of enrolled students -- had at least three tardies or unexcused absences during the 2008-2009 school session, the newspaper says.
The proposed legislation would apply to parents whose children have missed 10 percent of the school year, and would add California to the ranks of states that already have strict truancy laws on the books, like Florida and Texas, the Tribune reports.
Kamala Harris, the San Francisco district attorney who was responsible for drafting the pending legislation, oversees a truancy program in the city that she credits with a dramatic rise in school attendance, according to the newspaper.
"I think that everyone realized that for too long, issues that affect children were seen as small issues -- maybe because children are small -- instead of taking these on as big issues," Harris tells the Tribune. "You know who that chronically truant 6-year-old is going to be? The 'menace to society' that everyone will be knocking on our door about, asking me to prosecute."
The federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention reports that truancy left unchecked is a proven risk factor for serious juvenile delinquency, and is also linked to numerous negative outcomes in adulthood.
The California bill requires school districts to provide parents with support services to address the truancy, with a referral to the justice system, the Tribune reports. Parents sent to court can plead guilty and receive a "deferred judgment," allowing for dismissal of the charge if the child's attendance improves and they have followed court orders -- which may include parenting classes and substance abuse treatment.
Teresa Drenick, deputy district attorney for Alameda County, Calif., tells the Tribune parents often wind up in truancy court because "their life issues have gotten so overwhelming to them that getting their child to school becomes a very low priority."
Many of these parents have physical or mental health problems, have no permanent home and rely on public transit to get their child to school, she says, while some also suffer from domestic violence and homelessness.
Drenick tells the Tribune it's important for the court to intercede when parents have not responded to the school district, citing a stricter truancy policy instituted in Alameda County in 2004 that has yielded significant improvements in attendance for 80 percent of families.
However, not everyone believes the proposed truancy law will benefit children and their families.
Adrian Kirk, who directs the Oakland school district office that works with truant children and their families, tells the Tribune the bill is too punitive. He says since sending your child to school is such a basic thing, a parent must have serious problems if they're not doing so -- problems he says the threat of punishment is not necessarily going to solve.
"The circumstances of their lives haven't changed one iota, and now we're going to punish them harder," Kirk tells the Tribune.
Related: Missed Parent-Teacher Conferences Could Mean Jail Time for Parents
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- Hi I'm going to be a mommy for the first time. Would it be okay to name my first child, if a boy, after my father's name?
- Dealing with being a single mom
- My sister could be my mother found old diary of hers had relations with father also old hospital papers showing she gave birth same day I was born. c...












ReaderComments (Page 5 of 5)
8-22-2010 @ 4:22AM
GROG said...SO LET ME SEE IF I'VE GOT THIS RIGHT
WHEN I WAS IN SCHOLL, A LONG LONG LONG TIME AGO
I WAS TOLD IT WAS A "PRIVILAGE" TO BE THERE
NOW THAT CALIFORNIA IS SOOOO FAR IN DEBT
IT'S NO LONGER A PRIVILAGE, IT'S CAN BE TURNED INTO A
CASH COW - LIKE ARNEY AND THE ARNEY NOTS HAVEN'T GOT ENOUGH WAYS TO SCREW THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA
NOW THEY'LL SCREW THE KIDS TOO
SILLY ME, I JUST REMEMBERED, HE WHO HAS ALL THE GUNS, CONTROLLS ALL THE MONEY
HOW COULD I FORGET THAT?
MABEY I SPEND TOO MUCH TIME IN THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT SPEND MORE MONEY ON HEALTH CARE AND TAKING CARE OF THE PEOPLE INSTEAD OF COMING UP WITH WAYS TO SCREW THEM
Reply
8-22-2010 @ 5:35AM
coolstrngr said...How about making some laws against teens who "run away" in general and those who harbor them. In California there are no laws against running away, CPS says to follow your run away in your car with the flashers on to protect them till they get where you didn't want them to go.
Reply
8-22-2010 @ 6:02AM
Gc said...I had a problem with one of my 3 kids who was truant. I changed my works hours so I could hand-deliver him to school. Well guess what? After he was personally delivered to school by me, he would slip out the back door! I obtained a PINS (person in need of supervision) warrant on him from the courts because the school threatned to put him in foster care because I couldn't prevent him from slipping out of school. So do you want me to go to jail because I had a cunning little brat for a kid? I don't think so.
Reply
11-22-2010 @ 6:21PM
AQ said...Gc - case in point. And why was your "brat" bunking school? Because there was something at school that bothered him so much that he'd rather be in DEEP trouble with you, the teachers and the law than face whatever it was.
I wonder what it was. Bullying by another child? Or more likely a teacher or more teachers were victimizing him consistently and his truancy was a survival measure for his troubled young spirit? Maybe someone was even abusing him? Maybe it was so horrible that he felt he couldn't confide in his parents? Or maybe his brain was dying from boredom? Did you ever get to the bottom of it?
8-22-2010 @ 9:07AM
MeeshaLin said...OH MY GOSH! I cannot believe what I have just read!!
Everyone blaming the other person for children cutting class.
Come on seriously think about this.
I've read that some people feel the parents should be fined/jailed,
the teachers need to have more 'interesting' subjects to keep the kids in class, the police or sheriffs should escort truant children to school, the kids should have to go to jail or have an ankle bracelet attached so they will stay in school.
EVERY single family has different reasons that a child may cut class. It could be a number of things, the child hates school, hates mom or dad, hates home, is being abused, is chronically ill at no fault of anyone, is threatened by a classmate, has mental issues like anxiety for example and cannot be around people, etc.
The parents or parent may be doing everything they can to make sure they get through to their child they must attend class on time every day or they will face punishments, not being able to go out on the weekend, things taken away, etc., it can work in some cases and in others it doesn't matter who does what to them or their mom or dad, they are going to cut class.
If it is true that this new 'possible' law to jail parents and or fine them to keep their child in class is all in the best interest for the child to learn and it is not because the school gets paid for each child in school that day, then what needs to be done is a few different things...
1. Teacher, principal, child, parent meeting. (to try and find out the reason the child is cutting class).
2. When and if they find out what the problem is and depending on the reason then they can figure out a plan to help.
3. If the above does not work and the child continues to cut class, instead of putting mom or dad in jail, have both or one (depending on if they are a single parent) go to school with the child and stay at the school to make sure they do not leave.
The catch to that one is - whatever money was to go to jailing the parent must go to the parents directly for missing work and staying at school to monitor their child.
There has to also be some sort of law that will make sure the parent will not loose their job over this.
The problem with this is that it will disrupt other students, their own child, all sorts of backfiring will go on.
Want to know why????
BECAUSE NO ONE GIVES TWO SH*TS IF THE CHILD IS AT SCHOOL OR NOT!!
THEY NEED TO GET PAID FOR EVERY KID, EVERY DAY, AND THEY MUST ALWAYS BE ON TIME!!
Come on just be honest! Don't act like you care about the child's education and future. For one you have no clue who they will be when they grow up regardless if they missed a few days of school.
I wonder if Jeffrey Dommer attended class everyday on time?
How about Charles Manson?
The Craigs List Killer?
The Mother who drowned her 3 children?
Ya okay they must have all cut class at some point in their lives!!
Whatever!!
I will say this, my son is in 2nd grade now, last year in first grade if he was ill, had a fever, etc. he HAD to go to school! At that time the school nurse would take his temperature to see if I was lying!
I will never forget the few times in the entire year my son was sick but I had to send him to school and explain to him the best way I could that he had to see the school nurse in order to come back home. That sucked so bad. I don't have transportation, my son takes the bus.
I had to send him sick on the bus to school, then find a car to borrow to pick him up after the school verified he was ill.
It only happened a couple times.
The last time was pretty bad, he had the flu and was throwing up.
I borrowed a car, carried my son in his pj's with a bucket for him to throw up in, bring him to the office so he can throw up everywhere so they could see he was sick.
That made me sick!!!
I am all for learning and going to school, and my son loves school.
I was afraid, thinking to myself, hoping my son wouldn't hate school just for the memories of having to do that.
Like I said before, every family and child has different reasons for not going to class. Find out first if the kids are being tirds or there is something else going on.....
I mean really, this is just going to ruin our children, having to be in foster care while parents go to jail? or how about parents loosing their homes due to paying fines??
This is very very stupid!!!
I hope things work out the way the are supposed too!!!!
Good luck to all who mean well!!!!!
Reply
8-22-2010 @ 11:35AM
Mom2000 said...WOW!!! I would NEVER send my child to school in that condition!! I don't care what the school says. The health of my child would be first and foremost!!
11-22-2010 @ 6:16PM
AQ said...Sheesh! You have been bullied and abused! Is there a possibility of changing schools? This totalitarian attitude of schools and teachers stinks to the highest heavens. The father of Kiyosaki, who was a top educator on Hawaii, identified at least 9 different learning styles for different children. This "one shoe fits all" policy of schools has made more than one child sick and broken. The worst is when they intimidate parents into helping them bully the children - like they have done with you. Strongs to you!
8-22-2010 @ 10:02PM
William Gagliardi said...To separate parenting responsibilities with children's behavior continues the trend of dividing family and developing socially irreponsible adults.It should begin with reaafirming parent's rights over their children until 18 years old and graduated from high school. Then make parent's responsible to take control of their children's lives. Eventually when a parent loses MONEY, home confinement, and public embarressment they will do what is right..even if it is for selfish reasons. There are age limit laws based upon prudent principles and psychologically developed behavioral models yet we give kids Freedoms and responsibilities they can't handle at younger ages than ever before. It is time to at least be consistent!
Reply
11-22-2010 @ 6:04PM
AQ said...I find it amazing how the "poll" is worded. Anyone wanting to vote "no" for whatever reason (such as, having a better idea) is forced to "agree" with the foul excuse that truancy "isn't the parent's fault" - an opinion that is loudly aimed at riling anyone with half a sense of responsibility. Equally, "yes" is staved with "parents should take responsibility" - a Motherhood Statement if you pardon my French. Of course parents should take responsibility. But if PARENTS are taking responsibility, that is the OPPOSITE of the STATE taking responsibility by jailing parents! Can you spot how this poll is rigged in favour of people voting for that law?
There can be many reasons for truancy. I know a girl who was so scared of a certain teacher, she got such bad stomach cramps in the mornings that she had to throw up. The school regarded her staying home sick as "truancy". I vote that such brutal teachers be fired on the spot. Parents, take your power back. Find out (from your child's classmates) what the teacher is doing to your child. It's really easy: You just ask. Teachers think they can physically manhandle and emotionally abuse children in front of other children because they don't really believe children will ever tell anyone about it. But they do, if asked.
If truancy gets punished by prison, where does that leave homeschoolers??
Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.
... or does America not support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in their constitution anymore?
Reply
12-06-2010 @ 12:59PM
Nathaniel said...Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
This is of the United Nations, not of the United States Constitution. This looks nice, but I take everything from the UN with a large grain of salt. Why,the UN shows it is anti american almost on a daily basis. It recently allowed the President of Iran to open with a Islamic Prayer, but if someone tries to open with a prayer of any other religion the microphone is turned off. This is only an example.
In the U.S. Constitution; there is no enumerated constitutional right to an education. A state constitution may include such a right, but I doubt that being required to pay for education would be considered a violation of that right.
11-28-2010 @ 8:52PM
Roy Gutfinski said...The same idiots who have taken away parents' authority to control their own children want to criminalize parents who are unable to make their children attend school. Insane!
Reply
12-06-2010 @ 12:35PM
Nathaniel said...I have not seen the bill, but have lived in CA, FL, and TX. I do believe we do need to do something Nation Wide. I am a RN of over 30 yrs, and more than 1/2 of that in Pediatrics. If the bill only places rules/fines only on the parents then it is worthless. If it does not also have rules/fines on the Student, and the Schools it needs to add that. I have seen many parents who have lost control of their children, due to either they had no support (from the Schools, and other authorities, &/or from family ... single parent, or from other family members); or they chose to spoil their child and nothing wrong with occassionally spoiling anyone,, but not on a regular basis for then the child learns no self control. Each School needs to have teachers/security/parents/volunteers/or cameras at all doors in this bill / Law to show if the parent/school bus dropped off the child, once the Child is dropped off it is now the responsibility of the school, and all students who are old enough to know it is wrong to not stay in class. I agree with the posts that state parents need to let the child know they mean bizness and all entertainment devices are removed from the childs room, and their ability to use them for a specified amount of time. All schools need to have parenting classes especially in the early yrs of the child. These classes need to show the parents not only several views on parenting but also what responibility they have as parents, add to let parents know what community/school support they have with children that they are losing control with. Once the child is at the age the parent and school feel has reached the ability to understand they (the Child) is also held accountable for their actions, then they are to attend a class until the instructor passes them as understanding the child themselves can and will be held accountable for all truency.
Reply