Curfew-Breaking Teen Sentenced to Hard Time - Babysitting for Free
Filed under: In The News, Weird But True, Chores, Social & Emotional Growth: Teens, Activities: Teens
Credit: Adrian McCandless, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram
What we had here was a failure to communicate.
Kristin Rausch should have known better. You do not want to break the law in Texas, a state known for its strict treatment of criminals.
So when the 16-year-old violated curfew, the hammer came down and her parents sentenced her to hard labor.
Make that really hard labor: She has to take care of small children.
Rausch might have been better off with bread and water in solitary confinement, but no, the Star-Telegram in Fort Worth reports, she must donate 30 hours of free babysitting.
Her father and stepmother took out an ad in the Southlake Journal, complete with Rauch's photo, offering her services.
This is Rausch's first experience doing hard time, according to the Star-Telegram. She belongs to the National Honor Society at Carroll Senior High School in Southlake, a suburban community just 10 miles west of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport.
Yet, curfew is a big deal in the Rausch home, and violating it brings swift and certain retribution.
The Star-Telegram reports Rausch actually got off light. Originally, her parents were going to offer her services to a community service project. But when that fell through, they went with babysitting.
Even so, the newspaper reports, she lucked out, and ended up watching children ages 6 to 10 instead of rowdier babies and toddlers.
The humiliation factor of seeing the ad may have been the worst part of the punishment.
"I was embarrassed," Rausch tells the Star-Telegram. "I had no idea they had done that."
The ad is worded to sound as if Rausch wrote it herself. "My pain is your gain," it states.
"We wanted her to make it up with community service," her stepmother Wendy Rausch tells the Star-Telegram. "My husband got the idea from a situation he encountered at work that people like free labor."
Of course, taking out an ad with a picture of a pretty teenage girl who is available to go to people's homes could be dangerous. The Rausches know that, the Star-Telegram reports, which is why they carefully screened all babysitting requests.
By last weekend, the newspaper reports, Rausch had completed nearly half of her sentence.
Joanne Reding, a neighbor of the Rausch family, tells the Star-Telegram Rausch's pain was definitely her gain. Reding says she was able to attend a weekend meeting that she probably would have missed with no one to watch her 11-year-old son.
"I think this is a great idea," Reding tells the paper. "What she did was very serious, and I admire her parents for calling her on it."
Related: Grounded Teen Uses Facebook to Protest Punishment










ReaderComments (Page 3 of 4)
8-24-2010 @ 3:48PM
rebkad said...Never ceases to amaze me what some parents do for punishment! If I were this girl - I would wait until legal age and get them both back with embarassing photos and info on a full page ad in their local newspaper. Yes, who knows HOW LATE she was and WHY...? Overbearing and yes asking for trouble with preditors....etc. Parents sound like they are moronic idiots let alone have the class of a cockroach. Parents deserve retaliation and definately PARENTING CLASSES - should have had the parenting skill classes YEARS ago. the idiots.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 3:57PM
David S. said...The parents were probably well-intentioned, and I believe teens need to be punished when they break rules, but putting your daughters photo in the paper offering a free service? Not a good idea. They could have handled this differently --- I am sure there were some friends or realtives that needed free babysitting.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:01PM
DD said...I'm not saying the girl shouldn't be punished for breaking curfew. Kids need to know that they can't get away with flouting their parents' rules. But I don't think this was the best way to punish her. She wasn't caught stealing or drinking or anything like that, she just came home late. It seems like the punishment was a little too much. However, she definitely won't be breaking curfew again any time soon.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:06PM
mick deering said...I am 70 years old, an i came from a family of 13, when my dad told us something to do we did exactly that. An we were not late when we did it. Parents need to have strong guidance in there home. i sure would not put an ad in the paper, that shows pure ignorance. First of all there is to many divorces today, children are shuffled around like trash. An i do believe this step mom had something to do with it, sounds like it to me, Maybe she needs thrown out. Discipline makes the child, we as parents lack that.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:09PM
j said...I agree w/ all those here that are conscerned about pedophiles/rapists/child endangerment. they should have just kept the free babysitting in the family & friends circle instead of offering their daughter as a slave to whoever may have read the add. I also agree w/the thought that the parents should have offered an incentive for her to come home instead of threats. some personalities take threats as a challenge. And how would these parents have felt if some tragedy had happened on her watch? Say someone fell down the stairs & broke their neck, or the house caught fire & someone was burned or worse. Their daughter would be held liable. Or what if the person they left her w/ was a pedophile/rapist & she just disappeared? How smart would that feel?
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:11PM
Angiebaby said...I agree with the parents lowering the boom on this kid, but I think this was the wrong way to do it. No parent should EVER advertise in the newspaper for their teenage daughter to go out into strangers' homes for ANY reason. Babysitting is a great job for a teenager, and make them do it for free in penance if you like, but make her work for families you know from work, the neighborhood or your house of worship.
Just looking at her photo in the newspaper with the headline "Want a free babysitter for a night out?" makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up.
Reply
8-26-2010 @ 8:04PM
Christine Jones said...A number of years ago, when my son got into trouble at school, as part of his punishment, I took him to work with me. At the time, I was manager of a gas station/convenience store. He had to wash the windows of cars that were getting gas. If the customer offered a tip, he was to refuse it and explain why he was doing this. Worked very well. Customers were flabbergasted at first, then impressed and appreciative. My son is now an upstanding father of two young girls, and doing a fine job for himself and his family.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:28PM
highlandmg said...who would let thier teenage daughter go to a strangers house? Every child molester knows this child. good work parents
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:28PM
Guy Salsburg said...Her father & stepmother imposed the punishment. However, we do not know if her biological mother is still alive and whether they have shared custody or the father has full custody. For such a harsh punishment to be imposed, if there is shared custody, her real mother should have been consulted. And then there is the fact that punishing her may also be punishing the children she babysits because her being angry about the punishment may be passed on by her - intentially or unintentially. I think this was an ill advised punishment.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:39PM
JudyO said...I wholeheartedly believe in atoning for transgressions, but I would not feel safe having my teenaged daughter babysit for strangers who responded to a newspaper ad. I have to know the families of the people she sits for.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:36PM
normanfields said...Sounds like a great idea,but I would as another parent have some resversations about somebody babbysitting my kids as a form of punishment.This teenager is being punished for not following rules.Do you really want to intrust the care of your kids,and rules you would like followed ,to a teenager that might be tempted to violate your trust in the care of YOUR kids?
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:36PM
Sue said...Agree that she should be punished. She's a good, smart kid who certainly knows how to contact her parents if her car breaks down or she's going to be late for any reason. No excuses.
Publishing her picture advertising for free work is criminal. It's a far worse thing than missing curfew. It's offering your child up to be raped, kidnaped, killed. If a priest can rape a child in a church, none of your "careful screening" is going to do jack squat to protect your daughter. If you are willing to humiliate her so much that you do something as stupid as that, you don't deserve the daughter you have, broken curfew or not.
How many serial killers and serial rapists, once caught, did people say "Oh, I never would have believed it. He was such a nice man!"?
Stupid, mom and dad. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Let's hope your daughter learns more from YOUR mistakes than she does from her own. Maybe YOU should offer to do some community service as well for what you did? You put your child in DANGER. NOTHING is worth that.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 6:56PM
michelle said...Sue I agree I have a 16 year old daughter and I would take away everything even the car before I would put her out there for free services. How many young girls go missing daily. One most recently in Moreno Valley California and all she was doing was leaving summer school and walking to a friends house. She is now dead. Shame on the parents and figure out a different form of punishment is all I can say.
8-24-2010 @ 5:10PM
JUDY said...Sounds like a step mothers idea to me lol..The kid is a looker and an A student and they publically humiliate her for a curfew violation?
I cannot believe the number of people in ehre who believe sticking your kids photo in the papers and offering her out for free services is ok. They should get nailed for this crap. They cannot ground their kid? They have to make her look like a fool? I bet she bails the day she turns 18 and never looks back at these 2 loosers.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 4:54PM
mrsvonii said...If she is an honor student this probably isn't the only time her picture has been printed. It isn't an invitation to rape. I think it's a pretty good punishment and it sounds like she is the kind of responsible youngster who would do a good job babysitting.
It certainly seems more constructive than my step daughters constantly "grounding" their children. Having to spend time in a bedroom with internet, television and soundsytem while talking and texting on the cell isn't much of a punishment and certainly doesn't teach responsibility.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 7:44PM
Jenni said...I'm not saying that a step parent should have no control over her household but there is no better way to nurture resentment than having step mom lower the boom on a teenager. Punishment should be meted out by the biological parent. Take away the phones, computers, cars and whatever else they can't live without. Your son-in-law needs to take control and be his children's parent. Don't make step mom the heavy.
8-24-2010 @ 4:57PM
ttrexxx said...threaten to erase all the music on their ipod or close out their fasebook account. or both or remove their laptop for 6 months..that's a good one that works
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 5:19PM
Jim said...The parents are harsh idiots. I beleive the old proverb "Spare the rod, spoil the child" but thisis going overboard. When my sons screw up they get grounded. If its really bad the get grounded from electricity. No T.V., no Ipod, no video games, nothing that uses electricity. On the other hand I also reward my boys for doing good. My oldest son was potty trained at 2 years old. If he used the toilet he got a tootsie roll, and no he doesn't have a mouthful of fillings because I also taught him to brush his teeth twice a day.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 5:17PM
KatieCouric'sNamesis said...If she'd been convicted of a misdemeanor in court (and violating a curfew is a misdemeanor), she'd have gotten community service as a first-time offender.
So, this makes total sense.
Bravo, Mom and Dad for holding your daughter accountable for her actions. It's a pity more parents don't do the same.
Reply
8-24-2010 @ 5:18PM
robyn said...First off I think it was a good punishment. Putting a child in their room to pout and do nothing is not productive. Second I am pretty sure that the parents did a good job of checking out the people wanting the baby sitting. I am also sure that she is already in trouble and she is not stupid enough to mistreat a child. Maybe her paretns thought of this and that is partly why she was not siting for infants and young children.Cerfew is a big deal. I know when my son was in his teens I would have went out of mind with worry if he had not called and didnt come home when he was suppose too. also if they are allowed to get away with this what rules are next they are going to push to the limit and past? I think the babysitting is a wonderful idea, for one if the parents are late coming home and she has to wait for them it is giving her a dose of what it feels like to be told one thing and then it not happen. What if the parents had to work the next morning and she was late coming home keeping them up and worried. I know we dont know all the details, and sense we dont, maybe we shouldnt be so judgemental on the parents was putting the child at harm. I dont think they was doing this.
Reply