Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Charlotte Robinson: LISTEN: How Gay And Lesbian Couples Become…
New Turnaround Teacher 'Trying To Get It Right' In Tough School
Circumcision: Is It Right for Your Baby Boy?
Filed under: Newborns, Babies, Toddlers Preschoolers, Health & Safety: Babies, Development/Milestones: Babies, Day Care & Education, Feeding & Sleeping, Baby-sitting, Research Reveals: Babies, Nutrition: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Babies, Health & Safety: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Development: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Behavior: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Activities: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Gear Guides: Babies, Gear Guides: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Research Reveals: Toddlers & Preschoolers, Expert Advice: Toddlers & Preschoolers
The decision to circumcise is up to parents. Credit: Nicole Hill, Getty Images
The debate over circumcision heated up when the Centers for Disease Control announced it may recommend circumcising all baby boys, but experts say the decision still rests with parents.
First of all, just what is circumcision? Dr. Rodolfo Sarmiento, a pediatrician on staff at Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital in Downers Grove, Ill., told ParentDish it's an elective procedure done to boys after birth, usually 24 hours after they are delivered. The prepuce, or overlying skin at the tip of the penis, is removed.
The procedure does cause the child pain, so doctors will administer a pain reliever such as Tylenol. Some physicians, Sarmiento says, prefer to give a newborn sugar or a local, topical anesthetic to help with pain control.
Not all parents choose to have their children circumcised, which is why the CDC's announcement caused such a stir. Officials are considering promoting the procedure in the U.S., according to The New York Times, because it may help reduce the spread of H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS.
The proposal is based on data gathered from studies in African countries showing that men who were circumcised reduced their risk of H.I.V. infection by half, The Times reports. However, some opponents say circumcising newborns in the U.S. is a strategy that wouldn't pay off for decades.
Other reasons to consider circumcision, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics, include:
- A slightly lower risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs). A circumcised infant boy has about a 1 in 1,000 chance of developing a UTI in the first year of life; an uncircumcised infant boy has about a 1 in 100 chance of developing a UTI in the first year of life.
- Prevention of foreskin infections
- Prevention of phimosis, a condition in uncircumcised males that makes foreskin retraction impossible
- Easier genital hygiene
"If so, then proceed, if no then do not do it," he says. "Because when this boy grows up, he will be very different from his father."
Related: CDC to Release Circumcision Recommendations












ReaderComments (Page 4 of 4)
9-03-2010 @ 7:50PM
J Alex Sg said...I´m so happy I´ve escaped this horrible mutilation and do feel deep sympathy for those males who regret having it done on them, so cowardly as it always is when done to babies or boys ,ie, when they can´t speak out or choose for themselves.
Reply
9-04-2010 @ 4:27PM
Frank said..."There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene."- Royal Dutch Medical Association on Circumcision (46,000 members)
circumcisionandhiv royal-dutch-medical-association-issues-statement-on-male-circumcision-of-infants-and-children-aap-no
"overlying skin at the tip of the penis, is removed."
In real terms cutting off: 1/3-1/2 shaft skin, 1/2 -all of the sensitive inner mucosa, irreplaceable 75% (65%-85%) of the sexual receptors, irreplaceable Dartos muscle necessary for complete sexual function. World's foremost penis expert Dr. John Taylor's site: research cirp org/
circumstitions com/Sexuality Sorrells et al. Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis.
norm org/lost "The Lost List" What is lost to circumcision and what can be restored.
"doctors will administer a pain reliever such as Tylenol. Some physicians, Sarmiento says, prefer to give a newborn sugar or a local, topical anesthetic to help with pain control."
There is no pain reliever that relieves all or even most pain. The nerves to the penis originate from many sources:
cpj sagepub com/content.abstract Newborn circumcision with local dorsal penile nerve block doesn't work.
Traditional pain relief given to babies during infant circumcision - sucrose pacifiers do not reduce pain twt.mx/R8Yg
bit dot ly/ZDEfA Imagine having penile wounding that must be torn apart everyday for a year.
Considering this and that most circumcisions are not done with anesthetics, here's what Nelson Mandela said about his circumcision: It was blinding white light of electrical fire that burned throughout all his veins.
bit dot ly/mMoZR PAIN: 3,928 island villagers males&females all ages forced circ'd into Islam by Muslim clerics
"Not all parents choose to have their children circumcised"
NYTimes reports from CDC presentation the US circumcision Rate is a now at 32.5%, 2009.
"because it may help reduce the spread of H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS."
CircumcisionAndHIV dot com for all your needs on this issue.
mysite dot verizon dot net/dortfay/science dot html Science and Circumcision - Basic tenets of science
In real world situations, this has flopped. The US has the highest circumcision rate and the highest HIV/AIDS rate of ALL industrialized nations. With all our medicines, and healthcare, what better way to demonstrate circumcision doesn't work against HIV.
Simply African researchers say DON"T KNOW why. Isn't that cause for pause?
Further Langerhans cells in the foreskin is part of the immune system defending against disease by secreting Langerin which kills HIV dead.
cirp dot org/library/disease/HIV/ Circumcision and HIV Infection (langerin)
Why are researchers looking to vilify nature, the foreskin. Why not concentrate, especially before advocating circumcision in Africa, where 1 in 5 HIV infections are caused by medical staff!
tinyurl dot com/yks9apv 1/5 HIV Infections Caused by Medical Staff (5 million infected per year in Africa, 2009) papers backed by Royal Society of Medicine.
# AIDSMAP: Circumcision's Effectiveness A Distant Third. bit dot ly/9V8z3
"Dr. DEAN EDELL: The AIDS/Circumcision Fallacy" (twitthis dot com/hop83u)
The HIV/circumcision myth, Over $2 Billion per year spent on circumcising male babies. bit dot ly/11oDjB
"Prevention of foreskin infections"
What other healthy body part do we cut off to prevent infections?
Most all infections are iatrogenic. Doctors are not taught about the foreskin. Many medical books show's the man's penis as circumcised. Most all infections are caused using soap in the foreskin unbalancing the natural pH. bubble bath is the worst, and by medical staff prematurely retracting the foreskin. Normal retraction can be up to 19 years.
knol dot google dot com/k/dan-bollinger/foreskin-care/qtxksznmmbu5/2# Foreskin Care
knol dot google dot com/k/tom-guider/a-look-at-yeast-infection-candidiasis/2md17vp4f830c/4# A look at yeast infection candidiasis
"Prevention of phimosis, a condition in uncircumcised males that makes foreskin retraction impossible"
Dr. Rodolfo Sarmiento is stuck in the misinformed past. These doctors, including U. of Chicago Hospital (where foreskins come to die), are why Illinois has an extremely high circumcision rate.
jurology dot com/article/S0022-5347(05)63612-9/abstract termed "infrequent but important complication" circumcision can cause phimosis.
"Easier genital hygiene"
Really? To rinse, would I rather pull back then forth erogenous skin or...
Am I being emotional?
knol dot google dot com/k/circumcision-and-human-behavior# The Emotional and Behavioral Effects of Circumcision.
cirp org/library/psych/cansever/ Psychological Effects of Circumcision by Gocke Cansever.
"consider whether or not the father is circumcised.If so, then. proceed."
Just how does this apply to when circumcision started in the US. The fathers were mostly intact until the '40's. Sons are not going to notice if father has skin. Son's will notice that father's is bigger. One could equally say fathers should restore their foreskin to look like their son. Actually that would be better for dad AND mom.
HOW ABOUT:
healthvene factors-affecting-male-fertility Circumcision lowers male fertility
sexasnatureintendedit fustration to orgasm
(2010) Infant circumcision causes 117 neonatal deaths/year in US, 115 die of SIDS, 44 die of suffocation.
PLEASE support:
MGMbill org a strictly equal rights of sexes amendment.
I think $1 USD should be levied on every circumcision in the US to go towards ForeGen org.
youtube Intro to Foregen org, a non-profit agency to promote foreskin stem cell regeneration
foreskin-restoration net/forum/showthread Foregen Financial Disclosure
Reply
9-08-2010 @ 7:49PM
kandi said...It is definantly a great Idea to have your baby circumsized. not only is it better for them and reduces the cause of getting infection or diseases...it would be insane not too...I guess there are people out there that are not but my expieriences and knowlege of people I know..its better to not remember then to have something go wrong "downstairs" and have it done later as an adult! A little Snip Snip and your good to go.
Reply
9-12-2010 @ 11:04AM
Jackie said...wow @ kandi. That little snip snip, should eventually grow into 15 square inches of pleasurable skin that has a function, and a purpose. It was put there for a reason. If it wasnt supposed to be there why not just be born like that. By your post i take you have never had sex with a intact man, and let me tell you. Your missing out!!!! I have had sex with both, and it is un comparable! Sex with a intact man feels exactly how it should, and is amazing!!! Also no health organizations even recommend it done. With proper hygiene, and care it is easily maintainable. Would you cut off your clitoris and clitoral hood, just so it was easier to clean?? i didnt think so. So why do it to your baby boy. It is a unnecessary body modification! Let his penis be how it was intended to be!!!
Reply
9-25-2010 @ 12:15PM
brittany said...Genesis 17:2, 9-11.
"As for you, you and your offspring after you throughout their generations are to keep My covenant. This is My covenant, which you are to keep, between Me and you and your offspring after you: Every one of your males must be circumcised. You must circumcise the flesh of your foreskin to serve as a sign of the covenant between Me and you."
Say whatever you want, the Bible has never let me down.
Reply
12-09-2010 @ 10:39PM
Brittany said...Keep going, go to genesis 17:12-13
"and he that is EIGHT DAYS OLD shall be circumcised among you (Abraham) every man child in YOUR GENERATIONS, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised..."
He was talking to Abraham and he said only in his generation!! SOOOOO there you have it only in Abrahams generation and only children he brings into his home!!
9-14-2010 @ 7:03PM
jackemama said...Great article, I was reading on this site called the Skinny Scoop about circumcision and there are some interesting answers on there as to whether women went in depth or not in researching before doing it...also, who drove the decision? Check it out at theskinnyscoop.com
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 10:42PM
KIM said...my son was circumcised and my husband as well. Its a choice of the parents. People say that you can teach your child proper hygiene and they won't have any problems. WRONG! As a toddler they squirm all over the place when your trying to clean them and if you dont pull the forskin back all the way it can get infected if any bacteria is left behind. Also, when they are older and not able to care for themselves they can get infections due to incontinence. I know I work in a nursing home and a few of our male residents (not circumsized) the foreskin you can't even pull back. Which in turn they are now susceptible to all kinds of infections. People need to look at things in the long term.
Reply
12-09-2010 @ 10:31PM
Brittany said...Your wrong, if you knew what is was like to have a child that wasn't circumcised then you'd know that there is no extra skin to pull back until about age 10, ask a doctor they'll tell you. My son pees just fine no skin in the way at all. Do your research before posting about uncircumcised children.
12-09-2010 @ 10:28PM
Brittany said...This is dumb, every boy in my family and my husband family is NOT circumcised and they are all fine and have never had a problem. In my opinion if the dad isn't then the son shouldn't be either. Just imagine a child learning to pee like daddy and daddy pulls his skin back and the son is circumcised and he does the same and hurts himself because he has no extra skin. Plus the extra skin doesn't need to be pulled back until about age 10 (that's what the doctors told me) plus we wash our kids until about age 6 and after that we can teach them how to properly wash their area, same for a girl. Other countries circumcise women we sure in the hell don't do that so why do it to a boy? So Dumb, again if daddy isn't circumcised then DON'T do it to your child either no point!!
Reply
12-09-2010 @ 10:37PM
Brittany said...Keep going, go to genesis 17:12-13
"and he that is EIGHT DAYS OLD shall be circumcised among you (Abraham) every man child in YOUR GENERATIONS, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised..."
He was talking to Abraham and he said only in his generation!! SOOOOO there you have it only in Abrahams generation and only children he brings into his home!!
Reply
1-19-2011 @ 8:21PM
Morgan said...Circumcision is wrong for the fact that men want back what they lost which is why foregen is raising money to regenerate everything lost to circumcision at foregen.org
1 gender of a species of the entire animal kingdom does not have a birth defect called the foreskin. The foreskin is not a birth defect. It is a wonderful thing and the fact that we have to weigh benefits v. cons shows circumcision is wrong. If there was nothing wrong with it why dispute it? Circumcision, no Male Genital Mutilation, is WRONG , it is rape, and it is a violation of human rights. see doctorsopposingcircumcision . org
Reply