SmackDown: Should a Former Prostitute Be Allowed to Teach in Public School?
Filed under: In The News, Opinions, Sex

The oldest profession is also one of the most controversial. Illustration by Christopher Healy
Being an Ex-Hooker Isn't the Same as Being an Ex-Accountant
by Jessica Samakow"So tell me something unique about you that isn't on your resume," inquires an elementary school principal.
"Oh, I used to be a prostitute," the prospective teacher replies.
"Perfect! You're hired!"
In what bizarre world would this conversation ever take place, you ask? Answer: The Bronx.
Okay, so maybe elementary school art teacher Melissa Petro's interview didn't exactly include the dialogue above. But it may as well have. According to the New York Post, Petro posted an essay this month claiming she also had been a prostitute.
Using her real name and picture, Petro writes, "From October 2006 to January 2007 I accepted money in exchange for sexual services I provided to men I met online in what was then called the "erotic services" section of Craigslist.org" in the Huffington Post.
Petro goes on to explain how her lack of pimp usage somehow made her Craigslist experience safe and convenient. And she claims that her chosen channel of prostitution made her "no more a 'professional' than a person renting a room on the same site" because these people, of course, are not necessarily professional real estate brokers. Somehow, I don't see the correlation. Any way you slice it, a prostitute is a prostitute. I am not quite sure what separates a "professional prostitute" from an "amateur" one.
The self-proclaimed "non-pro" writes in the Huffington Post, "I found the lifestyle physically demanding, emotionally taxing and spiritually bankrupting, and so I made a decision to desist some months after I'd gotten started, exiting the industry just as freely as I'd entered."
Her next move? Becoming an art teacher at an elementary school in the Bronx. While her decision to exit the industry may deserve a pat on the back, I believe that Petro's past should deem her unqualified to be a teacher at an elementary school.
To my knowledge, at the very least, teachers must not have a criminal record if they are to be considered for jobs. So, Petro may have a clear record because she was never formally charged with prostitution. The fact of the matter is, however, that prostitution is illegal. Whether she has run into trouble with the law or not, accepting money for sexual acts is against the law. If Petro had admitted online that she used to rob banks, she likely would not be able to keep her job. We would hope not, at least. Why is this any different?
In today's ever-growing cyber world, published information is impossible to hide. Petro admits that she has not even tried to be cautious about disguising her past on the web. She is aware that her colleagues are "googling" her and that this could be a potential threat to her job. And if your colleagues are "googling you," you better believe that your students are as well.
The students may be young, but they've grown up with Google as their encyclopedia and are undoubtedly curious to find out what their teachers are up to outside of school. In high school, I found a CD that my Spanish teacher's husband, a Jewish cantor, released. Last year, I found a college professor's blog about her adventure to Taiwan. Embarrassing as my Google habit might be, I know that I am not alone.
There is a good chance that Petro's students are too young to even know what a prostitute is. So upon their findings, variations of, "Mommy, what's a prostitute? Can I be one?" probably will follow. It is no wonder that parents are outraged by the exposure of Petro's past and do not want her teaching their kids.
Some might argue that there is a shortage of teachers in less fortunate neighborhoods and that finding them is a difficult task. This may be true, but I hardly think that the "adult services" section on Craigslist is the best place to start looking.
Key Word with Former Prostitute is 'Former'
by Tom Henderson"Go your way," Jesus tells the adulterous woman everyone else wants to stone to death. "Sin no more."
Read John 8:1-11 carefully. Nowhere does Jesus add, "But don't even think of trying to be an art teacher, ya little tramp!"
That's because Christianity is based on forgiveness and redemption. So is our secular justice system. Except in the most extreme cases, we don't execute people or lock them up forever. We hope they reform and go on to become contributing members of society.
That is our fondest wish -- as a society, anyway. As individuals, we are a little too eager to cast the first stone.
More than a few people are itching to chuck a few rocks at Melissa Petro. She is very open about the fact that she was a prostitute for a few months before becoming an art teacher in New York City. She told her story on the Huffington Post, even using her real name and photo.
And I admire her for that.
Mealy-mouthed people who squirm, lie and generally refuse to take personal responsibility by not putting their names and faces to their actions, opinions and pasts disgust me a lot more than sex workers. And it seems, at times, that the mealy-mouthed are inheriting the earth.
The Internet allows people to spout whatever bile they want without putting their names on it. Long have I yearned for someone to come clean about something before being confronted with the incontrovertible evidence.
Some scummy scandal-monger probably would have exposed Petro as a former prostitute eventually. That she would tell the tale herself -- candidly, bluntly and without feeling the need for a melodramatic mea culpa? I find that extremely refreshing.
No, I would not want her standing in front of a classroom and telling my child about the last time some guy paid her $300 for fellatio. Similarly, I would hope his algebra teacher would refrain from telling him how her husband likes to play barnyard in the bedroom.
Parents at PS 70, where Petro teaches, have reacted predictably.
"I don't want nobody that used to do that to be around my kid," one of them tells the New York Post. "People like that should not be allowed to be anywhere near children."
That seems to be the general consensus. "She's not a good role model," another mother tells the newspaper. "I do not want my daughters to find out about this, and I do not want my daughters to be around that kind of person."
Not a good role model? This is a woman who has a masters of fine arts degree in creative nonfiction and is, by all accounts, a respected teacher. She also happens to be a former prostitute. The key word here is "former." She changed her life, and has the courage not to lie about her past.
She is exactly the kind of role model I want for my teenage son.
His peers often refer to sex workers -- and women in general -- as "whores." There are video games where players murder prostitutes, but that's OK because they're not real people. And they're prostitutes. Boys grow up learning to dehumanize prostitutes while also learning that being sexually promiscuous themselves makes them "studs."
I want my son to learn that prostitutes are real people, worthy of respect and capable of growth and change. You don't have to accept what they do as a profession to respect who they are as fellow human beings.
Would I want him to learn these lessons in art class? Not necessarily.
I seriously doubt the subject ever comes up with Petro's students. Very few kids probably read the Huffington Post and, if they do, more power to them. They could probably handle a serious and mature discussion about the situation.
Sadly, the same can't be said of the many of their parents. Many of us still have a lot of growing up to do.
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- D. hickman v. intel, microsoft et.al federal district court dc (bill gates deposition part 1 you tube?) are you a owner of a company?
- LAW SCHOOL OR COPYCAT would'nt it be a difficult profession ( lawyer)if anyone could use your court case defense as plaintiff or defendant
- Any advice for first time mom?











ReaderComments (Page 7 of 10)
9-29-2010 @ 12:10PM
tom hammond said...Well, I have learned a lot from various prostitutes. Especially the one who made me repeat my lessons until I got it right.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:30PM
Keia said...i can't say that i am fully comfortable with the idea. but sometimes people change, sometimes they change for the best and if this person is willing to teach students than let her teach. its hard out their to find good teachers, but if this person is willing to let go of her former life than she should. while everyone is on their high horse about what a teacher's backround should be, please find out what led her to that life. people do not become hookers without a reason.as long as she is teaching proper information to students than let her be. i highly doubt she will teach them how to make change with their butts and what it takes to be a proper pimp. so while it might be a hard subjest to understand, but understanding is important.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:17PM
Leon said...This woman has more honesty and Integrity than all the people ready to kick her when shes down. this is one reason society has problems like street people, homeless & prostitutes, because that Holier than thou attitude dose just that, keeps people down, you don't have to look very far to find someone ready to cast the first stone on hear say. here is a woman honest and strong enough to reveal what she did before becoming a teacher, and with the Moxie to Improve herself. I think she is Morally superior to all of her critics.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:22PM
SusanM said...It's not the fact that she WAS a prostitute, it's that she seems to be ok with people who ARE prostitutes - and says as much in public.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:24PM
k said...Hey, Jessica Samakow can't even tell the difference between bank robbery and prostitution. We're lucky she isn't a teacher.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:56PM
tiffanie said...Yes, key word is former. I don't see anything wrong with a former pros wanting to teach! Everyone can turn their lives around and being a teacher is one of the best ways to do it.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:43PM
Dmollykins said...Jessica/Tom, I hope you also teach your child the real reason why a teen/woman becomes a prostitute, But first, Tom, I want to thank you for putting a face on this woman, making her human. Many fathers fail to do that with women period, and these are the guys who turn out to be "Johns," themselves. These women (and men) were sexually abused as children. Often by family members, or known and trusted people outside of the family. Many became addicted to drugs and/or alcohol to stuff the pain and shame of their abuse. Being underage, they could not get jobs to pay for their habit. The predator bought them gifts and gave them money to insure their silence, and continue the abuse. This woman is blessed to still be alive, she wants to start afresh. I'm sure the people yelling the loudest about her past, have some "little nasties," in their closet they don't have the guts to talk about. She is not a molester, if anything, she was the victim of one.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 2:29PM
Niki said...As long as she's not doing it now, I couldn't care less that she is a former prostitute. What bothers me is that she felt the need to reveal all in a newspaper. The chances of someone finding out that she prostituted for 3 MONTHS, years ago, were very slim in the first place. If she was worried about scandal or blackmail, that could have been resolved when the need arose. Why not wait until it was uncovered and then address the issue then? The end result would have been the same as advertising it in the paper. In the end, I'm forced to think she did it all for PUBLICITY. How much do you want to bet she won't be teaching in a few months, but will have a much higher paid job and selling her story elsewhere?
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:46PM
Dmollykins said...I should have also added, "In the giving of gifts and monies for sex, the child learns quickly about trading sexual favors for money."
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:47PM
Dave said...She can teach me a thing or two, the hard way! LOL
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:50PM
Joe Spelta said...Does anyone other than me smell a book or movie deal coming out of this?
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 1:05PM
Jack said...At least you would not have to worry about her giving it away for free like so many teachers are doing now days.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:53PM
bonde said...I admire her for telling the truth. Prostitution is in her past. She is no longer practicing it nor did she say that it is a good thing. If she still believes in prostitution as a way to make money, then I will say she should not be teaching as she may influence the children to her own way of thinking. But since she is no longer practicing prostitution and has turned around to a noble professional then she should be well accepted and allowed to teach anywhere she wants to. She is no longer prostituting and was not even in the profession for long before leaving. If we are all supposed to be stoned for our sins, then we should all be dead now. What matters now is that she is no longer a prostitute. Let her teach so long as she is not teaching the children how to become a prostitute.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:55PM
sue said...Let ye who are without sin cast the first stone. Not one person on this earth is without sin.....some protesting the loudest are probably guilty of worse than she is. You go girl and keep your chin held high.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 12:59PM
TJG1 said...I have two thoughts on this discussion; (1) It seems to me that no one bothered to asked her why she chose to be public about her past but in this day and age of betrayal of trust for money, TMZ, The Star Ledger, the Inquirer and Fox News I would not be surprised if she didn't do it for a variety of reasons one of which was to beat someone to the punch and (2) it seems to me that here is an opportunity for parents with children in that school or even her class to have a life-lesson discussion on any number of issues surrounding this subject with their children if and when the subject ever comes up.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 1:14PM
Willard Bateman said...Americans are so uptight about sex, its amazing that we have so many people in the USA.
If she is a good teacher, keep her and be be glad you have her.
There are plenty of old maid teachers that are very bad teachers.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 1:06PM
KWEENBEE said...I am surprised by those who are so upset with Ms. Petros' changing her life around. She used her money, it didn't cost the taxpayers any tax money in financial aid for her education and yet people complain. She did what she did with a purpose in mind, to receive an education, to better her life and chances; but people hate seeing someone change, makes them feel bad that they don't get off their lazy arses to get ahead. Instead they sit there judging everyone else making their way to succeed. It is most obvious they could use a teacher, any teacher, so they can spell correctly and not be so ignorant in their thinking...
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 1:06PM
frank said...It seems that this article completely misses the point. I dont think the question is whether a former prostitute should be teaching kids...the problem is that she created a video on the internet discussing her sex life with her boyfriend and comparing it to her job teaching children. I dont think she is showing good judgment by publicly discussing her life as a prostitute and her current sex life. She seems like a complete moron and I wouldnt want her around my children. She's lucky she has a job at all when so many people are struggling! She should be so grateful to have a good job...but it seems to me that she is completely disrespecting it!
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 1:10PM
diane said...If anyone wnats their kids taught by a former prostitute they should be put in an institution or they are probably the same way so find nothing wrong with it. Let them teach liberals, they are already immoral hoes, they could probably teach her a few tricks. Goes along with their handing out condoms in first grade program and sodomy clubs.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 1:11PM
Tena said...As long as she isn't teaching deviant sex acts to her students (and they don't know about her past), what difference does it make? Does she have to pay for her past the rest of her life?
Reply