Adoptive Parents Ordered to Surrender 3-Year-Old to Biological Father
Filed under: Just For Moms, Just For Dads, Adoption, News, In The News, Weird But True, Single Parenting, New In Pop Culture
In what may turn out to be a nightmare-come-true for adoptive parents, an Indiana couple risks losing their son today to the child's biological father in Ohio, after fighting to adopt the boy for nearly three years.
The couple, Jason and Christy Vaughn, arranged to adopt the boy, Grayson, from his biological mother after his birth in 2007. However, after a series of legal battles that ascended to the Ohio Supreme Court, the Vaughns have been ordered to immediately turn the boy over to his biological father, Benjamin Wyrembek, according to the Toledo Blade.
The Vaughns were present at Grayson's birth in October 2007, and have had custody of the boy since they took him to their home in Indiana just eight days later, according to ABC News. However, within 30 days of his birth, Wyrembek, registered with the Putative Father Registry in Ohio, affirming that he might be the boy's father. Wyrembek then filed a suit to establish parental rights in December 2007, just weeks before the Vaughns filed for adoption, according to court documents.
Wyrembek had been seeing the biological mother -- who was married to another man at the time -- when she became pregnant. Ultimately, she broke off the relationship with Wyrembek and divorced her husband, then surrendered the child at birth to a Columbus, Ohio, adoption agency, according to the Fort Wayne News-Sentinel.
Grayson's biological mother tells ABC News she lost contact with Wyrembek early in her pregnancy, and wasn't required by law to provide his contact information to the adoption agency. Court documents confirm that the biological mother and her husband -- the legal father -- filed the necessary papers to surrender custody of the child within weeks of his birth.
Seventeen months later, after genetic testing confirmed Wyrembek as Grayson's biological father, and before the adoption could be finalized, an Ohio court ruled that the Vaughns had filed their adoption petition prematurely -- since paternity had not yet been determined -- and awarded custody to Wyrembek.
The custody decision has since been upheld by the Ohio Court of Appeals and, most recently, by the Supreme Court of Ohio, according to court documents, which refer to the "right of a natural parent to the care and custody of his children (as) one of the most precious and fundamental in law."
However, the Vaughns say that although they were aware of Wyrembek's intentions early on, he refused to meet or talk with them after Grayson's birth. So, as time passed, they became convinced that the law was on their side, the Blade reports.
"He's never contacted us directly. He's never asked how the child is doing. He's never sent a birthday card," Jason Vaughn tells the Blade. "What they'll say is they've litigated this from the beginning, that he filed a paternity action in the very beginning; that he's done everything he can do."
Glenn Sacks, national executive director of Fathers and Families, a national family court reform organization, tells ParentDish he sees this type of case all too often.
"These cases are very difficult because what usually happens is that the adoptive parents will hold onto the child as long as they can," Sacks says. "And then by the time it winds its way to a decision, they say, 'How can we rip the kid from the only family they've ever known and give him to his biological father?' "
But the attorney for the Vaughns, Michael Voorhees, asserts that the Ohio courts have not followed state adoption law.
"The law says you don't need (the birth father's) consent for adoption if he willfully abandoned the birth mother during the pregnancy," Voorhees tells the Blade.
In response to the decision, Wyrembek's attorney, Alan J. Lehenbauer tells ABC News: "My client, the biological father, was awarded legal custody by an Ohio court after consideration of all evidence." Lehenbauer adds that his client "has sought the return of his child since shortly after birth and will not relitigate this matter in the media."
Jason Vaughn says litigation is not the same as support.
"We want him to have contacted Grayson and to have supported him," he tells ABC News. "And our position is he has not done that."
Sacks says he thinks there's an enormous amount of prejudice against biological fathers who want to raise their kids.
"People say, 'Gee, could he really raise a kid on his own like that?' " Sacks tells ParentDish. "But when motivated fathers have a chance to raise their kids, they're usually very effective, and the research bears that out."
The Vaughns tell ABC News there are currently two different adoption petitions pending in Ohio, and they haven't had their day in court yet; they are now appealing the 24-hour order to turn Grayson over to Wyrembek.
"I just want to ask, if there's a congressman, a judge, a senator, the Ohio governor, the Indiana governor, please get involved. Please, I am begging you; this is our family," Christy Vaughn tells CBS News.
Reacting to the 24-hour turnover order, the Vaughns are asking that a transition be mandated, and have hired a child psychologist to draft a recommended transition plan for a slower, measured transition. That plan has been filed with the court in Ohio and is awaiting decision.
"If we're going to lose Grayson -- we don't think we should -- but if we're going to, then it's got to be done right, and the current order that stands isn't right, and anyone should know that," Jason Vaughn tells ABC News.
Christy Vaughn says she can't imagine telling her two other children that they'll be losing their brother.
"There's absolutely no difference. He's our child, and he has been since the moment I held him. I don't know anything else but that," she tells ABC News.
Neither of the attorneys in the case could be reached for comment.
Your<span>Voice</span>
Ask Us Anything About Parenting
Recently Asked
- LAW SCHOOL OR COPYCAT would'nt it be a difficult profession ( lawyer)if anyone could use your court case defense as plaintiff or defendant
- 3 SHOWS A HOUR 7 HOURS = 21 (10 DAYS = 210) 10 STUDIOS = 2100 20 STUDIOS = 4200 (IN 10 DAYS) 3 (20 MINUTE SHOWS).
- There are more than 67,000 households on the list ...?????????????











ReaderComments (Page 5 of 38)
9-28-2010 @ 4:19PM
iamme said...Please tell me you are not serious! Do you really think that in a few years he wont remember his mom and dad and brothers that he was taken away from? That is the craziest comment I have heard and so not true! He will remember the fear he faced as he was taken from them and placed with a man that he didn't even know. He will remember that forever! The adoptive family is his family, the only family he knows. If the birth father wanted what was best for this child then he would leave him with the adoptive family. Can you imagine what it would be like to be a child and taken away from everything you have ever know? Can you imagine what it would be like to take home a baby from the hosiptal and love this child as your own and within a few months time have someone try to take him away from you? It would be heartbreaking. This child should stay with his adoptive parents!!!
9-28-2010 @ 5:22PM
Sory said...agree with you 100%
9-28-2010 @ 5:47PM
Lismara829 said...I have put more than 700 adoptive children (now adults) back with their birth parents. I have seen only about 3 that worked out where they had a good relationship. I assure you, this child will have one bad life if he is taken from the only family he knows. I know two children that were taken from their mother and sent to Va. to their father's home. They were sent back after a year and four months. They suffered Post Traumatic Syndrome, Stockholm Syndrome, had been with psychiatrists for a year and four months and all they wanted was to go home to their mom. They had made plans to run away ( ages 8 and 9) and were about to do so when their mom demanded a shrink examine the stepmother. She had the kids back to their mother in a day. Those kids will be messed up for the rest of their lives. The social worker who recommended that the father have them had a son in the 5th. grade. HE FLUNKED 5TH.
GRADE! If she was so knowledgable, having a Master's degree in
psychology and social work, how is it she could not even raise her own child?
9-28-2010 @ 3:33PM
Lori said...The adoptive parents KNEW that the biological father wanted his child BEFORE they filed formal adoption papers. They sould have said "I understand how important it is to have your child in your life - here, you are the Father, give him a good life." THEY will have caused this hearthache on their "adopted" child when he gets "ripped" from their arms & put with his true parent, his Father, who has gone through the legal steps to demand his rights, and the rights of the child to be with a biological parent that wants him. Just because the Mother didn't want him to have the child, it doesn't mean he doesn't get a say. This is simple - they've basically stolen the child & want a kid so bad they won't give him up. Fathers DO have rights - deal with it! The longer they drag it out, the more sympathetic they think people will be to them.
Reply
9-28-2010 @ 4:05PM
Iamme said...This family was there during the womans delivery, the adoptive mother was the first person to hold this little boy. They went through the 9 month pregnancy just as if she herself were pregnant. The birth father wasn't too interested in being this boys father then. This little boy only knows one family and that is his adoptive family. It is selfish of the birth father to now want to take him away from who he believes are his parents and brothers. Can you imagine how scary that would be for a child? I could understand letting the birth father see him and spend some time with him. But this little boy should continue to be raised by his parents, his adoptive parents. They are providing him with a good home and love and that is where he should stay! I pray that this family doesn't lose THEIR child!!!
9-28-2010 @ 3:35PM
BIBS said...THIS VERY THING HAPPENED SEVERAL YEARS AGO.THE REAL PARENTS GOT TOGETHER AND DECIDED THEY WANTED THE LITTLE BOY BACK AND THEY GOT HIM JUST TORE THE ADOPTIVE PARENTS TO PIECES.I WONDER WHERE HE IS NOW AND HOW HE IS DOING MUST BE A TEENAGER NOW. IT IS SO SAD THESE THINGS HAPPEN THE CHILD IS THE REAL LOSER.
Reply
9-28-2010 @ 3:33PM
MARLENEM34 said...There ought to be a law for adoptive parents to be protected from things like this. You raise an infant for years and than that child can be torn away from you like this! Does any body care how they feel!!!! It sucks..
Reply
9-28-2010 @ 3:42PM
Cary said...There is a law. It's called the Putative Father Registry. It give fathers a limited time to come forward and file in order to protect their rights - as little as 30 days. This father filed at 17 days, and before they filed adoption papers. Given that, how can anyone say the system has treated these parents unfairly. The father has been treated unfairly. He has had to fight for 3 years to get the son he never gave up.
9-29-2010 @ 2:26AM
Eva said...Yeah... we should protect adoptive parents so that they can STEAL people's children legally. That makes sense.
9-28-2010 @ 4:06PM
Itsjust me said...they only had him for YEARS because the court system is so slow to get anything done. If you were SMART enough to read the story before commenting-the FATHER tried since the child was born to get custody of HIS child. The adoptive parents are selfish,
9-28-2010 @ 4:34PM
lori said...were you adopted? what about our feelings no one asked me what I wanted as a baby? I wanted my bio parents to love and want me at 46 I still want that give him back!
9-28-2010 @ 3:33PM
vickie said...At first I thought I would be all for the adopted parents...but...Since they were aware ..A MONTH...after he was born ...they should of let the father take custody....the boy will eventually want to find him .The adopted parents made things worse .....
Reply
9-28-2010 @ 5:29PM
Julie said...It took a LONG time before anybody knew whether the bio father was, in fact, the child's father. It wouldn't be appropriate to turn the child over to some random man who said he might be his father.
9-28-2010 @ 11:49PM
Me said...No offence to all men but most you when run away when you find out your girl is pregnant and he probably did the same thing called her a liar and she had to do it on her own. The baby well now three year old child is a happy home with people and siblings that love him. The father needs to back off, you didnt want him before why do you want him now ???
Reply
9-28-2010 @ 3:34PM
dee said...what a selfish man!!!! That child only knows his adopted parents...
the bio father DOSE NOT care about any one but himself... I have a granddaughter whose mother gave her at the age of 3months to another family and my son, her bio father did not want to cause is daughter harm by try to take her away from the only family she knew... he has a great relationship with both the family and his daughter (she knows he is her bio father).... that man need to think of the child not himself....
Reply
9-28-2010 @ 3:58PM
Itsjust me said...he is NOT selfish. It is HIS child and he filed for custody right after the baby was born. Shame on the SELFISH adoptive parents who also KNEW he was trying to get custody.
9-28-2010 @ 4:35PM
Sheila Williams said...Perhaps your "son", should have loved his child more than himself, and raised her himself, eh? My childrens young cousin was in the very SAME situation as this young man, fought for his daughter. WON, the court case, won his daughter, has raised her all alone, and done a WONDERFUL job. She is a beautiful, well adjusted child, who KNOWS, without doubt, she is loved, wanted, and cared for. A FATHER, has exactly the SAME rights, as a mother, has(or SHOULD) the same love in his heart for his child, as the mother, and should be given the respect he is due for trying.It is truly sad to me, there are not MORE men being good fathers, and people respcting them for it, rather than tearing into him, and running him down for wanting to do what is RIGHT by his child!
blessings for your day
granny of eleven
9-28-2010 @ 4:21PM
willy mollfull said...WHO ARE THE IDIOTIC MORONS or THE MORONIC IDIOTS??
The boy belongs in the only family he knows, this guy is a total stranger to him; don't pay any attention to the LAW, pay attention to your heart and theirs..
Reply
9-28-2010 @ 4:41PM
HubbaBubba said...So.....it only matters that the child stay with the Parents that he knows? What if the child were kidnapped as an infant? Should the child not be returned to the biological parents, even though he may be well adjusted and loved (by the kidnappers)?
9-28-2010 @ 3:37PM
Tonya said...This is really sad. I am going to side with the bio Dad on this bevcause even though he had made no effort to contact the family who had his son, they knew that he wanted the child and they could have very well reached out to him. His own knowledge that they wanted to keep his boy probably fueled him to just go through legal channels instead of having it out with them emotionally. The bio Mom should have thought of him too...she thought enough of her husband (ex) to have hm sign away a child that wasn't even biologically his. The actions on the part of everyone else but the bio dad seem to have been premeditated, with the intent being that he have no choice in any matter regarding his own son. Why then would anyone expect him to start making contact? He probably didn't want to expose himself to any covert actions on their part whilst they smiled in his face. The saddest thing is that the samll child is being taken away from the people he knows as his parents. Getting attached to children you did not give birth to is easy...I watched my newest grandson for a couple of months but my disability kept me from being able to continue. I miss him so much...and I only had him for a few hours every other day.
On the flip side of this...I know there are laws that force a man to pay child support for a child his wife had by another man. By the court overturning the father's (by marriage) decision to place the boy up for adoption will the court now start paying attention to other unfortunate married Dad's whose wives have made baby's with other men and then want and actually get child-support from their husbands because the law allows that a man who is married to a woman can be listed as the father of her child even if the child isn't his?
This may change precedent...
Reply