Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Charlotte Robinson: LISTEN: How Gay And Lesbian Couples Become…
New Turnaround Teacher 'Trying To Get It Right' In Tough School
People Would Be Nicer If They Got More Cuddling and Breast Milk, Study Says
Filed under: News, In The News, Weird But True, Breast-Feeding, Research Reveals: Babies, New In Pop Culture
Know what Atilla the Hun's problem was?
Not enough breast milk when he was in kindergarten.
Plus, he never got the parental attention he deserved. That Atilla was left alone to rant and rave in his crib without anyone picking him up and saying, "There, there, good Mongol warrior. Everything's all right. No need to disembowel your teddy bear."
People would be a lot nicer if they got more cuddling and breast milk, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Notre Dame.
Our ancestors, back around the time of the Flintstones, got more of both. Especially breast milk.
Darcia Narvaez, the study's lead researcher, says in a university press release that humans should really drink breast milk until they are kindergarten age. A child's immune system isn't fully formed until age 6, and breast milk provides its building blocks, she adds.
Ancient humans used to breast-feed children longer until people started getting all weirded out by women's breasts. Suddenly, a woman breast-feeding a 5-year-old was considered creepy.
Too bad, Narvaez says in the release. Her study shows that children who get more cuddling and breast milk grow up more mentally healthy and with more highly developed empathy and consciences than their milk- and cuddle-deprived counterparts.
They might even be smarter.
Narvaez suggests we have lost our way. Our hunting and gathering tribal ancestors did things by instinct that we now, in our pretentious sense of enlightenment, have abandoned. One of them is cuddling our babies when they cry.
Many parents believe you shouldn't respond with cuddling and affection every time your baby cries out in his or her crib. You may well spoil the little brat. In fact, Narvaez says in the release, responding promptly and lovingly is the best thing you can do.
"Warm, responsive care giving like this keeps the infant's brain calm in the years it is forming its personality and response to the world," she says.
Our ancestors also let babies and young children sleep with them. Many, if not most, children nowadays sleep in separate rooms completely separated from the elders. That's not necessarily a good thing, according to Narvaez.
The bottom line, she says in the release, is you can't love a child too much.
"Our research shows that the roots of moral functioning form early in life, in infancy, and depend on the affective quality of family and community support," says Narvaez, who specializes in the moral and character development of children.
Her research included studying the practices of parents of 3-year-olds and a separate study of how certain child-rearing practices relate to what happens to children in a national child abuse prevention project. She and her researchers also compared parenting practices between mothers in the United States.
Her results will be presented at a conference next month at the university titled "Human Nature and Early Experience: Addressing the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness."
Narvaez identifies six characteristics of child rearing common to our distant ancestors:
- Lots of positive touch
- Prompt responses to a crying baby
- Breast-feeding up to age 5
- Multiple adult caregivers; it takes a village, in other words
- Natural childbirth, providing mothers with the hormone boosts that give them the energy to care for a newborn
- Free play with playmates ranging from other children to adults.












ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
9-28-2010 @ 9:31PM
Roberta said...My daughter-in-law and all three of her siblings were breast fed. None of them are exactly Mary Sunshines. Nor is her son whom she breast fed. However, my sons who were bottlefed and loving fathers and husbands and sons and all around great guys. go figure.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 10:12AM
Mindy said...Ah yes... it's too bad we ALL can't be as WONDERFUL as your boys! Undoubtedly no woman will EVER be good enough for them... Gotta love mothers in law like you, Lady.
9-29-2010 @ 1:45AM
Dianne said...Tell you a secret: Its a "theory".
9-28-2010 @ 10:11PM
JEB BUCKINGHAM said...Ahhh, poor Osama, poor Adolf, poor Mommar, poor Kim Jong, poor Saddam. They all didn't get enough cuddling or breast milk. Hug a future muslim terrorist today and give him/them some breast milk to make them nicer.
Reply
9-28-2010 @ 11:43PM
Wilbur said...Jeb, Isn't there a birther meeting or KKK meeting you should be at?
9-28-2010 @ 10:24PM
Laurin said...It really varries person to person and family to family..there ARE other factors in determining if a kid is going to be Mother Teresa or Belle Guiness. I personally feel how a child is raised (heir trust-vs-mistrust phase of infanthood being a magor factor) is far more important that whether or not a kid pops out of the woman's vagina or is breastfed...all studies show though that affectionate parents raise far more socially able and moral children than those whose main addage is 'let the 4 month old cry it out'..Harlow's monkeys were a great example of this..they did a simular study with infants in a orphanage, but that study only lasted 4 weeks..the unnurtured babied were dieing..
Love is one of the magor human needs.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 5:27AM
TR said...Oh my God, are these seriously adults commenting on this board with such unbelievably basic spelling mistakes as spelling "major" maGor and dying "dieing"???? I'm not even convinced she spelled her own name right.
9-29-2010 @ 8:33AM
Alicia said...Gotta agree with TR on the spelling thing. Also, as for the "cry it out' comment, there are moments where you have to do just that. In my family, we're pretty easily divided among the "cry it out" and the "pick up every time they fuss." Let me tell you, the kids, and adults, who cried it out, but still had firm, loving parents, boundaries, and an open, honest relationship with their parents where they could talk about anything are more confident, more intelligent, more capable, friendlier, happier and easier to get along with. The people whose parents ran for the crib every time they started crying, spent their whole lives hovering, did all the achievement classes 9speech therapy for the two year old with a lisp anyone?), etc are unpleasant, entitled underachievers. I can't comment on the breast feeding versus bottle feeding, because we were all bottle fed.
9-29-2010 @ 12:57AM
chckpope said...This sounds like a load of you know what. There are just as many screwed up kids raised on breast milk. And I know quite a few really well balanced kids raised on a bottle.And to suggest they need to breast feed until they are 5 is ridiculous. Hugging your kids and expressing your love to them is fine, but running in every time they whine will spoil them. Your job as a parent is to raise them to live in a world that doesn't cater to their every whim. Otherwise you end up with the nut cases that shoot up classrooms because someone doesn't want to be their friend. Most of this psyco bs is someone else trying to sell another book.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 8:28AM
The River Rat said...I am an old man and I agree with this article. I think some cuddling and a little breast milk straight from the container would make me feel a lot better too.
Reply
9-29-2010 @ 1:53PM
MajKit said...I got my husband over here reading this and him saying DUH! LOL! We cosleep and I nurse for years and other "crunchy" childrearing ways and we're confident about producing well rounded adults. Nice article to remind us we're just doing what is naturally best for our babies and beyond.
Reply