Victoria's New Secret: Your 7-Year-Old May Be the New Kid on the Bra Store Block
Filed under: In The News, Development: Big Kids
Girls, they grow up so fast. Too fast. Credit: Getty Images
Specialists in glands and hormones have noticed an alarming increase in girls as young as 6 or 7 showing signs of puberty, according to a new study conducted through the Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Centers, established in 2003 by the National Institute of Environmental Health Science and the National Cancer Institute.
That means the trek to the bra store and the pressure to cover those little bumps may be mounting earlier than you anticipated. The new study reported in the journal Pediatrics found that very young girls are showing protrusions from their chests earlier than ever before, increasing their risk of breast cancer and other health problems, as well as taunts from boys, says Frank Biro, M.D., director of adolescent medicine at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the study's lead author, in a release.
The study found that the proportion of girls who had breast development at ages 7 and 8, particularly among white girls, is greater than that reported from studies of girls who were born 10 to 30 years earlier, according to the release. At age 7, 10 percent of white girls, 23 percent of black girls and 15 percent of Hispanic girls had evidence of breast development.
The issue is of concern, Biro says in the release, for both medical and psychosocial reasons. Studies suggest that earlier puberty, as measured by the age a girl is at first menstruation, can slightly increase the risk of breast cancer.
"What causes earlier onset of puberty isn't entirely clear at this time, but we are looking closely at several different potential factors, including genes and environmental exposures, as well as how those two may interact with each other," Biro says.
Overweight girls were more likely to have more breast development, the study shows. But Biro says he does not think weight is the whole story. He adds in the release that it is possible environmental chemicals are also playing a role, and that future research will examine girls' hormone levels and their exposure to various chemicals.
What the study means for retailers, who have come under fire for offering over-sexualized clothing to kids, remains to be seen. Last April, a survey by the Guardian.co.uk, found an array of items available in major chains, from a T-shirt for a 3-year-old bearing the slogan "Future WAG" to a top for a toddler with a pink bikini appliquéd on the front.
The Guardian's report prompted British retailer Primark to remove its line of padded bras for little girls, according to TheAge.com.











ReaderComments (Page 4 of 5)
11-01-2010 @ 11:41AM
Nancy W said...We need to stop injecting food source animals with hormones. They pass on to us in the milk and meat we get from them. If it means lower production then so be it. We eat too much meat, anyway.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 12:12PM
Vinsmom99 said...The hormones in food are probably a factor. However, everyone rushing to consume soy products is probably a bigger factor. Soy has a lot of phytoestrogen in it. So this form of estrogen may be causing the onset of puberty to come at an earlier age. Tofu is processed to a further degree than other soy products and is therefore, not as much of a problem as other soy products. Put down the soy people and buy organic milk (no hormones).
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 12:18PM
Seth said...most mexican girls beging having sex at 9-10 years of age and their parents encourage it.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 12:47PM
Myrrh said...Unfortunately it's not just hormones in the milk... they feed cows and chickens hormones to make the breasts and rib meats more plentiful. It also gives the animal a shorter time to its own reproductive age, making breeding more profitable.
But those chemicals go into our children's bodies and do not just get excreted, they absorb into and effect the childrens' bodies.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 12:29PM
B. Taylor said...They article seems to only casually mention the fact that overweight girls develope more quickly and that they're looking into environmental factors. Is that not the whole root of this? No doubt that hormones, natural and synthetic, and hormone mimics in plastics are the reason. Also, it's getting warmer and it's a fact that females in warmer climes develope earlier. If your kid (male or female) is overweight, they're going to have larger breasts. This is a good reason to cut back on meat, even the organically raised type, and keep your kids intake of crap to a minimum. And as far as clothing sales? Look at who controls the finances. If it's the children, then you've got more of a problem than precocious puberty.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 1:39PM
jenP said...The warmer climates of the US have the most fat people. It's more of a cultural thing. Cultures that encourage kids to eat too much. I'm sure plastics and hormones are a factor but how come the skinny girls aren't effected? Girls who have flat tummies and thin legs do not go through puberty earlier. Parent's that say their kids are of a "normal weight" are just lying. All the "normal" kids I see are fat.
11-01-2010 @ 12:32PM
Ashley said...I am amazed by all of the hostility flying back and forth on this subject. Many of the viewpoints brought up are valid (if not all relevant). I also believe growth hormones in our food are the major contributor to early development, but I cannot say this with any certainty. As far as the age of development goes, I am currently 26 years old, I was 13 years old when I started my cycle. My two best friends also began their cycles around this time. Girls here were not developing until 12-14 when I was younger. I have a 7 year old daughter, and a nine year old niece. My 7 year old is very thin (because of her genes) and shows absolutely no signs of early development. However, my nine year old niece has begun to develop breasts, and her mother was a late bloomer. She is not overweight, but is heavier than most girls her age. So I believe that genetics and weight also play a role, but the growth hormones in our foods are what is really causing this to be a HUGE problem.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 12:34PM
Riognach said...YEARS ago - perhaps 25 or 30, a study came out that the USDA was shipping meat overseas and to the US territories that had too high a hormone level to be sold in the continental United States. Puerto Rico was a major consumer of this meat, and what prompted the study was the observation that little girls there were developing breasts and beginning menses much earlier than stateside kids. It turned out the hormones in the meat were to blame. It's not only girls who suffer, but the boys too. There is a higher rate of little boys with delayed testicle descent. I don't know itf a study has been done on the rate of gynecomastia in boys exposed to elevated hormone levels (estrogen or estrogenic-like chemicals) but my guess would be that breast development is higher for them as well.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 12:41PM
Susan said...It's not only the hormones in food children are eating, but also the sexually explicit images they see on TV and movies (this has been well researched). This is a natural chemical reaction occurring when sex hormones are stimulated, either visually or physically. or by the direct introduction of hormones through the foods are children are being fed. Please parents, preserve your children's childhood. Protect them from stimulating influences before they are ready for them by shutting off the TV in their presence, and purchasing healthy foods. To those saying hormone free foods are too expensive; use the money you spend on junk food, cigarettes, alcohol, TV, movies, cell phone, and internet services, plant a garden, go vegetarian, ... whatever it takes. It's all about priorities.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 12:44PM
Stirfry said...The cause is enviromental and manmade, we live in a estrogen dominant society BPA, Parabens, Phenoxyethanol these perservatives are found in everything and they have estrogenic effects on people especialy children, as well as SOY, in asia it is used as a nastural contraceptive due to the estrogenic potential it has, most baby formulas are SOY based. read up on the studies of these listed, PARABENS and Phenoxyethanol are perservatives can be found in almost all baby and childrens shampoos, womens cosmetics and toiletries,and plastic containers especially bottled water BPA the same. any mother using products with these chemicals transfer the same risks to their unborn child, things absorbed throught the skin have a 10times higher potentcy then anything you ingest orally.But companies dont want you to think otherwise because then where would there buisness be if you stopped buying the fun shampoos and such.and overweight girls are bigger candidates for breasts because the breast is mostly fat, thats why when an over weight woman sheds pounds her boobs may shrink a size... we have created this problem for our little girls and it is up to us to educate ourselves where the economy will not and protect them the best we can and ourselves.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 1:42PM
jenP said...SOY is horrible. No one should consume it especially pregnant women. Why is it marketed as health food? It worse that fried chicken!
11-01-2010 @ 12:53PM
Dmollykins said...Scary, damned scary, probably right now, there is some freako pedophile anxiously reading this article. Like parents of young kids don't have enough to worry about already.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 12:53PM
Jack McGaw said...It is not just the girls. Look at the boys in Jr High, and high school they are showing sign of being much older. When you see high school boys with beards they have grown up too early.
In my days there was no hint of a beard of anything like that on the boys. As a matter of fact when we were inducted into the Army in WWII most of us shaved about one a month if that often, In the Army in basic training we were requied to shave each day even though there was nothing to shave. Now there are some boys in Jr High who have more beard than I had when I was 22.
Something has change, I don't know what it is. In the girls people noticed the bumps, but not the beards on the boys.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 1:48PM
jenP said...Researchers have actually found that males are measuring lower in testosterone. Your evidence is just anecdotal (based on a few teens you saw). More boys are developing breasts actually. The cause of this is fat cells. They are too fat, the fat cells release excess estrogen causing a hormonal imbalance.
11-01-2010 @ 1:06PM
Suprsavr-Nazgrel said...It's not just girls maturing young...a week after my 10th birthday, I got a rather interesting present during the night before Christmas, LOL. That was 30 years ago, and now I've occasionally heard of boys starting puberty even younger than that, at 9. The girl's situation is obviously worse than the boy's, but both should be studied.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 1:37PM
k said...That is exactly what it is. Imagine all of the hormones that are pumped into almost every protein we consume. That's enough to give guys boobs. I've seen some 16 year olds that look older than I do.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 1:27PM
missp said...I don't like all the hormones and processed foods out there but I think a lot of people are in denial about their daughters. The main link researchers have found is body fat %. Face it, if your daughter is chunky, she will go through puberty early. If she's skinny, she'll go through it later. Puberty is kick-started by body fat % in girls. The body realizes she could support an extra life then "boom" puberty. All the overweight girls I knew went through puberty early. I would honestly be shocked if a big girl didn't go through puberty early because I've never seen that.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 1:36PM
Bill said...That's an easy one to figure out , It all started when they started giving hormone shots to cows to produce more milk . The hormones are in the milk the kids drink.
Reply
11-01-2010 @ 1:53PM
sassy said...I drank large amounts of milk and went through puberty late (almost 15). None of the girls I knew who went through puberty early drank milk. They hated it. They mostly drank soda which in turn made them fat too. The thicker girls seem to have an aversion to milk.
11-01-2010 @ 1:49PM
randel1958 said...I blame it mostly on the food industry. They dump chemicals on and in everything we eat. Make it bigger faster, less time, more profit. They don't care about the outcome. It's all about Greed!
Reply