Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Linda Bloom LCSW and Charlie Bloom MSW: Overwhelmed Parents: A…
Allison Tate: What I Would Like to Tell My Son's 5th Grade Teacher Now
Should Your Child Be as Airbrushed as a Supermodel?
Filed under: In The News
You need the Flash Player to view this. Click here to install.
That shiner your kid got last weekend on the playground? Abracadabra! It's gone! Same goes for that cowlick that makes him look like Alfalfa from "The Little Rascals."
A wave of the hand, a click of the mouse and -- poof! -- it's a good hair day after all.
The New York Times reports photographers are increasingly doctoring school photos through the magic of Photoshop and other forms of photographic wizardry.
Shhh, listen carefully. You can almost hear thousands of photojournalists flopping about the floor in convulsive fits of indignation. Ethical lines are always shifting, but doctoring photos remains one of the Seven Deadly Sins in photojournalism. (It replaces gluttony.)
Drew Nash, a photographer at the Times-News in Idaho Falls, knows photo editor R. Ashley Smith would hand him a blindfold and cigarette if he so much as erased a pimple on a kid's face.
"In the newspaper world, you just don't do that sort of thing," Nash tells ParentDish. "It's a matter of honesty and ethics."
But school portraits? That's when the lines get as blurry as if you were using the Photoshop smudge tool.
"That's a whole other area," Nash says. "You're not serving up those images up to the public."
Even in portrait photography, however, Nash tells ParentDish, doctoring photos is a slippery slope. Physical imperfections are part of being human. How long can you remove little flaws before you have created a fictional character, rather than a portrait?
"You don't, for example, want to mess with Cindy Crawford's mole," Nash tells ParentDish.
You also don't want to send the signal that kids aren't good enough as is, Dr. Bradley S. Peterson, chief of child and adolescent psychiatry at Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, tells The New York Times.
"What supports healthy growth of the child and capacity to love themselves is parental idealization, that this child is perfect, and the apple of one's eye," he tells the newspaper.
All that goes out the window if kids think they need to be "fixed."
"It can inadvertently send a message that 'I perceive you as less than perfect and not ideal,' " he tells The Times.
Nonetheless, The Times reports, school photos are becoming as airbrushed as the covers of Vogue.
Parents are being asked if they want their kids' teeth whitened or their scars, moles, zits and braces erased.
Joseph Sell, the New York area manager for Lifetouch, tells The Times his company takes about 30 million school photos a year -- and alters about 10 percent of them.
The percentage goes up during the self-conscious middle school years, he adds. By students' senior years in high school, he says, about half the students want photographers to rearrange their faces.
"The media and magazines have exposed our marketplace to people that are well groomed and well cared for," Sell tells The Times.
So blame the media? Well, blame the other media, Nash tells ParentDish. Many photojournalists -- never to be confused with the fashion photographers who shoot supermodels for magazine covers -- still stay on the right side of the ethical line, he says.
And, younger kids may still prefer the traditional ethics of photojournalism over 21st century special effects, as well.
The Times tells the story of Michael Terzuoli, a second grader who brushed back his hair for a school photo at Bay Ridge Prep to reveal a nickel-size birthmark on his forehead.
His mother, Tatiana, tells The Times she asked him what he would do if saw his photo without his distinctive birthmark.
Terzuoli's answer: "I'd rip it up."











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 3)
11-23-2010 @ 7:37AM
Beth said...I wish they had doctored school photos when I was in school. Especially since my mom thinks it's funny to show my step kids the zit-faced, bad-haired, chubby, poorly dressed version of their stepmother from 15 years ago. I do recall the photographer retouching my senior photos though...
I guess if they are not removing something that is a permanent part of the kid's appearance, it's fine. Who wants to have Mt. Vesuvius on their nose during the one chance they have to immortalize their school year? If they're removing a birthmark, freckles, an eyeball...well that's different...
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 11:47AM
Thomasvpt said...That's all I wanted was a pimple removed, however the photo studio decided to take off my daughter's freckles as well. They don't ask what you want removed and I didn't think they would remove something that was permanent like freckles. That was so wrong!!!
11-23-2010 @ 3:43PM
Marcia said...Considering how bad a few of my school pictures turned out, I am totally for them touching up a little here and there with parents' permission. Doesn't anyone else remember how it feels to have a crappy looking picture in a year book?
11-23-2010 @ 8:02AM
John F.C. Taylor said...Question. Are these pictures being altered at the request of the parents? If it is at their request, I have no problem with it. If it is being done by the photography studios without the parents consent then I'd definitely agree with those who think it's wrong.
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 8:29AM
dmom1 said...yes, my childrens school uses lifetouch and retouching is only by request and there is a $6-$10 charge. They don't do major changes, mostly acne or scrapes if a stray piece of hair is sticking out. No contouring, coloring changes or anything drastic.
11-23-2010 @ 8:34AM
Andrea said...It is not done w/o the parent's consent. When the order form comes home to choose which package you'd like to purchase, there is an option to check if you'd like any airbrushing done on blemishes/braces/acne. If you choose to have the airbrushing done, you are charged an additional fee (usually $5.00) on top of the package price. I now have two high school age children but this option has been around since they were in grade school. I have never had it done but a friend of mine has for her child. She had her child's braces removed. My child has braces also but I left them. To each his own I guess. :)
11-23-2010 @ 11:51AM
Thomasvpt said...I thought they only removed blemishes and stray hairs, but to my surprise instead of just removing the pimple on my daughters forehead they took off her freckles as well. So if you are considering the touch-up option you might want to speak with someone from the studio first to confirm what they will and will not remove.
11-23-2010 @ 8:51AM
P.J. said...Amusing the things that reporters will and will not do !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 8:53AM
Angiebaby said...Damn. What's on that kid's face? Ringworm? Anyway, school photographs have been doctored since I was in HS. (Which explains why I have a little white spot on my shoulder instead of that big ass pimple that was really there in my Senior picture. Can I get a "Amen"?) I support school photos removing ringworm from a kid's face, but airbrushing to look like a supermodel is optional and usually available only in a higher priced package. Read the options on your school portrait order forms. The regular packet includes maintenance services like removing a pimple that looks like a third eye between your brows. The more expensive the packages get, the more options you have. Meaning? It is simply a choice parents parents make and then pay for, so why blame the photo company?
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 9:04AM
Sarah said...They have done this for YEARS! Why all the fuss now?
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 9:17AM
eri5426301 said...Ah the good ole black and white , they must of done it to mine no big pink pimples showing on the edge of my lips or in between my eyebrows or the edge of my nose , and the licked down hair over my forehead looks good too, Glad they did it 60 yrs old now
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 9:31AM
Lee said...The title is misleading to say the least, Being once a teenager with bad skin and sometimes bad hair I would have loved to have the chance to ask my mom to get those zits removed. They aren't making kids look like supermodels just making yearbook day much more tolerable for those who might have been having a really bad day. But this touch up ability has been around for over 12 years now, the writer makes it sound like it's some new evil plot, I'm sure in Idaho it is new but the rest of the world it's been around for years and parents along with kids everywhere are glad it is.
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 10:35AM
Rita said...They did that to my son one year. I specifically did not check the box marked "photo enhance" and his pic came back looking like he had face powder and lip gloss on. I know my 7 year old is cute but that was riduculous.
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 11:18AM
anonymous said...I think it's something the parent should discuss with the child before picture day. Not only do you want to avoid hurting a child's feelings, but most parents want those memories to be accurate. What one person sees as a flaw could easily be seen by another as distinguished, or unique. Should be left up to the individual.
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 11:40AM
Thomasvpt said...I have never requested touch-ups for my childrens school photos before, but my High School daughter had a big pimple on her forehead so I went ahead and ordered it. She is a beautiful redhead with freckles. When we received her photos back, to my surprise, they had removed her freckles. I was so upset. Her freckles make her who she is. She liked them and now wants to wear cover-up make-up to cover her beautiful freckles. Now I wish I had just left the pimple on her forehead. After all, isn't that what adolescence is all about?
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 11:45AM
Me said...I checked the box to get my daughter's photo retouched. She had a couple of pimples on her forehead that I figured she wouldn't want immortalized forever. I was very surprised when we got the photos back and they had removed her braces.
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 11:53AM
Lisa said...My daughter's freshman year, airbrushing was optional, with a small fee. The next year they airbrushed all the photos. I didn't like it. Neither did she. We want a real photo of what she looked like at that age, not a vanity shot.
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 12:01PM
wyatt said...I'm a photographer, and i pretty much had a rule that i only fix things that are temporary like zits and scabs, but i also think a good way to help people understand how much things on magazines are airbrushed is to show them an airbrushed photo of themselves
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 12:27PM
frank said...If it's just to remove something minor like a scratch, acne, a bit of hair that was laying wrong, and at the request of the parents/child? I don't see anything wrong with it. I'd not remove something like freckles though, that's part of who they are.
Reply
11-23-2010 @ 12:44PM
veronica said...This is ridiculous...they digitally enhanced our high school senior pictures back in 1999! It was the best thing that could have ever happened. We were all ecstatic when we got our pics back and saw that some pimples were removed and blemishes erased. It's the best thing for anyone who is having a picture taken that is going to be displayed. I wouldn't want my kid to have a bad pic of themselves at all. I didn't want it as a child and teenager and this generation of kids won't be mentally scarred or any of that crap because my generation wasn't and I'll bet if you looked back at your school pics some of you would wish to have them Photo shopped too.
Reply