Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Karri-Leigh P. Mastrangelo: Pregnant or Not, I Don't Regret My…
How To Have A Stress-Free Blended Family Vacation
College Website Rates Female Students as Sex Objects
Filed under: In The News, Teen Culture
A Boston University student started the RateBU.com website to rate female classmates. Credit: Corbis
She also finds time to volunteer at a preschool for children with developmental disabilities.
But who cares about that? She's got a great butt and boobs that won't quit! Tell the world!
A website at Boston University lets male students rate their female classmates as pieces of meat.
Justin Doody, the engineering student who created RateBU.com, claims it's all in good fun.
"I never meant for the site to be sexist at all," he tells the Washington Post.
The idea is hardly original. Mark Zuckerberg, the creator of Facebook, made his first foray into social media in 2003 with FaceMash. As a sophomore at Harvard University, Zuckerberg pulled photos of women off campus servers.
Doody tells the Post he stands on higher moral -- and legal -- ground by only taking content submitted by users. A lot of the submissions come from the female students themselves, he claims.
Maybe so, says a professor at the University of Iowa who studies gender roles. But Meenakshi Gigi Durham tells ParentDish Doody only thinks he's taken the high road. He's really just wallowing in the same old sewer.
"We're in a social and sexual culture that, despite the feminist gains that have been made, persistently defines women in terms of sexuality and positions men as the arbitrators of their sexual worth," she says. "This is a really regressive phenomenon that gives men a great deal of social power and reduces women's -- especially women's ability to be recognized as multidimensional human beings with worthwhile characteristics other than male-defined 'hotness.' "
Durham's work focuses on media and the politics of the body, with an emphasis on gender, sexuality, race and youth cultures. She is the author of "The Lolita Effect," a 2008 book about how girls are forced to become too sexy too soon.
She tells ParentDish RateBU.com is just an extension of the message young men and women get every day.
"Both men and women internalize these messages and can't see a problem with them, as there's very little out there that might challenge or critique them," she says. "Magazine cover lines encourage women to strive for 'hotness,' and at the same time, coach men to evaluate women solely on that basis."
That's fine with with him, Doody tells the Post.
"I saw an opportunity to do it in a different way," Doody tells newspaper. "I think most people understand the site is a big joke and not meant to be taken seriously. It's not meant to be malicious at all."
Then again, maybe the girl who gained weight after losing her father to cancer doesn't want her dress size publicly critiqued.
The Post reports numerous students are protesting what they feel is an invasion of privacy. The student government recently passed a motion condemning the website as "offensive" and asking students not to use it.
At least one Facebook group has been organized to protest the site.
"I think it's completely disgusting and degrading," Nicole Rojas, the junior journalism major who created the Facebook group, tells the Post. "I don't believe degrading girls should be a form of entertainment."
But Doody tells the Post the site just gets more and more popular. He claims the main page features more than 630,000 votes on more than 400 women. He says he has no plains to add section for male photos.
Websites such as RateBU.com are anything but harmless fun, Durham tells ParentDish.
"We live in a media-saturated environment, so media concepts of male-female relationships become the social norm, playing out in real life in various ways, like on this website," she says. "As a result, the possibility of ethical, equitable, inclusive and mutually affirming relationships becomes less and less likely.
"What's the future for women's advancement if men keep viewing women in these really primitive and sexist ways?"











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 1)
12-14-2010 @ 2:22PM
Alicia said...Disgusting. I hope this doesn't come to my college. He's hoping to expand the sight and if it somehow wends its way into Vermont and onto my campus, I'm planting stink bombs in every male bathroom and putting spiders in their locker room. May any man who thinks this is "good fun" get itchy bites in inconvenient, possibly painful, places.
Reply
12-16-2010 @ 11:10PM
michael said...Women vote the most on the site.
Reply
12-14-2010 @ 10:00PM
jamin said...Doody: the name says it all!
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 6:08AM
RUSS said...SERIOUSLY, GET A GRIP. ATTRACTIVE PEOPLE ARE ATTRACTIVE PEOPLE. YOU KNOW THE TYPE, THEY HAVE A PRESCENCE, THEY ARE EASY ON THE EYE. SAY YOU'RE IN A COFFEE SHOP READING, SOME PEOPLE HAVE THE ABILITY TO PULL YOUR EYE AWAY FROM YOUR PAPER OR BOOK AND OTHERS PASS BY WITH OUT YOU EVEN NOTICING. IT IS WHAT IT IS. I'M FRANKLY OVER ALL OF THIS EQUALITY WHINING AND PROTESTING. GET A JOB, GET A LIFE AND MOVE ON. THERE WILL ALWAYS BE SOMEONE MORE ATTRACTIVE AND OR SMARTER THAN YOU. DEAL WITH IT PEOPLE... NO AMOUNT OF VERBAGE OR IDLE PROTESTING WILL EVER CHANGE ANY OF THIS. YOU JUST LOOK FOOLISH.
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 6:22AM
Alicia said...A) You're internet etiquette is despicable
B) It's not about whether or not some people are more attractive than others. That's a "no sh*t sherlock" statement if I've ever heard one. It IS about the inappropriate objectification of women, as if nothing else matters more than looks. In 2010, that mindset shouldn't exist at all, but the fact that women are volunteering for this is even more sad. It says that women don't value their own skills over their beauty and need to be told the are beautiful in order to feel good about themselves. After all, who cares if you have a PhD, so long as you look like Jessica Simpson or Scarlett Johanson.
12-14-2010 @ 11:38PM
andrea said...Does anyone else find it extremely fitting that the boy's name is "Justin Doody"? That's all I have to say about that.
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 12:18AM
DR. BRIAN said...IT IS ONLY FUN ! ---"POLITICALLY CORRECT,"ANTI-HUMAN NATURE , "KILL JOY" PONTIFICATIONS FROM THE PUTATIVE ILLUMINATI TO THE CONTRARY---"LIGHTEN UP !"---THESE ARE YOUNG, MALE ADULTS---AND GUESS WHAT ?----THEY ARE BIOLOGICALLY UNABLE TO KEEP THEIR EYES OFF OF, OR FAIL TO EVALUATE THE COMPARATIVE PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS RELEVANT TO THEIR FEMALE CLASSMATES---IT'S NO BIG DEAL !---IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, THEN JUST IGNORE IT---IT'S ONLY FUN ! ---IT'S COLLEGE HI-JINX FOR GOD'S SAKE !!
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 10:43AM
Josef said...Hahaha what. "Biologically unable" to keep their eyes off? That's some mad bullshit we've socialized into your culture. Your "boys will be boys" attitude is base, crude and misogynistic to say the least. Obviously, the only solution is for women to wear veils to avoid the untoward gaze of women because men can't control themselves. There's just some brute animalistic sex drive men absolve them from misdoings and any attention they award a woman is her fault.
12-16-2010 @ 10:42PM
noreenarshad said...I think that everyone may be overanalyzing into this. It's simply based on looks, not character, but it's not like the message is that a women's worth should be entirely based on her physical attractiveness. And as a girl myself, I would not mind if my picture was on this site. It's not like the males who use it think that I'm just a pretty face or not. And even if I was rated "unattractive", how..., no, why is that relevant to the rest of my image or feeling of slef worth? It's just a number, isn't it? By a bunch of random people, who have different tastes in attractive women as well. Not all guys think large chest+ thin body= hot! It's just one thing, plain and simple. And I think it'll be evened out if there was a men's section as well. I'm not being objectified just by anyone when they say I'm pretty or not. We're not all 5 yeras old anymore, please grow up. They're not little boys who think girls are just frilly dress wearing pansies, as well as we women know that they're ot a bunch of playground apes and jocks. They realize I'm a human being. We realize them to be better than that to simply assume we're all eye candy for them. I don't know anyone like that who would think such things of ladies, but I feel sorry for those of you who must be scrutinized by the trifle percentage of men who actually think that way. But all in all, it's just one variable of a bigger picture, and I'm pretty sure they know it as well as we do. And so, this is being blown way out of porportion. And let's all just stop and think.... would this really hurt anyone? And if so, that person needs some self confidence and some realiy check on what things should really hurt them, say this economy, or women in other countries with actual problems first, like how women in Guatemala are killed and yet the lawmakers turn a blind eye. That's way more important a topic to do something about than me obsessing over a bunch of dudes who think I'm unnattractive. I say there should be a confirmation E-mail thing of the photos or something. And there cannot be any images like they were taken while the subject of the photo was drunk or something.
Reply
12-16-2010 @ 1:12AM
JRS122 said...So? Women do the same thing. How about that story that just came out about how a college girl rated guys. She also slept with a bunch and said she only chose the handsome guys.
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 1:27AM
Avi said...I'm actually a student at BU, and this site has taken a lot of flack. However, I have to say since they added guys to be rated, the site may be a lot of things, but it isn't sexist. It's an easy way to waste time and blow off steam while studying for finals, which we're all stressing about now, and if you don't want your picture on it you just contact the site manager and they'll take your picture off. It's more of a trust issue with your friends if they put you on the site without telling you. And no, I'm not a sexist boy who just wants to look at hot girls, I'm a girl who knows how to take a joke.
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 2:24AM
Dina said...Justin Doody. Doody? as in, Howdy, Doody! as in, a pants full of Doody? If I was going to create something so juvenile and offensive as this rating Web site I'd surely change my name from something so easily (and juveniley) ridiculed as "Doody"!
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 5:36AM
Patrick said...take it easy folks...they have added males to the site...
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 6:03AM
brian said...hate to tell you buddy, but it has ratings for both guys and girls so just about everything you said in this article is null and void. also not to mention it only ranks the top 25 in both categories so its not so much a ranking of all the girls as it is a compliment to the top 25. If someone takes in personally that they are not in the top 25 in a school of 16000 they should really get over themselves.
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 9:16AM
Jaded said...Some people are insensitive to others feelings and need sensitivity training. However, many more are intolerant of anything and everything that they disagree with and need tolerance training.
Reply
12-15-2010 @ 12:41PM
RUSS said...ALICIA, THOSE ARE SOME CUTELY ORGANIZED CURSE WORDS, I STAND CORRECTED, YOU'RE BY FAR MUCH MORE ADEPT AT PROPER INTERNET ETIQUETTE THAN I. THAT ASIDE, YOUR SOPHOMORIC SOCIOLOGY 202 DISCUSSION GROUP FORGOT TO POINT OUT THE REALITIES OF THE HUMAN EXISTENCE. NOT EVERYONE LIVES IN A SELF RIGHTEOUS INDIGNANT BUBBLE DISPARING OVER HOW HORRIBLE MEN ARE AND OH, THOSE POOR UNILIGHTENED PRETTY LITTLE GIRLS MUST BE. FOR ALL, THIS IS 2010...! AS YOU SAID... BY THE WAY, WHO'S TO SAY THESE GIRLS AREN'T PURSUING DOCTORATES. WHO ARE YOU TO IMPOSE YOUR VIEWS ON THEM. YOU SEE, MOST OF US -MEN AND WOMEN- ACTUALLY COEXIST IN THIS IMPERFECT WORLD AND THAT MEANS YOUR LAMENTATIONS AND PONTIFICATIONS ARE JUST YOU VENTING. BUT AGAIN, THANKS FOR THE TIP ON PROPER INTERNET ETIQUETTE. OH, AND GOOD LUCK, YOU WILL NEED IT.
Reply
12-16-2010 @ 11:09PM
katie said...if you guys want to see how horrible the site is you can use my friend's login
username: mclayman@bu.edu
password: yourpass
it's pretty bad
Reply