Hot on HuffPost Parents:
Bonnie Fuller: Zach Sobiech: You Were a Huge Inspiration in Your…
When A Tornado Strikes, Should Schools Evacuate?

Barbara Walters' Question on 'The View' Gave Me a Pregnant Pause
Filed under: Opinions, Celeb News & Interviews
My husband, now known as Congressman-Elect Sean Duffy, Barbara Walters, Baby Maria Victoria and me behind the scenes this week at The View.
It was a provocative question, especially since baby #6 was sitting on my lap at the time. I simply responded, "Being a mom is the best job in the world!"
Politico called the answer "diplomatic," and National Review's Kathryn Lopez tweeted that it was "graceful," but I couldn't help being disappointed with my response. Not that it wasn't true -– being a mom is the best job in the world - but I felt that a question as culturally loaded as this one deserved a better answer, especially from someone who has written countless columns and an entire book on the subject of at-home motherhood and the sad fact that our culture does little to applaud or elevate this noble calling.
So, if I had it to do over again, what would I say to Barbara? I'd say, "Barbara, I consider it a privilege and a blessing to have six kids and watch them grow up. As fun as it is to be here with you all (and it is!) I wouldn't trade the precious and fleeting time I have home with my kids for anything."
The truth is, I honestly hold nothing against Barbara for asking the question. Come on, it's "The View!" We expect conversation-starters and brutally blunt discussion. More importantly, I understood full well what Barbara was trying to say. She's a smart woman and a mom herself, so she knows that raising children, especially six, involves not only professional sacrifices, but also many daily personal sacrifices. From Barbara's perch, I can see why my decision to choose at-home motherhood in rural Wisconsin over a "budding career" as she called it, seems perplexing.
What I failed to articulate in that moment on behalf of all the other at-home moms watching is that amid the daily diapers, dishes and tedium, there is also a certain kind of happiness that one can only derive from service to others – especially our children. In our me-first culture, that is a very counterintuitive notion, but one that recent scientific studies into the field of "happiness" are confirming. People who serve others are happier, regardless of their income or personal circumstances.
But setting aside service for a moment, perhaps the most under-examined aspect of mothering is pleasure -– yes, pleasure! Despite the hard work, an increasing number are choosing to do it full-time because they derive real pleasure and a deep sense of satisfaction from doing it well.
Being an at-home parent does not make me a better parent. What it does afford me are more opportunities to become the best parent I can be. That's as satisfying a feeling as any daytime Emmy -- and it won't wear off when the headlines fade.
Time spent with my kids permits me to better understand their personalities and needs. Like any other profession or sport, I improve my skills and techniques the more time I spend doing it. Becoming a better player in the parenting game means more moments to enjoy the game -– or in this case, delight in my children. Would I trade that for anything? Not a chance. Not even for a career as illustrious and historic as Barbara Walters'.











ReaderComments (Page 1 of 5)
12-16-2010 @ 2:42PM
Janet said...Your response was great and as a mother who may have "given up a budding career" for motherhood, I was cheering you on. Your further clarification in this piece is something most stay at home mothers experience, but perhaps would not have articulated so well. Janet Hinz
Reply
12-17-2010 @ 10:26AM
Franksfoil said...The day that "dad" is expected to answer that question is when we'll have true equality.
12-17-2010 @ 2:43PM
PCO said...To have women on television as hosts and guests is a pleasure. Getting insight from any women is informative. As a mom with "no career", I find it humbling that I can influence my children...after all I am raising adults, not children.
12-16-2010 @ 3:21PM
Sandyone said...I used to tell people that my daycare cost me $35,000. That's about what I was making when I quit to raise my first child. My daycare 'costs' me nearly $100,000 now. That's about what I'd be making if I'd continued on my career track.
I haven't seen the clip of the interview, (were you guest hosting or there as an interviewee?) but I can see why you're disappointed in your answer. That's a hard question to answer well. It was a pretty awkward question and you came out of it looking fine. I'd put it in the "W" column. Sometimes 'good enough' is good enough.
Does Walters really think you don't have a career? From where I'm sitting, it seems like you have a career. Sure, your career doesn't run your life...you just fit it in between your life, but it's still a career.
*shrug* I never wanted a career, so I'm rarely bothered by people who don't appreciate my motherhood. I'm doing what I've always wanted to do, so there's little conflict for me.
Reply
12-17-2010 @ 12:09PM
lou said...$100,000 a year in daycare??? We is your daycare, in Trump Towers Penthouse? lol I highly doubt any daycare could cost more than 10k a year. Othewise...good post.
12-17-2010 @ 1:22PM
lizzie said...Lou, the "costs" she was referring to is the opportunity cost of not pursuing a career, not the cost of the daycare itself. She even says so herself with "That's about what I'd be making if I'd continued on my career track." Before responding to a comment, read it again carefully.
12-16-2010 @ 4:58PM
Jani said..."Did you ever think, 'I wish I had a career and I didn't have six kids?"
That's such an odd question. I would ask Barbara, do you wish you had no kids so your career could have been better?
And why is it that Rachel has 'no career'? She's sitting here writing and appearing on 'The View'. I would hardly categorize her as having 'no career'.
It's odd how this culture puts down women for being mothers. And how even in 2010, its presented at one or the other : have a career or have (six) kids.
Reply
12-16-2010 @ 6:48PM
Alicia said...Funny, I get the opposite, that this society puts down women who don't want children. I never want kids. I know I never want kids and every time someone asks me about kids (which is ridiculous to begin with, I'm 20. Why would I be planning for kids at 20?), the immediately get hostile when I say I don't want them. And try finding a gyno who will give me an IUD, like I'm going to want kids in the 3-5 years THAT little gem is going to be effective.
12-16-2010 @ 8:52PM
dsnk said...As a mother of two young kids, I applaud you for knowing that you do not want kids and taking steps to ensure that it doesn't happen. I love my kids dearly, but it is haaaard work, and not for everyone (not to say your work isn't hard--there is all kinds of hard work); in fact, I've counseled people I know who are "on the fence" with their decision to wait and really be sure.
12-17-2010 @ 6:38AM
Alicia said...Yeah, I'd like to make it permanent, but no one will give Essure to a 20 year old. I know pregnancy terrifies me and I just don't have the patience for an infant, so if I ever do decide to have kids, i know Ill adopt an older child. Thanks for the support. Most people are not as reasonable as you when it comes to being childfree or deciding on children.
12-17-2010 @ 11:13AM
phil said...I found the question rather rude, but not uncommon for Babs. The View is a typical, hen party where someones' claws are always ready to come out and seemingly soft interview questions are lobbed with a mean backhand. Please. Do not take Babs seriously. No real journalist does.
12-17-2010 @ 9:17PM
inara said...Alicia, as a mother of 5 adopted "older" children (home at ages 5,5,6,7 & 8) and 4 homemade, let me tell you it takes MUCH more patience, grace & energy to love & raise them than an infant...but i hope you keep your heart open to either in the future :o)
12-18-2010 @ 7:51AM
wils said...Alicia, I think you are a clear-thinking woman. The only thing is....you might (might/maybe) change your mind about a family. And if you adopt, I think that is great, but I know women that said the same thing when they were young like you, and chose never to have children and..well, lets face it, they regret now. They are older now, have "careers" but they often whine to me about how they wish they had their own kids. I don't know what think but..i think keep your options open just in case you change your mind.
12-18-2010 @ 7:51AM
wils said...gangsterpimp, wow. its been proven that women are losing the balance battle. yanno, i work, and frankly its IMPOSSIBLE to give my kids quality time. and i don't think that ditching kids in daycare because mummy wants a career (or daddy, doesn't matter which) the minute the kid pops out ..is a good thing.
I wish we could have both and be alright but its fail at this point. I think, the ideal job is one that is very VERY flexible, and one that pays enough so that the overtime isn't needed. Then moms and dads could both have family time and it could be alright.
1-14-2011 @ 3:46PM
Kara said...Alicia, I'm 33, and I still don't want children.
12-16-2010 @ 9:54PM
kaya said...Sorry, but being an at home mom is better for your kids. Kids aren't pets to be left home alone all day only for us to return to them at night, or better yet, to be put in doggy day care, or kid daycare as sadly, so many of you do. You are effectively depriving your kids of love, bonding, touching, nurturing, teaching, and turning them into little narcissists.
Reply
12-17-2010 @ 8:35AM
gangsterpimp said...I totally disagree and why do the stay at home moms hate on the women who can balance work and family? My mom worked and I turned out just fine: graduated high school, never had to be picked up from the police station, never got suspended from school, served in the military and went to college. Most people I know who had a mom at home all the time turned out to be spoiled brats who can't do a damn thing for themselves as adults and want everything handed to them, then wanna curse out the parents when they cant have their way. I never was disrespectful when she said "no". The hard truth is that many stay-at-home moms are lazy and want someone to take care of them so that they do not have to work and use a baby as an excuse, while their husbands, baby-daddies, or taxpayers are hard at work. I have the utmost respect for the women who can balance a real career and still raise a family.
12-17-2010 @ 9:17AM
Maggie W. said...I think both Kaya and "gangstpimp" are obnoxious in their posts. You BOTH generalize large groups of people. How about understanding and backing up ANY parent who is doing the best they can for their children. I applaud all those who can have a successful career AND the healthy, loving family. I also applaud those who stay home full time to take care of their children. Both are hard jobs.
I personally get to stay home, while watching someone else's child. Kind of the best of both worlds, home with my daughter, yet making some money as well.
Shame on Kaya for spewing such awful comments about hard working mothers who work to provide for their children.
And Shame on you, "gangstapimp" for spewing such awful comments about hard working stay at home moms who do all they can to help their children meet their potiental
12-17-2010 @ 9:18AM
Jenn said...Well, Kaya, some of us do not have the luxury of staying home with our kids. I am the main breadwinner in our home so I HAVE to work. I am also in school full-time, helping to advance my career. I would LOVE to stay home with my daughter and take her to school every morning. Unfortunately I cannot do this. And my daughter is turning out just fine!! She is sweet, polite, caring, considerate, helpful and just wonderful!! And I lavish her with attention and love!! It is all about finding a balance. You do not know a woman's individual situation so think about things before you run your mouth!!
12-17-2010 @ 11:13AM
KIm said...Raising kids your own way is fine- whatever way you choose. Does anyone with six kids ever consider what the country would look like if every family chose six kids? Bye bye wilderness.